U SING ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES TO GUIDE LIBRARY SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS Diane Wahl Beth Avery Annie Downey University of North Texas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NYU Graduate Student Academic & Research Experience ARL Fall Forum Lucinda Covert-Vail & Carol A. Mandel 12 October 2007.
Advertisements

Utilizing LibQUAL+® to Identify Best Practices in Academic Research Library Web Site Design Raynna Bowlby Brinley Franklin Carolyn Lin.
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
Studying Distance Students: Methods, Findings, Actions Fifteenth Distance Learning Services Conference Memphis, Tennessee April 20, 2012 Beth Avery and.
Reading Rodski: User Surveys Revisited The 25 th IATUL Annual Conference Krakow 2004 Dr. Grace Saw University of Queensland Cybrary Brisbane, Australia.
Studying Ourselves: Libraries and the User Experience at UNT Diane Wahl.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Reading LibQUAL+ Results The University of Chicago Library LibQUAL+™ Survey Supervisors’ Meeting June 16, 2004.
Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
LibQUAL+® Lite at UNT Presented By Diane Wahl Texas Library Association Annual Conference Houston, Texas April 2, 2009.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
How Assessment Will Inform Our Future 1. Administration of on-going user surveys and focus groups to enhance reference services 2. Analysis of LibStats.
Understanding Users to Develop Better Library Services Nancy Fried Foster, Lead Anthropologist Susan Gibbons, Associate Dean River Campus Libraries University.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
IT Student Survey 2009 Your name here. Overview Over 1,400 responses were received. Students across all faculties, nationalities and years were represented.
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
SET UP SLIDE. Survey of Organizational Effectiveness Meeting July 13, 2001 Presentation by Dr. Karen Haynes, President University of Houston-Victoria.
Cumberland County: May 28 Oak Ridge: June 2 Roane County: June 4 Scott: June 4 Campbell: June 9 Knox: June 10 Loudon: June 11.
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
Library User Studies Hsin-liang Chen SLIS, Indiana University.
LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Instruction & Assessment Plan, Melissa Bowles-Terry April 4, 2011.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
Faculty Survey Results Buswell Memorial Library, 2014.
Proposition: Digital Collections Are Easier to Find and Use through DLF Aquifer’s American Social History Online Katherine Kott, Aquifer Director Library.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.
Faculty Information Needs: Online Survey at UCSF Gail Persily Janice Contini CNI, April 2007.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
Going Beyond The Numbers How We Are Benefiting From Our Experience With LibQUAL+® The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey Carolyn Gutierrez Associate.
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
Perceptions of Value and Value Beyond Perceptions Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.
New Faculty Orientation Seneca College Libraries Information Services Librarian Newnham Campus August 30, 2007.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Measurement and Assessment of Library Programs and Services Eileen E. Hitchingham Dean, University Libraries Virginia Tech The Changing.
Texas State University LibQUAL Survey 2015 Core Survey Section IC 1-8 Information Control Ray Uzwyshyn Director, Collections and Digital Services Texas.
Guiding Light: Leading a Campus Through Transition Karen Miles UC Berkeley Dec. 8, 2006 Sakai Conference.
LibQual at UAB Lister Hill Library Pat Higginbottom Associate Director for Public Services
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
Focus on SCONUL Institutions: Cranfield University – DCMT Campus Stephen Town.
Using LibQUAL+ to Rethink Public Services June 2003.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
Good, Fast, and Cheap: The Pioneering Reference Chat Service at the University of North Texas Presented by Martha Tarlton and Donna Arnold Music Library.
STRATEGIC SURVEYS FOR YOUR UNIVERSITY December 2014 ITHAKA S+R.
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
Reading Radar Charts.
Using LibQUAL+® as a Foundation for the Library’s Support of
Presentation transcript:

U SING ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES TO GUIDE LIBRARY SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS Diane Wahl Beth Avery Annie Downey University of North Texas

I SSUES WITH RESEARCH VALIDITY Theory problems Single Method problems Researcher problems Data problems

W HAT IS T RIANGULATION ? Validation or not Method 1 Method 2 Method 3

W HY T RIANGULATION ? Validation Balance Widen Deepen

W HERE W E S TARTED LibQUAL+ Survey 2009 Results Assessed problem areas by looking at items with largest superiority gaps Superiority gap = the difference between what is perceived and what is desired

L ARGEST O NLINE U SER S UPERIORITY G APS RankLibQUAL+ Survey ItemMean Score 1A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work The electronic information resources I need-1.15

F OLLOW U P F OCUS G ROUPS Summer 2009 Distance learners Improvements to online services will benefit on campus users as well as remote users Graduate students Supports university-wide focus on research

Online Student Focus Group Recommendations Increase the Libraries’ presence and visibility in Blackboard. Make the UNT Libraries’ website easier to search. Obtain, publicize, and provide instruction in the use of a discovery tool. Provide library instruction that doesn’t require being at the physical library. Communicate and collaborate more effectively with faculty members that teach online classes. C OMPARING L IB QUAL+ S URVEY AND F OCUS G ROUP R ESULTS FOR O NLINE S TUDENTS RankLibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps – Online Students 1A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 2Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 3Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources 4Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work 5The electronic information resources I need

C OMPARING L IB QUAL+ S URVEY AND F OCUS G ROUP R ESULTS FOR G RADUATE S TUDENTS RankLibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps – Graduate Students 1A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 2Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work 3Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 4Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources 5The electronic information resources I need Graduate Student Focus Group Recommendations Make information of interest to graduate students easier to find on the library website Improve communication with and outreach to graduate students. Increase graduate student participation in library workshops targeted to them. Customize reference services for each discipline.

E THNOGRAPHIC A NALYSIS BY A NTHROPOLOGY G RADUATE S TUDENTS Fall 2010 Graduate level Anthropology Dept. qualitative analysis classes One on campus and one online Used a variety of methods: Focus groups Interviews Observations

C OMPARING L IB QUAL+ S URVEY, F OCUS G ROUP & E THNOGRAPHIC R ESULTS FOR O NLINE S TUDENTS RankLibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps – Online Students 1 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 2 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 3 Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources 4Print and/or Electronic journal collections I require for my work 5The electronic information resources I need Online Student Focus Group Recommendations Increase the Libraries’ presence and visibility in Blackboard Make the UNT Libraries’ website easier to search Obtain, publicize, and provide instruction in the use of a discovery tool Provide library instruction that doesn’t require being at the physical library Communicate and collaborate more effectively with faculty members that teach online classes Anthro Class Recommendations Improve user experience with the UNT Libraries website; (includes problems with access tools) Improve library instruction Improve communication

C OMPARING L IB QUAL+ S URVEY, F OCUS G ROUP & E THNOGRAPHIC R ESULTS FOR O NLINE S TUDENTS Rank Spring 2009 LibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps – Online Students 1 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 2 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 3 Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources 4 Print and/or Electronic journal collections I require for my work 5 The electronic information resources I need Summer 2009 Online Student Focus Group Recommendations Increase the Libraries’ presence and visibility in Blackboard Make the UNT Libraries’ website easier to search Obtain, publicize, and provide instruction in the use of a discovery tool Provide library instruction that doesn’t require being at the physical library Communicate and collaborate more effectively with faculty members that teach online classes Fall 2010 Anthro Class Recommendations Improve user experience with the UNT Libraries website (includes problems with access tools) Improve library instruction Improve communication Rank Spring 2011 LibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps – Online Students 1 Online course support (readings, links, references) 2 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 3 Making me aware of library services 4 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 5 The electronic information resources I need

C OMPARING L IB QUAL+ S URVEY, F OCUS G ROUP & E THNOGRAPHIC R ESULTS FOR G RADUATE S TUDENTS RankSpring 2009 LibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps – Graduate Students 1 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 2Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work 3Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 4 Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources 5The electronic information resources I need Summer 2009 Graduate Student Focus Group Recommendations Make information of interest to graduate students easier to find on the library website Improve communication with and outreach to graduate students Increase graduate student participation in library workshops targeted to them Customize reference services for each discipline Fall 2010 Anthro Class Recommendations Improve user experience with the UNT Libraries website Improve library instruction Improve communication

C OMPARING L IB QUAL+ S URVEY, F OCUS G ROUP & E THNOGRAPHIC R ESULTS FOR G RADUATE S TUDENTS Rank Spring 2009 LibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps – Graduate Students 1 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 2 Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work 3 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 4 Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources 5 The electronic information resources I need Summer 2009 Graduate Student Focus Group Recommendations Make information of interest to graduate students easier to find on the library website Improve communication with and outreach to graduate students Increase graduate student participation in library workshops targeted to them Customize reference services for each discipline Fall 2010 Anthro Class Recommendations Improve user experience with the UNT Libraries website Improve library instruction Improve communication Rank Spring 2011 LibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps – Graduate Students 1 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 2 Quiet space for individual activities 3 Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work 4 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 5 The electronic information resources I need

W ILLIS L IBRARY O BSERVATION S TUDY Pilot study 1 st floor only One week in February times per day Basic Findings Average of 100 students on first floor at a time Low: 20 High: 172 Roughly ¼ of students using laptops at any given time Average # of workstations in use: 30 Low: 8 High: 59

T OTAL P ATRONS BY T IME OF D AY

P ATRONS A LONE OR I N G ROUPS – W EEKDAYS ONLY

C OMPARISON OF L IB Q UAL 2011 TO W ILLIS P ILOT O BSERVATION S TUDY 2011 LibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps A getaway for study, learning, or research Library space that inspires study and learning Quiet space for individual activities A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own Modern equipment that lets me easily access needed information A comfortable and inviting location

B RAINSTORMING AFTER O BSERVATIONS Recommended by Nancy Foster (Library Anthropologist) Brainstorm possible implications based on patterns of what students DO rather than what they say they want Under utilized areas – W136 and Forum Glassed in Poor light Don’t feel as comfortable; less feeling of student ownership Highly used areas Obviously for them + workstations = high use Relaxed feel Good light; open Outlets