Global Biodiversity Information Facility Participants’ Report 2011 Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF)
GBIF Participants’ Report 2011 Background and context GBIF has run an online Participant Reporting System in its current form from The previous reports are available here: 2009: : In response to feedback that the previous reports were too lengthy, the 2011 Participants’ Report is presented in this format of a deck of slides to enable reuse by Participants in relevant presentations. These slides are a complete analysis of the data provided by GBIF Participants in 2011, including a regional view to support the work of the regional subcommittees. Trends from are included where a sufficient number of Participants have responded to a question over the three years. A highlights presentation, presented to the Governing Board at their 19 th meeting in Lillehammer, 2012 will be available after the meeting here:
2010: 94 page report 2011: Deck of slides available for use in relevant GBIF meetings 2011 Participant Report: New format
GBIF Participants’ Report 2011 Contents I Participant Reporting System objectives 2011 Response Rates Section 1: Engagement – National Nodes – Regional Activities – Training – Outreach and Communication Section 2: Informatics Infrastructure – Priorities for Informatics Infrastructure
GBIF Participants’ Report 2011 Contents II Section 3: Biodiversity Science, Content and Use – Discovery and metadata – Digitization and mobilization – Names services (ECAT) – Data use Section 4: Strategic Partnerships and Uptake – Strategic partnerships – Participant use of the GBIF 2011 Work Programme Section 5: Evaluating the Participant Reporting System – Three main problems identified – Value of the Participant Reporting System to GBIF’s Participants – Lessons learnt – Conclusions
1.To provide a channel for GBIF Participants to report on the status of their activities and their implementation of the GBIF Work Programme 2.To enable GBIF Participants to communicate their needs and priorities to the GBIF Secretariat 3.To provide an overview of the activities carried out by the GBIF network as a whole Participant Reporting System Objectives
Response rates for countries and economies
AfricaAsiaEuropeLatin AmericaNorth AmericaOceania BeninChinese TaipeiAndorraArgentinaCanadaAustralia Burkina FasoIndiaAustriaColombiaUSANew Zealand CameroonIndonesiaBelgiumCosta Rica GhanaJapanDenmarkCuba GuineaPakistanFinlandMexico KenyaPhilippinesFrancePeru South AfricaRepublic of KoreaGermany TogoIceland UgandaIreland Luxembourg Norway Poland Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden The Netherlands United Kingdom Country and Economy Participants providing (partial) 2011 reports Response rates for countries and economies
Country and Economy Participants not providing 2011 reports AfricaAsiaEuropeLatin AmericaNorth AmericaOceania Central African Republic BulgariaChile CongoEstoniaNicaragua Equatorial GuineaPortugalUruguay MadagascarSwitzerland Mauritania Morocco Tanzania Response rates for countries and economies
Response rates for organizations
Organization Participants providing (partial) 2011 reports: 1.Bioversity International 2.DIVERSITAS 3.Encyclopedia of Life (EoL) 4.Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT) 5.ETI Bioinformatics 6.ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability 7.Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) 8.Inter-American Biodiversity Information Network (IABIN) 9.International Centre for Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPIE) 10.International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) 11.International Long Term Ecological Research (ILTER) 12.NatureServe 13.Nordic Genetic Resource Centre (NordGEN) 14.Society for the Management of Electronic Biodiversity Data (SMEBD) 15.Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections (SPNHC) Response rates for organizations
Organization Participants not providing 2011 reports: 1.Asean Centre for Biodiversity (ACB) 2.AndinoNET 3.Albertine Rift Conservation Society (ARCOS) 4.ASEANET 5.BGCI 6.BioNET 7.CABI 8.CBOL 9.CETAF 10.CYTED 11.DiscoverLife 12.EASIANET 13.EEA 14.Finding Species 15.FreshwaterLife 16.IBOL 17.ICZN 18.ISIS 19.MSEF 20.NSCA 21.OBIS 22.PBIF 23.SAFRINET 24.SCAR 25.SINEPAD 26.Species TDWG 28.WCMC 29.WDCBE 30.WFCC 31.Wildscreen Response rates for organizations
National Nodes – Origin and development status of GBIF’s national Nodes – Barriers to the development of national Nodes – Work areas covered by national Nodes Regional Activities Training Outreach and Communication Section 1: Engagement
Origin of national GBIF networks
Development of national Nodes
Participant Report , N=25 Countries and Economies providing reports over 3 years Trend in Nodes' development
Budget for national Nodes
Staffing of national Nodes
n indicates the number of Nodes from each region that replied to the question
Sustainability of national Nodes
These three barriers have consistently been reported by national Nodes as the top three most significant barriers in 2009, 2010 and 2011
National data portals
Use of national data portals
Collectively the lists maintained by 41 country Participants include an estimated total of 3,058 institutions and 12,283 people National networks
n indicates the number of Nodes from each region that replied to the question
Collectively a total of 1442 data holding institutions were reported as being involved in the national Nodes of the 39 country Participants that answered this question
Providing information services
Regional activities – national Nodes
Regional activities - organizations
National Nodes providing training
4 organization Participants organized 7 training events in 2011, through which a total of 64 people were trained on GBIF related activities 1 of these training events benefitted from the train-the-trainers approach Organizations providing training
Only 5 country Participants had submitted digital training materials to be included in the Online Resource Centre National Nodes developing training materials
Organizations developing training materials
National Nodes participating in GBIF training
Trend in training participation Participant Report , N=24 Countries and Economies providing reports over 3 years
Organizations participating in GBIF training
National Nodes involved in outreach
Organizations involved in outreach
Collectively 30 country Participants reported that they circulate GBits to a combined total of 7517 people Communication: GBIF’s newsletter In addition, 2 organization Participants reported that they circulate GBits to a combined total of 1010 people
n indicates the number of Nodes from each region that replied to the question Communication: GBIF’s newsletter
Priorities for Informatics Infrastructure National Nodes’ priorities Organizations’ priorities Section 2: Informatics Infrastructure
25 country Participants provided responses over the three years. Their top priorities each year were consistently: Tools to customize and deploy data portals Tools for harvesting and indexing datasets from your community of data providers Tools for documenting and sharing metadata Informatics priorities
Discovery and metadata Digitization and mobilization Names services (ECAT) Data use Section 3: Biodiversity Science: Content and Use
National Nodes’ metadata policies
National Nodes’ metadata catalogues
N=29 Countries and Economies providing reports over 3 years Metadata catalogues
2011 Participant Report, N=58 Countries and Economies Data mobilization strategies
Data mobilization by organizations
Countries promoting data publishing
Organizations promoting data publishing
National Nodes improving data quality
Actions to improve data quality
Organizations improving data quality
Actions to improve data quality
Checklist publishing by National Nodes
Checklist publishing by national Nodes
Support for checklist publishing
National Nodes’ data use projects
Trend in involvement in data use Participant Report , N=22 Countries and Economies providing reports over 3 years
Organizations’ data use projects
Scientific publications – national Nodes
Scientific publications - organizations
Value of GBIF mediated data – national Nodes
Value of GBIF mediated data - organizations
Strategic partnerships Participant use of the GBIF 2011 Work Programme Section 4: Strategic Partnerships and Uptake
2011 Participant Report, N=46 Organization Participants Strategic Partnerships
Use of GBIF Work Programme – national Nodes
Top three useful services for national Nodes st Informatics infrastructure provided by GBIF GBIF technical recommendations, documents and guidelines GBIF Data Portal ( 2nd GBIF Communications Portal ( GBIF meetings (regional, global) Guidance and assistance from the GBIF Secretariat Staff 3rd GBIF Data Portal ( Guidance and assistance from the GBIF Secretariat Staff Exchange of experience and know-how with other Participant Nodes at GBIF meetings N=26 Countries and Economies providing reports over 3 years
Use of GBIF Work Programme - organizations
Three main problems identified Value of the Participant Reporting System to GBIF’s Participants Lessons learnt Conclusions Section 5: Evaluating the Participant Reporting System
Trend in response rates Problem 1: Low response rates, incomplete reports, patchy data GBIF Participant Report
Feedback on PRS scope and system Problem 2: Too many questions, but still not enough detail overall “The report is useful and relevant, but it is too long” “I believe the report is not sufficiently detailed to figure out why at the participant level progress is not as high as it should be.” Problem 3: Using questionnaire software for reporting purposes “The report could provide more summary information about my NODE extracted from the GBIF data portal and other GBIF information systems.” “A way of improving the system could be to reuse the information from previous reports”
Value of the Participant Reporting System to country Participants
Value of the Participant Reporting System to organization Participants
PRS lessons learnt 1.GBIF receives information from Participants through various streams that need to be brought together in an automated way
PRS lessons learnt 2.Participant needs and priorities benefit from discussion in order to better understand the requirements and way forward Through regional meetings, the NSG, and focal Nodes groups, develop recommendations and feasible approaches in consensus between the regions
Conclusions The GBIFS will not run the Participant Reporting System in the same way for 2012 GBIF is focusing on improving those network status metrics which could be made available through country and regional pages to be developed in the new Portal in an automated way The Nodes Steering Group (NSG) is now a functional standing committee providing rich recommendations through regional reports and input on Nodes’ priorities to the GBIF Work Programme The GBIF Secretariat proposes to work with the NSG to devise a new set of metrics to be assessed through regional reporting to complement information available through the portal