Title IA Fiscal Issues Jackie Godbout Title IA Program Consultant

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing a Title I Budget Title I Directors Budget Workshop June 14, 2011 Waterfront Place Morgantown, WV.
Advertisements

Title I Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged Part A: Improving Basic Programs Operated by Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) Providing.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers U.S. Department of Education 1.
Some slides in this presentation were excerpted from US Eds February 2009 PowerPoint presentation titled: Help! Im a New Title I Director. What Do I Need.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds
New Title I/NCLB Directors Workshop NCLB Winter Conference January 16, 2007 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon, Title.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Title I, Part A District Budget Planning The “Small” Stuff Julie McGuire, MEd Federal Funds Coordinator Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title I, Part A Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance.
1 Title I Comparability Requirement Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
RTI and Title I An Overview Facilitated by Tara Black & Dean Richards.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Title I Services in Non-Public Schools Equitable Services Requirements and Funding Basics.
1 Title I Services For Children Enrolled In Private Schools Molly Little Associate Director, Instructional Services and Federal Programs North Clackamas.
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability, and Supplement/Supplant PAFPC April 2011.
Schoolwide Program Presentation New England Comprehensive Assistance Center Steve Hamilton.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
ARRA Title I: The chance of a lifetime to address our most vexing challenges Reform and Restore: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational.
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
Title 1, Part A Local Consolidated Plan (LCP) Application May 2009.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Understanding Title I. Title I Defined A federal allocation of funds for schools classified as low income for the purpose of assisting students to demonstrate.
Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
ESEA APPLICATION TRAINING 2013 Equitable Participation Rules for Title I Private School Students Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 1.
Title IA Planning, Fiscal, and Parental Involvement Workshops Maine Department of Education Kathryn Manning Jackie Godbout Rachelle Tome May 2006.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Fiscal Considerations Spring 2006 NCLB Regional Workshops.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Creating a Good Title III Plan Title III & Migrant Directors’ Meeting Lansing, Michigan April 26, 2011 Shereen Tabrizi, Ph.D. Manager, Special Populations.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Schoolwide Consolidation Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide.
Oklahoma State Department of Education Janet Barresi State Superintendent of Public Instruction Consolidated Schoolwide Funds.
Title I Part A: Back to Basics ESEA Odyssey Fall 2010.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
1 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
Office of Title I & Section 31a Compliance Welcome! Title I, Part A (Title I) Program and Budget Planning March
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
Larry Fazzari Program Supervisor k12.wa.us 1 TITLE I, PART A PROGRAMS SCHOOLWIDE VS. TARGETED
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) MASFPS LANSING, MICHIGAN NOVEMBER, 2008 Leigh Manasevit Brustein & Manasevit 3105 South Street NW Washington, DC (202)
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Title I Services For Children Enrolled In Private Schools Molly Little Associate Director, Instructional Services and Federal Programs North Clackamas.
New Fiscal Rules for Funding Flexibility with Title I, Part A
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act and the Tile I, Part A Program
Title I, Part A Supplement not Supplant (SNS) Under ESSA
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
MEGA Advanc-Ed ASSIST ACIP Local Indicator Transform 2020 Compliance
Program Models Title I-A
AUDITS----SINGLE AUDIT CONCEPT, COMPLIANCE
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability & Supplement, Not Supplant
Presentation transcript:

Title IA Fiscal Issues Jackie Godbout Title IA Program Consultant 624-6705 jackie.godbout@maine.gov

Title I Part A – Basic Program for Disadvantaged Part B – Reading First, Early Reading First, & Even Start Part C – Migrant Education Part D – Neglected & Delinquent Part F – Comprehensive School Reform Part G – Advanced Placement

Title I-Sec. 1003 & Title IA-Sec. 1115(a) Even though the general purpose statement for Title I, Parts A-H is to ensure that all students have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education and reach, at a minimum, proficiency on challenging State academic achievement standards and assessments,

Title I, Part A resources are to be used only for programs and services to support all eligible children served under this part as defined under Section 1115(b) or a schoolwide program as defined under Section 1114.

Section 1120A Title IA Fiscal Requirements Maintenance of Effort = LEA Comparability = School Supplement, not supplant = Student

Sec. 1120A(a) Maintenance of Effort Requires districts to maintain fiscal effort by at least 90% from year to year. If not, federal funds are reduced. The expenditures on the EF-M-45 are used for this comparison. Determination is made in June using the preceding two completed years’ data. We compare total expenditures and a per pupil expenditure. The LEA must reach 90% in at least one of these categories. Expenditures not considered: Debt service and Capital Outlay A waiver may be requested through USDE

Section 1120A(c) Comparability of Services …is a precondition to receiving Title I Funds …is about fairness …looks only at state and local resources …compares each Title I school to the average of non-Title I schools or, if all schools are Title I, to each other.

Comparability [cont’d] Comparability is flexible. May exclude schools with less than 100 students. Has a variety of measures. May be measured by school size—large vs. small. May be measured school by school or grade span by grade span. May be measured differently for schoolwides vs. targeted assistance schools.

SEAs responsibilities regarding comparability Establish procedures for LEAs to use to determine comparability. Definition: Maine has adopted the teacher/student ratio and the per pupil instructional staff salary expenditure. Timeframe for making comparability determinations and adjustments: October 1-November 1. Recordkeeping Requirements: Documentation to support staff counts and student enrollment numbers reported. Monitoring for compliance.

LEAs responsibilities regarding comparability Determine what measure to use—either state adopted form or other as noted in the Consolidated NCLB Application. Develop written procedures if using other than state adopted form. Calculate annually. Document and submit to the state that Title I schools are comparable. Maintain records for three years.

Supplement, Not Supplant Section 1120A(b) A SEA or LEA shall use these Title IA funds to supplement the funds that would, in the absence of such federal funds, be made available from non-Federal sources for the education of students participating in programs under this part, and not to supplant such funds. “As hard as I try, I just don’t know if I’m using Title I funds to supplant state or local funds. Can you help??” Desparate in Detroit

Supplement, not supplant Testing To test for supplanting apply these assumptions: Is the activity required by federal, state or local law? Year to Year (Were the services/person supported with local funds in the prior year?) Title I vs. Non-Title I—Are these services provided to non-Title I students or in non-Title I schools? If you answered YES to any one of these, then supplanting is assumed and rebuttal can occur.

Supplement, Not Supplant Exclusion You may exclude supplemental state and local funds used in unserved Title I eligible schools so that Federal funds may be used in the higher-poverty schools. However, an LEA may no longer use supplemental state and local funds in an ineligible Title I school without also providing Title I eligible schools their fair share of those funds.

Carryover Funds An LEA has considerable discretion in using carryover funds: Allow each school to retain its carryover funds for use in the subsequent year. Add carryover funds to the LEAs subsequent year’s program. Designate carryover funds for a particular district/school activity.

Carryover for Setasides For those setasides required by law I.e. parent involvement, 10% AYP staff development, the LEA must carry over the unspent funds and spend them for the specific purpose in addition to the full reservation for the following year.

Schoolwide Fiscal Accountability The law requires the SEA to remove financial barriers for consolidating funds in a schoolwide program to support and upgrade the school’s entire program. So, may a schoolwide program use Federal funds on any activity?

Schoolwide [cont’d] Yes, ONLY IF… The school’s comprehensive needs assessment demonstrates that such activity is needed to raise the achievement of students in the school, particularly the lowest-achieving students. The schoolwide plan reflects the need. The school’s annual evaluation demonstrates that the program is effective in raising student achievement.

Title I Rules of Thumb for In-Class Delivery Models Responsibility: The Title IA staff is responsible to provide assistance to identified Title I participants when in the class. Duties: The Title IA staff may not assume any of the duties the classroom teacher would be required to perform as part of the regular instructional program. Team Teaching: The sharing of delivery of the regular instructional program in the classroom is not allowed.

Title IA Demonstration Lessons These lessons, for the specific benefit of Title I children, would be intermittent and presented on an irregular basis as a particular need of the Title I children in the class becomes apparent. No regularly scheduled whole group instruction by the Title I teacher may occur.

Cooperative Learning Groups Having the Title I staff scheduled to work regularly with pre-established, fixed cooperative learning groups containing Title I and non-Title I students I not allowed. The Title I staff may facilitate cooperative learning groups with Title I and non-Title I students only until the Title I students have mastered the specific objective for which the group was formed.

Heterogenous Groups Similar to the Cooperative Learning Groups, this arrangement lasts only until the Title I children have mastered the specific objective for which the group was formed.

Small Group Work The Title I staff may not work with small groups within the classroom that have no Title I students in them.

Rules of Thumb for Pull-Out Delivery Model Section 1115(c)(1)(C)(iii): Minimize removing students from the regular classroom during regular school hours. Ensure that the regular program of instruction in the content is delivered by the classroom teacher.

Notice: The following examples apply to a Targeted Assistance School (TAS) program. Schoolwide programs will be discussed in a future meeting.

Supplement or Supplant Examples Local and Title IA funds are used to provide a classroom math workbook for all students. Supplement or Supplant

Answer Supplant Title IA funds may not be used to purchase materials for the general education program.

Supplement or Supplant Example Local, Title IA and Special Ed funds are used to purchase an assessment to be administered to all students for a variety of reasons, of which one reason is for Title I identification and selection. Supplement or Supplant

Answer: Supplant. An LEA may not provide an assessment  for non-Title I students with State and local funds while using Title I funds to provide the same assessment for Title I participating students. (This principle applies within a single Title I school, or across the district among Title I and non-Title I schools.) This would violate the supplanting prohibition because an LEA may not use Title I funds to provide services to Title I students that it provides with non-Title I funds for non-Title I students.In addition, for targeted assistance schools, it is the responsibility of the LEA to identify at-risk students from State or local sources. Once eligible children are identified, Part A funds may be used to identify those most in need or to identify their specific educational needs. (Nola Cromer, USDE)

Supplement or Supplant Example The LEA hires a K-12 Director of Curriculum. All the Title I schools in the LEA are K-8 targeted assistance schools. Thirty percent of the students in the LEA receive Title I services. Title I pays for 30% of the Curriculum Director’s salary. Supplement or Supplant

Answer: Supplant. This is a K-12 position and this employee is responsible for the curriculum for all students, not just Title IA students and Title IA schools. No supplemental services are being provided by the Curriculum Director.

Supplement or Supplant Example The district offers a Title I summer school and accepts non-Title I identified students because local funds also support the summer school. Supplement or Supplant

Answer: Supplant. By adding local funds to the Summer School program and opening it to all students, the Title IA students are not receiving additional services.

Supplement or Supplant Example Title I funds pay for an extended day K program and/or a pre-K for identified low-achieving students. Supplement or Supplant

Answer: Supplemental. As long as only Title IA identified students participate in the programs, then they are receiving additional services.

Supplement or Supplant Example Title I funds are used for a high school summer program where students who have failed a class receive this instruction and receive a new grade and credits, if passed. Supplement or Supplant

Answer: Supplant. Title IA can provide supplemental tutoring services in the summer but may not be used to provide core instruction on which a grade or credit will be issued.

Supplement or Supplant Example Title I purchased materials for a Title I Demonstration Lesson that involved the whole group. These materials are then going to be used by the regular classroom teacher and the whole class during future instructional activities. Supplement or Supplant

Answer: Supplant. The purchase is to support the whole class to be used by the classroom teacher and will not be under the control of the Title I program.

Supplement or Supplant Example The district has chosen a new K-8 math curriculum. The district uses Title I funds to provide additional Staff Development after the core program staff development has been provided by the district. Supplement or Supplant

Answer: Supplement. As long as the district has already provided the core staff development required to implement the new program and offers Title IA services in the content area, then Title IA funds may pay for additional staff development to enhance instructional strategies directed at the needs of Title IA students.

Play “Bureaucrat for a Day” Write Your Own Example/Answer E-mail to jackie.godbout@maine.gov by June 16. We will review, modify, and post to the workshop overheads. Result: A wonderful resource for all of you to use as you plan your projects and expend your Title IA funds. Prize: The satisfaction that you have contributed to the successful implementation of the program and use of Title IA funds.

QUESTIONS or CONCERNS????