Focusing on Learning Outcomes NOT Education Inputs: The Role of Classroom Assessment in the Post-MDG Environment Craig Esbeck Reading Association of Uganda.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

RtI Response to Intervention
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Early Reading and Phonics
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Williamsville’s Title 1 Program… Teachers and Parents Working Together for Children.
Orientation to the English Language Arts K to 7 IRP (2006)
Parents as Partners in Education
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
1 Getting to the Core of the Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for Policy and Practice Advanced Literacy Panel.
1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap National Association.
Mary Beth Allen East Stroudsburg University.  What is the major purpose of RtI?  What are the goals of RtI?  What are the benefits of implementing.
SLAs – MAKING THE SHIFT. Session Goals Deepen understanding of Inspiring Education, Literacy and Numeracy Benchmarks (embedded in Curriculum Redesign)
Literacy Continuum K-6 Western Sydney Region – Literacy Background
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
E-Program Portfolio Let’s Begin Department of Reading and Language Arts Program Portfolio Central Connecticut State University Name: Date Submitted: Program.
Continuing dominance of “language of instruction” debate.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Current Context Key Points-Draft Plan Good Practice
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
CREATE AN INTEGRATED TEACHING UNIT ECE 460 Early Childhood Curriculum.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
1 Promoting Third Grade Reading Proficiency National Governor’s Association Policy Institute May, 2012 Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D. Professor of Education.
DOES LEADERSHIP MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 The importance of school leadership on the quality of schools and the achievements of pupils:
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
School Leaders Professional Learning for School Leaders: The Principal’s Role in School Transformation Cynthia Mruczek Rich Barbacane April 19, 2011.
SWITCHING TO COMMON CORE. What is Common Core? Common Core is a new set of standards our country is adapting PARCC is designing- *Partnership for Assessment.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Kindergarten 2011/2012. Standards and objectives  Common Core Curriculum  Dibels Next  Tool Kits   HB2732   Pre and Post test assessments assessments.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Applying Research to Reading Instruction: What’s Next? Timothy Shanahan University of Illinois at Chicago
Principles of Effective Teaching of Reading (and Writing)
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Supports K–12 School Effectiveness Framework: A Support for School Improvement and Student Success (2010). The integrated process of assessment and instruction.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
SETRC network guide for assessment of programs.  Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy  Determining priority need.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Best Start Kindergarten Assessment
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
FACE Symposium Michele P Brooks M.Ed Assistant Superintendent, Office of Family & Student Engagement Boston Public Schools.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
OKLAHOMA EARLY READING FIRST What We Are Learning Priscilla Griffith University of Oklahoma Go Sooners!
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Literacy Secretariat Literacy is everyone’s business Effective Early Years Literacy Teaching Practices Margaret Sankey, Manager Andrea Barker, Project.
Literacy Assessments Literacy Workgroup Marcia Atwood Michelle Boutwell Sue Locke-Scott Rae Lynn McCarthy.
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
1 Making Waves Online Learning Environment NEW!!.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education. Vukelich, Helping Young Children Learn Language and Literacy: Birth Through Kindergarten 3/e Chapter 1 Foundations of.
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
Improving Literacy and Numeracy Outcomes Geoff N Masters.
Bilingual/ESL Department
Emergent Literacy ECSE 604 Huennekens Why Is It Important?
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Seaford School District
Title: An evaluation of Early Grade Reading Assessment in Namibia
Presentation transcript:

Focusing on Learning Outcomes NOT Education Inputs: The Role of Classroom Assessment in the Post-MDG Environment Craig Esbeck Reading Association of Uganda March 13, 2014

UWEZO Recommendations: 1.Do NOT do more of the same. 2.Insist on rigourous evidence. 3.Focus on learning outcomes instead of educational inputs. 4.Learn from what works. 5.Experiment and test out new ideas.

Presentation Outline I.Introduction to Assessment II.The Three Elements of Effective Early Literacy Assessment Systems III.Uganda’s Early Literacy Assessment System IV.Innovations in Classroom Assessment in Uganda

I. Introduction to Assessment What do you think of when the topic of educational assessment is mentioned? Make a “mind map” of all your associations related to assessment.

I. Introduction to Assessment Why the focus on assessment?

I. Introduction to Assessment Why the focus on assessment? Global shift from educational inputs to learning outcomes in post MDG environment. Growing demand from governments, NGOs and civil society for accountability in the education sector. Assessment, done well, is good for children.

I. Introduction to Assessment Definition of Assessment: Latin root meaning “to sit beside” “The purpose of [assessment] must be to improve services for children and ensure that children benefit from their educational experiences.” International Reading Association Assessment should be non-threatening; affirming the learner’s knowledge and skills

I. Introduction to Assessment Guiding Principles for Early Literacy Assessment: Assessment should support children’s development and literacy learning. Assessment should take many different forms. Assessment must avoid cultural and language bias. Assessment should encourage children to observe and reflect on their own learning progress. Assessment should shed light on what children ARE able to do as well as the areas where they need further work. Parents should be a valued source of assessment information, as well as an audience for assessment results.

I. Introduction to Assessment What do We Assess? The 5 Components of Literacy Instruction: 1.Phonemic awareness 2.Phonics (alphabetic principle) 3.Vocabulary 4.Fluency 5.Comprehension

II. The 3 Elements of Effective Early Literacy Assessment Systems 1. Multiple Forms of Evidence Sound early literacy assessment systems should include a range of assessments, from informing and reflecting classroom practice to serving district and national program evaluation needs.

II. The 3 Elements of Effective Early Literacy Assessment Systems The three major types of assessment instruments that give important data in an early literacy assessment system are: A. Screening measures B. Classroom assessments C. Program evaluations

II. The 3 Elements of Effective Early Literacy Assessment Systems A. Screening measures: Screenings are a first step in identifying learners who may be at risk of delayed development or academic failure or who need further evaluation for special services. Example: Visual and auditory testing are common screenings done routinely in schools.

II. The 3 Elements of Effective Early Literacy Assessment Systems B. Classroom assessments: Classroom assessments that are directly linked to the instructional program can provide a rich source of information on a single child or a group of children. Example: Letter Name Knowledge Test in the Benchmarks video.

II. The 3 Elements of Effective Early Literacy Assessment Systems C. Program evaluations: Program evaluation and accountability are an essential component for any assessment system to work effectively. Examples: NAPE, EGRA and UWEZO are assessment tools designed for program evaluation.

II. The 3 Elements of Effective Early Literacy Assessment Systems 1.Multiple forms of evidence A. Screenings B. Classroom assessments C. Program evaluations

II. The 3 Elements of Effective Early Literacy Assessment Systems 2. Leadership Research suggests that the educational institutions that have been most successful in educating all children share some common attributes and paramount among those commonalities is leadership that creates a shared vision of success and provides the staff with the tools to meet that vision.

II. The 3 Elements of Effective Early Literacy Assessment Systems 3. Coherent Professional Development Effective assessment systems rely on well-trained and reflective teachers who understand cognitive and literacy development as well as the basic concepts of appropriate assessment.

III. Uganda’s Early Literacy Assessment System Let’s reflect on Uganda’s Assessment System. 1.Multiple forms of evidence? a)Screening measures? b)Classroom assessments? c)Program evaluations? 2.Leadership? 3.Coherent professional development?

III. Uganda’s Early Literacy Assessment System What key policy reforms has Uganda enacted that strengthen classroom assessment in early literacy?

III. Uganda’s Early Literacy Assessment System Reform 1. Focus on literacy, numeracy and life skills in early primary. Reform 2. Competency-based assessment model with literacy competences identified in reading, writing, listening and speaking. Reform 3. Language of Instruction in the local language with a focus on attaining literacy in the local/area language first, followed by English. Reform 4. Continuous assessment model. Reform 5. Class teacher system in early primary.

III. Uganda’s Early Literacy Assessment System What government entities are responsible for implementing classroom-based literacy assessment?

III. Uganda’s Early Literacy Assessment System Agencies Responsible for Assessment Nationally: UNEB, NCDC, MoES Regionally: DES, PTCs (CCTs) District-level: DEO and Inspectorate School-level: Head teacher, Head of Academics, Class Teacher

IV. Innovations in classroom-based assessment What are some of the innovations in classroom assessment being implemented by USAID’s School Health and Reading Program (SHRP), Mango Tree’s Northern Uganda Literacy Program (NULP) and others?

IV. Innovations in classroom-based assessment Mango Tree’s video on continuous assessment

IV. Innovations in classroom-based assessment Innovation 1: Identification, integration and dissemination of the 5 Components of Literacy Instruction into the Ugandan education system.

A sample of Save the Children’s Literacy Boost Assessment Tool Using the 5 Components of Literacy

IV. Innovations in classroom-based assessment Innovation 2: Clearly articulating the literacy competences to be assessed during the lesson, the week, the term and the academic year and delineating literacy competences from thematic competences.

An extract from Mango Tree’s P1 teacher’s guide for Leblango, Term 2 Week 9

IV. Innovations in classroom-based assessment Innovation 3: Embedding continuous assessment of the identified competences into the daily lesson plan templates to ensure that teachers take the time to assess learners every day.

IV. Innovations in classroom-based assessment Innovation 4: Revising the Class Progress Record aka Continuous Assessment Monitoring Form to make it more teacher friendly.

SHRP’s Continuous Assessment Monitoring Form

IV. Innovations in classroom-based assessment Innovation 5: Revising the marking system. SHRP Model: Level 3 = exceeds competence (full triangle) Level 2 = competent (2-sides of triangle) Level 1 = not yet competent (1-side of triangle)

IV. Innovations in classroom-based assessment Innovation 6: Providing summative assessments for Week 12.

Extract from SHRP’s P1 teacher’s guide for Lebacoli, Term 1 Week 12

IV. Innovations in classroom-based assessment Innovation 7: Revising and translating the parent report card to make it more user-friendly.

Mango Tree’s P1 Parent Report Card

IV. Innovations in classroom-based assessment What other innovations do we as the MLEN want to make advocate for to improve Uganda’s Early Literacy Assessment System?

Thanks for your interest and attention! Craig Esbeck