DPAS II EVALUATION 2012 Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation DPAS II.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
Mentoring New Educators
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Quality Liaison Meeting Thursday – April 10, 2008 Wilson Middle School.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.
Santa Rosa County District Schools Professional Orientation Program (POP) Professional Improvement Plan (PIP)
Acknowledging and Honoring Quality Performance.  The purpose of the EAS process is to provide teachers with the opportunity to reflect on professional.
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
High School Teachers Teach Content: Implications for SW PBS Implementation
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
University of Central Missouri College of Education Office of Clinical Services and Certification.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
1. Learning Targets 2 Staff will understand the various Teachscape platforms offered by South Dakota Staff will be able to login to their Teachscape account.
Cooperating Teacher Orientation
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 4 Component Five – Student Improvement.
1 Presented by Media Services Media Specialists Connections and Issues Training: November – December Zone Based Meetings.
Whiteboard Zoom Out OKED TLE Pilot Facilitator Training.
The National University Special Education Internship Introduction to the Program
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Preparation & Development of Professional Portfolio Workshop: Danielson A Presenter: Mrs. Shirley J. Delgado M. A.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
CHEA GENERAL MEETING August 31, 2011 STATE SALARY SCALE Professional Learning Community (PLC) NEGOTIATIONS DPAS II CHANGES STATE SALARY SCALE Professional.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
CHANGING ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION. Belief Statement Grades should be an effective means of communicating academic and social progress The language.
CPRE Research on Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation National Conference on Teacher Compensation and Evaluation Chicago, Illinois November 29, 2001 Herbert.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Consider this… “Effective leaders see what is essential and ignore the rest…focus on what is vital and eliminate all of the extraneous distractions…stop.
Effective Instructional Feedback Mike Miles July 2009.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
Maine Teacher Effectiveness Status.  Maine approved a teacher evaluation law during in the 2012 Legislative sessions.  The rules were determined in.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
TOP TEN LIST OF COACHING BELIEFS CURRICULUM 511 DR. PECK BY: HALI PLUMMER.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Parent Strategies to Help Improve Communication with Teachers and Schools PRESENTED BY: DR. LATEASHA WHITE PARENT INVOLVEMENT LIAISON STOCKBRIDGE MIDDLE.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Educator Effectiveness Dr. Mark Kirkemier, Coordinator Dr. Alison Grizzle, Education Administrator Dr. Kisha Tolbert-Woods, Education Specialist.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Presentation transcript:

DPAS II EVALUATION 2012 Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation DPAS II

First Effort Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation Spring 2006 Progress Education Signed Contract Surveyed teachers, specialists, administrators Interviewed approximately 5% Ran three focus groups Three pilot districts June presented first report Lots of things to work on Training Forms Processes support

Second Effort Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation Another round with the pilot districts Most respondents felt DPAS II provided a better picture Richer conversations about instruction Positive about conferences Forms getting better Manuals and training still needed work Most felt system fair, easy to follow Still work to do in training, manuals, forms Much less confusion in the second year

Invite More in Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation Expanded the project Interviews and focus group conversations stronger Concerns more sophisticated Data availability Types of data – qualitative versus quantitative Goals Support Use of Professional Learning Communities How can we update goals

How about everyone join the fun! Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation is first full implementation Over 10,000 invitations to survey sent Response rate about 40% Pilots more positive than new participants Experience helps 321 interviews and six focus groups Most graded the DPAS II a B Most feel no additional training needed Goal setting still an issue

RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation Training on qualitative and quantitative data. Increase district level support for specialists. Establish statewide data warehouse for easy access. Facilitate peer support groups for goal setting and data analysis. Create new opportunities for experienced teachers. Create an online forum to share ideas. Create videos to demonstrate reflective practice conferencing. And more…

Maturing in 2010! Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation Best statewide response to surveys yet – 60%! Most still positive about DPAS II. Conversations about instruction getting better. Goals are still a problem. Data availability to measure growth still a concern. Concern about process becoming routine. Worry about support and training for new teachers. Confusion about growth models. Specialists still need more support.

General Findings 2011 Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation The Majority give DPAS II a grade of B. The Student Improvement area needs attention. Overwhelming agreement conferences positive. Most teachers and specialists spend less than 5 hours on paperwork. Administrators spend more than 120 hours. Most do not need more training but they do need refreshers. DOE Website very helpful.

General Findings 2012 Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation Little difference in grade last three years. Still a B. Teachers believe the best indicator is instruction. Everyone believes discussion most valuable. Announced versus unannounced observations. Evaluators believe unannounced observations more valuable. Forms not difficult but some duplication exists.

Teachers Grade DPAS II 2012 Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation

Specialists Grade DPAS II 2012 Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation

Administrators Grade DPAS II 2012 Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation

What Did Teachers Say? Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation Increase the amount of unannounced observations. Increase walkthrough observations. Be viewed through more than one lens. May include peer visitation and observation. Walkthrough observations (multiple) should be the basis of the experienced teachers yearly reflection. Make evidence part of the normal routine. Make use of technology to provide feedback. Provide brief conferencing after walkthrough observations.

More From Teachers Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation Eliminate formal announced observations for prepared teachers and replace with walkthrough observations. Expand some form of mentoring for experienced teachers. Training focusing on observation and feedback techniques for evaluators and peer observers. Remove the word Evaluator from DPAS II.

Communication Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation Create additional vehicles for conversations and communication for teachers. Use the Internet to share information and ideas. Build in refresher training for all teachers to reconnect with the philosophy of reflective practice. No changes in DPAS II once the school year begins. Eliminate the routine questions contained in Professional Responsibilities. Train teachers with the same information given to evaluators. It was more insightful. Make certain emphasis on goal setting and sharing extends to areas like parent communication.

What Did Specialists Say? Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation Use walkthroughs with several different observers. Use peer evaluation. Tie goals and expectations to national standards from the various professional associations. Increase training for evaluators on specialist DPAS II. Review current classification to assure correct instrument is being used, teacher versus specialist. Customize rubrics and forms by specialty.

What Did Administrators Say? Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation Use walkthroughs on a regular basis. Several individuals to participate at different times in walkthroughs. Observations from walkthroughs basis of reflective feedback. Use announced, formal observations and walkthroughs for new teachers. Improve and customize rubrics and forms for specialists. Continuation training for reflective practice conferences. Find a way to increase unannounced observations, the best part of DPAS II. Separate formal Improvement Process actions from the DPAS II program. Summative conversations should be as much about the future as the past.

Thanks to YOU!!! Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation We at Progress Education could not do this without the cooperation of all educators in Delaware!!