EXTENDING THE THERAPEUTIC JUSTICE MODEL TO PROBLEM GAMBLERS Mark G. Farrell, JD; Jessica Aungst Weitzel, MPH; Thomas H. Nochajski, PhD, Buffalo Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Veterans Treatment Court
Advertisements

Summit County ADM Board Cross Systems Training
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Many people who end up working in the juvenile probation field never imagined they’d have a job as a juvenile probation officer. Sometimes it takes coming.
Pretrial Release and Diversion
Residential Community Supervision Programs
AKRON MUNICIPAL COURT PRESENTATION. AKRON MUNICIPAL COURT  WHAT IS THE AKRON MUNICIPAL COURT?
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
Presented By: Aki Nearchou, LBSW & Brian Fuller, PH.D. KCMHSAS
Tribal Juvenile Wellness Courts
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change Nov. 10, 2010 Lecture James M. Byrne, Professor.
Georgia Behavioral Health Legislative Caucus. Mental Health Courts in Georgia Appalachian Circuit Superior Court (Pickens, Gilmer and Fannin Counties)
Misdemeanor Sanctions
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial
Managing drug- involved offenders with HOPE Presented by: Angela Hawken, PhD October 22, 2010 ACJRCA.
REALIGNING RESOURCES TO FUND YOUR DTC CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROFESSIONALS – NATIONAL CONFERENCE BANFF, ALBERTA OCTOBER 24 – 27,
HOPE Probation H awaii’s O pportunity P robation with E nforcement October 2012 Judge Steven S. Alm First Circuit Court, Honolulu, Hawai`i
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.
Juvenile Delinquency November 14, Daily Agenda  Review Section 2 Assessment  Section 16-3 Juvenile Delinquency  Chapter Review on page 380. 
Tammy Westcott, Assistant District Attorney Director of Alternative Courts Tulsa County, Oklahoma.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Sue McNabb (225)
Cuyahoga County Strengthening Communities – Youth (SCY) Project: Findings & Implications for Juvenile Justice David L. Hussey, Ph.D. Associate Professor.
Crime Chapter 8 Section 2. Crime Prohibited by law Punishable by the government.
LA County Cases: An Overview of Characteristics & Disposition Outcomes Denise C. Herz, Ph.D. California State University—Los Angeles School of Criminal.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008.
PREPARED BY NPC RESEARCH PORTLAND, OR MAY 2013 Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Results.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Criminal Justice System. Police Have immediate control over who is arrested “Police discretion” Size of U.S. population and number of police officers.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
Sanctions and Incentives Length of time is important: The longer a patient stays in treatment, the better they do. Coerced patients tended to stay longer.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
Vermont Treatment Court Dockets Compassion & Accountability ~~~~~ Innovative Practices Conference Vermont Law School November 15, 2013.
History and Background Formed in 2006 as a joint collaboration of San Mateo County Courts, Probation Department, District Attorney Office, Sheriff’s Office,
PROBATION TERMS AND OFFENDER BEHAVIOR Purpose: To align the terms of probation with a behavioral change model of probation and evidence-based practices.
What Makes Drug Courts Effective? Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction.
SENTENCE:  punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime.
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections. JUSTIFICATION Reintegration Preparing offenders to return to the community unmarred by further criminal.
Introduction Results Treatment Needs and Treatment Completion as Predictors of Return-to-Prison Following Community Treatment for Substance-Abusing Female.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
District of Massachusetts Court Assisted Recovery Effort.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
Kaplan University Online CJ101 Unit 8 Introduction to the Criminal Justice System.
Sentencing and Punishment Court Systems and Practices.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Performance Evaluation of Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction.
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
The Criminal Justice System
Summit County Probation Services
Criminal Sanctions.
SENTENCING.
RSAT and Drug Courts: Working Together
Community Corrections Alternative Program
Treatment Court Dockets
Criminal Justice System Components: Locating Probation and Parole
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
BY: Honorable Robert S. Anchondo
DRUG COURTS IN ILLINOIS
Presentation transcript:

EXTENDING THE THERAPEUTIC JUSTICE MODEL TO PROBLEM GAMBLERS Mark G. Farrell, JD; Jessica Aungst Weitzel, MPH; Thomas H. Nochajski, PhD, Buffalo Center for Social Research, University at Buffalo SUNY, New York WHY CREATE A THERAPEUTIC GAMBLING COURT? The Amherst Town Court established the nation’s first and only therapeutic gambling court because: Pathological gamblers are at high risk to commit crimes such as tax and other fraud offenses, larceny, embezzlement, etc. Pathological gambling is a treatable psychological disorder Gamblers charged with crimes are usually incarcerated or placed on probation at high cost; no treatment and likely to reoffend Continued problems and consequences likely without treatment; family breakup, bankruptcy, high suicide rates HOW DOES GAMBLING COURT WORK? The gambling court is based upon the drug court model of therapeutic justice. Participants sign a contract agreeing to: Present for regular court sessionsAttend scheduled treatment sessionsAttend self-help meetings Remain substance freeRefrain from criminal activity Treatment agencies send progress reports to the court on a regular basis with recommendations and areas of concern. The judge administers positive or negative sanctions: Positive: praise, tokens, less frequent reporting, or other Negative: admonishment, more frequent reporting, jail, dismissal and return to criminal court Negative sanctions are corrective and intended to foster compliance and adjust behavior toward graduation and long-term recovery Graduation requires: Successful completion of treatmentFull-time employment or schoolRestitution agreement in place Freedom from public assistance (if possible) Graduates receive: Reduced or suspended sentencesReduced fines or feesTools to remain free of addictive behaviors WHO IS ELIGIBLE FOR GAMBLING COURT? Participants referred to gambling court by presiding judge Screened by trained and experienced gambling counselors Gambling court participants have: Committed and/or been convicted of or pled to a misdemeanor crime Been diagnosed by a gambling treatment provider as having pathological gambling disorder or severely abusive gambling behaviors: Abusive gamblers: 12-week educational program Pathological gamblers: At least 1 year treatment and court experience Signed a contract to enter gambling court and abide by all requirements Defendant, his/her lawyer, and the DA (in pre-plea situations) agree to the conditions of the therapeutic court. In post-plea situations, plea can be withdrawn upon successful completion. THE FUTURE OF THE GAMBLING COURT The Amherst Gambling Court has been recognized nationally as a model for the development of similar courts. To enhance court operations and extend this model, there is a need for: More extensive research about participant outcomes A greater number of gambling treatment providers Enhanced partnerships between the court and agencies More precise and sophisticated screening measures for courts A better understanding of the co-occurrence of substance use and gambling disorders In jurisdictions with limited resources, the gambling treatment court could be integrated to an extent with existing drug courts. THE GAMBLING COURT TODAY Since 2001: Over 500 gambling court screenings ~180 with some gambling history screened not pathol. 60 received gambling education but no gambling ct. ~75 gambling court participants Number of participants greater each year May 2006: 23 active participants 15 male; 8 female 17 Caucasian; 6 African American Average of 32 years of age (range: 16-51) Gambling court graduates have not committed any new gambling-related crimes, to the knowledge of the court. Defendant continues detrimental gambling and experiences further negative consequences, potentially including another arrest(s), marital/family difficulties, bankruptcy, suicide Defendant who appears to have gambling problem referred to gambling court Defendant screened for gambling court eligibility Defendant with “positive” gambling screen completes full assessment through qualified gambling treatment provider Defendant classified as pathological gambler enters gambling treatment with agreement of counsel and DA; attends gambling court for status hearings Defendant complies with treatment and court requirements Defendant does not comply or “stumbles” Defendant sanctioned once or more Defendant completes treatment, graduates, and receives reduced sentence/fines Defendant remains noncompliant Defendant returned to traditional court and sentenced Defendant serves sentence (jail time or probation, generally) Crime Committed