Dr. Jon Milleman, Assistant Superintedent Jennifer Thomas, WTEA President MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Changes 2013-2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
___________________________ NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program North Carolina Alternate Assessment Academic Inventory.
Advertisements

Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.
Acknowledging and Honoring Quality Performance.  The purpose of the EAS process is to provide teachers with the opportunity to reflect on professional.
The teacher of each classroom is responsible for evaluating the individual student's progress toward the AKS as described in the guidelines below. Kindergarten.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Dr. Jon Milleman, Assistant Superintendent Sabra Gage, WTEA President MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information Review of Updates
Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) Summative Assessment and Professional Growth Goals Conferences June 2014 Webinar.
Important Points The SWF stands for Standard Workload Form. Workload is covered by Article 11 in the collective agreement. Your SWF is your personal contract.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Teacher Evaluation Model
New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information. Primary Evaluators All teachers will be assigned one Administrator to be the Primary Evaluator. The primary evaluator.
Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
RISE Principal Evaluation and Development System: Overview and Principal Effectiveness Rubric.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives AMAOs are achievement objectives for English learners that corporations must meet that receive Title III funds.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar November 17, 2014 Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Growing Success-Making Connections
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
Welcome – Please sign-in and sit with your Mentor Professional Growth Planning Process.
U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) Title VI, Section 504, Title II – Special Education and Limited English Proficient Students.
Introducing The Work Sampling System. What is Work Sampling? Authentic Performance Assessment Curriculum Embedded Instructional Assessment Authentic Performance.
Grading Guidelines for Secondary Schools
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
ERIKA HALL CENTER FOR ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION AT THE 2014 NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STUDENT ASSESSMENT NEW ORLEANS JUNE 25, 2014 The Role of a Theory of Action.
1 Intro to Dual Credit Programs: Policy and Program Requirements, 2013 May 2013.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Working Portfolios For Non Classroom Teachers. Agenda Determine Working Portfolio rubric Understand the performance levels and scoring Brainstorm possible.
Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Special Education Educator Evaluation and Professional Growth.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Grading Guidelines for Secondary Schools
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview August 4, 2015 and August 10, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
TAA2 Assessor Workshop Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
Grading Guidelines. These grading guidelines are for all of NISD to prepare you for college, the workplace, and personal success.
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information.  The primary evaluator will assign the final rating  The primary evaluator will take the lead on any Performance.
Framework In Action: Theory into Practice
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
TEM 4.0 For School Librarians Laurie Butler, Library Services Advisor 2014.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Community School Sponsor Evaluation Advisory Panel Final Recommendations.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
TPGES Overview Part II Jenny C. Ray PGES Consultant.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
Special Education Meeting November 5, 2013 ASC 3:30 TENNESSEE ROOM.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
PoHi TLE information.
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Leon LEADS Leon Evaluation And Development System
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Evaluation Information
Grading Students with Disabilities
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Jon Milleman, Assistant Superintedent Jennifer Thomas, WTEA President MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Changes

Overview Changes were made in response to feedback from both teachers and administrators We are seeking consistency in reporting of ratings from observations through the summative process We attempted to provide clarity regarding the inclusion/exclusion of students from special populations in the calculation of Primary and Secondary Measures

Overview We attempted to provide clarity regarding the attendance or enrollment of students and their inclusion/exclusion from the calculation of Primary and Secondary Measures We updated the Appendices of the Guidelines to reflect actual and current practice

Summative Deadlines Removed “prior” to May 15 Replaced with “by” May 15 By May 15 for teachers in years 1 & 2 with MSDWT By May 15 for teachers on a POA By seven (7) calendar days prior to the last teacher day for all others

Weighting Domain I = 20% Domain II = 45% Domain III = 15% Primary Measure = 12% Secondary Measure = 8% Performance Rubric = 80% Student Measures = 20%

Weighting This change results in our system functioning closer to the intent of the wording of Indiana Law. The law states that objective student measures must “significantly inform” the evaluation. In the future, we will consider weighting objective measures at the 25% level. The additional 5% weight could measure an “all school” measure, student feedback, or other options suggested by teachers or administration. All changes in this area will be discussed with WTEA representation.

Rating Scale Summative Calculator – Excel

Enrollment/Attendance Full Year Courses Assessment data of students continuously enrolled in a teacher’s classroom on or before the twentieth (20) student day will be included in the calculation of the Primary or Secondary Student Achievement Measure. The teacher may appeal to include students that enrolled after the twentieth student day or were not continuously enrolled in the teacher’s class prior to the administration of the assessment used for teacher evaluation. Appeals should be made to the primary evaluator.

Enrollment/Attendance Semester Courses Assessment data of students continuously enrolled in a teacher’s classroom on or before the tenth (10) student day of the semester will be included in the calculation of the Primary or Secondary Student Achievement Measure. The teacher may appeal to include students that enrolled after the twentieth student day or were not continuously enrolled in the teacher’s class prior to the administration of the assessment used for teacher evaluation. Appeals should be made to the primary evaluator.

ELL/Special Needs and Data General Education teachers shall exclude data for ELL’s in levels 1 and 2 when the Student Measure is an achievement based measure (i.e. A one time proficiency assessment that is summative in nature).

ELL/Special Needs and Data General Education teachers should assume all student data for students with an IEP who participate in ISTEP or IMAST will be included in ALL student achievement and growth data used for teacher evaluation. Data for these students will be included in all Primary and Secondary Student Achievement Measures. Prior to removal of any student data for evaluation purposes, the teacher must consult the primary evaluator. Student Achievement and Growth Data may be removed for those students participating in ISTAR. Prior to removal of any student data for evaluation purposes, the teacher must consult the primary evaluator.

Appendices Appendix B has been replaced with screenshots of OwnIt! – Reflecting the actual documentation used during observations Appendix C more clearly describes the use of the comment section as final documentation at the Post Observation Reflective Conference Appendix D describes in detail the uses for the comment boxes in the Summative Evaluation