Preliminary Results Progress Coordinated Assessments Reports from the Field.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program
Advertisements

RTT Analysis Workshop Species Status and Trend (Chapter 1) Casey Baldwin RTT Chairperson WDFW Research Scientist.
Monitoring Watershed Restoration Effectiveness Nez Perce Tribe DFRM-Watershed Division Rebecca A. Lloyd, Project Leader.
COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.
Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Paul Kucera and Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management BPA Project
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Lake Creek Chinook Salmon Performance Measures Paul Kucera and Chris Beasley Nez Perce Tribe/HDR FishPro.
UMATILLA RIVER FISH PASSAGE OPERATIONS
Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment in the Columbia Cascade Province Project Goal: The Columbia Cascade Province will have an implementation strategy that.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Data Management in Support of the Fish & Wildlife Program Summary.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) and StreamNet NW Power & Conservation Council, Sept. 20, 2006.
CHARACTERIZE AND ASSESS WILDLIFE-HABITAT TYPES AND STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS FOR SUB-BASINS WITHIN THE BLUE MOUNTAIN PROVINCE Project:
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Preliminary Results of Management Question Survey Jim Geiselman & Jen Bayer March 16, 2006 Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP)
CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.
Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.
TRIBAL DATA NETWORK COLUMBIA RIVER INTER-TRIBAL FISH COMMISSION.
Assessing the use of PIT Tags as a Tool to Monitor Adult Chinook Salmon Returns to Idaho John Cassinelli Regional Fisheries Biologist Idaho Department.
Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON AND STEELHEAD RETURNS FPAC and TMT – March 2013 Presented by: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) A Presentation for: Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Anadromous Fish Advisory Committee.
8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.
Coordinated Assessments Project; Priorities and Expectations March 16, 2015 StreamNet Executive Committee.
A Guiding Framework For Regional Monitoring Participants –Alan Byrne (IDFG) –Alex Conley (Yakima Salmon Recovery Board) –Chris Drivdahl (WA State NPCC)
StreamNet Project Overview for Data Management Category Review Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presented to: NPCC Independent.
Hydrosystem Operations and Fish Recovery in the Columbia River Basin U
Coordinated Assessments Roadmap: Selecting & Prioritizing Indicators July 8, 2015.
1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.
BUILDING STRONG SM 1 Columbia River Salmon and Federal Columbia River Power System Rock Peters Senior Program Manager.
In Search of the Lost Legions Attempting to account for Hatchery-origin steelhead returns to the Snake River Herb Pollard – NOAA –National Marine Fisheries.
Defining CBFWA’s FY09 Workplan Members January 15, 2009.
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.
RMIS Overview & Infomap Service PSMFC Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC) Overview of RMPC & CWT Database Since 1977 the RMPC has provided essential.
Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook: Relative Reproductive Success in Captive Chinook Salmon Melissa Baird 1, Ewann Berntson 1, Timothy Hoffnagle 2, Steve.
Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting What Are Managers Required to Provide Their Constituents? March 9-11, 2004 Bob Leland.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
: Program Coordination and Facilitation Services January 17, 2012 Tom Iverson Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.
Estimating integrative effects of the H’s on salmon populations.
Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
BPA F&W Program Data Management Needs for Monitoring Support and Coordination Coordinated Assessments Workshop, 2011.
Coordinated Assessments April 3, 2014 Workshop Data Exchange Standard: Overview, Changes, Additions, and Direction Mike Banach PSMFC
1 Independent Scientific Advisory Board June 12, 2003 A Review of Salmon and Steelhead Supplementation.
Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Technology Exchange Meetings Steve Rentmeester, Environmental Data Services Sean Quigely, Pacific.
Improved access to data to support high level indicators for salmon and steelhead.
Implementation of the Lower Columbia River Recovery Plan Northwest Region August 19, 2013.
Okanogan River Fish Update for the IOLBC Okanogan Basin Monitoring and Evaluation Program (OBMEP) Osoyoos Lake Water Science Forum Presenter: John.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
RTT Analysis Workshop Synthesis: Data Gaps and Research Needs (Chapter 5) Presented by Keely Murdoch MaDMC Chair Yakama Nation.
Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Data Stewardship and Data Standards Practices Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Prepared for: USBR Tech Transfer Meeting Jennifer.
Session 6: Data Flow, Data Management, and Data Quality.
Lessons Learned from DET Development and Initial Pilot.
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
BPA Expectations for Regionally Coordinated RM&E Programs Jim Geiselman – BPA BPA Expectations on the Development of Standard.
Five basic objectives of ISTM
United Nations Statistics Division DESA, New York
StreamNet Executive Committee Meeting
Status of Steelhead in Oregon
Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop
StreamNet Steering Committee Meeting
Tucannon River Programmatic Habitat Program (a 30 mile long project)
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Results Progress Coordinated Assessments Reports from the Field

Data Exchange Templates AgencyData SpecialistGeographic AreasPopulationsCompletePartialNot started WDFW Wenatchee, Washington Jamie HallmanUpper Columbia WDFW Vancouver, Washington Danny WarrenLower Columbia7200 ODFW Corvallis, Oregon Beth TimmonsLower Columbia ODFW La Grande, Oregon Matt BartleyMid Columbia Lower Snake River Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Mission, Oregon Pete MarkosMid Columbia11470 Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation Warm Springs, Oregon Joanna MilesLower Columbia Mid Columbia IDFG Boise, Idaho Martha BrabecInner Columbia Snake River Confederate Colville Tribes Omak, Washington Isaac CadienteInner Columbia Okanogan Basin 4400 Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Pocatello, Idaho Isaac CadienteInner Columbia Snake River Yakama Nation Klickitat, Washington Michelle Steg-GeltnerInner Columbia11245 Nez Perce Tribe Lapwai, Idaho John WalrathInner Columbia Total

Data Analysis Flow Diagrams AgencyData SpecialistGeographic AreasPopulationsCompletePartialNot started WDFW Wenatchee, Washington Jamie HallmanUpper Columbia WDFW Vancouver, Washington Danny WarrenLower Columbia ODFW Corvallis, Oregon Beth TimmonsLower Columbia ODFW La Grande, Oregon Matt BartleyMid Columbia Lower Snake River Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Mission, Oregon Pete MarkosMid Columbia11803 Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation Warm Springs, Oregon Joanna MilesLower Columbia Mid Columbia IDFG Boise, Idaho Martha BrabecInner Columbia Snake River Confederate Colville Tribes Omak, Washington Isaac CadienteInner Columbia Okanogan Basin 4400 Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Pocatello, Idaho Isaac CadienteInner Columbia Snake River Yakama Nation Klickitat, Washington Michelle Steg-GeltnerInner Columbia11515 Nez Perce Tribe Lapwai, Idaho John WalrathInner Columbia Total

Coordinated Assessments Reports from the Field Preliminary Results Lessons Learned

General Lessons Learned Population (as defined by NOAA) is not a unit that data are commonly collected across the region A “population responsibility directory” is not available within agencies and questions remain around: – population & population scale – responsibility for indicator calculations – overlap of responsibility – when overlap exists, what is the official database of record? Granularity of population lists conflict with some agency/tribe management objectives – Some VSP indicators only available for population aggregates, rather than by CBFWA/TRT populations

Data Exchange Templates Terminology issues – smolt – natural spawner vs. natural origin spawner – recruit/spawner vs. progeny/parent Current DET version does not accommodate all agency/tribe specific indicator calculations – Complex calculations are not captured – Complexity will need to be addressed in the next version of the DET

Data Analysis Flow Diagrams PROS Generally speaking, well received Have been useful when discussing indicator derivations with biologists Serves multiple audiences and purposes CONS Desired level of detail inconsistent – e.g., programmer vs. biologist vs. supervisor needs – Depending on audience the diagram may not show all gaps – Data flow vs. data analysis

Coordinated Assessments Reports from the Field Preliminary Results Data Availability

Data Availability: Indicator Level Indicators are sometimes reported → but the supporting metadata is not included Not all agencies calculate all 3 of the chosen VSP indicators Natural Spawner Abundance (NSA) is the most commonly available Spawner to Adult Ratio (SAR) the least and the most variable

Data Components of the Indicator Highly variable – Different ways to store data – Inconsistencies even within an agency Sometimes the entire process is done in Excel while other agencies use a local or regional database Storage of the metrics is variable: Published papers and reports, internal documents, websites Sometimes the data are hard to find

Examples of Data Management Systems capable of sharing data: Idaho Fish and Wildlife Information System (IFWIS) ODFW Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Tracker Colville Tribe : Website that houses reports and formation of a database to house data from multiple sources WDFW Juvenile Migrant Exchange (JMX) NOAA Salmon Population Summary (SPS)

Data Availability Issues Changing methodology impacts and complicates availability Lack of funding (staffing) Inconsistent platforms and format Lack of management priority for specific indicators

Coordinated Assessments Reports from the Field Preliminary Results Gaps and Needs

Populations Need to define the populations of interest Multiple naming conventions are used Some indicators are calculated at scales larger or smaller than the actual population as formally defined

Resources Money/time for data personnel who can: Understand the data flow, data analysis and reporting process Calculate indicators and supporting data Perform data QA/QC Collect and enter data into database Develop metadata

Data Management Database infrastructure Metadata Data dictionary Data sharing, documentation, and transparency Consistent methods for internal data analysis A streamlined process for reporting data data are exchanged multiple times before reporting

Communication Clearer communication of project objectives e.g., “What’s in it for me?” Little coordination and communication between/among/within agency offices Concern over data ownership and potential misuse of data

Future of the DET The DET is a work in progress and needs further work before the region considers implementing it as a formal business practice for sharing data.