Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Santa Rosa County District Schools Professional Orientation Program (POP) Professional Improvement Plan (PIP)

Published byGabriela Wigglesworth Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Santa Rosa County District Schools Professional Orientation Program (POP) Professional Improvement Plan (PIP)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Santa Rosa County District Schools Professional Orientation Program (POP) Professional Improvement Plan (PIP)

2 SRCDS: Professional Orientation Program (POP) Same Process new format Majority of the program is electronic located in the Professional Growth System (PGS) – Portfolio Requirements sent to HR (paper chase) Documentation of the Appeals Process Final FEAPS assessment by team and signatures Mentor Team’s Final Recommendation Form – The POP participant must complete all POP requirements plus IP Level 1 requirements

3 SRCDS: Professional Orientation Program (POP) Observations: – 10 Minimum Observations plus one 1 st Semester Evaluation Building Administrator :2 formal, 4 informal (these are tied into the Evaluation System to eliminate duplicate of effort), and One 1 st semester evaluation Mentor Peer: 2 formal Mentor Other Educator: 2 formal All observations require a Pre and Post Conference

4 SRCDS: Professional Orientation Program (PIP) – Electronic process in PGS – Process for PIP is located in the Instructional Evaluation Manual

5 Santa Rosa County District School Evaluation Systems Thank you for your patience and cooperation as we continue to “grow” these tools.

Download ppt "Santa Rosa County District Schools Professional Orientation Program (POP) Professional Improvement Plan (PIP)"

Similar presentations

Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO). Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.

Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO). Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.
DPAS II EVALUATION 2012 Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation DPAS II.

DPAS II EVALUATION 2012 Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation DPAS II.
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Performance Appraisal Systems

Performance Appraisal Systems
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.

Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN UPDATE PROPOSALS COMMITTEE UPDATE MAY 2008

PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN UPDATE PROPOSALS COMMITTEE UPDATE MAY 2008
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.

Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST 2011-2012.

C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year 2005-2006 PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,

New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.

August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,

1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.

Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
CTE Credential Program For IHE and District Representatives Meetings held March & April 2010.

CTE Credential Program For IHE and District Representatives Meetings held March & April 2010.
Professional Development and Appraisal System

Professional Development and Appraisal System
 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute 1012.34 and State Board Rule 6A 5.065  The Florida Department of Education and.

 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.

Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Differentiated Supervision

Differentiated Supervision

Similar presentations

Ads by Google