: Research Question: Would ridership needs in the area of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project be better Served by the implementation of a Bus Rapid.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Advertisements

Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
GIS for Title VI Compliance
City Heights: A Rehabilitative Plan for Homeownership Abstract: Homeownership not only contributes to the stability of a neighborhood but also, provides.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Land Use Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit: The Boston Silver Line Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for.
Oceanside-Escondido Rail Line Final Project Presentation John R. VelascoMay 12 th, 2003.
Identifying Successful Transit Oriented Developments in Los Angeles By: Lupita Ibarra Introduction to GIS Midterm Project February 8, 2011.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
Managing Director/CEO
RapidRide Briefing Growing Transit Communities East Corridor Task Force January 31 th, 2012 Ron Posthuma, Assistant Director King County Dept. of Transportation.
Public Transit in Sacramento
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Bus-only Lanes on Wilshire Who Wants Exemptions? Sarah Peters UP 206a Final Project.
BRT as a Precursor of LRT? Lyndon Henry Data Analyst Capital Metro Austin, Texas TRB/APTA Joint Light Rail Transit Conference Los Angeles 20 April 2009.
Freedom to work Freedom to text Freedom to read.
Potential Sites for Transit-Oriented Development in San Diego Katie Lemmon UP 206 A Midterm Project February 8, 2011.
CIVITAS ELAN Open Academy Ljubljana 16 April 2010 Eric N. SchrefflerTom Rye, PhD Transport ConsultantNapier Edinburgh San Diego, California, USAUniversity.
1 Metrolinx delivers The Big Move Regional Transportation Plan: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area November 5, 2012 Bruce.
Alasdair Cain & Jennifer Flynn National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida Mark McCourt &
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.
A Spatial Analysis of Orange Line Rider Demographics November 1, 2012By Tamar Sarkisian.
Results of a Hedonic Regression Model That Estimates the Impact of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Stations on Surrounding Residential Property Values Along the.
Sketch Model to Forecast Heavy-Rail Ridership Len Usvyat 1, Linda Meckel 1, Mary DiCarlantonio 2, Clayton Lane 1 – PB Americas, Inc. 2 – Jeffrey Parker.
Feasibility Study Jonathan CalderwoodJune 14, 2013 West Shore Communities Feasibility of Sustainable Transportation with Passenger Ferry Service.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
South American Scanning Tour Bill Vincent Breakthrough Technologies Institute.
Presented by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate. Issue: What determines travel mode choice Transit mode share in LA county was 3% in (Source: SCAG Year.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
The FY 2006 New Starts Report Responding to the Demand for Transit.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
EFFECTS OF RISING GAS PRICES ON BUS RIDERSHIP FOR SMALL URBAN AND RURAL TRANSIT SYSTEMS Jeremy Mattson 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity.
East Portland In Motion covers all of Portland east of 82 nd Avenue. This represents 28% of the city’s population and 23% of its land area. East Portland.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
© 2007 Noblis, Inc. BUS RAPID TRANSIT AS A CATALYST FOR LAND USE CHANGE: THE ROUTE 1 CORRIDOR CASE STUDY 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Morgan County Transit Discussion UTA Corporate Staff Presentation November 19, 2013.
BRT in Pittsburgh: Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
The Purple Line Transit Connecting Bethesda, New Carrolton, and the Washington Metro Presented by- Nick Flanders Rose Ryan Anupam Srivastava.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
1 CREATING WALKABLE COMMUNITIES THROUGH SMART GROWTH INCENTIVES.
APC University: San Diego’s Use of APCs on Three Six Modes from Three APC Vendors Brian Lane Senior Transit Planner San Diego Association of Governments.
FlexBRT Project Briefing. Background Feasibility Study began in – $750,000 TEA-21 Grant to study an ITS Circulator in North Orange County/South.
Serving a “Rainbow” Ridership – Designing and Providing High-Quality Public Transit for a Demographically Diverse Population Lyndon Henry COMTO Conference.
San Diego Trolley. Current Current/future expansion Propose extension.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
1 Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change Smart Growth America, The Urban Land Institute.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
Metropolitan Council 1 Twin Cities Region Transportation Policy Plan Nacho Diaz Metropolitan Council Evaluating Economic and Community Impacts of Transit.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
1 Bus Rapid Transit Strategic Plan May BRT Strategic Plan Evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of six BRT corridors Establish framework for.
Add Your Thoughts: love 1.What do you love about your neighborhood? most want to change 2.What would you most want to change about your neighborhood? big.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY.
Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Program October 10, 2007.
The Location Relationship Between Low-Income Households and Transit Stations in LA Zhaosen Wang February 13,2012.
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
Presentation transcript:

: Research Question: Would ridership needs in the area of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project be better Served by the implementation of a Bus Rapid Transit system or an expansion of the trolley System? Abstract: On July 23 rd, 2010, SANDAG reconfirmed the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project. It will extend the already existing LRT system from Old Town Transit Center to University City. The purpose of this research is to examine if the BRT system is a better alternative form of public transportation than the proposed LRT solution. By comparing the operation and capital costs, fare, ridership and economic development of the LRT and BRT system, I found that not only is the BRT system more economically feasible, it is also easier to implement and more flexible than the LRT system. Through these findings, it shows that the BRT system is indeed a better alternative method for this region than the trolley extension. Conclusion : BRT is flexible, easy to implement and more economically feasible to build than an LRT system. With BRT’s flexibility, services could be added and routes could be changed based on regional growth and demand. Expansion of the trolley to UCSD will allow efficient transit from UCSD to downtown, however it fails to link to other parts of the San Diego region that desperately needs public transit, such as areas with a high percentage of households without a vehicle and areas with an excess amount of low income households. Although for SANDAG’s proposed route expansion, the trolley is less expansive than the BRT system, what San Diego needs is an entire efficient system of public transit. If SANDAG had investigated the proposed region as a whole instead of the one single route, I believe the BRT system would be the better alternative method for this region. Research Methods: Case studies – BRT in Brisbane, Australia. BRT vs. LRT in Los Angeles, California. Census Data American FactFinder Database – San Diego County Median Age, San Diego County Percentages of House Holds without a Vehicle, Average Population Income in San Diego Region SANDAG, MTS, GAO, TransNet, i-15 BRT Plan, BRT Guideline - Operation & Capital Cost, Ridership, Fare, Economic Development LIGHT RAIL TRANSITBUS RAPID TRANSIT OPERATION & CAPITAL COST Capital Cost on average is $34.79 million. Operation Cost on average is $13.25 million. Capital Cost on average is $13.49 million for Busways, $8.97 million for Bus on HOV Lanes, $0.68 million for Bus on Arterial. Operation Cost on average is $3.96 million. RIDERSHIP Elderly and youth are more likely to use Light Rail Transit. People without private vehicles and people with low income are also more likely to use Light Rail Transit. From the survey, Light Rail Transit is seemed to be more comfortable and user-friendly by local residents. Elderly and youth are more likely to use Bus Rapid Transit. People without private vehicles and people with low income are also more likely to use Bus Rapid Transit. In comparison to LRT, BRT is seemed to be the lesser of the two choices from the respondents of the survey. FARE One way: $2.50 Day Pass: $5.00 Senior: $1.25 One way: $2.50 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTEconomic development increases significantly with the addition of a Light Rail Transit station. Light Rail stations are more permanent in comparison to Bus Rapid stations, therefore businesses are more likely to bloom. Because Bus Rapid Transit are flexible and can be changed more easily, economic development along Bus Rapid stations are less significant than Light Rail stations. Businesses like consistency. Evaluating BRT and LRT in the San Diego’s Mid-Coast Corridor Region Jennifer W. Chang, University of California, San Diego, Urban Studies and Planning Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Trolley Extension Line Findings: BRT has been very successful in the two case studies of Brisbane, Australia and Los Angeles, California. Because of the similarities between these two cities and San Diego, BRT should also be a successful form of public transit in SD. San Diego County Percentage of House Holds without a vehicle Average Population Income in San Diego County References: Maps – SANDAG, GIS Charts – GAO 03/08/2011