Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Union of B.C. Municipalities Clinic on Understanding Development Cost Charges September 24,
Advertisements

Local Government Finance BUSINESS RATES AND POOLING.
Past and Current Initiatives in Pinellas County to Coordinate Planning between the School Board and Local Governments 1996 – Interlocal Agreement and Comprehensive.
Proposed Land Use & Development Regulations Public Hearing Month Day, 2012.
BITHLO COMMUNITY WATER Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 8, 2013.
Regional Water Service Development Cost Charges Update October 2014 Bryan Shoji, P.Eng. General Manager, Infrastructure Services.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
Transportation Strategy Board July 28, 2010 Responsible Growth.
Taking the Mystery out of Economic Development Tools Chris Eng, Chisago County HRA-EDA.
AIRPORT AREA INFRASTRUCTURE TIF DISTRICT: Public Hearing Presentation Oct 21, 2013.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 11, 2012 CELEBRATION POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS.
2013 BUDGET General Fund Revenues$84,870,998 Expenditures Divisional 69,635,424 Non-Divisional 5,695,509 Transfers 9,540,065 84,870,998 $ Nil * Capital$14,788,522.
Washington County Economic Development Council Utah Alliance for Economic Development RICHFIELD MEETING Friday, 13 July 2012.
KINGWOOD UDGET PRESENTATION TOWNSHIP OF KINGWOOD 2012 BUDGET PRESENTATION.
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
How to make 4% LIHTC deal work: Case Study from Fairfax County Presented by: Aseem Nigam, Director, Real Estate Finance & Grants Management Division, Fairfax.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, July 7, 2015.
Financing Your CIP …and Planning Ahead for New O&M.
Public Information Meeting Tools for Intensification within the Yonge/Davis Urban Centres Marion Plaunt MES, MCIP, RPP Planning and Building Services August.
Reduction and Deferral of Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item March 29, 2011.
2006 Budget Challenges Additional Increases in Pension Contributions = +$451,200 Additional Assessment from RVSA = +$315,000 Increases in Fuel and Utility.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
BITHLO COMMUNITY WATER Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners December 18, 2012.
Beech Grove, Indiana TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Heather R. James, Ice Miller LLP April 18, 2013.
1 RHD Cost Sharing Review Update 2011 UBCM Convention Presented by RHD Cost Sharing Review Implementation Group September 26, 2011.
Biennial Budget Budget Message Presented by Chris Jordan, City Manager April 27, 2009.
Overview of System Development Charges Presented to the Ad Hoc Committee on Large Diameter Water Mains by Chris Cullinan, Acting CFO January 8, 2014.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
2013 Budget Presentation. Outline Planning Framework Proposed Tax Rate Increase Analysis of cost drivers Detailed work plan Strategic Linkage Timeline.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2006 Water Services National Training Group 10 th Annual Conference 7 th September 2006.
Economic Incentive Plan and Impact Fee Update Board of County Commissioners Work Session February 7, 2012.
School Closure Moratorium Committee September 27, 2011.
PUT TITLE HERE GSN Briefing Capital Programs Branch Ministry of Education OASBO March 27, 2008.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Finance Committee Meeting Water Rate Study Update Habib Isaac – Principal Gregg Tobler – Task Manager August 13, 2012.
St. Johns County Association Roundtable June 8, 2015 Jesse Dunn Assistant Director OMB St. Johns County BCC Fiscal Year 2016: Separate Challenges Looking.
Liberalization of Electricity Market in Taiwan Su, Jin-sheng Energy Commission Ministry of Economic Affairs August 8, 2001.
The Budget Process. The Phases Information Gathering Information Gathering Department Requests Department Requests Financial Projections Financial Projections.
Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Annual Update Adoption Public Hearing April 5, 2011.
Revenue-Based Development Incentives Property Tax Revenues Bob Rychlicki Kane, McKenna and Associates, Inc.
2015 Financial Plan. PROCESS Staff began work on this budget in September 4 meetings including today are scheduled – Jan 26, 28 and Feb 2 and further.
Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code - MPC State enabling legislation for all municipalities except Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Newly Elected Officials.
Centre Region Council of Governments. 150 Square Miles 83,000 Population *Includes Students.
Implementing SB 1525: An Update Cheyenne Walsh Squire Sanders (US) LLP Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona Winter Conference Prescott, Arizona.
MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEWS. Spheres of Influence and Municipal Service Reviews Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg.
Presentation to Board June 17, 2008 Presented by: J. A. Sabo, Associate Director – Leading Services & Treasurer of the Board BUDGET York Catholic.
1 Financial management for water, sewer, and storm water systems Most financial management of water, sewer, and storm water systems takes place in a government.
Borrego Water District Revenue Workshop. Potential Revenue Sources  Background  Service Area Relatively Small  Largely Undeveloped  Absentee Owners.
Western Hills Water DistrictWater Rate Update Board Meeting HF&H Consultants, LLC 0November 4, 2015 HF&H Consultants, LLC Western Hills Water District.
School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012 School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012.
Sanitary Sewer Fee Study March 4, Summary Sausalito’s 75-year-old sewer system is old and deteriorated. While the current rates have allowed the.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS MAHOMED VAWDA Acting Chief Director: Institutional Oversight Dept of Water Affairs Dept of Water.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
1 Transportation Impact Fees and Street Maintenance Fees Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department January 21, 2010.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
Open Door Program Presentation to Affordable Housing Committee Sean Gadon, Director Affordable Housing Office June 20, 2016.
Proposed Draft Financial Plan April 10, 2017
CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
Boston’s Payment in Lieu of Tax Program:
Development Charge Public Meeting October 23, 2017
2018 Preliminary budget and tax levy SEPTEMBER 25, 2017
Public Hearing Sanitary Sewer Fees
Review of Planning Department November 19, 2018
Minor Amendments to Housing Incentives Policy
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
Developing the power sector in Federal Nepal Main lessons from international experience Kathmandu, November 06, 2018.
Introduction Last comprehensive review was undertaken in 2012/2013
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Presentation transcript:

Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff

Background Opus DaytonKnight hired to prepare a Comprehensive Regional Water Plan Plan was adopted by the Infrastructure Services Committee in June 2013 Opus DaytonKnight prepared a corresponding Business Plan and Rates Development report which was adopted in December 2013 Remaining work is the preparation of a revised DCC Bylaw to incorporate recommendations in these reports

How do local governments pay for new infrastructure? Negotiate Development Agreements during rezoning process Require Servicing Agreements for frontage improvements during subdivision or building permit process Assess DCCs Apply for grants, use Gas Tax Revenue Use property tax revenue Use contribution to capital in water user rates

What are DCCs? Used to pay for capital projects needed to support growth – only projects which support growth are included Based on the ‘user pay’ principle Operations and maintenance and projects only benefiting existing customers are not included Not just another tax – DCCs based on need, not on comparisons to other local governments Development Cost Charge Best Practices Guide

Why are DCCs important? Used to fund infrastructure associated with growth Facilitates development by providing a method to fund capital works DCCs allow development to proceed by sharing the burden and pooling revenues (statutory reserves) Large infrastructure projects cannot be funded by a single developer (e.g. Chapman Water Treatment Plant) Without adequate DCCs taxpayers pay for future needs or infrastructure projects are deferred

How do existing rate payers contribute? Parcel taxes Utility rates – contribution towards capital Rate payer’s portion of DCC projects ~ 37% Municipal Assist Factor – 1%

Do DCCs affect housing affordability? Housing prices based on market values – not costs Increased costs (DCCs, building materials, financing, etc.) can impact Developer’s profit margin or willingness to pay high raw land costs Draft bylaw provides incentive to build smaller units and mixed use projects – townhouse and apartment DCCs based on $/square metre rather than per unit consistent with the Regional Sustainability Plan

When were DCCs last reviewed? First comprehensive review of DCCs since 1997 (17 years) Significant time between DCC reviews usually creates large spikes in DCC rates Recommend review every 5 years, ideally minor reviews with each Capital Plan – provides stability in the real estate market First time the District has published list of DCC projects and provided detail on how DCCs were derived – useful communication tool

What are existing DCCs? Land UseUnitWater ResidentialLot$1,650 to $3,000 Non-ResidentialBuilding Unit$1,650 to $3,000

What are the objectives of DCC Review? Update DCC capital projects list to ensure future growth needs can be met Consider increases in construction costs Review growth projections to ensure appropriate amount of DCCs are collected Ensure consistency with OCPs and Financial Plan Combine three DCC Bylaws Incentive to construct more sustainable smaller units Clarify exemptions and DCC credits/rebates

Why prepare a DCC Background Report? Provide SCRD Board, developers and residents with information used to prepare DCC rates and how they are calculated – important part of a transparent process Supports Ministry of Community Services and Rural Development approval process – required prior to bylaw adoption Used as a communication tool Provides opportunity for constructive feedback Used by staff when assessing DCCs

What are the proposed changes? Administrative »Added definitions »Changed how DCCs are assessed to reflect current practices »Separate multi-family rates based on unit size »Credit for existing serviced lots »Exemptions are clarified »Added a 6 month grace period Projects »Incorporate recommendations in Comprehensive Regional Water Plan Rates »Reflect current capital needs and associated growth projections

What type of projects are DCC projects? Only infrastructure needed to support growth Projects which benefit existing customers are charged a portion (37%) Projects which benefit a single land owner are avoided Infrastructure renewal, operating and maintenance costs are not included Infrastructure upgrades which do not benefit growth are not included

What are the Major DCC Projects? Chapman Water Treatment Expansion Transmission main upgrades Fire protection upgrades Distribution main upgrades Intensive demand management programs

How are DCCs Calculated? Total DCC project costs »Minus portion assigned to existing residents (37%) »Minus existing DCC reserves (~ $800,000) »Minus Municipal Assist Factor (1%) Divide by growth Capital $ Growth

What are the proposed DCC rates? RegionalEastbourneEgmont/Cove Cay Single Family/lot$3,632$5,951$5,684 Townhouse/sq.m. Apartment/sq.m. $20.10 $30.42 $32.93 $49.84 $31.45 $47.60 Congregate Care/bed$1,525$2,499$2,387 Commercial/sq.m.$10.90$17.85$17.05 Industrial/sq.m.$10.90$17.85$17.05 Institutional/sq.m.$10.90$17.85$17.05

How does it compare to existing rates? Proposed Regional DCCs Existing DCCs % Increase since 1997 Single Family/lot$3,632$1,650 to $3, % to 4.75% Townhouse/sq.m. Apartment/sq.m. $20.10 $30.42 $1,650 to $3,000 0% to 3.60% (1.20%) to 2.30% Congregate Care/bed$1,525$1,650 to $3,000(3.90%) to (0.50%) Commercial/sq.m.$10.90$3.30 to $ % to 7.30% Industrial/sq.m.$10.90$3.30 to $ % to 7.30% Institutional/sq.m.$10.90$3.30 to $ % to 7.30%

How can the impact be reduced? Short Term »Grace Period – 6 months following bylaw adoption »Apply for building permits before new DCCs come into effect »Incentive to construct multi-family units as rates are proportionately lower Long Term »Lower raw land costs

What are the impacts of lower (old) rates? Deferred infrastructure projects – Chapman Water Treatment Plant at capacity Greater share paid by existing rate payers Developments postponed due to lack of capacity Strong reliance on grant funding DCC reserves not keeping up with costs/needs

What are the next steps? Modify draft DCC Background Report, if necessary Commence public consultation »Place draft report on website »Initiate Engagement Plan: July 10 through September 12

Questions/Comments