FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Second International Seville Seminar on Future- Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

Second Stakeholders Forum on EU cooperation in Education and Training 2009 EUROPEAN YEAR OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION Report of the workshops February.
Six Countries Programme Workshop May 2006 Shaping the future through learning from the past – Evaluation and Foresight Dr. Mari Hjelt Gaia Consulting.
Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Foresight.
Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Responsibility.
Linking regions and central governments: Indicators for performance-based regional development policy 6 th EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION OF COHESION.
Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.
J. David Tàbara Institute of Environmental Science and Technology Autonomous University of Barcelona Integrated Climate Governance.
Olivier DA COSTA, Philine WARNKE Fabiana SCAPOLO, Cristiano CAGNIN
Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Adaptive.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
The Use and Impact of FTA Attila Havas and Ron Johnston Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and Australian Centre for Innovation Third.
EVALUATION as an instrument of governance for a regional social plan Dr. Annamaria Casini (sociopolitical management expert) SULMONA - 22nd October 2012.
© UKCIP 2011 Learning and Informing Practice: The role of knowledge exchange Roger B Street Technical Director Friday, 25 th November 2011 Crew Project.
Building open regional innovation strategies: New opportunities provided by Smart Specialisation Strategies Claire Nauwelaers Independent STI policy expert.
FANRPAN Adding Value in Agricultural and Natural Resources Policies and Processes in Southern Africa.
Intellectual Property and Bilateral Trade Agreements Moving towards effective participation.
Orienting Innovation towards Grand Challenges: a real-time experiment in the application of foresight-assisted processes Professor Ron Johnston Australian.
Africa and National Communications under UNFCCC : A Means To An End Dr. George Manful Senior Task Manager, Climate Change Enabling Activities, UNEP.
" ICT SUPPORT FOR UNIVERSALISATION OF SECONDARY EDUCATION“ Ashish Garg Asia Regional Coordinator Global eSchools and Communities Initiative 27 th May 2009,
Richard J.T. Klein Stockholm Environment Institute and Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Linköping University.
DIVISION Landstingsdirektörens stab Coral Interreg Europe proposal Project proposal addresses objective 1.2 of the Interreg Europe Programme: Improve the.
Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO): Update Deborah Roseveare Head, Skills beyond School Division Directorate for Education OECD 31.
Strategic Commissioning
KT-EQUAL/ CARDI Workshop: ‘Lost in Translation’ 23 June 2011 Communicating research results to policy makers: A practitioner’s perspective.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Time to act on the Future of Europe …
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
Nef (the new economics foundation) Co-producing Lambeth what’s possible? Lucie Stephens and Julia Slay nef, October 2011.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
Dr C Svanfeldt; DG RTD K2; October 6, Support for the coherent development of policies Regional Foresight in a European Perspective Dr. Christian.
Telecentre-Europe Recommendations, June Review of our vision/purpose: Vision: By 2010, Telecentres.Europe will be a viable network of telecentres.
Mysoltani.ir سایت فیلم روشهای مشارکتی Technology Foresight Foresight is about preparing for the future. It is about deploying resources in the best.
Sustainable Futures FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY Meirion Thomas Cardiff Business School & CMInno Group In collaboration.
Presentation to Joint Committee on the Improvement of Quality of Life and Status of Youth and Disabled Persons Umsobomvu Youth Fund Wednesday, May 30,
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Strategies for making evaluations more influential in supporting program management and informing decision-making Australasian Evaluation Society 2011.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Strategic Direction Janice Melnychuk Russ Dahms If you don’t know where you are going Any path will get you there.
Adaptive, Embedded, and Disruptive Foresight: Theory and Evidence for a Futures Literacy Approach Riel Miller xperidox futures consulting, Paris, France.
How to measure the impact of R&D on SD ? Laurence Esterle, MD, PhD Cermes and Ifris France Cyprus, 16 – 17 October L. ESTERLE Linking science and.
The BMBF Foresight Process Kerstin Cuhls, Walter Ganz, Philine Warnke Fraunhofer ISI and Fraunhofer IAO Third International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented.
Version VTT TECHNOLOGY STUDIES Evaluating the societal impacts of Public research organisations: A (belated) paradigm shift in the making Kaisa.
Alice Pedretti, Project Manager Effective management of complaints for companies Lessons learned from the Management of Complaints Assessment Tool Amsterdam,
Challenge of global foresight: lessons from IMS scenario and roadmapping process Cristiano Cagnin & Totti Könnölä JRC-IPTS & Impetu Solutions The 4th International.
Achieving Outcomes through Combining Approaches G. Clar, S. Hafner; H. Acheson Steinbeis-Europa-Zentrum; Forfás Second International Seville Seminar on.
Introduction to advocacy
Projects, Events and Training
Session 1. The Central Principles of HiAP
Presentation title 5. Overview of the process to formulate and implement NAPs: process, 2 objectives, guidelines, the NAP-SDG iFrame, upcoming SBI assessment.
Investment Logic Mapping – An Evaluative Tool with Zing
Philine Warnke and Gaston Heimeriks IPTS
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Martin Müller InRoad Coordinator InRoad
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
Interpreting Foresight Process Impacts:
Module 5 The Climate Expert and your role as a consultant
Governance of the FTA Community
Managing a PSIA process
Workshop 1: PROJECT EVALUATION
The National Implementation Plan for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) - FINLAND Juha Pyykkö, Ambassador, Finland.
The Use and Impact of FTA
Forward Studies Unit (Latvia)
New Approaches to Governance
Date and venue: 23 September, MSFD PCG, DG Environment, Brussels
Presentation transcript:

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Second International Seville Seminar on Future- Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Contribution of the FORLEARN project to the study of Foresight Impact on Policy-Making Olivier DA COSTA, Philine WARNKE Fabiana SCAPOLO, Cristiano CAGNIN European Commission / Joint Research Centre / Institute for Prospective Technological Studies

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Outline FORLEARN project Challenges of policy- / decision-making Interface between Foresight and policy-making Contribution of Foresight to policy-making 1.Policy informing 2.Policy facilitating through enabling change 3.Strategic counselling 4.Democratic function Different contributions at different steps of policy making Five major issues for high impact

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making FOR-LEARN Project Part of the Foresight Knowledge Sharing Platform initiated by DG Research Objectives: 1.Consolidating and improving access to existing Foresight knowledge and know-how 2.Providing support to practitioners undertaking Foresight exercise (territorial or sectoral) 3.Promoting mutual learning between practitioners and users 4.Improving interconnexion of European projects and actors 5.Addressing current research issues

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making FOR-LEARN Learning Cycle Foresight Learning Cycle WP1 Online Foresight guide WP1 Online Foresight guide WP2 Online Query WP2 Online Query WP3 Mutual Learning Workshop WP3 Mutual Learning Workshop Expertise for the support to practitioners Knowledge gaps Feedback to update the guide Foresight Learning Cycle WP1 Online Foresight guide WP1 Online Foresight guide WP2 Online Query WP2 Online Query WP3 Mutual Learning Workshop WP3 Mutual Learning Workshop Expertise for the support to practitioners Knowledge gaps Feedback to update the guide Information about Foresight such as what it is what it can do for you and what not. Practical guidance on how to design and carry out the different phases of a Foresight exercise Detailed description and implementation advises for a number of Foresight methods Case studies presenting past and current exercises (territorial or sectoral) emphasising practical information and lessons learned Links to more academic discussions and references to go deeper into the current research issues To promote Transfer and consolidation of knowledge Codification of practises Research on knowledge gaps Different types Bilateral (in support of a specific exercise, ex Romanian) Multilateral (addressing a knowledge gap with experts) Consolidation (presenting results to a larger audience) Individual and targeted support to practitioners, especially beginners Direct answer Reference to other sources or contacts Possibly set-up of a Mutual Learning Workshop to address the issue more in depth

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Challenges of policy- / decision-making Under severe time pressure Information overload not always reliable not always relevant Speed of change & uncertainty, Increasing complexity of issues Multi-dimensional: S&T, economic, cultural & social, political, environmental Inter-connection, inter-dependency, multi-causal Good old fashioned control system not applicable You can never change one thing Difficulty to switch modes dealing with urgency long-term thinking Challenge to transmit complexity

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Bottleneck in the communication Huge basis of material in the Society, Academy, Industry (over)simplification and formatting for the messages to go through: indicators, ranking... Problematic of policy-making often on a reduced basis Black box Pandora box

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Three approaches Increase the bandwidth Huge basis of material in the Society, Academy, Industry Optimise the signal Transmit more relevant, useable and operational material Improve reception Improve credibility by giving good advises Make thing interesting rather than boring Increase the bandwidth Create mechanisms of consultations at different steps of policy-making Couple qualitative with quantitative Use parallel channels of attention: pictures, movies… Use of the media Problematic of policy-making often on a reduced basis Optimise the signal Improve reception

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Why revisiting impact on policy-making? From interviews and literature review: Increasing emphasis on impact assessment and on value for money Debate on new policy-support instruments Long-standing experience in Foresight allows for review of lessons learned

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Two main functions of Foresight for policy making Actor Policy Actor Informing policy Acto r Facilitating Policy Foresight process Foresight product

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Anticipatory intelligence Dynamics of change (scenarios, roadmaps) Future opportunities & threats Strengths & weaknesses of the current system for addressing future challenges (e.g. skills & competencies available) Visions for change Recommendations for action Based on a diversity of knowledge sources Stakeholders views Viewpoints and expectations in reference to a policy field New ideas from new channels 1: Policy informing function Policy Informing policy Foresight product

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making 2: Policy facilitating function Actor Policy Actor Foresight process Facilitating Policy through enabling change Within the targeted arena of change: Common ground Linkages & interfaces Combinations between elements (e.g. institutions, companies, people, knowledge, beliefs, technologies, products) Joint visions Learning platforms Soft coordination Awareness of policy objectives, strategy and constraints Willingness to contribute to policy implementation because of agreement with the goal to reach and even feeling of ownership Distributed intelligence Shared information as an input to decision-making for various actors and stakeholders beyond policy-makers Policy benefit: Enhanced the receptivity of the systems and thereby its capability to react to future challenges and evolve in phase with policy- making Remark: In innovation policy, fostering the ability to change and the connectivity are objectives in themselves in order to enhance the innovation capability

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Two main functions Policy Foresight product Informing policy Facilitating Policy Highlighting: Dynamics of change Future risks & opportunities Capabilities of the system New ideas & visions Stakeholders views Enabling change by building amongst stakeholders: Common ground Soft coordination Distributed intelligence Foresight process

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making 3: Strategic counselling function Specific function for some policy-oriented exercises Concept: Joint translation of outcomes from a collective exercise into strategic options for a specific policy actor (e.g. ministry) Outcome: Future-oriented strategies in specific policy fields (e.g. adaptive, robust) adapted to the needs of a specific policy actor

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making 3: Strategic counselling function Policy Product: Informing Collective Foresight Process: Facilitating Strategy Phase Adapted strategic options

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making 4: Democratic function Improve the transparency and legitimacy Especially for policy with long-term impact or large budget spending

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Foresight in policy-making Evaluation Agenda- setting FORESIGHT Strategy building Ex-ante impact analysis Learning Implementation Understanding of changes Receptivity of the system New ideas Legitimacy, transparency Visions Strategic options

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Five crucial issues identified by practitioners [2 nd FORLEARN Mutual Learning Workshop Brussels April 2006] 1.Embedding Foresight in policy process 2.Adequate involvement of policy makers 3.Joining policy implementation 4.Building a reservoir of knowledge 5.Linking to choices and values

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making 1 Embedding Foresight in policy process Issue Foresight outcomes are only taken onboard if they are well in phase with policy-making process, in terms of Timing Cultural compatibility Useability Approach Careful analysis of policy-context (positions of other actors etc.) to define space of manoeuvre for the policy actor Positioning in reference to other ongoing policy processes Dont stand alone but competitive

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making 2 Adequate involvement of policy makers Issue Finding the right balance of policy makers involvement On the one hand policy-makers require external and neutral advice On the other they may not, without early involvement, embrace the outcomes (Not Invented Here) Presence of policy makers encourages lobbying rather than creative thinking Approach Finding specific roles for policy makers in the process Windows of policy interaction & windows of seclusion

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making 3 Joining policy implementation Issue Anticipatory intelligence is not easily translated into strategies Even more so if it stems from a collective process Difficulty for policy makers to communicate their agenda within open process Lack of understanding about real needs of policy makers Stakeholders not in a position to develop policy strategies Approach Jointly translating anticipatory intelligence from collective process into strategic options If in line with the specific objectives of this exercise And: Keeping protected spaces for creativity Not diverting collective process with the constraints of implementation

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making 4 Building a reservoir of knowledge Issue Precise answers to precise questions are usually not possible on the spot, neither always desirable Changing policy agenda, difficult to be in phase Different time scales: Foresight slower than policy-making Not always possible to go through the strategic counselling phase Limit the aversion against prescriptions that some policy makers have Approach Anticipate timing of decision-making Conceptualise outcomes as a reservoir of possible policy alternatives (rather than prioritisation or recommendations) that can be adopted by different actors at different times Even in case of a major change, e.g. elections

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making 5 Linking to choices and values Issue Policies should be linked to normative objectives such as sustainability, quality of life etc. Stakeholders need to be convinced that the policy results of a choice, not a lack of choice E.g. French referendum on European constitution Approach Linking explicitly the exploration of the future with debates about choices and values Not only possible futures but also desirable futures

FORLEARN & Foresight Impact on Policy-making Thank you for your attention