COSP Evidence-Based Practices. COSP Definition  Consumer-Operated Service Programs (COSPs) is an umbrella term for programs that are administratively.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Advertisements

Ontario’s Policy Framework for Child and Youth Mental Health
1 Highlights of a Systematic Review of Research on Peer-Delivered Services Boston University Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation March 2010.
Introduction to Consumer Operated Service Programs
Consumer-Operated Service Programs Results Jean Campbell, Ph.D. Greg Teague, Ph.D. E. Sally Rogers, Sc.D. Asya Lyass, M.S. Ph.D. (Cand.) FROM INNOVATIONS.
Joseph Rogers, Executive Director National Mental Health Consumers’ Self-Help Clearinghouse 1211 Chestnut St., 11th Floor Philadelphia, PA ,
A BluePrint for Ohio’s Community Mental Health and Addiction System
Peer Services Enhancing the Continuum of Care Doug Smith, M.D., DFAPA Medical Director and Forensic Psychiatrist Summit County ADM Board Director of Community.
THE IMPORTANCE OF PEER SUPPORT
Shaping the future of palliative care leadership: taking the reins Deborah Law Program Manager Workforce Innovation and Reform Health Workforce Australia.
South West Experience. How we went about Different Perspectives Findings Questions But first …………………..
Integration, cooperation and partnerships
Introducing the SAMHSA ToolKIT on Permanent Supportive Housing
Consumer- Operated Services. 2 What are Evidence-Based Practices? Services that have consistently demonstrated their effectiveness in helping people with.
Medicaid Information Technology Architecture (MITA) Where Louisiana Medicaid is Today and Where it Will To Be in the Future April 17, 2012.
Key Findings : Paying for Self-Management Supports as Part of Integrated Community Health Care Systems July, 2012.
Strengthening partnerships: A National Voluntary Health Agency’s initiatives in managed care Sarah L. Sampsel, MPH* Lisa M. Carlson, MPH, CHES* Michele.
Case Management Chapter 19. Introduction  Renewal of interest in case management has been brought about by a fragmented and depersonalized social service.
A Pennsylvania and New Jersey Collaboration 2012.
1. 2 “…the Commission recommends a fundamental transformation of the Nation’s approach to mental health care.” New Freedom Commission on Mental Health.
Towards a Multi-Agency Knowledge Broker Network
THE EXPANDING AND EVOLVING ROLE OF PEERS AND PEER SUPPORT SERVICES LaVerne D. Miller 1.
Consumer-Operated Service Program Multi-Site Research Initiative.
Presentation Developed by the: Illinois Department of Human Services/Division of Mental Health Illinois Mental Health Collaborative for Access and Choice.
Grading America’s Public Mental Health System – Cloudy Skies, Silver Lining on the Horizon? Mary Giliberti Director of Public Policy and Advocacy, NAMI.
Implementation Strategy for Evidence- Based Practices CIMH Community Development Team Model Pam Hawkins, Senior Associate Association for Criminal Justice.
Medicaid and Behavioral Health – New Directions John O’Brien Senior Policy Advisor Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP.
Health Care Reform Strategies Moving Forward: Transforming Behavioral Health Recovery in an Era of Health Care Reform Pat Taylor Executive Director Faces.
Employment Service Rule
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
The challenge and promise of community based participatory research 1.
Transforming Mental Health Services Through the Use of Evidence-Based and Emerging Best Practices Columbia River Doubletree June 3-4, 2004 Peer Support.
The New Public Health System
SIM- Data Infrastructure Subcommittee November 14, 2013.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;
LEAs as Service Providers and Collaborators in the Federal Framework to End Youth Homelessness: Youth Intervention Model NAEHCY Conference October 27,
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Georgia Housing Voucher and Bridge Funding Programs SFY 2013 A Year in Review.
SAFETY NET INNOVATION NETWORK Moving Forward - July 2012.
SOAR and Consumer-Run Organizations: Informational Call! PRESENTED BY: SAMHSA SOAR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER POLICY RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. UNDER CONTRACT.
Elizabeth WellsDennis Daley School of Social WorkWestern Psychiatric Institute University of WashingtonUniversity of Pittsbu rgh Supported by Grants #
Complex Care Teams Context The Department of Health white paper “Our Health, Our Care, Our Say” ‘By 2008 we expect all PCTs and local authorities to have.
 Low educational attainment  Lone parents  Unemployment  Family Breakdown  Loss of partner/spouse/parent/s  Addictions  Disability – physical and.
Walsall Council Social Care and Inclusion The Care Act 2014 What it will mean for you Stuart Fletcher.
Module IV: Building Organizational Capacity and Community Support Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the United States Departments of Education, Health.
4/24/2017 Health and Social Care Reform in Greater Manchester Developing a commissioning strategy for Primary Care Rob Bellingham — Director of Commissioning.
EHealth Progress Across the States in 2007 Results of a Survey of State Officials AcademyHealth National Health Policy Conference State Health Research.
THE COORDINATED RESPONSE TO REENTRY Alameda County Reentry Network.
Updated by Gary Bond Evidence for the Effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support Model of Supported Employment.
Integrated Health/Behavioral Health Competencies in SMH Melissa George MHEDIC May 2015.
Creating an Integrated Framework for Reducing Disparities in Health Care Quality Francis D. Chesley, Jr., MD Director Office of Extramural Research, Education.
Consumer-Run Programs and Drop-In Centers: Providing a Rationale and Research Base for Implementation of Recovery Oriented Services in Fairfax County Empowered.
Inputs Outputs Outcomes ActivitiesParticipantsShort TermIntermediateLong Term Georgia Hospital Association Disseminate information on best practices in.
Five Year Forward View: Personal Health Budgets and Integrated Personal Commissioning Jess Harris January 2016.
Advice and Health Project James Sandbach, Low Commission.
1 Highlights of a Systematic Review of Literature on Peer-Delivered Services Boston University Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation June 2010.
Maryland’s School Mental Health Initiatives and Progress.
The History of the Consumer Movement and Peer Supports Presented by Patrick Hendry Senior Director, Consumer Advocacy Mental Health America Webinar May.
Bedfordshire CCG - Our Story Health and Wellbeing Stakeholder Event 1 February 2013 John Rooke, Chief Operating Officer 1.
HEALTH AND CARE STANDARDS APRIL Background Ministerial commitment 2013 – Safe Care Compassionate Care Review “Doing Well Doing Better” Standards.
Community Connections Heather Altman, MPH Project Director, Community Connections Carol Woods Retirement Community /
Adult Social Care in 2014 A brief summary of what’s happening CAS Health and Social Care Forum 29 January 2014.
Introduction The majority of telemedicine interactions in Ontario, outside of a hospital, take place among a small number of medical specialities, including.
Peer Support in Behavioral Health Presentation to the Mental Health Caucus Adrienne Shilton, CBHDA April 20, 2016.
Overview: Evidence-based Health Promotion and Disease Management Programs.
Beaver County Behavioral Health
Oregon Supported Employment Center for Excellence (OSECE)
ADVANCING THE PRACTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT
Presentation transcript:

COSP Evidence-Based Practices

COSP Definition  Consumer-Operated Service Programs (COSPs) is an umbrella term for programs that are administratively controlled and operated by persons with mental illness and emphasize self-help as their operational approach in delivering peer support services.

Introduction: Development of COSPs In the early 1970’s, large numbers of psychiatric patients were discharged from psychiatric hospitals to find themselves adrift in uncaring communities. In response, they began to organized small groups for mutual support through self-help approaches and to advocate for social justice.

Development of COSPs By the 1990’s persons with mental illness began to more formally organize on a national level championing the South African disability motto “Nothing About Us, Without Us.” Many self-help groups were bundled together as consumer-operated service programs (COSPs).

Development of COSPs By the turn of the 21st century, the push for recovery and the use of peer support services accelerated across the United States as COSPs matured, diversified and increased in numbers.

Primary COSP Models Today, a wide range of peer support services are available through six primary COSP service delivery models: –Self help groups –Drop-in centers –Specialized peer services (crisis, unemployment, homelessness) –Multi-service agencies –Peer educator and advocacy programs –Peer phone services (warmlines)

COSPs and Positive Outcomes Until recently, mental health services research focused primarily on the effectiveness of traditional mental health modalities and programs to treat mental illness, and neglected to consider COSPs as valued service partners that could produce positive outcomes for persons with mental illness leading to recovery.

COSP Multi-Site Study Largest and most rigorous study of COSPs to date A decade of research was funded by SAMHSA and led by the MIMH Coordinating Center on eight COSPs located across the United States Randomized, controlled trial study design Fidelity tool Analyses: As-Treated and Intent-to-Treat Over 1800 study participants (adults with severe and persistent mental illness)

COSP Study Results Participants offered consumer-operated services as an adjunct to their traditional mental health services showed significant gains in positive subjective wellbeing (CWB) –hope, self-efficacy, empowerment, goal attainment and meaning of life in comparison to those who were offered traditional mental health services only.

COSP Study Results The greatest gains in CWB were found for the participants who used the peer support services the most. Variations in CWB effects across sites were unrelated to formal COSP models of peer support service delivery. Most important, analyses of COSP practices and outcome results established evidence of a strong relationship between key peer practices and CWB outcomes.

COSPs Are EBPs COSP study results confirmed that COSPs are evidence-based: –Using the EBP protocol of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, previously the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research [AHCPR]), two additional randomized controlled trials were identified that supported the CWB hypothesis. – SAMHSA recognized COSPs as EBPs and funded the publication of the COSP EBP Toolkit

COSP Study Roll Out Fidelity Tool based on COSP study developed, field-tested and implemented in selected states Website developed with public domain data base, data dictionary, final report, fidelity tool, links Coordination between SAMHSA and UM- STL Communications Press Release

Policy Efforts to Expand COSPs as an EBP As the nation’s mental health system adopts an integrated, recovery-based approach to providing mental health services and supports, evidence of the effectiveness of COSPs will encourage policy efforts to expand peer support services within the continuum of community care.

VISION OF THE FUTURE COSPs will become a vital force for promoting the wellbeing of persons with mental illness carrying a message of recovery across the globe.