Baseline Change Request BCR Title: EBD New 6 Ton Bridge Crane Installation BCR #: N/A Presenter’s Name: Robert Law CCB Presentation Date:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July Training Outline Part 1 Cost-per –SF and Detailed Estimate Pay Item Detailed Estimate Segments Bridge Level Data Segment Level Data Supports.
Advertisements

SiD Surface assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC) MDI-CFS Meeting Sep. 4-6, 2014, Ichinoseki (Japan)
Skyscraper Construction
Business Critical Rules March 2015
CMS ZDC Crane Emergency Payload Removal Procedures This document proposes the viability of using a portable hydraulic actuator Hand crane (Davit crane)
J.D. NEUHAUS powered by air J.D. Neuhaus L.P. The Force To Lift Your Business J.D. Neuhaus LP 9 Loveton Circle Sparks, MD Phone:
Positron Source Update Jim Clarke Deepa Angal-Kalinin James Jones Norbert Collomb At Daresbury Laboratory and Cockroft Institute 21/07/2009.
1st Quarter Contractor Business Meeting March 13 th, 2015 Yesika L. Kain/Ben Mulherin Plant Engineering Facilities Session.
Instrument Space Requirements Rob Connatser Chief Instrument Project Engineer November 2014.
1 GLAST LAT ProjectMechanical Systems Mechanical Systems Mechanical / Thermal Hardware November 2004 Status Marc Campell, Subsystem Manager.
The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.
Richard M. Boyce FAC October 29-31, Installation Planning Integration process – IMT update Installation Planning &
Senior Design: Validation of Design December 15, 2008.
David Saenz FAC November 11, 2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Far Experimental Hutches David Saenz Project Manager.
LINACs Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
Preliminary studies for Muon shield modification to accommodate LCLS II Alev Ibrahimov December, 2010 BSY.
Addendum to EDMS document “Instruction Manual for inserting the CMS ZDCs using the HXTC crane” In addition to the ZDC detectors in the TAN instrument.
MICE Magnetic Field Mitigation Review Potential impact on ISIS of MICE Stray Magnetic Fields 24 th September 2013 Martin Hughes.
1 Alternative assembly option of ILD Y.Sugimoto 2010/10/18 ILD Integration
EBD existing crane details and future bridge crane upgrade Alev Ibrahimov June
SNuMI 1 Outline Action Items PP2 Progress [Nancy/Elaine] –Org Chart Update –FY07 Budget/Plans Discussion –FY08 Summer Shutdown –Overall cost Reduction.
1 Kenneth Osborne, 9/14/07 Inter Group communications at the Advanced Light Source. Overview of the different methods of communication between different.
Injector/Re-injection Chicane Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF LBNF/DUNE Logistics Workshop Summary Mike Headley August 19, 2015.
ENEN H- INJECTION: STATUS ON MECHANICAL DESIGN - VACUUM SECTORIZATION - BHZ162 CHAMBER MODIFICATIONS - DUMP AREA - BHZ11 CHAMBER MODIFICATIONS.
Magnetic Mitigation - Contents l Magnetic Mitigation General l West Wall Compressors l Rack Room 2 l Magnetic Shielding Yoke Jason Tarrant – Integration.
ORKA Preservation Task Force ORKA Preservation Task Force first meeting Wednesday, February 8, Notes by Peter H. Garbincius Notes from meeting are.
Option – 5m Undulators What is the optimum length for an LCLS undulator?  XFEL is using 5m undulator segments.  Is this optimum?  What are the advantages.
Presented by the Wood Truss Council of America
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
Run 12: STAR Status and Schedule Update RHIC Coordination Meeting October 18, 2011 Bill Christie BNL Outline Status update Schedule update and issues Summary.
N_TOF Technical Report INTC, CERN 21 May 2007 P. Cennini AB-ATB n_TOF Technical Coordinator Status of the old Target Removal Status of the old Target Removal.
R2E Mitigation Project P5 Relocation Options - Discussion R2E Mitigation Project CMS Relocation Options Towards An R2E Baseline 1 M. Brugger for the R2E.
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
Progress on Remote Handling Systems TAC 12 Magnus Göhran – WPM 15 th October 2015.
Experimental Areas Studies Lessons learnt at CMS M Gastal & CMS Technical Coordination (A Ball, W Zeuner)
RICH1 Gas Enclosure Installation. Experimental Area Meeting at CERN on 21st June 2006 Bill Cameron (Imperial College London) on behalf of the RICH1 team.
Upgrade projects and APT update DT-LHCb coordination meeting 28 September 2015.
Management System Part II: Inventory of Radiation Sources – Regulatory Authority Information System (RAIS)
Extended Detector Cutoff Considerations WFIRST Project Office May
SNuMI 1 Outline Action Items PP2 Progress [Nancy/Elaine] –Org Chart Update –FY07 Budget/Plans Discussion –FY08 Summer Shutdown –Overall cost Reduction.
PS/SPS Days Roberto Losito/Oliver Aberle 13th January 2004
Chapter 13 Aggregate Planning.
SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting, Dec. 16, 2014 SCU Presentations Today Intro. & Performance Motivations (P. Emma, SLAC, 20+5) Conceptual Cryostat Design: Option-A.
CLIC MODULE TRANSPORT AND INSTALLATION Keith Kershaw CES, 8 October 2008.
Forklift pick set-up interfacing with a MCHP
Mu2e Mu2e Remote Handling Review Comparisons: Costs, Risks & Maintainability Ryan Schultz Deputy L3 Manager Target Station 3/3/2015.
Scientific data storage: How are computers involved in the following?
SECONDARY BEAM HANDLING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN STATUS BRUNO FERAL (CERN/EN) DIAMANTO SMARGIANAKI (CERN/EN) Project Leader: I.Efthymiopoulos (Cern/EN)
LCLS-II Project Overview David Schultz LCLS-II Deputy Project Director March 19, 2012.
6-Mar-2016 Dan Wenman | FC Installation 1 APA installation and integration at CERN Shipment of APAs APA handling Acceptance testing Tools needed.
LBNE Remote Handling Layout Options Adam Carroll Van Graves Tom Burgess FNAL/ORNL Videoconference March 11, 2010.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
The Next Generation of a Gamma Irradiation Facility GIF++
Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions
Shielding Design for LCLS Injector Operation – Phase one
St. George Infrastructure
CBETA Technical Review
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
Status of the MICE Construction Project
Escalator Installation
MICE Partial Return Yoke Mechanical Design
INSTALLATION SEQUENCE
Joint Meeting SPS Upgrade Study Group and SPS Task Force
IT-4328: Technical Specification
Collimator Control (SEUs & R2E Outlook)
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
MEIC Cost Estimate Overview
Installation Status & Operational Readiness Process
BRAN: LS2-plans TREX M. Palm, E. Bravin, BE-BI-PM.
Presentation transcript:

Baseline Change Request BCR Title: EBD New 6 Ton Bridge Crane Installation BCR #: N/A Presenter’s Name: Robert Law CCB Presentation Date:

2 BCR Summary This BCR entails the requirement for a new 7 ton motorized chain hoist & bridge crane system to be installed in EBD Area to efficiently, safely and timely facilitate the removal and/or installation EBD system activities as follows: Removal of (2) existing LCLS dumps shielding with combined weight of approximately 92 tons (57 tons for South dump; 35 tons for North dump) Installation of LCLS-II new dumps shielding with combined weight of approximately 408 tons (204 tons each for both North and South dumps) including 90 plates weighing 2 tons/plate, Relocation / Installation of EBD hard & soft beam lines components / devices including (3) permanent magnets, and (2) dump slugs with shielding coffins weighing between 5 and 6 tons each. Installation of over 200 new shielding components for both hard & soft beam lines components / devices. CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY

3 BCR Form CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY

4 Background In Electron Beam Dump (EBD) housing there are (2) monorail cranes on the North and the South sides. Each rail starts with a short piece and finishes with short piece assumable 20.5’ each. The middle section is a long rail assumable 41’ long. The two crane rails are parallel ( field verified). Distance between rails is 98.5”. The distance from South and North walls to the South and North rails center is 39.25”. Both cranes have lifting capacity of 5 tons (10,000 lbs) each. Based on current SLAC crane records, only the South monorail crane has anchored fixture for crane certification with quadrennial certification date of November 1, Refer to Figures 1 & 2 for existing monorail cranes arrangement. CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution

5 Background (Continued) CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution (Continued) BEAM Monorail crane rails - 41’ EBD Housing End Figure 1: Existing monorail crane rail view from the South side

6 Background (Continued) CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution (Continued) Figure 2: Existing monorail cranes view downstream Monorail crane rails ” apart EBD Housing 177”W X 150”H

7 Problem -Relocation of (3) permanent magnets in EBD will be a challenge since the current crane rails do not fully align with both North and South beam lines as shown in Figure 3. -New beam lines after the BYD magnets are not parallel to each other and to the existing crane rails. Existing cranes will cover very limited service areas as shown in Figure 4. -Existing shielding was put in the pit with forklift when there was no East wall in the housing and there were no obstructions on the North side. -New dump will have two similar beam lines on the North and South sides with very limited space between them and forklift access will be either unsafe or not feasible. CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution (Continued)

8 Problem (Continued) -New shielding will be much larger than the existing ones in magnitude of more than 4 (total combined new dumps shielding quantity will be about 408 vs total existing dumps shielding quantity of 92. The average single shielding plate weighs about 2 tons. Besides new shielding, there will be over 200 new shielding components to be installed for both hard & soft beam lines components / devices. - A single heaviest device to be lifted, the dump slug with shielding coffin required by RP, weighs between 5 to 6 tons. CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution (Continued)

9 Problem (Continued) CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution (Continued)

10 Problem (Continued) CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution (Continued) Figure 4: Top view of existing cranes coverage areas

11 Solution -Install a new 7 ton motorized chain hoist / trolley and bridge crane system in EBD Area using existing monorail crane rails to meet EBD System’s crane capacity and space dimensions requirements as outlined in Figures 5 & 6. -The new crane system will provide the required coverage area as shown in Figure 7. -Installing shielding and beam lines components / devices with the new bridge crane will be safer, reduce potential worker injury, equipment damage, and maintain the project’s fast paced installation schedule. -The entire EBD Area will be modified and the installation of the new crane system will not impact EBD system installation schedule. CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution (Continued)

12 Solution (Continued) CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution (Continued) Figure 5 Crane upgrade requirements: -Single hoist rail; -Capacity – 6t Min; -Dim “A” – 10” Min; -Dim “B” – 160” Min; -Dim “C” – 118” Min Existing rails Ceiling

13 Solution (Continued) CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution (Continued) Figure 6 Crane upgrade requirements (continued): -Dim “D” – 920” min; -Dim “E” – 30” Max;

14 Solution (Continued) CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution (Continued) New bridge crane coverage area Figure 7: Top view of new bridge crane coverage area

15 Alternative Solutions Considered -No new crane: Material handling equipment access for shielding, beam lines components / devices installation works in EBD Area will be seriously affected in terms of logistics, cost and schedule. Inadequate available crane capacity to lift heaviest object will be a problem. -Different shielding design to meet RP requirements will be a challenge in terms of cost and schedule. -Option to install a new 7 ton manual hoist / trolley and motorized bridge crane system vs the current proposed 7 ton motorized hoist / trolley and bridge crane is currently being considered as another option to lower first cost. CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY Background, Problem, Solution (Continued)

16 Technical Review EBD installation bi-weekly meetings have been held for several months to plan Accelerator and Photon System installations. The group has concluded that a modified crane is required to: Install the heavier objects like shielding and dump slug. Facilitate remotely removing a radioactive dump slug in the event this will be required. CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY

17 Summary of Cost/Schedule Changes For new proposed 7 ton motorized hoist/trolley and motorized bridge crane system: -Total Construction Cost: $223k -Total Estimated Cost: $235k -Installation to start after December 17, 2016 (LCLS short downtime) -No change to current construction schedule For new alternate 7 ton manual hoist/trolley and motorized bridge crane system: -Total Construction Cost: $184k -Total Estimated Cost: $196k -Installation to start after December 17, 2016 (LCLS short downtime) -No change to current construction schedule For no new crane option - Total Construction Cost Increase: $600k (ROM) - Total Estimated Cost Increase: $700k (ROM) - Construction schedule delay (short downtime): ~ 25 days - Construction schedule delay (long downtime): ~ 35 days CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY

18 Impact of not approving Material handling equipment access for shielding, beam lines components / devices installation work in EBD Area will be seriously affected in terms of logistics, cost and schedule. Inadequate available crane capacity to lift heaviest object will be a problem. Design of a temporarily installed lifting device capable of moving 2-6 ton objects in a restricted area will be challenging and likely result in a less safe working environment. If the dump slug ever needs to be removed, radiation exposure time is expected to be longer relative to having a crane design optimized for this purpose. Increased risk relative to safety, hardware damage, and schedule. CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY

19 Stakeholder Review Stakeholder Input Received -PMCS group: Updating P6 -System Managers and CAMs: Infrastructure Systems, Photon Systems, and Accelerator Systems have been working together on this. -ES&H: Reviewed details with Jim Healy. Jim provided feedback indicating that installing shielding and devices by crane will be safer, reduce potential worker injury, equipment damage, and maintain the project’s fast paced schedule. CCB Presentation MM-DD-YYYY

20 Documents Updated If approved, the following will be updated: Applicable ICD and RDS eCAM Book BOE’s CCB Presentation MM-DD-YYYY

21 What else should we know? CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY

22 Questions? CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY

23 CCB Presentation – MM-DD-YYYY