Students at the Center: A Framework for Instructional Decision Making Presented By Beth Tsoumas & Merryl Brownlow.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAS and RTII ED 517 Spring Edward G. Rendell, Governor Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak, Secretary of Education Standards Aligned System Integration Trainer.
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Stepping Stones to Using Data Measures of Academic Progress ® (MAP ® ) The names of other companies and their products mentioned in this presentation are.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Assessment & Data Driven Instruction Session 1: What Data Do We Have? Session 2: What Does the Data Mean? Session 3: What Do We Do With It?
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
1. PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation – PBIS requires some.
Van Hise Elementary School Improvement Plan (SIP) UPDATE October 29, 2013.
AZLEARNS AF Accountability NWEA MAP Student needs Parent conferences State test proficiency Student growth Special Programs Bottom 25% RIT( Rausch Index.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Arshall Public Schools Walking the Talk: The Role of Leadership in Implementing an RtI Framework Presented By: Barb Sramek, District Administrator Barb.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Our Road to Success PIONEER SCHOOL DISTRICT. Student Demographics  Enrollment 734 students pre-K through 8 th  2.1% American Indian/Alaskan Native 
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
RtII for Middle School Bethann M. McCain; RtII Consultant
School Improvement Plans School Improvement  The Vision  Progress  Plan Components  Problem-Solving What is our vision for school improvement.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
D62 Response to Intervention
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Educational Program Review Mrs. Diane Fisher, CPA Chief Executive Officer High School Cafeteria March 4, 2014.
Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: Some Models to Consider Laura.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
CULTURES OF COACHING AND MENTORING Principal’s role in Coaching and Mentoring teachers.
Understanding MTSS HOW MTSS DIFFERS FROM RTI
RtII Response to Instruction and Intervention paTTAN.
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic, Resource Teacher.
PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation.
Los Angeles Unified School District “MyData 201- Data-Based Decision Making, RtI2 and MyData” Co-hosted by your RtI and MyData Teams
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Growth and Goals Measures of Academic Progress ® (MAP ® ) Measures of Academic Progress, MAP, and DesCartes: A Continuum of Learning are registered trademarks.
Exploring with MAP Pointers Run Elementary School November 2015.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Educators have collaborative and deep conversations about students, standards, essential learnings, student work, primary and secondary resources, rigor,
MAP Measurement of Academic Progress. What information does MAP provide classroom teachers? Performance data linked to Ohio standards A “RIT Score” that.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
Response to Intervention: The Georgia Student Achievement Pyramid of Interventions October 22, 2008.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
January 25, 2012 Special Education Opportunities Review Progress Report.
March 11, Update: DOK and ELs LEARN training.
Evaluating Growth Patterns. Setting the Stage  Welcome/Introductions  Structure for the day  Materials review R A M Materials Reports Activity M A.
October 17, What is the primary purpose(s) and responsibility of our committee?
Using PLCs to support MTSS Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012 Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Charter School Contract Outcomes: Establishing Clear Outcomes for Your Performance Contract Shya Tran and Paula Higgins Minnesota Department of Education.
The Principles of Data Use in a RtI / 3-Tier Model
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Mountain Park Elementary School
Data in Reading Club: Understanding scores, goals, & more Fall 2013
TRUMBULL COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER
Using data for instructional decision-making
Mountain Park Elementary School
New Prospect Elementary School
School Strategic Planning 2022
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
S.T.E.A.M. Focused Instruction:
Presentation transcript:

Students at the Center: A Framework for Instructional Decision Making Presented By Beth Tsoumas & Merryl Brownlow

School Improvement Plan Focus on the Student Achievement Goal NWEA becomes the primary data source for measuring success Examine current performance Determine area of opportunity at the building level

Spring 04/05/06 Reading

Spring 05/06 Reading - Special Education

Spring 05/06 Reading - GG ELL

GG All Reading Growth

GG Special Education Reading Growth

GG ELL Reading Growth

READING GROWTH ALL STUDENTSELL STUDENTS

OVERALL RIT PERFORMANCE vs. HIGH ACHIEVING NORMS READING ALL STUDENTS SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

READING PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS MEETING GROWTH TARGETS

School Improvement Plan

Teacher Goal Setting Professional Development Goals align with School Improvement Plan –Focus of the goal becomes how the professional development activity impacts students –Goal outcomes are measured by impact on students

Overcoming Barriers BarriersStrategies to Overcome Barriers TimeData Days/Faculty Meeting Structure MoneySIP Budget -consider resources people Building Budget - think creatively Professional Development Dollars Other Factors to Consider: Training/Resources Access to Appropriate Instructional Materials Staff Ownership and Trust in Instructional Decision-Making Triangulation of Data - What other sources do you have?

Data Days Release time for each team to work with data Empowering teachers to use data in context Administration plays support role vs directing Collaboration with special area teachers (ELL, Special Ed, Fine Arts, etc.)

Results of Data Day ELL focus…making a difference for 3 students –Cross referencing NWEA & ACCESS Guided Reading focus…differentiating for various RIT band groups Special Education focus… –Cross referencing NWEA & CBM data –Determine tiers for Problem Solving

Student Goal Setting Student Impact Better understanding of student needs and instructional levels Individualized Goal Setting for Students Student ownership in the learning process Progress monitoring shared by teacher and student Ultimately, improved achievement

Next Steps… Progress Monitoring –Reporting out of Data Day focus at a faculty meeting –Winter NWEA in reading for all students –Data Day in late February to monitor and adjust –Spring analysis to determine success of action plans in the SIP

Questions