November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting1 Photochemical Modeling Investigation of an Extended Winter PM Episode in Central California 1. Air Resources Board,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of Lidar Backscatter to Determine the PBL Heights in New York City, NY Jia-Yeong Ku, Chris Hogrefe, Gopal Sistla New York State Department of Environmental.
Advertisements

Preliminary Results CMAQ and CMAQ-AIM with SAPRC99 Gail Tonnesen, Chao-Jung Chien, Bo Wang, UC Riverside Max Zhang, Tony Wexler, UC Davis Ralph Morris,
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Tanya L. Otte and Robert C. Gilliam NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with U.S. EPA National Exposure Research.
The Sensitivity of Aerosol Sulfate to Changes in Nitrogen Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds Ariel F. Stein Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
October 17, 20065th Annual CMAS Conference1 Photochemical Modeling Investigation of an Extended Winter PM Episode in Central California 1. Air Resources.
Muntaseer Billah, Satoru Chatani and Kengo Sudo Department of Earth and Environmental Science Graduate School of Environmental Studies Nagoya University,
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
National/Regional Air Quality Modeling Assessment Over China and Taiwan Using Models-3/CMAQ Modeling System Joshua S. Fu 1, Carey Jang 2, David Streets.
Ams/awma_ PROCESS-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF THE GULF BREEZE IN SIMULATING OZONE CONCENTRATIONS ALONG THE EASTERN GULF COAST Sharon G. Douglas.
O UTLINE Why are we interested in linking GEOS- CHEM with regional air quality model (CMAQ)? Technical issues to consider when linking GEOS-CHEM & CMAQ.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
Regional Modeling Update September 12, 2002 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Ajith Kaduwela, Ph.D Luis F. Woodhouse, Ph.D.
Modeling Overview For Barrio Logan Community Health Neighborhood Assessment Program Andrew Ranzieri Vlad Isakov Tony Servin Shuming Du October 10, 2001.
1 CCOS Update November 3, 2006 PC Meeting Project Status –Completed Projects Results –On-Going Projects Status Plan for CCOS Final Phase –Guiding Principles.
Utah Wintertime PM2.5 Modeling Lance Avey Utah Division of Air Quality.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
A comparison of PM 2.5 simulations over the Eastern United States using CB-IV and RADM2 chemical mechanisms Michael Ku, Kevin Civerolo, and Gopal Sistla.
Comparing Modal and Sectional Approaches in Modeling Particulate Matter in Northern California K. Max Zhang 1, Jinyou Liang 2, Anthony S. Wexler 1 and.
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
VISTAS Emissions Inventory Overview Nov 4, VISTAS is evaluating visibility and sources of fine particulate mass in the Southeastern US View NE from.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 2 T. W. Tesche Dennis.
Using CMAQ-AIM to Evaluate the Gas-Particle Partitioning Treatment in CMAQ Chris Nolte Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
October 1-3, th Annual CMAS Meeting1 Effects of Liquid Water on Secondary Inorganic Aerosol in Central California During a Winter Episode 1 Planning.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Impact of high resolution modeling on ozone predictions in the Cascadia region Ying Xie and Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Department of.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
SJV PM10 SIP Modeling & Data Analysis December 5, 2002 Policy Committee Meeting.
Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.
CMAS Conference 2011 Comparative analysis of CMAQ simulations of a particulate matter episode over Germany Chapel Hill, October 26, 2011 V. Matthias, A.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
Modeling Regional Haze in Big Bend National Park with CMAQ Betty Pun, Christian Seigneur & Shiang-Yuh Wu AER, San Ramon Naresh Kumar EPRI, Palo Alto CMAQ.
October 1-3, th Annual CMAS Meeting1 Impacts of Ethanol Fuel on PM Concentrations in Northern California during a Winter Episode 1 Planning and Technical.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF MADRID: A NEW AEROSOL MODULE IN MODELS-3/CMAQ Yang Zhang*, Betty Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shiang-Yuh Wu and Christian.
Evaluating temporal and spatial O 3 and PM 2.5 patterns simulated during an annual CMAQ application over the continental U.S. Evaluating temporal and spatial.
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency OZONE SIP MODELING and DATA ANALYSIS Policy Committee Meeting John DaMassa Saffet Tanrikulu.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
October 1-3, th Annual CMAS Meeting Comparison of CMAQ and CAMx for an Annual Simulation over the South Coast Air Basin Jin Lu 1, Kathleen Fahey.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
1 Prepared by Neil J.M. Wheeler and Kenneth J. Craig Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California for the Fifth Annual Community Modeling and Analysis.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study: Update March 17, 1999 Air & Waste Management Association Conference.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Response of fine particles to the reduction of precursor emissions in Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China Juan Li 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yang Gao 1, Yun-Fat Lam.
Pearl River Delta (PRD) The distribution of city clusters in China Analysis and numerical simulation on a server Fan Qi 1,Yu Wei 1, Luo Xuyu 1, (1. Department.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CCOS 2000 Model Intercomparison: Summary of.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency CCOS STATUS REPORT Policy Committee Meeting Saffet Tanrikulu, Ph.D. October 25, 2002.
Using Linked Global and Regional Models to Simulate U.S. Air Quality in the Year 2050 Chris Nolte, Alice Gilliland Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division,
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency March 13, 2003Presentation to the Policy Committee1 Ozone SIP Modeling and Data Analysis:
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder
Models-3/CMAQ Applications in California
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Simulation of Ozone and PM in Southern Taiwan
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
Presentation transcript:

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting1 Photochemical Modeling Investigation of an Extended Winter PM Episode in Central California 1. Air Resources Board, California Environmental Protection Agency 2. Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California at 2 Davis 3. Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Univ. California at Davis 4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Davis # Now at Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University Jinyou Liang 1, Ajith Kaduwela 1,2, K. Max Zhang 3,#, Qi Ying 1, Michael Kleeman 4, and Anthony Wexler 2,3,4

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting2 Modeling Approach Use data from California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) – MM5 meteorology with FDDA (NWS data) ARB/UC Davis emissions inventory Several AQ modeling approaches –CMAQ (with ARB modifications) –CMAQ-UCD –CMAQ-MADRID –CIT/UCD

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting3 Meteorology Model Performance MBMGE Wind speed (ms -1 )0.49 (0.5)1.53 (0.5) Wind direction (º)3.54 (10)57.21 (30) Temperature (K)0.76 (0.5)2.5 (2)

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting4

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting5

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting6

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting7

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting8 ARB CMAQ Model Setup 4 km 2 horizontal grid (185x185) with 15 vertical layers up to 15 km Internal mixture, modal approach, SAPRC99_ae3_aq Some code modifications ~22-day run on 16-CPU Linux cluster in ~2 days

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting9 PM 2.5 Mass Grid Cell Best Match within 49 Cells 49-Cell Average

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting10 PM Mass and Key Components mFEmFBR n=0n=3n=0n=3n=0n=3 NH NO SO 4 = TC PM PM

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting11 Inorganic Gas Species mFEmFBR n=0n=3n=0n=3n=0n=3 CO HNO NH NO NO O3O SO

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting12 Organic Gas Species mFEmFBR n=0n=3n=0n=3n=0n=3 ALK ALK ALK ALK ALK ARO ARO OLE OLE TERP

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting13 Individual Components – Domain

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting14 Individual Components – FRS

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting15 Nitrate at Fresno

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting16 Individual Components – ANGI

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting17 Nitrate at Angiola

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting18 Individual Components – BAK

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting19 Nitrate at Bakersfield

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting20 24-Hour PM Bakersfield

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting21 Control Strategy The dominant component of PM 2.5 was NH 4 NO 3 During this episode, NH 4 NO 3 was –most sensitive to NO x controls –less sensitive to anthropogenic VOC controls –least sensitive to NH 3 controls Carbonatious matter, which was dominant where wood burning was prevalent, was mostly primary Sulfate was not a major component

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting22 Next Steps Improvements to emissions Improved methods for meteorological modeling Improvements to chemical mechanisms Evaluation of aloft model performance Mass conservation/consistency in meteorology and air quality models and related issues Modeling of an entire year or longer Use of satellite products for model inputs and evaluation Corroboration of modeled results

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting23 Acknowledgments We thank –Kemal Gürer for generating episodic meteorology fields using MM5 –Kasia Turkiewicz for her assistance in understanding and utilizing the observational data –Paul Allen for his development of long-term emissions inventories

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting24 DISCLAIMER The contents of this presentation does not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the California Air Resources Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting25 International Conference on Atmospheric Chemical Mechanisms December 6-8, 2006, just before the AGU meeting in San Francisco (with events planned for the weekend) Held at University of California, Davis Impressive list of U.S. and international invited speakers Information and registration at ConfHome.cfm?confid=264 ConfHome.cfm?confid=264