Oregon City School District Ensuring Quality and Promoting Professional Growth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohios Educator Standards. Ohios Standards for the Teaching Profession.
Advertisements

Pioneer Career and Technology Center, Shelby, Ohio Criteria of the Master Teacher Designation Criterion A: Consistent Leadership Criterion A: Consistent.
USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
NNPS Teacher Performance Assessment System The Framework.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
EDU 250 Roxanne Stansbury  It is important to learn about Danielson’s Domains because they are the framework for how we measure effective teaching.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) “Designing” © Pennsylvania Department of Education.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 1 Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Looking at Teaching through the Lens of Standards Irv Richardson A Presentation to the 600s Sub-Committee July 22,2010 9:00 – 11:00.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
IOWA CORE CURRICULUM LEADERSHIP TRAINING Day Two.
Teacher Evaluation Conversations (#14) Principal Cluster Nov. 30, 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.
Oregon City School District December GOAL: Implement a performance based evaluation system for all certified staff in fall 2011 Adopt standards.
Special Education Educator Evaluation and Professional Growth.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support UPDATE Presented by the Oregon Department of Education November 19, 2012.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
TEACHER EVALUATION SUPPORT ESU 10 DEC. 14 TH, 2011.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Using the Learning Targets for Coaches Supporting Coaches to Do Their Best Work.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Teacher Evaluation 張媛甯 資料來源: Handbook on Teacher Evaluation (Chapter 1-3) (Chapter 1-3) J. H. Stronge & P. D. Tucker 著.
Charter schools in California By Brenda Casillas, Maria Davis, Apeil Dixon.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Building North Carolina’s Globally Competitive Workforce TEACHING; LEARNING; DOING.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Welcome.
Teacher Evaluation Conversations (#14)
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Oregon Framework Elements One and Two.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Free powerpoint template:
Presentation transcript:

Oregon City School District Ensuring Quality and Promoting Professional Growth

Agenda 1.Define Quality in our district: Identify 4-6 domains or “big ideas” 2.Outline a Continuum of Professional Growth: Identify and label 3-5 levels of performance

What? How? Standards with criteria Clear definition of exemplary practice Procedure for novice to experienced teachers Consistency of judgment based on data Self-reflection Professional growth goals Promoting Professionalism and Ensuring Quality

Standards for Quality and Professional Growth Quality = Standards as criteria for assessing performance Professional Growth = Standards as targets for professional growth goals 4

5 Continuous Process Step 1:Adopt 4-6 Quality Standards Step 2: Adopt Continuum of Professional Growth Step 3: Develop all 4 blueprints Step 4:Refine Quality Standards & Continuum Step 5:Review/revise PD Handbook for to be piloted/revised for

Questions??? Should the standards describe all aspects of teachers’ professional lives? Should the standards be based on research about effective teachers/effective instruction? Should the standards have criteria, like a continuum or rubric, to describe different levels of performance? (novice to experienced, less skilled to expertise) Should the standards apply to all levels and all content areas? Should the standards be the common language for professional staff among teachers and administrators? Should the standards be a public document for teachers, administrators, parents, community?

What How = Framework of Professional Practice Standards to consider: Danielson’s Domains California (New Teacher Center) ISSA INTASC Salem NC12 Lake Oswego (no criteria) State of Oregon (TSPC/no criteria)

Resources Your experiences OARs/ORS Contract language Board Policies Published standards like Danielson’s work Best Practices Examples from other districts Free powerpoint template: 8

9

Your Experiences What’s Working? List 3-4 components that are currently working or; You would like to see in your evaluation system What’s Not? List 3-4 components that are not currently effective Free powerpoint template: 10

Standards Review examples of standards Select the top 2 or 3 you prefer. Be prepared to state why. Discussion Consensus Free powerpoint template: 11