Information Literacy: Challenges at the school level James Henri UPH Session 5 Associate Professor Faculty of Education The University of Hong Kong

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To Flex or Not to Flex… That Is the Question Presented by Pamela Kuck Instructional Technology Director CESA 8
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
When Students Can’t Read…
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
ETL504 - Teacher Librarian as Leader Objective: Be able to relate issues in leadership theory and decision-making to the teacher librarian's role in the.
Principal Professional Development project
Information Literacy Demonstration – Partnership of Faculty and Library Gergana Georgieva Information Literacy Librarian August 25, 2008.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
The Principal-Library Team Dynamic… Powerful partnerships forging information literate school communities Lyn Hay School of Information Studies Charles.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Joanne Muellenbach, MLS, AHIP The Commonwealth Medical College Scranton, Pennsylvania June 26, 2012.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
The Comprehensive School Health Education Curriculum:
STRATEGIES FOR ONLINE LEARNING IN A GLOBAL NETWORK UNIVERSITY INTED 2013 Annette Smith, Kristopher Moore, Erica Osher Reifer New York University.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Chapter 13 Program Evaluation and Technology Integration Strategies.
Texas Education Agency Updated F-2 FOUNDATION.
I’m In Activity Reflect on the morning in 1-2 sentences “I’m in”
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
1 Julia Da Silva- Beharry, August The goal of this final project is to disseminate key research findings and K-12 classroom application strategies.
The goal of this final project is to disseminate key research findings and K-12 classroom application strategies. This is based upon the effectiveness.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Information literacy features strongly on the CIT Strategic Plan, the Learning Services Division Business Plan and the Library & Learning Centre Operational.
Using the Nine Characteristics to Test Assumptions in School Improvement G. Sue Shannon OSPI Senior Researcher WERA/OSPI Assessment Conference December.
Presidential National Commission on Information Society and Development (PNC on ISAD)  Government commitment to information society Accelerated Shared.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Made by: Mudassar Iqbal 1 INTEGRATION OF IT PLAN IN SCHOOL SYSTEM.
Dr. Lesley Farmer California State University Long Beach
Information Literacy: School & university synergy James Henri UPH Session 7 Associate Professor University of Hong Kong.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
K-12 Technology Literacy Curriculum and Assessment.
Essential Conditions for Implementation of... Local Professional Development Programming.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
THE TEACHER-LIBRARIAN AND STRATEGIC CHANGE Towards 21C learning in a 21C school.
Module 4: Unit 3, Session 3 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 3, Session 3.
This presentation:  is “ready-to-use” for presentations to school division administrators, board members, library personnel, teachers, etc.  incorporates.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
Module Four: Resources for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
A Leadership Challenge Using web search tools in the 21 st C learning environment Group 1 Jenna Abercrombie Katharine Mathews Leanne Sharpe Leanne Richards.
A Leadership Challenge Using web search tools in the 21 st Century learning environment Group 1: Jenna Abercrombie, Katharine Mathews, Leanne Richards,
Hannah Love LSIS 5645 Core Assessment IV. Why is information literacy necessary?  To fulfill the goals of education by preparing students for The workplace.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
QTC Tel: : Yan Li QTC Tel: : Student-Centred Learning The Challenge of Change.
 “I have to teach the same information skills each year because students do not learn them.”  “I don’t have time to give tests so I do not assess student.
New Frameworks for Teaching and Learning Bertram C. Bruce Nicholas C. Burbules Scott D. Johnson James A. Levin.
THE TEACHER-LIBRARIAN AND STRATEGIC CHANGE Towards 21C learning in a 21C school.
ETL504 - Teacher Librarian as Leader Objective: Be able to relate issues in leadership theory and decision-making to the teacher librarian's role in the.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Presenter: Mazinza Ndala Tel:
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
4 September 2007 Distributive Leadership for Learning & Teaching 1 Total Curriculum Management (TCM) An Integrated Curriculum Using Distributed Content.
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
LANGUAGE TEACHERS AND THE NEW CURRICULUM IN KAZAKHSTAN Bob Obee Express Publishing Astana 2016.
S CHOOL -B ASED L EADERSHIP T EAMS 1. COLLABORATIVE CULTURE School Based Leadership Teams… this team really, really matters PRINCIPAL and PS/RtI COACH:
TRANSVERSAL COMPETENCIES IN EDUCATION POLICIES AND PRACTICE
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction
Creating a Collaborative WE Learning Culture
The Year of Core Instruction
Purposeful Literacy Leadership for Administrators: Start a Movement
Roles of a Media Specialist
Using data for instructional decision-making
Librarians in the 21st Century
Information Literacy: What is it and Why Should I Care?
Presentation transcript:

Information Literacy: Challenges at the school level James Henri UPH Session 5 Associate Professor Faculty of Education The University of Hong Kong

The Big Picture If students are to understand that information literacy has value, it must reach them not as assignments, lists of rules, and checklists, but as enthralling work. If information literacy is to stick for a lifetime, information literacy must be a transformational process that compels students past twilight, imbued with a feeling of investigating something enormous! After: Abilock, D. (2004)

More Big Picture Our task is to teach our students the rigorous, analytical, sweaty work of closely examining an argument, questioning our thinking patterns, ferreting out inconsistencies— fundamentals of critical thinking. Rather than teach the skill, if we teach to transfer that skill—in using a library, recognizing bias, or analyzing an argument—from one setting or task to another, students recognize that information literacy is not a school task but a lifetime habit of mind—of evaluating and using information for personal, social, or global purposes. Abilock, D. (2004)

Information Literacy: Barriers Information skills in isolation Teacher Librarians in isolation Teachers in isolation

Information Literacy: Barriers Focus on knowledge not on learning & understanding (photocopy learning) Focus on the learning not on the learner Textbook/Testing focus Classroom isolation Learning for school, not learning for life Curriculum focus on content

Information Literacy: Barriers Lack of planning time Unimaginative time tables Focus on the tools not the transformation Home work (for mum) Lack of information policy development

Information Literacy: Barriers Lack of whole school IL focus Inadequate reporting about the learner and progress towards IL Inadequate attention to library support staff Inadequate funding for library collection & services

Focus on students rather than focus on teachers and the culture of the workplace

IL is about Partnership

Partnership relies on a shared: Vision Commitment Capability Capacity Focus

What is the vision? Is there a shared understanding of the IL concept? How robust is that concept?

What is the vision? Scenario 1 Information literacy is about equipping students to search efficiently. Scenario 2 Information literacy is about information mastery.

What is the commitment? Is it reasonable to assume this might be a responsibility associated with delivery of information services? Is it reasonable to assume that the teachers will frame questions that avoid ‘copy and paste’ discoveries? Scenario 1 Information literacy is about equipping students to search efficiently.

What is the commitment? Are librarians and teachers masters at this? Is it reasonable to assume that it is part of the mandate of the library? If this is delivered by the library what drives students to take it seriously? Should librarians also instruct the teachers? What pressure would be needed? Scenario 1 Information literacy is about equipping students to search efficiently.

What is the commitment? How is progress in subject content mastery measured & reported? How is progress in information mastery measured & reported?

What is the capability? Are teachers information literate? Yes: What is their role in this? What is the librarians role in this? How do they ensure synergy? Scenario 2 Information literacy is about information mastery.

What is the capability? Are teachers information literate? No: What can be done? 1.Pre-service education 2.Tertiary Teaching Certificate 3.Continuing Professional Development (by whom?) 4.Integrated curriculum 5.Essential Learning Scenario 2 Information literacy is about information mastery.

What is the capability? Are librarians information literate? No: What can be done? 1.Pre-service education 2.Tertiary Teaching Certificate 3.Continuing Professional Development (by whom?) 4.Integrated curriculum 5.Essential Learning Scenario 2 Information literacy is about information mastery.

What is the capability? Are teachers information literate? Are librarians information literate? YES So what will be the respective responsibilities? Scenario 2 Information literacy is about information mastery.

What is the capability? Partnership possibilities

Henri, J. (1992) Collaborative teaching and learning: Wagga Wagga, NSW: CIS.

Teacher LibrarianSubject Teachers Students Frame a Curricular Unit What do we want to learn? Who is the audience? What will we create? How, when, and with what? What new skills are needed? How will the learning be assessed and rewarded? What is already known? What don’t we want learned? Sharing and recording responsibility for learning Implementation Evaluation Principal approval & support Time for Planning Specialist Teachers The Planning Model

What is the capacity? How do librarians add this to their workload? Is it reasonable to assume that there are things librarians can stop doing? Will it work if teachers are left out of the loop? (What drives learning at your place?) Scenario 1 Information literacy is about equipping students to search efficiently.

What is the capacity? Are the policies and structures in place to support this? Are there clear role demarcations? Is the destination clear? Scenario 2 Information literacy is about information mastery.

What is the focus? 1.The teachers The focus must be on making certain those who deliver learning are equipped to create learning opportunities that enable a coordinated and sustained information literacy education.

What is the focus? 1.The teachers How do you gain access to them?

What is the focus? 2. Assessment The focus must be on making certain that mastery of information is rewarded.

Teachers Rule! No matter how well students make use of information to learn, no matter how skillful they are as information users the design of learning will fall upon the teachers. If the teachers are not skillful information users they will not design learning experiences that enhance information literacy in a planned and systematic way.

Focus Questions Who are currently using the schools information services? Do the teachers spend their spare time in the library or using information services to enhance their teaching and student learning? Do teachers spend considerable time collaborating with the teacher librarian to select and evaluate information resources? Do teachers fight for a bigger slice of the budget for information services? Does the teacher librarian offer a sustained program of professional development for teachers to foster their mastery of the processes of becoming informed?

Focus Questions Is the teacher librarian providing information leadership in terms of information policy development and knowledge management issues? Does the teacher librarian provide input into curriculum development that highlights the need for constant integration of learning and information processing? Does the school provide information services that are able to meet the decision making needs of the school leadership? Or is the focus of information services focused on the students with only a passing thought being given to the needs of the teachers and the school leadership?

Bibliography Abilock, D. (2004) Information Literacy From Prehistory to K–20: A New Definition. Knowledge Quest, 32(4), March/April 2004 (pp. 9-10) 4abilock.pdf Farmer, L. and Henri, J. (2008). Information literacy assessment. Lanham, ML: Scarecrow press Fox, R., & Henri, J. (2005). Understanding teacher mindsets: IT and change in Hong Kong schools. Educational Technology and Society, 8(2), Henri J. (2004). Building an information literate school community: Putting teachers first. ASLA Online I: Constructing Communities of Learning and Literacy Conference Retrieved from Henri, J. (2006). Learning and assessing in the information literate school: A social constructivist perspective. In K. Bonanno and P. Nibbs (Eds.). Visions of learning: ASLA Online II conference proceedings, Australian School Library Association, Zillmere, Australia (pp. 1-10).

Bibliography Henri, J. (2005). Mapping the information literate school community. Retrieved from olCommunity.pdf olCommunity.pdf Henri, J. (2005). What is an information literate school community and what are the implications for teacher librarians? Retrieved from y.pdf y.pdf Henri, J., & Asselin, M. (Eds.). (2005). leadership issues in the information literate school community. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. Kong, S.C., Henri, J., Lee, F.L. & Li, S.C. (2005). A study on the development of an information literacy framework for Hong Kong students. Unpublished Research Report. Retrieved from