WP 3: Human Performance Metrics 10 Oct 2002 Brian Hilburn.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
Advertisements

Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group Part 1: Usability Testing.
1 Results - Experience of Participating Air Traffic Controller By T. Symmans EUROCONTROL.
1 Validation & Measurement Methods for the PHARE Demonstrations R A Whitaker Validation Project Leader.
1 centre dÉtudes de la navigation aérienne COMMON METRICS FRAMEWORK FOR ATM PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING Almira Williams, CSSI Inc.
Human Performance Metrics for ATM Validation Brian Hilburn NLR Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
CARE ASAS Validation Framework. Partners CARE ASAS Board - Francis Casaux EURCONTROL - Mick van Gool, Ulrich Borkenhagen Consortium Partners Aena, Isdefe,
Performance Requirements – Dynamic Density & Dynamic Resectorization Concepts Rich Jehlen Manager, Air Traffic Planning Division Toulouse June, 2002.
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
© 2002 EUROCONTROL 1 One Sky for Europe EUROCONTROL CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION FRAMEWORK DISSEMINATION FORUM Validation Data Repository.
CARE ASAS Validation Framework System Performance Metrics 10th October 2002 M F (Mike) Sharples.
FAA/Eurocontrol TIM 9 on Performance Metrics – INTEGRA Rod Gingell 16 May 2002.
The EMERALD RTD Plan and the ASAS Validation Framework R P (Bill) Booth 10 October 2002.
Market Research Ms. Roberts 10/12. Definition: The process of obtaining the information needed to make sound marketing decisions.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A The Transition Towards Free Flight: A Human Factors Evaluation of.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A The Free Flight Deck Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) S-7, “Flight.
Department of Psychology Work-, Organisational-, and Environmental Psychology Copyright: K. Wolfgang Kallus 2006 Overview on Human Factors Tools for Aviation.
Presentation Styles Balancing Function And Fashion Ben Carson Rajesh Golla Sunil D’souza.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. 2 FJK User-Centered Design and Development Instructor: Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Dept.
User Testing & Experiments. Objectives Explain the process of running a user testing or experiment session. Describe evaluation scripts and pilot tests.
The art and science of measuring people l Reliability l Validity l Operationalizing.
Evaluation Adam Bodnar CPSC 533C Monday, April 5, 2004.
Jesper Kjeldskov & Jan Stage Department of Computer Science Aalborg University Denmark New Techniques for Usability Evaluation of Mobile Systems.
6th Framework Programme Thematic Priority Aeronautics and Space.
Data-collection techniques. Contents Types of data Observations Event logs Questionnaires Interview.
Ymir Vigfusson Adam Silberstein Brian Cooper Rodrigo Fonseca.
User Interface Design Chapter 11. Objectives  Understand several fundamental user interface (UI) design principles.  Understand the process of UI design.
1 Development of Valid and Reliable Case Studies for Teaching, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Other Purposes Margaret Lunney, RN, PhD Professor College of.
Deirdre Bonini Integra S/A Denmark Eurocontrol Experimental Centre
Conducting a User Study Human-Computer Interaction.
‘One Sky for Europe’ EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 VALIDATION DATA REPOSITORY Overview.
1 Enabling Large Scale Network Simulation with 100 Million Nodes using Grid Infrastructure Hiroyuki Ohsaki Graduate School of Information Sci. & Tech.
Program Evaluation. Program evaluation Methodological techniques of the social sciences social policy public welfare administration.
ASSTAR User Forum #1 Rome 4th April 2006 ASAS-TN2 Second Workshop ASSTAR Safety Approach and Preliminary Issues Dr Giuseppe GRANIERO, SICTA
Computerised Air Traffic Management Tools - Benefits and Limitations OMAR BASHIR (March 2005)
CARE/ASAS Validation Framework Guidelines & Case Studies Mark Watson NATS.
Paradigmatic issues Positivist and critical/interpretive research Qualitative and quantitative research Induction and deduction Experimental and non-experimental.
Survey of Traffic and Radar Controller Communication and Workload
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, April 2007 G2G project G2G project : ASPA S&M experiments and main validation results Marinella Leone
International Civil Aviation Organization Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP) – Framework for global planning H. Sudarshan SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi -WP/7 Workshop.
Projects EMERALD and EMERTA EMERALD WP5 The Specific case of ASAS/ADS-B.
Evaluation and metrics: Measuring the effectiveness of virtual environments Doug Bowman Edited by C. Song.
KLM - Operations at Schiphol: how does ASAS fit? ASAS TN2: final seminar, April, Paris E. Kleiboer Sr. Manager Strategy ATM.
1 Evaluation of Cooperative Web Caching with Web Polygraph Ping Du and Jaspal Subhlok Department of Computer Science University of Houston presented at.
IAT 814 Introduction to Visual Analytics Symbols vs Perceptual Science Sep 11, 2013IAT 8141.
CARE/ASAS Validation Framework Ros Eveleigh Activity 2 Project Manager NATS.
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
1 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Jan Van Doorn Director EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre April 2006 ASAS / ADS-B: Implementation.
Malmö 5 September. 27 th 2005 NUP ITP TT Reykjavik “NUP -- ITP”
A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic.
WERST – Methodology Group
ENAV S.p.A. 1 AENA / ENAV / DFS / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Malmoe, ASAS /ADS-B: SAMPLE ANSPs STRATGIES & EXPECTATIONS.
© 2003, Carla Ellis Vague idea “groping around” experiences Hypothesis Model Initial observations Experiment Data, analysis, interpretation Results & final.
Vague idea “groping around” experiences Hypothesis Model Initial observations Experiment Data, analysis, interpretation Results & final Presentation Experimental.
UCI Large-Scale Collection of Application Usage Data to Inform Software Development David M. Hilbert David F. Redmiles Information and Computer Science.
1 Evaluation of Cooperative Web Caching with Web Polygraph Ping Du and Jaspal Subhlok Department of Computer Science University of Houston presented at.
Www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de Institute of Computer Science Chair of Communication Networks Prof. Dr.-Ing. P. Tran-Gia Simulation Framework for Live.
6. (supplemental) User Interface Design. User Interface Design System users often judge a system by its interface rather than its functionality A poorly.
고려대학교 산업경영공학과 IMEN 315 인간공학 1. INTRODUCTION. 고려대학교 산업경영공학과 IMEN 315 인간공학.
The Relationship Between Traffic Stability and Capacity for Decentralized Airspace 7th International Conference for Research in Air Transportation June.
Measurement-based Design
Chris Shaw, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/7
Chris Shaw, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
Karim Zeghal EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
Management of Multiple Dynamic Human Supervisory Control Tasks
Evaluation Objective vs. subjective Matching representation to:
MEASURING CAREER READINESS
CSM18 Usability Engineering
1. INTRODUCTION.
Presentation transcript:

WP 3: Human Performance Metrics 10 Oct 2002 Brian Hilburn

Goals Extract set of ASAS applicable HumPerf Metrics Outline application methods (guidance) Provide primary references Mapped onto: - Application (eg Airborne Sep.) - Validation Type (eg Realtime, etc) - Agent (ATC vs Flightdeck) - Human Performance Area

Human Performance Areas –Workload –Situation Awareness –System Monitoring –Teamwork –Trust –Usability and User Acceptance –Human Error

Parallel WP2 (System Metrics) –SYSTEM versus HUMAN performance? Distinction sometimes arbitrary –Performance Areas differ –Implicit links to Goals human performance influences SAFETY etc

WP 3 Deliverable ASAS f 1 Air Ground Wrkld SA etc Obj Subj Fast t Real t ASAS f n....

Methods Literature review - ASAS sources (transatlantic FreeFlight) - ATM validation efforts (INTEGRA, RHEA,…) - Aviation Human Factors - Human Factors general Distillation of methods and metrics Guidelines Including general Measurement Issues

General Measurement Issues Validation test subjects Experimental design in validation Analytical techniques Balancing validation realism & data collection

Format of Metrics

Guidance: Literature Consensus and Expert Opinion... EXAMPLE

NASA Task Load Index Heart Rate Variability Pupil Diameter Human Computer Trust Scale Auditory Choice Secondary Task Response Time Situation Awareness Rating Technique Blink latency Choice Reaction Time secondary task etc……… Human Performance Metrics

Choosing a Metric –ObjectivityObjective / Subjective –IntrusiveHigh / Low –CostHigh / Low –ReliabilityHigh / Low –ValidityHigh / Low –UtilityHigh / Low –ExpertiseHigh / Low –ResourceHigh / Low

A Worked Example... Given: Airborne Spacing application (in-descent spacing scenario) Controlled airspace Study: Real time Question: Transient workload peaks? Issues: Time resolution, intrusiveness, cost

Applying the Framework

General Guidance

l Link between System and Human Performance metrics l What are my goals? l Relationship to higher validation goals l Guidance, not a cookbook l Ideally used in conjunction w SYSTEM metrics Conclusions