Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: Garth Torok, Weather Processors Group, Aviation Weather Directorate Date: 21 June 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 GEOSS Monitoring & Evaluation. 2 1st GEOSS M&E WG meeting outcomes Agreed on 1.the final draft of Terms of Reference for the M&E WG 2.The plan for delivery.
Advertisements

© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
Episode 3 / CAATS II joint dissemination event Lessons Learnt Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Philippe Leplae EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels,
Presented to: Right Sizing Team By: Ken Hamm, AJP-6830 Aviation Weather Office Date: July 14, 2010 v0.1 Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Weather.
The AIM Modernization Program
Requirements Engineering n Elicit requirements from customer  Information and control needs, product function and behavior, overall product performance,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Early Tests of Aircraft Tracking on NWRT PAR Working Group William Benner, Weather Processors Team.
Presented to: MPAR Symposium By: William Benner, Aviation Weather Group, Operations Planning Date: 12 October 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Multi-function.
Introduction and Overview “the grid” – a proposed distributed computing infrastructure for advanced science and engineering. Purpose: grid concept is motivated.
8/28/2005ECEN5543 Req Elicitation1 Targets of Requirements Engineering ECEN 5543 SW Engineering of Standalone Programs University of Colorado, Boulder.
Presented to: MPAR Symposium II By: James Williams – Director, Systems Engineering and Safety Date: 17 November 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Multifunction.
Creating Architectural Descriptions. Outline Standardizing architectural descriptions: The IEEE has published, “Recommended Practice for Architectural.
PBN Airspace Concept Process
1 REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING and SYSTEMS ANALYSIS Elements and Definitions.
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory 2007 MPAR-1 JSH 5/2/2007 Session 2: Current State of Military Investment in PAR Panel Lead: Dr. Jeffrey Herd (MIT LL) Panelists:
1 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council (CSRIC) Working Group 1A - Public Safety Consolidation.
Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Division Date: March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation.
9/11/ SUPPORT THE WARFIGHTER DoD CIO 1 Sample Template Community of Interest (COI) Steering Committee Kick-off Date: POC: V1.0.
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
Requirements Analysis
© 2012 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. A Concept of Integration (CONINT) of Weather Information and Related Systems Engineering Artifacts Matt.
University of Sunderland COMM80 Risk Assessment of Systems ChangeUnit 13 Overview of Riskit*: The Method and its Techniques * Further information available.
Requirements Elicitation. Who are the stakeholders in determining system requirements, and how does their viewpoint influence the process? How are non-technical.
FAA NAS Enterprise Architecture – Informing Future Challenges in V&V for NextGen 2009 V&V Summit November, 2009.
24-25 June 2010 SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum, Rome SWIM-SUIT Final User Forum.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
FAA System-Wide Information Management Program Overview for SWIM-SUIT Public Lauch Donald Ward Program Manager FAA SWIM Program April 2007.
Illustrations and Answers for TDT4252 exam, June
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Business & Enterprise Systems The Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and the Integrated Master Schedule.
Presented to: IWG 26 By: Jason Burns (FAA) Date: February 5-7, 2014 Federal Aviation Administration DFMC Work Plan Update.
1 15 quality goals for requirements  Justified  Correct  Complete  Consistent  Unambiguous  Feasible  Abstract  Traceable  Delimited  Interfaced.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 What is Solution Assessment & Validation?
System Wide Information Management (SWIM). FAA Transition to Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) - System Wide Information Management (SWIM) Initiative.
Health eDecisions Use Case 2: CDS Guidance Service Strawman of Core Concepts Use Case 2 1.
Multifunction Phased Array Radar PAR Work Group Magda Batista-Carver September 11, 2007 Legacy Radar Lifecycle Cost Data Analysis Update Magda Batista-Carver,
Chapter 3 Strategic Information Systems Planning.
NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System
Presented to: Demonstrations and Prototypes TIM By: Steve Hodges Date: 05/04/2011 Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Access to SWIM (AAtS) FY11 planned.
Service Component Registry and Repository (SCRR) April 26, 2007 Lico Galindo 2007 Exchange Network National Meeting.
A Net-Centric DoD NII/CIO 1 Sample Template Community of Interest (COI) Steering Committee Kick-off Date: POC:
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Multifunction Phased Array Radar PAR Work Group Magda Batista-Carver June 21, 2007 Radar Operations.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM Assessment of MPAR Capability to Meet Agency Needs Jud Stailey, OFCM Executive Secretary, MPAR EC.
Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) Col Mark Weadon Air Force Weather Deputy for Federal Programs May 17 th,
Final Planning Conference (FPC) [Exercise Name] [Date]
1 Overview of JPDO and the Weather IPT Mark Andrews Weather IPT Lead July 13 th, 2006.
By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration NextGen Overview Storyboard 10 th Annual Verification & Validation Summit Harry William Bilicki September 24.
NASA ARAC Meeting Update on Next Generation Air Transportation System May 3, 2005 Robert Pearce Deputy Director, Joint Planning & Development Office.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: Jim Williams, Director of Systems Engineering, Operations Planning Date: 11 September 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.
Multifunction Phased Array Radar (MPAR) Update 1ICMSSR 12/16/11 ICMSSR Meeting December 2011 Doug Forsyth, Co-chair, WG/MPAR.
Presented by: Date: Federal Aviation Administration FAA Weather in the Cockpit Guidance and Policy Roger Sultan AFS-430 July 22, 2014.
1 Lecture 2.4a: SEF SE Planning and the SEP (SEF Ch 16) Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
Software Engineering Lecture 9: Configuration Management.
SUPPORT THE WARFIGHTER MPE Reference Architecture Development Kick-off Meeting Deputy Director Architecture & Interoperability Office of the DoD CIO Thomas.
Douglas E. Forsyth National Severe Storms Laboratory Executive Director for Facilities and Strategic Planning Chief, Radar Research and Development Division.
CS646: Software Design and Architectures Introduction and Overview †  Definitions.  The general design process.  A context for design: the waterfall.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Daniel Amyot, University of Ottawa Based on slides by Gunter Mussbacher (2009) and Stéphane Somé (2008) with material from these standards: IEEE ,
BLM Decision Making Process
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
IC Conceptual Data Model (CDM)
Air Force Airborne SIGINT Architecture & Analysis
Implementation Strategy July 2002
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Project Charter <Project Name>
DOD’S PHASED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Requirements Document
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: Garth Torok, Weather Processors Group, Aviation Weather Directorate Date: 21 June 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Multifunction Phased Array Radar MPAR Concept of Operations (CONOPS)

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 2 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 MPAR CONOPS Being developed in response to MPAR Working Group Action Item # “Using NGATS CONOPS as a model, develop an MPAR CONOPS rough draft”

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 3 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 MPAR CONOPS Working Group Chair –Mark Weadon, OFCM Members –Bob Saffle, NWS –Daniel Melendez, NWS –Garth Torok, FAA –Bob Blasewitz, FAA May require participation by subject matter experts across disciplines (weather, Surveillance, defense)

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 4 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 CONOPS Influence Concept of Operations (CONOPS) Operational Requirements (User Needs) Performance Requirements (Characteristics) Drives Radar System Architecture & Design Drives MPAR Cost Drives Scale

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 5 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 CONOPS - Decision Paths Document content and organization considerations –Evaluated multiple CONOPS examples NGATS CONOPS NGATS Weather CONOPS Surveillance and Broadcast Services CONOPS (i.e., ADS-B) Future Terminal Area CONOPS (i.e., DTASS) CONOPS and Operational Requirements for WSR-88D Dual Polarization Business Continuity Plan En Route Services CONOPS NAS CONOPS Others –Explored different templates FAA Operational Concept Template, Version 1.0 (May 1999) FAA NAS Systems Engineering Manual NWS Operations and Services Improvement Process (OSIP) Concept of Operations and Operational Requirements Template

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 6 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 FAA’s System Engineering Manual (SEM) - CONOPS Hierarchy Where does the MPAR CONOPS fall? Answer: Tailored hybrid of CONOPS and CONUSE

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 7 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 FAA’s System Engineering Manual (SEM) - CONOPS Hierarchy CONOPS (Service-Level) –Provides conceptual insight into a particular service of the integrated operational environment (e.g., nav, surv, comm) –Identifies current shortfalls and future needs –Identifies capabilities required for a specific service (without identifying specific technologies) –May use Operational Scenarios to illustrate desired operational concept –Provides a user perspective –Not system specific CONUSE –Extension of CONOPS with emphasis on specific system and its operating environment –Describes functional characteristics (i.e., stakeholder’s needs) of a proposed system from a user perspective –Tells a story using visual forms (diagrams, illustrations, graphs) and storyboards –Describes the user’s general system goals, mission, function, and components MPAR CONOPS –Hybrid of a CONOPS and CONUSE

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 8 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 Concept Document Outline 1. Introduction 1.1 Service or System Identification 1.2 Document Overview 1.3 Service or System Overview 1.4 References 2. Operational Need 2.1 Current Service or System 2.2 Current Support Environment 2.3 Operational Problems 2.4 Objectives and Scope 2.5 Capability Shortfalls 2.6 Existing Operations Requiring Change 2.7 Constraints 2.8 User 3. Service or System Justification 3.1 Potential Benefit of New or Modified Service 3.2 Description of Desired Change 3.3 Change Priorities 3.4 Assumptions and Constraints 4. Proposed Service or System 4.1 Objectives and Scope 4.2 Proposed Service or System Description 4.3 Proposed Support Environment 4.4 Modes of Operation 4.5 User 4.6 Operational Policies and Constraints 5. Operational Scenarios 6. Impacts 6.1 Impact on Current Operations 6.2 Organizational changes Required Appendix A – Glossary and Acronyms Appendix B – OSED (Oper. Serv. and Envir. Descr.) Describes current problem space (operational situation and shortfall) Provides description of the new system and the benefit it will provide Provides description of the proposed system and its characteristics Operational Scenarios to help better describe concept Provides description of impact to operations and the organization

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 9 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 Operational Scenarios

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 10 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 RADAR CONTROL, LOGIC & PROCESSING DST AUTOMATION SYSTEM (ADS-B Track correlation) 4-FACE MPAR ANTENNA RADAR DISPLAY 7 DATA ASSIMILATION A Flow of Radar Data/Environmental Data Records (EDRs) Control of Radar Scanning 7 Feedback Loop DST NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION SWIM GIG ENTERPRISE SVC 5. RADAR DATA TO NWP FOR INGESTION VIA DATA ASSIMILATION 6. DATA TO DISPLAY FOR HUMAN INTERPRETATION 7. RESULTS FROM NWP FED BACK TO CONTROLLERS FOR MANUAL/AUTOMATIC ADJUSTMENT OF SCAN STRATEGY 8. PROCESSED DATA FED THROUGH ENTRPRISE SERVICES TO DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS (HUMAN OR MACHINE) 1. SIGNAL TO ANTENNA ADAPTING SCAN PATTERN 1A. DATA FROM ANTENNA IS PROCESSED INTO EDRs 2. AIRCRAFT POSITION INFO TO ADS-B FOR CORRELATION WITH COOPERATIVE REPORTED TRACKS 3. AIRCRAFT MISMATCHES FLAGGED TO MPAR AS “TARGETS OF INTEREST” 4. PROCESSED RADAR DATA (AC AND WEATHER) SENT TO USERS VIA NETWORK SYSTEMS

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 11 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 Working Group Tasks Define Document scope, organization, and outline Develop Operational Scenarios and other visual forms to facilitate understanding of MPAR operation Identify agency mission shortfalls that should be addressed by this solution Expect MPAR CONOPS to be a “living” document Working Group Meeting tentatively scheduled for July –Baseline organization of document –Finalize initial operational scenarios –Begin assigning sections to individuals/agencies

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 12 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 Issues/Decision Points How should the document be bound? What capability is the solution required to deliver? Need to identify additional agency SMEs (e.g., DHS, DOD, etc.) to provide input

Multi Function Phased Array Radar 13 Federal Aviation Administration 21 June 2007 Milestones/Dates