Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
PORTFOLIO.
Theory of Action If teachers…. Curriculum: Teach targeted guided Math lessons based on reading data. Ensure student with disabilities are in the general.
Parents as Partners in Education
Elementary School Counselor
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
North East School Division An Introduction to Response to Intervention (RTI)2009.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Timberlane Regional School District
Support for Personalized Learning Presented by Dr. Sarah Lee RESA 4 Technical Assistance Specialist A recorded version of this presentation will be posted.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person, regardless of audience, of the following resources found on.
Early Intervention Project Proposal for
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
An Overview March Wh y Wh at Ho w Wh ere Wh en Wh o ?
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Colorado RtI Fidelity of Implementation Rubrics
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Integrating the MTSS Framework at the Secondary Level Dr. Jayna Jenkins, Learning and Development Facilitator, MTSS Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charles.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Dr. Neil Guthrie Assistant Superintendent
District Accreditation
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Comprehensive Planning
How are HLPs used? Components of HLP identified.
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
From Compliance to Impact: Utilizing the School Systems Review as part of a Continuous Improvement Process Ann LaPointe, Educational Improvement Consultant.
Gifted Education Integrated in RtI Instruction Systems
Schools of Excellence Recognition Program For Century Learning
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
An Overview April 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012

Overview – Support for Personalized Learning – Foundational Principles Framework of Support – Introduction to Practice Profiles – Structure of Practice Profiles – Use of Practice Profiles – Review Process Providing Support Agenda

Purpose of Support for Personalized Learning Support for Personalized Learning is a framework that promotes a well-integrated system connecting general, supplementary, gifted and special education in providing high quality, standards-based instruction and intervention that is matched to students academic, social/emotional and behavioral needs.

Purpose of Support for Personalized Learning

Foundational Principles SPL is a comprehensive school improvement framework. SPL is a technical structure that organizes and aligns curriculum, instruction and assessment in the form of increasingly intensive services and supports for all students. Student learning and needs are monitored and are assessed routinely using a continuum of technically adequate measures.

Foundational Principles Multi-level systems of support are established in order to meet changing needs of all students at any given point in time. Student response to instruction and intervention is used to evaluate the effectiveness of CORE, TARGETED and INTENSIVE instruction over time. SPL is a framework that promotes organizational flexibility and can be an effective process for building and sustaining teacher leadership and effective practices over time. Foundational Principles

Introduction to Practice Profiles Practice Profiles are tools designed to assist districts, schools and educators with self- evaluation of current instructional and assessment practices. Provide the means to reflect on policies and practices in order to improve outcomes for students.

Introduction to Practice Profiles The tools are based on the six components of SPL – Leadership – School Climate and Culture – Teams and Processes – Family and Community Partnerships – Assessment – Curriculum and Instruction

Introduction to Practice Profiles Practice Profiles may be used as: – An informational resource – A way to measure implementation – Tools to assist with planning and school improvement

Structure of Practice Profiles Profiles have been written for three levels of implementation – classroom, school, and district. Each profile discusses the six SPL components across the GROWTH STAGES – Emerging : Establishing Consensus – Developing : Building Infrastructure – Operationalizing : Gaining Consistency – Optimizing : Innovating and Sustaining

Structure of Practice Profile Within the profiles there are common key anchors and guiding questions on the far left column – Structures – Processes and Procedures – Professional Development

Structure of Practice Profile

Use of Practice Profiles Use of the Practice Profiles is a self-reflective process to: – Gauge their level of implementation in relation to the Optimizing stage – Plan for next steps in implementation

Use of Practice Profile

Use of Practice Profiles Directions: 1.Determine if you are going to focus on one component or the entire profile. 2.Read the rows and columns to get a sense of the scope of the component. 3.Using existing data determine and highlight or circle the cells that best describe the current stage of development.

Leadership School-level Framework of Support: School-Level Practice Profile

Use of Practice Profiles Directions continued: 4. After completing the profile indicate the current implementation stage of your site presently on the Scoring Summary. 5. Identify desired level of implementation. 6. Compare the gap between desired level and current level.

Use of Practice Profiles Scoring Summary

Use of Practice Profiles 7. Create and action plan with timelines to close the gap between desired level and current level of implementation. 8. Check on the progress of the action plan throughout the school year.

Use of Practice Profiles Key Points: Practice Profiles can be read horizontally or vertically. You do not have to read each component each time you use the profile. If you feel that two growth stages in one row describe your site, pick the cell to the left. It is possible to be in different growth stages across components.

It is possible to be in two different growth stages within one component. Discussing the information in these profiles requires collaboration and input from several departments/stakeholders/colleagues. These are not intended to be direct guides and do not describe how exactly to move forward. Use of Practice Profiles

Review Process When districts, schools and educators use the profiles to both measure implementation and plan for next steps, they are engaging in the Review Process.

Review Process The process is a formative review. The information and insights gained are used in planning. The series of formative review may lead to periodic summative transition points. The information helps make determination as to specific policy and program outcomes.

Providing Support Implementation practices and supports are necessary across each level of the Support for Personalized Learning framework.

Students School Staff School Leadership Team District Leadership Team WVDE Leadership Group RESA Leadership Team Improved academics and behavior Provides effective practices to support students Provides guidance and manages implementation Provides guidance, visibility, funding and implementation supports Provides guidance, visibility and implementation supports Provides guidance, visibility, funding and implementation supports Providing Support

Purpose of Support for Personalized Learning Support for Personalized Learning is a framework that promotes a well-integrated system connecting general, supplementary, gifted and special education in providing high quality, standards-based instruction and intervention that is matched to students academic, social/emotional and behavioral needs.