FHWA Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse Karen Scurry – FHWA Office of Safety Daniel Carter – UNC HSRC Shawn Troy – NCDOT CMF Clearinghouse Webinar,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Advertisements

Strategic Highway Safety Plan/Developing Local Road Safety Plans Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Safety.
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
NCDOT Usage of CMF Clearinghouse for CRF’s Shawn A. Troy, PE December 13, 2012.
FUTURE CMF RESEARCH AND CHALLENGES Traffic Records Forum October 27, 2014 Daniel Carter, UNC HSRC.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
Crash Modification Factor Development: Data Needs and Protocols Raghavan Srinivasan Daniel Carter UNC Highway Safety Research Center.
Overview  Improving highway safety is a priority for all state transportation departments.  Key roadway characteristics can be used to identify sections.
Highway Infrastructure and Operations Safety Research Needs (NCHRP 17-48) Prime Contractor: UNC HSRC Subcontractors: VHB Jim Bonneson Geni Bahar, NAVIGATS.
Spring  Crash modification factors (CMFs) are becoming increasing popular: ◦ Simple multiplication factor ◦ Used for estimating safety improvement.
CIAO Columbia International Affairs Online A Wealth of Information in International Affairs.
Scientific Investigation vs. Technological Design
How to Create a Book Purchase Request using Books in Print?
Quick Start Guide: Filters Advanced Learn about: 1.What filters are and their functionality 2.How to create a filter using Samples, Equipment & Labels.
Maggie Neave, Development Manager OCN Eastern Region Understanding Units Demystifying the language and assessment criteria.
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
SPF SIG State-Level Evaluation COMMUNITY LEVEL INSTRUMENT (CLI): PART 2.
Sociology 3322a. “…the systematic assessment of the operation and/or outcomes of a program or policy, compared to a set of explicit or implicit standards.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
SCOHTS STRATEGIC PLAN Goal 5 – Workforce Development.
AASHTO and the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) A Strategic Approach to Implementation Priscilla Tobias, PE State Safety Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation.
Network Screening 1 Module 3 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho.
A GENERIC PROCESS FOR REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING Chapter 2 1 These slides are prepared by Enas Naffar to be used in Software requirements course - Philadelphia.
Selecting Countermeasures 1 Module 5 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise, Idaho.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Safety Analysis in a Data-Limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, 2013 Boise, Idaho PILOT WORKSHOP AT NLTAPA Annual Meeting Train the Trainers 1.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 16 Experimental Research Proposals.
Introduction: Overview of Roadway Safety Management Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho 1 Module.
Science Fair How To Get Started… (
Preliminary Results – Not for Citation Strengthening Institutions Program Webinar on Competitive Priority on Evidence April 11, 2012 Note: These slides.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
Census Quality: another dimension! Paper for Q2008 conference, Rome Louisa Blackwell Quality Assurance Manager, 2011 Census.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES A BRIEF SUMMARY.
4 1 SEARCHING THE WEB Using Search Engines and Directories Effectively New Perspectives on THE INTERNET.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
E N T E R P R I S E Developing Consistency in ITS Safety Solutions – Intersection Warning Systems Project Overview December 2011.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Calibrating Highway Safety Manual Equations for Application in Florida Dr. Siva Srinivasan, Phillip Haas, Nagendra Dhakar, and Ryan Hormel (UF) Doug Harwood.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Advancing Safety through SAFETEA-LU Michael Halladay FHWA Office of.
ITE District 6 Annual Meeting 1 Implementing a Web-based Transportation Data Management System Prepared for: ITE District 6 Annual Meeting Honolulu, Hawaii.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
Highway Infrastructure and Operations Safety Research Needs (NCHRP 17-48) Prime Contractor: UNC Highway Safety Research Center Subcontractors: VHB Jim.
Impact of Intersection Angle on Safety HSIS Annual Liaison Meeting David Harkey, Bo Lan, Daniel Carter, Raghavan Srinivasan, Anusha Patel Nujjetty May.
Cable Median Barrier with Inside Shoulder Rumble Strips on Divided Roads Raghavan Srinivasan, Bo Lan, & Daniel Carter, UNC Highway Safety Research Center.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
DPS 201 Add Date Here DESIGNING FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ADD LOCATION HERE.
SHSP INTERSECTION EMPHASIS AREA. Emphasis Area Definition  The term intersection crash is defined as a crash which occurs just before, just after or.
Overview of the Final Report and Findings from the Review of Sampling Methods in Extrapolated New Base-Year Generation Studies May 11-12, 2004.
SDA Formulas Online Webinar Please use the mute button or press #6 on your phones to mute the teleconference line If you have questions or technical problems.
SDA Formulas Online webinar Tomika Moore Senior Chemist, Nonbeverage Products Laboratory September 13, 2012.
A2 Agreement Trial ICT November Key Points from Moderation  Majority of centres applied the assessment criteria successfully  Tasks selected and.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Are They Really Teachers? Virginia Baldwin Dr. Michael Anderson University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
BEST PRACTICES IN LIBRARY INSTRUCTION FORUM November 7, 2007
NDOT HSM Nevda Transportation Conference
FHWA Bicycle and Pedestrian Program
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
Current and Upcoming Features
Using CMF’s in Benefit/Cost Analysis and Project Prioritization
Misapplications of CMFs
CMF Resources and Development Course
The Pennsylvania CMF Guide & PennDOT HSM Analysis Tool
CMF Tune Up: Resources, Methods, and Real World Applications of CMFs
Contributing Factors for Focus Crash Types and Facility Types Raghavan Srinivasan University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center (UNC HSRC)
Presentation transcript:

FHWA Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse Karen Scurry – FHWA Office of Safety Daniel Carter – UNC HSRC Shawn Troy – NCDOT CMF Clearinghouse Webinar, 12/13/12

Introduction What is the CMF Clearinghouse? What is the purpose of the Clearinghouse? –Provide CMFs to users –Provide information and education on how to use CMFs –Link to other CMF resources Why are we here? Housekeeping

Agenda What is a CMF? Where does the information come from? Searching on the CMF Clearinghouse Interpreting search results Using search results North Carolina example Study details Demonstrations –Searches –User questions/scenarios

What is a Crash Modification Factor? A CMF is a multiplicative factor –Indicates the proportion of crashes that would be expected after implementing a countermeasure. Example: CMF = 0.8 CRF vs. CMF –Crash reduction factor (20%) –Crash modification factor (0.8)

What is the purpose of a CMF? The purpose of a CMF is to estimate the number of crashes expected after implementing a countermeasure. –Capture the greatest gain with limited funds. Identify most cost-effective strategy. Identify most cost-effective locations. –Compare safety consequences among various alternatives. –Compare results of new analyses with existing CMFs to check reasonableness. –Check validity of assumptions in cost-benefit analyses.

Scope Clearinghouse contains CMFs from studies that are: –Crash based –Focused on infrastructure characteristics or modifications (i.e., engineering) –Focused on producing a CMF –Explicitly reporting a CMF

Original Sources Highway Safety Manual Knowledge Document (1 st edition) FHWA Desktop Reference Guide for Crash Reduction Factors

Regularly Reviewed Sources Transportation Research Board papers Journal articles (ASCE, ITE, etc.) Other research reports (open TRID search) State research reports User submitted studies

Critical Review Process Purpose –Gather details about studies and CMFs –Evaluate quality and determine if included in Clearinghouse Preliminary review –Determine if study is eligible for Clearinghouse –Gather all applicable data on the study and CMFs Critical review –Examine data and establish star quality rating

Clearinghouse Review Process Structured but subjective process Star rating – what it is, what it isn’t Star quality rating criteria (Excellent, Fair, Poor) 1.Study design 2.Sample size 3.Standard error 4.Potential bias 5.Data source

Searching on the Clearinghouse Quick search and advanced search Search terms –Match all words, match any words, match exact phrase –Blank searches Narrowing fields –“All” returns only CMFs addressing “all” types/severities

Interpreting Search Results What is displayed in the search results? Why do some CMFs look the same? From search results to CMF details Missing data – dependent on study author Excel output HSM indications

Using Search Results Factors in choosing a CMF –Crash type and severity –Facility type –Star rating –Others: AADT range, state of origin, etc. APPLICABILITY is key Science of CMFs course

Guest Speaker Shawn Troy, NCDOT Safety Evaluation Group

Study Details Details on original study Shows all CMFs produced by the study

Demonstration Searches Left turn lane installation HAWK signal J-turns Bicycle lanes and superelevation

HAWK signal (pedestrian hybrid beacon)

J-turn

Wrap up Newsletter sign up User feedback is important NHI courses available –Application of Crash Reduction Factors (course FHWA-NHI ) –Science of Crash Reduction Factors (course FHWA- NHI certification for continuing education credit Future webinars

Questions? Karen Scurry, P.E. FHWA Office of Safety Programs