Kansas Spring River Metal TMDLs Thomas Stiles, KDHE Watershed Planning April 14, 2005.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

AMD and Extent in West Virginia Patrick Campbell - April 22, 2008.

Advertisements

Developing Water Quality Solutions for SF Bay

PCBs Total Maximum Daily Loads San Francisco Bay Fred Hetzel SFB-RWQCB May 13, 2003.

2005 Stream Phosphorus TMDLs to be proposed in July 5th NJR The NJDEPs Division of Watershed Management is seeking stakeholder input on proposed phosphorus.

Southern Whitewater River Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting October 29, 2013.

Marylands Approach to Success Stories Presented to the Region III States Meeting May 12, 2009 Presented by Jim George.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Patrick Campbell - March 17, 2009.

Presented by Melanie Williams. Plan Schedule Water Quality Status Trends Chain of Lakes Basinwide Issues Recommendations & goals Public Review Comments.

What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?

NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Update on the Niagara River U.S. RAP Niagara River Remedial Action Plan Implementers Session April 10, 2013.

TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.

TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.

Truckee River Water Quality: Current Conditions and Trends Relevant to TMDLs and WLAs Prepared for: Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility. City of.

“Universe” of potential phosphorus for trading Tributaries (Hangman, Little Spokane, Coulee) Mainstem groundwater Lake Spokane groundwater/surface water.

Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.

Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.

Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.

Exploring Trading to Reduce Impacts of Acid Mine Drainage: Cheat River, West Virginia Evan Hansen: Downstream Strategies, LLC Paul Ziemkiewicz, Jerry Fletcher,

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Cheat River Watershed TMDLs Draft TMDL Public Meetings August 3,2010 Kingwood, WV August 4, 2010 Blackwater.

Questions to answer What is the overall modeling approach (after calibration and background scenarios)? What are the WLA assumptions? How will Avista’s.

Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.

Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.

City of El Monte Draft Watershed Management Program (WMP) Ed Suher, P.G. CASC Engineering and Consulting October 9, 2014.

Developing a Nutrient Management Plan for the Napa River Watershed Group Members Vinod Kella  Rebecca Kwaan  Luke Montague Linsey Shariq  Peng Wang.

1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.

Components of every Good Watershed Management Plan NDEQ – Planning Unit August 6 th, 2014 NDEQ – Planning Unit gust 6 th 2014.

EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.

April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.

Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection November 6, 2014 Cabela’s Conference Room Wheeling, WV Upper Ohio North Tributary Watersheds Draft.

Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.

Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator

Morgan and Little Creeks Local Watershed Plan Totten Center, NC Botanical Garden 3 November 2004 Chapel Hill, NC

VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.

Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.

Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)

1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.

Update on Wyoming Draft 303(d) List and Changes to Watershed Planning.

Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.

Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.

Preparing for Regulatory Change WATER RESOURCES WORKSHOP February 20, 2004 Donald J. Brady, Ph.D.

Source Identification Stormwater Work Group March 24, 2010.

Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.

Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)

Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013.

Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.

Monitoring and Evaluating Reclamation Outcomes: A Case Study of the Roy Pray Mine By: Ashley Bembenek Environmental Consultant Image retrieved from Google.

Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.

Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 6, 2014 Moorefield City Hall South Branch Potomac & Shenandoah Hardy Watersheds TMDL Status.

Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDLs) Justin Watkins and Barb Peichel, MPCA.

West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.

Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.

District of Columbia TMDL Schedule and Update D.C. Department of Health Water Quality Division March 2004.

A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.

FY 2016 EAP Proposals 1.Groundwater Sampling at Coulee Creek 2.Deep & Coulee Straight to Implementation Project 3.Little Spokane DO/pH TMDL 4.Lake Spokane.

ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)

Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.

Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,

WVDEP TMDL Development Nutrient Management Training December 16, 2009 Dave Montali, WVDEP.

Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.

CHRIS ZADAK AND RACHEL OLMANSON, METR0-ST. CROIX WATERSHED UNIT WATERSHED RESTORATION AND PROTECTION STRATEGY.

Yahara River Watershed RCPP

Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective

Metal Loading to the Animas River

Niagara River Area of Concern

Clark Fork River Metals TMDL Development

Public Meeting February 19, 2009

ADEQ Approaches to the Assessment Methodology

Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs

Presentation transcript:

Kansas Spring River Metal TMDLs Thomas Stiles, KDHE Watershed Planning April 14, 2005

303(d) Listings 1998 – Lower Spring River, Turkey Crk, Short Crk, Brush Crk, Little Shawnee Crk – Pb, Zn, Cd, Cu 1998 – Biological Impairment on Spring River 2002 – Shoal Crk – Pb & Zn - Shawnee Crk – Cu, Pb & Zn

Current Metal WQS

Hydrology is Major Factor

Hydrology and Loadings

Hydrology and Hardness

Aquatic Life Impairment

Higher Flows, Higher Exceedances

High Flows Impact Clean Sites

High Flows ~ Impact of Sediments

Some Sites Degraded at All Flows

TMDL Allocations WLA: Pt Sources – Initially Zero LA: Variable by Location & Flow Condition MOS: Statistical Characteristics of Metals and Hardness

Variable Load Reductions

Highest Priority Issues Short Creek: Zn, normal to high Q Turkey Creek: Zn, normal to high Q Center Creek: Zn, normal to high Q; normal Q Shawnee Creek: normal Q Shoal Creek: very high Q Baxter Springs: normal to high Q; high to very high Q

Load Reduction Strategy 1. Tributary Reductions for Self & Baxter Springs 2. Reductions on Other Tribs – e.g.; Willow Creek 3. Removal of In-Channel Sediments 4. Potential Dredging of Empire Lake

TMDL Timeline Next Week: Submission to EPA : Ongoing Remedial Actions 2008: Reopen TMDL – NRDA data; effluent monitoring; establish WLAs 2009: Begin targeted sediment removal 2013: Revisit TMDL; note progress