EFQM Excellence Model & Levels of Excellence Learning Edge - July 05.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model Refreshing Review INTRODUCTION. Content Explain the Process used Talk about changes at different levels Question and Answer session What next?
Advertisements

Bernard Casier Member Quality Audit Cell The Flemish Quality Audit System Brussels, 26 th June 2012.
New partnership levels by LUKA VIDMAR Treasurer of BEST BEST PARTNERS ROUND TABLE 26 January 2007 Turin, Italy.
Achieve Benefit from IT Projects. Aim This presentation is prepared to support and give a general overview of the ‘How to Achieve Benefits from IT Projects’
Topic 6 - The Investors in People award
Salford Community, Health and Social Care Directorate Investors in People Feedback 2006.
Developing Employees ACC's Mission & Principles  "Create an Environment for Employees that fosters personal Growth and allows Individuals to achieve their.
A practical tool for driving customer-focused change.
1 Quality Management – Week 7 l Last Week – Benchmarking »Principle is that you compare your performance with others »See to be up with the best in each.
©2006 OLC 1 Process Management: The Foundation for Achieving Organizational Excellence Process Management Implementation Worldwide.
© EFQM 2014 EFQM Recognition Ireland Excellence Award George Wilson Centre for Competitiveness.
Business Excellence within The University of Bolton Strategic Planning Process 17 th October 2006.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
1 23 October 2003 Patrick LYNAM Chairman, Agency Group for Excellence EUROCONTROL Agency Journey to Excellence & Self Assessment.
INVESTORS IN PEOPLE CORPORATE ASSESSMENT DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Self-Assessment for Continuous Improvement: Tools and Techniques 16 September 2009.
The ISO 9000 family of standards
Implementing the new Australian Medical Council standards: The focus on Indigenous health Professor Michael Field Chair, Medical School Accreditation Committee,
Partnership between the NYCI, the Health Service Executive and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs National Youth Health Programme Kevin O’ Hagan.
Fostering and adoption
1©NQI NQI Progressive Excellence Criteria for the Federal Public Service No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or.
LAA Judging Criteria & Process 2015
© 2002 Systex Services1 ISO 9000:2000 OUTLINE Quality Management System.
The Cedar Foundation Stephen Mathews – Chief Executive Stella Maguire – Head of Organisational and Service Development.
at the Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Efficiency and IT Panel SHARP Project Update Sept 2005 Hertfordshire County Council
Quality Management.  Quality management is becoming increasingly important to the leadership and management of all organisations. I  t is necessary.
Supporting Integrated and Comprehensive Approaches to Climate Change Adaptation in Africa AAP Country Conference “Celebrating our Successes” 12 th - 16.
Developing people, growing organisations 1 Delivering change through effective governance Care & Repair Cymru Stephanie Bamford Thursday 20 September 2012.
The Future of Public Sector Quality Management with CAF The CAF External Feedback Procedure 2010.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
© 2002 Systex Services1 BUSINESS EXCELLENCE - using the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) self- assessment process.
Capacity Self-Assessment as a management tool for organisational development planning u A model used for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration,
NHS Education for Scotland Defining A Quality Improvement Framework For A Coordinated Service Model Workshop 27 th May 2003 Dr Ann Wales NHS Scotland Library.
Process Assessment Method
Investors in People “Nation building is not a spectator sport” (Minister of Labour, MMS Mdladlana, M.P.)
Self Assessment Using EFQM Excellence MODEL Down Lisburn Trust’s Experience of Continuous Improvement John Simpson Down Lisburn Trust.
Corporate Social Responsibility LECTURE 25: Corporate Social Responsibility MGT
CAF Resource Centre at EIPA Open Days Patrick Staes Senior Expert European Institute of Public Administration THE COMMON ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK.
The European Mark of Quality Stefano Schena, President EPR 24th October 2005.
Quality Assuring Deliverers of Education and Training for the Nuclear Sector Jo Tipa Operations Director National Skills Academy for Nuclear.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
Open ECBCheck Methods for Quality Development Rafael García Rodríguez University of Augsburg, 2010.
The European Quality Award “simply the best…” “There are many benefits of entering the European Quality Award.It gives us a better image in the markets.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.
EFQM Levels of Excellence
Needs for changes and adjusting to them in the management of statistical systems Panel discussion Prospects and Risks for the Future: How to manage uncertainties.
Self Assessment SELF ASSESSMENT FOR YOU Ann Pike 30 th September 2010.
COMPETENCY MAPPING ASSESSMENT & DEVELOPMENT BY : SUBHASHIS CHATTERJEE Sr. MGR (PERSONNEL)
EFQM Excellence Model and EFQM Community of Practice for Police Forces and Services Vilnius, March 29-30, 2007.
Comparison between the EQAVET process and the ISO 9001 and the EFQM Model Hungarian experience Katalin Molnar-Stadler Information Seminar for National.
Overall NSW Health 2011 YourSay Survey Results YourSay - NSW Health Workplace Survey Results Presentation NSW Health Overall Presented by: Robyn Burley.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
Total Quality Management in the pursue of Business Excellence.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
LAA Judging Criteria & Process
The European CAF external feedback procedure - Webinar Lessons learned
Active Training Awards 2017: Training Provider of the Year
Active Training Awards 2017: Transformational Leadership Award
Active Training Awards 2017: Small Employer of the Year (up to 100 employees) This category is aimed at employers that provide outstanding support and.
Active Training Awards 2017: Apprenticeship Provider of the Year
Active Training Awards 2017: Learning and Development Supplier of the Year This category is aimed at organisations that provide exceptional education and.
Guidelines for Self-Assessment at Program Level
Quality Managements Frameworks
LAA Judging Criteria & Process
New Standard for Employer Responsiveness
Presentation transcript:

EFQM Excellence Model & Levels of Excellence Learning Edge - July 05

Agenda The EFQM Model reflected in Levels of Excellence Examples of improving results/performance from R4E projects Examples of improving results/performance from C2E

EQA Recognised for Excellence Committed to Excellence Based on the full EFQM model 75 page submission in English Team of International Assessors Consensus and full Site Visit Enhanced Feedback Recognition at around 600+ points Based on the full EFQM Model 50 page structured submission in the local language or via workshop approach Assessors Consensus and basic Site Visit Feedback Report at criteria level Recognition at 400+ points Based on the 9 criteria of the EFQM Model 12 page SA summary + improvement plan Two stage process, assessment and site visit Supported by one Validator Recognition based on implementation of an improvement plan (no points) EFQM Levels of Excellence Overview

Main Objectives of the scheme Provide clear milestones on the journey to Excellence Maximise the number of organisations applying the fundamental concepts & principles of the EFQM Excellence Model Provide practical products and services that help organisations improve Provide consistent, European-wide recognition delivered by EFQM & its National Partners

Common features of all Levels 1. Based on feedback 2. Delivered to a common standard AND…

Common features of all Levels 3. Based on the Model & RADAR

The Model + R4E The EFQM Excellence Model is reflected in the Recognised for Excellence process as follows: Assessment against the 32 criterion parts + RADAR Written feedback against the 9 criterion parts Must score above 400 points after a site visit to be successful

Examples of R4E Improving results/performance 1 Public Sector Organisation - UK: Our assessment was good for Key Performance Indicators but low for others Assessment showed that although highly focused on all Stakeholders in our approaches, measurement was not being undertaken to reinforce this Measuring in all areas and getting good feedback will help us with our image and ensure we are focusing on the right areas for stakeholders

Examples of R4E Improving results/performance 2 2. Production Company - Poland: Preparing for the assessment was motivating for our people and that increased satisfaction, which in turn has an impact on production The process for R4E asks organisations to look at and describe their processes, at the same time he highlighted improvement opportunities for us Achieving R4E increased our standing & prestige in the context of EU integration and as a group of well managed European organisations

Examples of R4E Improving results/performance Telecom Services - Various: Assessment highlighted gaps in Assessment and Review of processes Projects were set up to review performance including benchmarking Improvements in process performance led to improved Key Performance Results

The Model + C2E The EFQM Excellence Model is reflected in the Committed to Excellence process as follows: Assessment against the 9 criterion parts Validation of improvements using RADAR Written feedback for each improvement action All three improvements must pass a profile to be successful

The C2E Process internal Analysis & Action Plan Version 1 12 pages Execution & Follow-up of Action Plan Site visit 1 day Version 2 12 pages 6 – 9 months performance time external

Examples of C2E Improving results/performance 1 Service Company - Spain Action - to develop a set of job specific training plans and evaluation Improvement – understanding the current state and implementing training and development to cover gaps Impact on Results – improved people satisfaction and improved performance because people are better equipped to deliver targets

Examples of C2E Improving results/performance 2 2.Telecoms Company – Czech Republic Action – Develop and deliver a Data Roadshow Improvement – Communicate to the companies people on a wide basis regarding products and services available Impact on Results – improved people satisfaction because they had access to people through the Roadshow they didn’t normally see. Improved Key performance results because of increased sales.

Examples of C2E Improving results/performance 2 3.Government Organisation - Belgium Action – Develop a performance Management System Improvement – Changes in reporting mean quantitative and qualitative measures now required Impact on Results – improvement in business planning leading to improved overall management of the organisation and consequently on performance results

General Benefits of applying the Model through C2E Identification of Organisations strengths and areas for improvement assessed against the most widely used management framework Structured process for identifying, prioritising, documenting and implementing improvement activity Feedback from external Validator on the implementation of the projects Where successful, recognition (logo’s, certificates, database entry and newsletter mention)

General Benefits of applying the Model through R4E External identification/validation of your Organisations strengths, areas for improvement & score profile by fully trained assessors using a proven management framework Written feedback helping you to improve the quality of input to your business planning process Where successful, recognition (logo’s, certificates, database entry & newsletter mention)