Fire resistance tests at SP RESS-4-10 Rev.01. Three sets of tests were conducted –Mock-up chassi, varying fuel, pre-heating time, direct exposure time.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cold Weather Operations & Winterization Kits C172R & C172S
Advertisements

J. Amdahl,, NTNU Dept, Marine Technology Beregning av ulykkeslaster for offshore stålkonstruksjoner – NFS Accidental Fires Design criteria.
Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
Impacts of Inductive and Conductive Interference due to High-Voltage Lines on Coating Holidays of Isolated Metallic Pipelines René Braunstein.
Design Steps : Furnace Of A Steam Generator P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Selection of Geometric Parameters….
Introduction Hydrogen has been successfully used in industry for decades, but current safety codes and standards must be updated for the situations encountered.
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1–2: General actions – Actions on structures exposed to fire Part of the One Stop Shop program.
DISTILLATION.
NHTSA Office of Applied Vehicle Safety Research Crashworthiness Division Li-ion Based Rechargeable Energy Storage System (RESS) Safety Research Programs.
Fires and Explosions In OR and ICU By Professor Dr. Mohammed Saeed Abd El Aziz.
Task 3.4. Validation of horizontal solutions Fire and mechanical characterization.
ACCIDENT IN WORKPLACE Department of Public Health Faculty of Medicine, UNPAD.
Proposal of Fire Resistance Test
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures –
A Parameter Study of Fast Cookoff. Purpose 1.Examine the effect of five parameters on the incident heat flux to an energetic device A.Fire Size B.Container.
14.4 Nuclear Energy FIGURE 16: Structure of the atom.
TF8: Research IF EVS-GTR Battery System Test Project and Test Methods’ Adaption to heavy /commercial Vehicles.
Controlling Hazardous Energy
1 Inspection and Testing Approved for Public Release.
PRESENTED BY ALBERT.N Under the guidance of Mr.N.RAMANUJAM M.E (Ph.d) (Associate Prof/Hod- Mech) DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING E.G.S.PILLAY ENGINEERING.
1 29 CFR THE CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY.
Korean Research Results “Fire resistance test” June 2, 2015 Korea Transportation Safty Authority (TS) Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute (KATRI)
FRANCE1 Informal adhoc ELSA Working Group Geneva, December 9th, 2009 Proposal from France based on - Informal document GRSP n° ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2009/16.
Presented by: Tony Serdenes, Greenman-Pedersen
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1–2: General actions – Actions on structures exposed to fire Part of the One Stop Shop program Annex A (informative)
Explosion An explosion is a rapid expansion of gases resulting in a rapid moving pressure or shock wave. The expansion can be mechanical or it can be.
A comparative study of test methods for assessment of fire safety performance of bus interior materials Presentation at GRSG 97, October 20-23, 2009, Geneva.
Review of the New England “Mini-Pilot” DHP Evaluation Why we ignore this study.
WIND TUNNEL METHOD Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce CHASSIS DYNO PRESCRIPTION.
Treatments and methods to manipulate stand structure suitable for fuel reduction.
Page June 2015 OICA position on venting EVSTF-04-11e.
TF8 work report for 9 th EVS-GTR conference Changchun.
EVPC1 Informal adhoc EVPC Working Group Geneva, may 18 th, 2010 Proposal from FRANCE based on EVPC informal group work Informal document No. GRSP
2015/9/29 Japan Automobile Research Institute 1 Asian Round Robin Test ~ Interim report ~ 12th WLTP-IWG 29 Sep – 1 Oct 2015 prepared by Japan WLTP-12-32e.
TF5 – Status report on thermal propagation EVS-GTR 9 th IWG meeting Changchun, China 2015/9/17.
Week 9.  Would you live in an area prone to wildfires? If so, where?  What level of risk from wildfires is acceptable to you? (How would you know if.
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE FIRE AND FIRE SCENARIOS When the flame impacts the ceiling the effect of the fire is given by an impinging flux. A procedure has.
Fire Resistance of the Load Bearing Structure of High Bay and Instrument Halls Fire and Egress Safety Analysis of the Instrument Halls Björn Yndemark WSP.
Shape Factor Example 2 The shape factor can be modeled as a thermal resistance where Rt=1/kS. Therefore, it can be integrated into the electrical circuit.
Rechargeable Energy Storage systems (REESS) requirements Gerd Kellermann, Germany Informal document GRSP (51 st GRSP, May 2012,
Shape Factor Example The shape factor can be modeled as thermal resistance as R t =1/kS, Therefore, it can be integrated with the electric circuit analog.
OICA observation on venting The 7 th all TF F2F Meetings EVS in Tokyo JAPAN 1.
S-244 Field Observer & Fire Effects Monitor Fire Effects Monitoring Lesson 2: Methods for Measuring Fire Effects Photo: Marshel Moy.
JLAB Pressure Systems Considerations Ed Daly. Outline Introduction Federal Law - 10CFR851 Compliance JLAB Pressure Systems Program –Complies with 10CFR851,
Samuel Nii Tettey (Ergonomist). At the end of Session, participants should be able to: - Identify fire problems at the enterprise level and Conduct Fire.
Combustion Processes. Colorado Fallen Firefighters Memorial May 7, 2011.
Progress report of TFG 7 “Fire resistance test” Mar. 3rd, 2016 Korea Transportation Safty Authority (TS) Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute.
Comparison among China, OICA draft for HD and R100 OICA TF8 June 7, EVSTF-08-42e.
Conformity assessment – some examples: cement, high pressure laminates, ceramic tiles.
Electric Vehicles Safety Global Technical Regulation Phase 1
Cupola Furnace.
Introduction CSWIP (Certification Scheme for Welding and Inspection Personnel) is administered by The Welding Institute. The CSWIP certification process.
Minimum Cooling Time for Metallurgy Applications
Informal adhoc ELSA Working Group
Structural Fire Engineering, October 2015, Dubrovnik, Croatia
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
‘Proposal of Fire resistance test’
Informal document No. 9 (50th GRE, 7-11 April 2003, agenda item 3.2.)
Japan research of thermal propagation test
The effect of varying fire scenarios on fire resistance ratings of reinforced concrete columns Khaled Sharawi CE 808.
Sandia National Laboratories
Korea Research Results “Fire resistance test”
Fabric Air Dispersion Systems
IVECO Proposal for Revised CoP Procedure
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures –
Japan research of thermal propagation test
Control of Hazardous Energy
Changes in EN
Supplemental Test for Determination of CO2 Emissions under Regional Conditions Results from Telco Oct. 30th, 2014 (Iddo, Markus, Helge, Andreas)
The Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regulations 2016
Presentation transcript:

Fire resistance tests at SP RESS-4-10 Rev.01

Three sets of tests were conducted –Mock-up chassi, varying fuel, pre-heating time, direct exposure time and indirect exposure time. Tests were conducted to evaluate different procedures. –Temperature and Heat Release Rate depending on fuel (winter and summer 98 octane petrol and Heptane). Tests were conducted to assess different fuels. –Temperature as a function of height above fuel. Tests were conducted to establish suitable placement for a RESS in a component test.

Tests with mock-up chassi Test 1 swedish winter petrol, normal R34 procedure Test 2 same as test 1 Test 3 winter petrol, no pre-heating, 90 s direct exposure (without bricks), 60 s indirect exposure (with bricks) Test 4 winter petrol, no pre-heating 60 s direct exposure, 60 s indirect exposure Test 5 winter petrol, no pre-heating, 120s indirect exposure with bricks in place entire time, no cooling afterwards Test 6 repetition of test 1 Test 7, Heptane, normal R34 procedure

Tests with mock-up chassi The temperature was measured at 5 places on the ”chassi” Heat Release Rate was also measured

Conclusions test 1-7 Preheating makes some difference, the influence might be larger if the fuel is not kept at RT before ignition There is a stochaistic variation in exposure, suggest to increase direct exposure by 10 s to compensate for this and the exclusion of preheating Cooling afterwards influences the result, but is not a realistic scenario – suggested that it be removed based on this Having the bricks in place from the beginning, i.e indirect exposure during entire time, results in a slower heating but the end temperatue is about the same as in the normal procedure, suggested to retain heating with and without screen

Different Fuels Test 8 Swedish Winter Petrol Test 9 Same as test 8 Test 10 Heptane Test 11 Swedish Summer Petrol Three Plate thermometers (measures thermal impact) were mounted above the fuel surface Heat Release Rate was measured

Different Fuels CONCLUSION → Keep commercial fuel

Component test Test 12 pool 1.17 m diameter (1.1 m 2 ) winter petrol Test 13 pool 1.48 m diameter (1.7 m 2 ) winter petrol Test 14 pool 1.67 m diameter (2.2 m 2 ) winter petrol Temperature measured every 10 cm above pool Heat Release Rate measured

Component test About the same temperature above 50 cm CONCLUSION → place RESS at 50 cm

Acceptance criteria During Phase A to D of the test, the RESS shall exhibit no evidence of fire, rupture or explosion, as defined in Table X of this document. No dangerous voltages shall be available on the chassi or RESS Verification The fire, rupture and explosion criteria are verified by inspection. Indicators of fire, rupture or explosion include, but are not limited to: sudden increase in flame intensity or size, emission of projectiles, loud noise. Voltage levels towards ground shall be continuously measured during phase A to D. If relevant after fire testing, isolation resistance shall be checked according to Annex 1.