Make Every Minute Count Alabama Association of School Boards October 7, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

Maximizing the Effectiveness of the Time You Have Now
Maximizing SCHOOL Time. Conducting a School Time Analysis WHAT YOU NEED Schedules Calendar Information on activities that interfere with instructional.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Creating Freshmen Success Task Force Report High School Study Session Board Presentation January 30, 2007.
MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Making Every Minute Count: An Introduction to the School Time Analysis Tool (STAT) Prepared for the Virginia Department of Education November 25, 2013.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
1 Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Reviewing National High School Improvement Strategies, Models, Characteristics and Potential Monica Martinez KnowledgeWorks Foundation (formerly of the.
The School Improvement Grant Program: Analysis of Performance in America’s Great City Schools Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
HSTW Southern Regional Education Board Orientation to HSTW Goals and Key Practices.
©2004 NCEE Archived Information America’s Choice High School Design Bob Mackin, Director America’s Choice High Schools National Center on Education and.
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
A New Vision for Summer School Jeff Smink Bridge Conference Seattle, WA October, 2011.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
Arizona’s Move On When Ready Initiative January, 2011.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Ohio HSTW/MMGW: The Positive Impact!. What is High Schools That Work?  An initiative of the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB)  The nation’s largest.
English Language Arts Program Update Dr. Lisa M. White School Committee Meeting January 24, 2011.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
School Year 2 Updates and Overview Thursday, August 20, 2015.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Scaling Up: Responding to Financial Constraints Through the Lens of Implementation North Santiam School District Fall Conference 2010.
TENNESSEE SUCCEEDS.. In the spring of 2007, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce released an education report card for all states. Tennessee received an “F” in.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Grant Administration: Best Practices Presented by: Dr. Martha Cantu Joe Garcia Cindy Valdez.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Local Control Accountability Plan Board of Education June 25, 2015 Alvord Unified School District Students | Teachers | Instructional Content.
Common Core State Standards
Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Planning for Dramatic Improvement Part B
New Prospect Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Make Every Minute Count Alabama Association of School Boards October 7, 2013

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Inform Policy: Support policy development and leverage federal, state, and local funding to support high-quality expanded learning time implementation Build Support: Build broad- based support to bring high- quality expanded-time school opportunities to all high- poverty students over time Improve School Practice: Through technical assistance, grow and strengthen the number of high-quality expanded learning time schools nationally Improve School Practice: Through technical assistance, grow and strengthen the number of high-quality expanded learning time schools nationally Generate Knowledge: Document and disseminate effective practices of high- performing expanded learning time charter and district schools across the country Generate Knowledge: Document and disseminate effective practices of high- performing expanded learning time charter and district schools across the country NCTL’s Strategy and Objectives 2

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Today’s Objectives 1.Learn about national, state and district trends to expand learning time 2.Understand that high quality expanded learning time schools Make Every Minute Count for students 3.Become familiar with NCTL’s Time Analysis Tools 3

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; ELT: Momentum Across the Nation 4 Learning Time in America: Trends to Transform the American School Day and Calendar

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; A National Movement 5

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; -Track state legislation -Partner with key leaders and advocacy organizations -Support State Task Forces -Build base of grassroots supporters in states across the country -Issue ‘calls to action’ at key moments in legislative process Growing Momentum for Expanded Learning Time (ELT) -TIME Act -ARRA: SIG, RTTT and i3 -ESEA Waiver Flexibility -Eventual reintroduction of ESEA Federal Policy State Policy Time to Succeed Coalition 6

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Informing State Policy Today, there expanded-time schools across the country. Since January 2011, 21 states have enacted legislation related to school time. And since 2008, seven states have passed legislation to grant districts or schools autonomies over budgets, staffing, and schedules. -Iowa: Established a three district expanded learning time pilot program and established a commission to study expanding learning time. -Texas: Established an Expanded Learning Opportunities Council to study expanded learning opportunities and to provide recommendations. -Florida: Enacted legislation to add an hour to each school day in 100 elementary schools specifically for reading instruction. 7

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; TIME Collaborative: Building State Models Connecticut: Bridgeport, East Hartford, Meriden, New London, Windham Colorado: Boulder Valley, Denver, Jefferson County Massachusetts: Boston, Fall River, Lawrence, Salem New York: Rochester Tennessee: Knox County, Metro Nashville

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Knox County Public Schools Metro Nashville Public Schools Achievement School District (Memphis) Our Key Partner in Tennessee: Tennessee 9

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; A District Perspective The purpose of the Office of Innovation is to inspire and empower innovative thought and practice in schools while building sustainable systems that ensure every student excels academically and discovers his or her unique interests and strengths. 10

Time for a rigorous and well-rounded education that prepares students for success in college and careers. Time to build high expectations for achievement and behavior Four Interlocking Gears Drive School Success Time for teachers to assess student understanding, analyze and respond to data Time to coach and develop teachers and continuously strengthen instruction Time Time People School Culture Data 11

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Maximizing Academic Learning Time Source: Elena Silva, “On the Clock: Rethinking the Way Schools Use Time,” Education Sector Reports, Academic Learning Time Time students gain and retain subject knowledge Academic Learning Time Time students gain and retain subject knowledge Instructional Time Time devoted to instruction Instructional Time Time devoted to instruction Allocated Class Time Total time in class Allocated Class Time Total time in class Allocated School Time Total time in school Allocated School Time Allocated Class Time Instructional Time 12

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Days 13

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Why More Learning Time? 14 Achievement More Time for Rigorous Instruction to Raise Student Achievement Engagement Inst Quality More Time for Engaging and Relevant Enrichment for Students More Time to Collaborate and Improve Quality of Instruction More Time Benefits BOTH Students and Teachers

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Four Year Change in Proficiency: (2008 – 2011) Top Performing and Bottom Performing Middle Schools with Four Years of ELT More Time Alone Does Not Guarantee Results Schools A & B: Higher Performing Schools Schools C & D: Lower Performing Schools 15

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Essentials of High-Quality ELT Schools At least 60 minutes weekly grade level and/or content area collaboration School-wide protocols for collaboration Administrators participate in and support collaboration At least 60 minutes weekly grade level and/or content area collaboration School-wide protocols for collaboration Administrators participate in and support collaboration All students receive at least 90 minutes more each week for enrichment Enrichment offerings are based in part on student interests and choice, with opportunities for mastery All students receive at least 90 minutes more each week for enrichment Enrichment offerings are based in part on student interests and choice, with opportunities for mastery Time to recognize achievement and reinforce positive behavior at least monthly At least 120 minutes weekly Students grouped based on data identifying academic needs At least 120 minutes weekly Students grouped based on data identifying academic needs At least 60 minutes of weekly teacher review of data School-wide protocols for analysis 4 -6 interim ELA, math assessments yearly At least 60 minutes of weekly teacher review of data School-wide protocols for analysis 4 -6 interim ELA, math assessments yearly No more than 2 school-wide priorities, and 1 instructional focus Clear and measurable goals No more than 2 school-wide priorities, and 1 instructional focus Clear and measurable goals Time allocated to academic instruction reflects student needs 16

% Academics/Academic Support% Specials/Electives% Other 17

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Do You Know How Time is Used in Classrooms in Your Schools? % Transitions% Teacher Led Time% Student Work Time % Assessment of Student Learning 18

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; School Time Analysis Tool (STAT) Classroom Time Analysis Tool (CTAT) Analyzing Time 19

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; School Time Analysis Tool (STAT) Use the data generated by this tool to: Learn how time is allocated across 3 broad categories: Academics, Specials/Electives, and Other Help your schools consider modifications to policies and practices that will optimize learning time for students 20

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Conducting a School Time Analysis WHAT YOU NEED Internet access Student schedules School calendar Information on activities that disrupt instructional time WHO YOU NEED Representative team of administrators, teachers, staff, and partners if applicable HOW LONG IT WILL TAKE Approximately 1 to 1.5 hours to enter the data and review findings FOLLOW-UP Share findings with full faculty Prioritize a few areas for improvement and action steps Follow-through on action steps 21

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; 0 min1950 min Weekly Allocated School Time Purposed Time Non- Purposed Time Academics and Support Non Core Academics Other Academics and Support -English -Math -Science -Social Studies -Foreign Lang. -Tutoring -Remediation -Targeted Supp. -Other -In class transitions -Misc. interruptions -P.A. announcements -In class transitions -Misc. interruptions -P.A. announcements Non Core Academics -Phys. Ed. -Art -Music -Computers or Technology -Community Building -Advisory -Other -Lunch/Recess -Homeroom -Transitions between classes -Study halls or Homework -Other How do Schools Really Allocate Time? Minutes 22

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; How does the STAT Work? STEP 1: Enter students’ start and end times, # standard days per week, and # standard days per year STEP 2: Break down time across a week for a “typical” student STEP 3: Make estimates about lost instructional minutes within classes due to daily interruptions STEP 4: Make estimates about lost instructional hours throughout the year due to special events STEP 5: Let the tool do the math so you can see the results – a snapshot of how time is spent for a typical student across the day, week and year 23

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; STAT Login Screen Access the STAT through this link:

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; STAT Results 25

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Sample: STAT Findings & Action Steps 26

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Maximize Instructional Time & Minimize Interruptions If a teacher increased instructional time by just 15 minutes a day through the use of more efficient routines and procedures, students in that classroom would gain 45 hours of instructional time per year. Research indicates that the average teacher devotes somewhere between 20-50% of time to instructional matters. 27

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Class Time Analysis Tool (CTAT) Use the data generated by this tool to: Learn how time is being used in individual classrooms across 4 categories Help your schools identify and capture effective time management routines, procedures and strategies that minimize interruptions 28

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; CTAT Login Screen Ctat.nctl.iontier.com 29

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; CTAT Results 30

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Sample: CTAT Findings & Action Steps 31

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; MEMC: Creating a Culture that Values Time “WE HAVE 90,000 MINUTES THIS YEAR; MAKE EACH ONE COUNT.” ~ Sign on a bulletin board at Mastery Schools’ Shoemaker Campus (Philadelphia) 32

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Make Every Minute Count for Your Students Understanding how your district, schools and classrooms are currently allocating and using instructional time is the FIRST STEP in creating a new school day/year that strengthens schools through more and better learning time. The SECOND STEP is learning more about NCTL’s planning process to support high quality, sustainable ELT schools. 33

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Lisa Pryor, Senior Director State & District Engagement Laura Middleton, Senior Director School & District Support (Tennessee) Gay Burden, Innovation Design Manager Metro Nashville Public Schools g 34