PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June 2013 Welcome PISA for Development Andreas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Potential impact of PISA
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
PORTFOLIO.
Parents as Partners in Education
The Index for Inclusion. Why have an Index Forum? Purpose To offer regular opportunities to discuss school improvement with other neighbouring schools,
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
Local, national and international benchmarking for improvement
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
Professional Learning Community at Work Delwyn L. Harnisch University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, Nebraska, USA Advances in Learning, Teaching and Technology.
What do international assessments measure: PISA Raymond J. Adams Washington DC, May This paper is intended to promote the exchange of ideas among.
PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment What students know and can do Andreas Schleicher Warsaw, 10 February 2011 Strong performers and.
Good teaching, good teachers and comparative analysis Fernando Reimers.
Implementing Mathematics K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Microsoft 2013 All Rights Reserved. Partners in Learning School Research Background.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
PISA for Development Initial Technical Meeting Overview Presentation 27 – 28 June 2013 Paris, France EDU/DCD.
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
PISA for Schools Pilot Overview of Results FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS March
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
OECD EMPLOYER BRAND Playbook 1 PISA 2012 Students and Money Financial literacy skills 9 July 2014 Launch.
LLS - why? Paradox of Estonian education – the very best results, but nobody is happy! Delegations to learn about the Estonian experience Strategy – there.
American Diploma Project 11 September 2009 Andreas Schleicher International Benchmarking International Benchmarking What it means – what it takes Washington,
PISA for Development Out of School Technical Meeting.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
UNESCO INSTITUTE for STATISTICS New Initiatives and Challenges UIS Education Statistics Programme Douglas Lynd, Senior Programme Coordinator.
Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO): Update Deborah Roseveare Head, Skills beyond School Division Directorate for Education OECD 31.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Civic and Citizenship Education in Times of Change: Curriculum and its Implementation Some Results of the IEA Studies Civic Education in Iraq: Study Tour.
PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment What students know and can do Andreas Schleicher 9 April 2011 PISA 2009 Evaluating systems to.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
2012 National Partnerships Schools’ Forum Margery Evans CEO, AITSL ~ Leadership for Learning ~
OECD World Forum “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy”, Palermo, November
PISA AND THE OECD TEST FOR SCHOOLS International benchmarking for schools and school districts Atlanta, October 2, 2014 Tue Halgreen Directorate for Education.
Hong Kong PISA Project Monitoring The Quality of Education in Hong Kong From An International Perspective Hong Kong November 2001 OECD Programme for International.
The European Credit system The European Credit system for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET)
Educational standards and economic and social development Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Lisbon Council Brussels, 14 September.
Student learning outcomes from a gender perspective What do international assessments tell us? Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
WORKING TOWARDS INCLUSIVE ASSESSMENT Messages from across Europe Reutte 28th February 2008.
LEARNER CENTERED APPROACH
Andreas Schleicher, OECD Directorate for Education, 2003 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow.
IMPROVING SCHOOL LEADERSHIP: LESSONS FROM OECD COUNTRIES UNESCO MEETING, 12 JANUARY 2013 Beatriz Pont, Sr. Policy Analyst Policy Advice and Implementation.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Hannah Love LSIS 5645 Core Assessment IV. Why is information literacy necessary?  To fulfill the goals of education by preparing students for The workplace.
Andreas Schleicher, Quality of Education – Teachers’ Professional Training and Development, Athens, 2003 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
Beyond Primary Education: Challenges of and Approaches to Expanding Learning Opportunities in AfricaAssociation for the Development of Education in Africa.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Contribute to international costs of Euros 200,000 Benefit from a survey focused on three domains of learning and can opt for additional domains Findings.
PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment What students know and can do Andreas Schleicher 7 December 2010 PISA 2009 Evaluating systems.
COURSE AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
OECD EMPLOYER BRAND Playbook 1 What makes schools and school systems successful? Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Organisation for.
Enterprise Development for Secondary School Students in Sri Lanka Lalith Welamedage Roger Candy.
1 Results from TALIS Press briefing 27 June 2014 Washington.
The future of PISA: perspectives for innovation
Partnership for Practice
Assessments for Monitoring and Improving the Quality of Education
PISA 2015 Excellence and Equity in Education Peter Adams
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
Teacher Education for Inclusion TE4I project
Exploring the dimensions of quality in education - OECD perspective -
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Indicators on the Quality of Educational Performance Quality of Education Teachers’ Professional.
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES. The American Psychological Association put together the Leaner-Centered Psychological Principles. These psychological.
Presentation transcript:

PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June 2013 Welcome PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Special advisor to the Secretary-General on Education Policy Head of the Indicators and Analysis Division, EDU Programme for International Student Assessment

PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June 2013 The motivation for PISA In a global economy, the yardstick for success in education is no longer improvement by national standards alone, but the most rapidly improving school systems internationally

PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June 2013 The idea of PISA Measuring educational progress within an internationally agreed framework to provide a basis for international collaboration on designing and implementing educational policies Show countries what achievements are possible Help governments set policy targets in terms of measurable goals achieved elsewhere Gauge the pace of educational progress Facilitate peer-learning on policy and practice

PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June PISA countries in %81% 83% 85%86% Coverage of world economy 87% Key principles of PISA ‘Crowd sourcing’ and collaboration –PISA draws together leading expertise and institutions from participating countries to develop instruments and methodologies… …guided by governments on the basis of shared policy interests Cross-national relevance and transferability of policy experiences –Emphasis on validity across cultures, languages and systems –Frameworks built on well-structured conceptual understanding of assessment areas and contextual factors Triangulation across different stakeholder perspectives –Systematic integration of insights from students, parents, school principals and system-leaders Advanced methods with different grain sizes –A range of methods to adequately measure intended constructs with different grain sizes to serve different decision-making needs –Productive feedback, at appropriate levels of detail, to fuel improvement at multiple levels.

PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June PISA countries in %81% 83% 85%86% Coverage of world economy 87% The latest PISA assessment  Over half a million students… representing 28 million 15-year-olds in 74 * countries/economies … took an internationally agreed 2-hour test… Goes beyond testing whether students can reproduce what they were taught… …to assess students’ capacity to extrapolate from what they know and creatively apply their knowledge in novel situations …and responded to questions on… their personal background, their schools and their engagement with learning and school  Parents, principals and system leaders provided data on… school policies, practices, resources and institutional factors that help explain performance differences. *Data for Costa Rica, Georgia, India, Malaysia, Malta, Mauritius, Venezuela and Vietnam will be published in December 2011

PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June 2013 Mathematics in PISA The real world The mathematical World A real situation A model of reality A mathematical model Mathematical results Real results Understanding, structuring and simplifying the situation Making the problem amenable to mathematical treatment Interpreting the mathematical results Using relevant mathematical tools to solve the problem Validating the results

PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June 2013 The PISA framework National educ, social and economic context Structures, resource alloc and policies Social & economic outcomes of education Community and school characteristics Student learning, teacher working conditions Socio-economic background of learners Antecedents contextualise or constrain ed policy The learning environment at school Teaching, learning practices and classroom climate Individ attitudes, engagement and behaviour Output and performance of institutions Quality of instructional delivery Quality and distribution of knowledge & skills Policy Levers shape educational outcomes Outputs and Outcomes impact of learning Individual learner Level A Instructional settings Level B Schools, other institutions Level C Country or system Level D Domain 3Domain 2 Domain 1

PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June 2013 School performance and socio-economic background Mexico Student performance Advantage PISA Index of socio-economic background Disadvantage Private school Public school in rural area Public school in urban area

PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June 2013 The challenge of PISA for Development  Can we develop a framework that embraces the diversity of contexts in which students learn, teachers teach and school systems operate? As comparable as possible to facilitate peer-learning As country-specific as necessary to be meaningful and interpretable in national contexts  Can we extend measurement to children not enrolled in formal education? Establishing policy-incentives for inclusiveness  Can we improve the relevance, quality and reliability of performance measurement? Establishing measures that work in a wider range of countries

PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June 2013 Find out more about PISA at… OECD –All national and international publications –The complete micro-level database …and remember: Without data, you are just another person with an opinion