TSB 1 ITU-T IPR Policy Presentation by Houlin ZHAO Director, TSB, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) at the Informal Forum Summit 3-4 December.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructions for the WG Chair l At Each Meeting, the Working Group Chair shall: l Show slides #1 and #2 of this presentation l Advise the WG membership.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0918r3 Submission September 2005 Emily Qi, et alSlide 1 Proposed TGv Selection Process Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Doc.: IEEE /0006r0 Submission March 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 What is a CA document? Notice: This document has been prepared.
Proposed Motion to Establish a Study Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 8.21) Document Number:
Nov. 14, 2005 C /81Chair, IEEE Opening November 2005 Plenary Session #17 Jerry Upton- Chair Gang Wu – Procedural.
1Copyright © 2007, Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. PWG IP Section Investigate an Update?
SEM21-02 ETSI Seminar 2010 « Legal Considerations » Erik Jansen, LL.M. ETSI Legal Director Copyright © ETSI All rights reserved. ETSI Seminar Sophia.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS © ETSI All rights reserved ETSI Seminar 2012.
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications Towards a Common ITU/ISO/IEC Patent Policy by Masamichi Niiya Telecommunication Standardization Bureau.
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications Overview of the TSB Director s Ad Hoc Group on IPR by Masamichi Niiya Telecommunication Standardization.
History of Ecma Rules and Patent Policy 29 June 2011 Michael Breidthardt.
International Telecommuniction Regulations 1 WG-ITR Council Working Group on ITRs General Overview Alaa M. Fahmy Chairman.
ITU WORKSHOP ON STANDARDS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) ISSUES Session 5: Software copyright issues Dirk Weiler, Chairman of ETSI General Assembly.
Tutorial on intellectual property rights (IPRs) Antoine Dore Legal Officer ITU Legal Affairs Unit Phone: Tutorial.
Tutorial for leadership teams of ITU-T study groups, TSAG, tariff groups and focus groups Alternative approval process (AAP) for ITU-T Recommendations.
International Telecommunication Union Informal Forum Summit San Francisco, July 2003 PROGRESS REPORT ON ACTION ITEMS SINCE THE 2001 IFS Greg Jones.
International Telecommunication Union ITU Seminar – Madrid, December 2002 ITU-T Membership Benefits Gary Fishman ITU-T TSAG Chairman
VCOM Conflict of Interest Policy Overview of Financial Conflict of Interest Related to Research December 4, 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0495r3 Submission May 2009 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 1 +1 (321) Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, Name Company.
Revision of WIPO Standard ST.14 Committee on WIPO Standards, third session Geneva 15 – 19 April 2013 Anna Graschenkova Standards Section.
1 S.Tronchon Legal Considerations when drafting a standard.
Cefic model SIEF Agreement: benefits and practical aspects CEFIC Legal Aspects of REACH Issue Team (LARIT) June 2009.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All 2011 IN REVIEW: ITU’S ACTIVITIES IN THE FIELD OF STANDARDIZATION & IPR Antoine Dore, Senior Legal.
Page 1 1 May 2007 [Updated January 2012] IEEE-SA Patent Policy Introduction and guide to IEEE-SA patent policy effective 1 May 2007.
1 May 2007 Instructions for the WG Chair The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: l Show slides #1 through #5 of.
Doc.: IEEE /0033r2 IMS Emergency Call Requirements January 2007 Donghee ShimSlide 1 IMS Emergency Call Requirements & Emergency Call number support.
Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) GSC-15
Instructions for the WG Chair l At Each Meeting, the Working Group Chair shall: l Show slides #1 and #2 of this presentation l Advise the WG membership.
TSB 1 Overview of the TSB Director’s Ad Hoc Group on IPR GSC 9, Seoul, Korea, 9 – 1 3 May 2004 by Houlin Zhao Director, Telecommunication Standardization.
Doc.: IEEE /1129r1 Submission July 2006 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Appeal Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
GSC-8xxx SOURCE:TIA TITLE:IPR Working Group Report AGENDA ITEM:Closing Plenary Agenda Item 1.1 DECISION DISCUSSIONX INFORMATIONX 21/10/2015 Report on the.
TSB 1 Overview of TSB Director’s Ad Hoc Group on IPR GSC 8, Ottawa, Canada, 27 April – 1 May 2003 by Houlin Zhao Director, Telecommunication Standardization.
Overview of the TSB Director ’ s Ad Hoc Group on IPR Telecommunication Standardization Bureau (TSB) International Telecommunication Union Place des Nations.
International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Philip.
Jan. 16, 2006 C /09Chair, IEEE Opening January 2006 Interim Session #18 Jerry Upton- Chair Gang Wu – Procedural.
International Telecommunication Union ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Yukio Hiramatsu Chairman, TTC IPR Committee.
IPRs and ITU-T Presentation at SG-17 Nikos Volanis – Legal Officer 10 September 2015.
C /27 May 15, 2006Chair, IEEE Opening May 2006 Plenary Session #20 Jerry Upton- Chair Doug Knisely – Procedural.
Doc.: IEEE /0020r2 Submission July 2008 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview Notice: This document has been prepared.
TIA IPR Standing Committee Report to TIA Technical Committee “Normative References and IPR” October 21, 2005 Paul Vishny, Chair Dan Bart, TIA.
xx session2_opening_notes.ppt Submission May 2004 Ajay Rajkumar, Chair, Slide 1 IEEE Session #2 Opening Session Ajay Rajkumar.
Doc.: IEEE /1623r0 Submission November 2006 Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.Slide 1 PHY Ad Hoc Nov 1 Agenda and Minutes Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0408r0 Submission May 2005 John Klein, SymbolSlide 1 TPC Comments Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It.
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission May 2007 Al Petrick, WiDeFiSlide 1 TGmb – Closing Report Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Summary of GSC-13 IPR WG Meeting Tom Goode, ATIS IPR WG Chair DOCUMENT #:GSC13-CL-05r1 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:Tom Goode, IPR WG Chair AGENDA ITEM:3.4.
Doc.: IEEE /2429r0 Submission Peter Loc, MarvellSlide 1 TGn LB97 Frame Format Ad Hoc Waikoloa, Sep 2007 Notice: This document has been.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All Dirk Weiler Chairman of the ETSI IPR Special Committee Document No: GSC16-IPR-02 Source: ETSI Contact:
Legal Considerations ETSI Seminar © ETSI All rights reserved.
Presentation at SG-17 Nikos Volanis – Legal Officer 10 September 2015
Standards and Intellectual Property Rights in ITU
Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) GSC-15
TTC Activities on IPR in Standards
Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview
IEC Patent Policy Jack Sheldon IEC Standardization Strategy Manager
JTC1 Chair’s Closing Report
IEEE Contribution Author’s Name Affiliation Address Phone
Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview
Explanations on CID #10076 Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
IMS Emergency Call Requirements & Emergency Call number support
Towards a Common ITU/ISO/IEC Patent Policy
Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution
Instructions for the WG Chair
Beam & LA January Agenda & Status
Overview of the TSB Director’s Ad Hoc Group on IPR
BEAM Ad Hoc September Agenda and Report for LB97
Instructions for the WG Chair
IEEE IPR Policy Date: Authors: March 2006 March 2006
Summary of GSC-13 IPR WG Meeting
IMS Emergency Call Requirements & Emergency Call number support
Instructions for the WG Chair
Presentation transcript:

TSB 1 ITU-T IPR Policy Presentation by Houlin ZHAO Director, TSB, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) at the Informal Forum Summit 3-4 December 2002, Geneva Place des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland Tel: FAX: ITU Home page address: ITU-T IPR Policy

TSB 2 nTo insure that Recommendations can be used by everybody without discrimination nTo exclude the commercial (monopolistic) abuse by a holder of a patent which is embodied fully or partly in a Recommendation Why an ITU-T Patent Policy?

TSB 3 New Environment nIncrease in the number of draft Recommendations involving new technologies associated with patents nInternational competition is increasing, patent holders are therefore less generous than was previously the case nPatent holders are eager to recover some of their costs through patent rights royalties. nNew, small manufacturing companies attempt to benefit from their patent rights nDiscussions in WTO have brought patent rights issues into the public arena

TSB 4 History of ITU-T IPR Policy nCCITT Code of Practice in 1980s and 1990s nCCITT Patent Policy nITU-T Patent Policy and database nPatent Declaration Forms nITU-T Patent Policy Guidelines n Software Copyright Guidelines n CCITT / TSB Directors Ad Hoc Group on IPR

TSB 5 Basic considerations of ITU-T Patent Policy nSimple and straightforward so as to be understood by the non-expert nIts underlying principle is similar to that of other standards making organizations nEarly disclosure and identification of patents/pending patents nDetailed licensing arrangements are left to the parties concerned

TSB 6 nAny ITU-T member should disclose any known or pending patent to TSB nSuch information should be disclosed as soon as possible, in no case later than the date of approval of the Recommendation nContributions to Study Group meetings should identify whether its proposal contains patents or pending patents Early disclosure and identification

TSB 7 nIndividual Patent Licensing Declaration n Common form of Declaration for Common texts between ITU-T and ISO/IEC nGeneral Patent Licensing Declaration Patent Declaration

TSB 8 Three Options Patent holders should declare their choice of option: Option 1)Free license to everybody Option 2)Paid-for license granted on reasonable terms and conditions on a world-wide, non-discriminatory basis (License arrangements are left to the parties concerned. ITU never intervenes in such a negotiation) Option 3)Unwillingness to grant a license

TSB 9 Option 3: Unwillingness to grant a license In this case, the following information should be provided: - patent registration/application number - an indication of which portions of the Recommendation are affected - a description of the patent claims covering the Recommendation ITU-T Patent Policy says: In such a case no Recommendation can be established ! The Guidelines say: Study Group should not be passive but proactive to resolve the problem

TSB 10 Patent Statements Database n Make available to the public information on patent declarations submitted to the TSB The URL for the database is: nItems shown on the Patent Database website: - Recommendation Number - Submitter Organization - Patent policy option chosen - Contact information - Patent information - Date Patent Statement received by TSB

TSB 11 Patent Statements Database (continued ) nThe Database may be viewed as simply raising a flag to alert users that patent licenses must be obtained for applications of a particular Recommendation n TSB does not assure the validity of the information in the database

TSB 12 n Reciprocity The Patent holder shall only be required to license to other Patent holders if these others are also willing to license their patents under options 1 or 2 of the Declaration. n Application Processes - Prerequisites - Submission of contributions - Conduct of meetings - Discovery of patents after publication - Patents held by ITU-T non-member organizations n URL: ITU-T Patent Policy Guidelines

TSB 13 The draft of Software Copyright Guidelines and the associated Declaration Form have just been developed. The refinement of the text is ongoing in the TSB Directors IPR Ad Hoc group. n Guidelines instead of Policy in order to make the rule more flexible. n The structure of the Software Copyright Guidelines is in principle similar to the ITU-T Patent Policy. n However, the Guidelines discourage Study Groups from including copyrighted software in an ITU-T Recommendation. The incorporation of normative software should be applied in exceptional situations: highly complex algorithms requiring exactness such as speech coders. Software Copyright Guidelines

TSB 14 n Options of Software Copyright licensing declaration Similar to the patent declaration, the options are roughly grouped in three categories: Option 1 Free license to everybody 1.1The Software copyright holder waives the copyright. 1.2The holder transfers the Software copyright to ITU on condition that ITU will grant free license on a non- discriminatory basis. 1.3The holder grants a free license on a non- discriminatory basis. Option 2 Paid for license granted on reasonable terms and conditions on a world-wide non-discriminatory basis Option 3 Unwillingness to grant license Software Copyright Guidelines (continued)

TSB 15 n Patent Statements received :918 n General Patent Statements received: 15 Statements received refer to option 2 (reasonable terms and conditions ) : 94% Statistics