A km 3 Neutrino Telescope: IceCube at the South Pole Howard Matis - LBNL for the IceCube Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UW River Falls, May 15-16, 2003 Searching for Dark Matter Through South Pole Ice Kurt Woschnagg University of California - Berkeley.
Advertisements

Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
The IceCube Neutrino Telescope Project overview and Status EHE Physics Example: Detection of GZK neutrinos TAUP2003 Shigeru Yoshida, Chiba University.
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree.
IceCube.
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
Search for Extremely-high Energy Cosmic Neutrino with IceCube Chiba Univ. Mio Ono.
EHE Lepton Propagation in the Earth and Its Implications to the IceCube EHE  Propagation in the Earth EHE  Propagation in the Earth What is the.
IceCube 1400 m 2400 m AMANDA South Pole IceTop Skiway 80 Strings 4800 PMT Instrumented volume: 1 km3 (1 Gt) IceCube is designed to detect neutrinos of.
Optical Sensor and DAQ in IceCube Albrecht Karle University of Wisconsin-Madison Chiba July, 2003.
The IceCube High Energy Telesope The detector elements Expected Sensitivity Project Status Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics CHIBA Univ. ICRC 2003.
Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole David Boersma UW Madison “New Views of the Universe” Chicago, 10 December 2005.
A feasibility study for the detection of SuperNova explosions with an Undersea Neutrino Telescope A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S. E. Tzamarias Physics.
Sebastian Böser Acoustic test setup at south pole IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Berkeley, March 2005.
IceCube a kilometer-scale deep-ice observatory in Antarctica Olga Botner Uppsala university, Sweden Neutrino 2004, June 14-19, icecube.wisc.edu.
PD Kobe Univ. 06/29/2007 General performance of the IceCube detector and the calibration results I am Mina Inaba from Chiba university. I will.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
Time Calibration of AMANDA Three Variations on a Theme of T 0 Kael D. Hanson Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Pennsylvania For the AMANDA.
Per Olof Hulth Stockholm university1 NSF Review March 25-27, 2003 Introductory remarks Per Olof Hulth Stockholm university.
Neutrino Astronomy with AMANDA Steven W. Barwick University of California-Irvine SPIE Conference -Hawaii, 2002.
Neutrino astronomy with AMANDA and IceCube Per Olof Hulth Stockholm University
IceCube S Robbins University of Wuppertal Moriond - “Contents and Structures of the Universe” La Thuile, Italy, March 2006 Outlook for Neutrino Detection.
The next generation of Neutrino telescopes -ICECUBE Design and Performance, Science Potential Albrecht Karle University of Wisconsin-Madison
SINP MSU, July 7, 2012 I.Belolaptikov behalf BAIKAL collaboration.
Frontiers in Contemporary Physics: May 23, 2005 Recent Results From AMANDA and IceCube Jessica Hodges University of Wisconsin – Madison for the IceCube.
First Results from IceCube Physics Motivation Hardware Overview Deployment First Results Conclusions & Future Plans Spencer Klein, LBNL for the IceCube.
Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole David Boersma UW Madison Lake Louise Winter Institute Chicago, 23 February 2006.
AMANDA and IceCube neutrino telescopes at the South Pole Per Olof Hulth Stockholm University.
An Overview of the IceCube Neutrino Telescope Kael Hanson University of Wisconsin – Madison 8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and Particle.
Computing in IceCube Georges Kohnen, Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium for the IceCube Collaboration The IceCube neutrino telescope.
CIPANP 2006K. Filimonov, UC Berkeley From AMANDA to IceCube: Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole Kirill Filimonov University of California, Berkeley.
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
The Status of IceCube Mark Krasberg University of Wisconsin-Madison RICH 2004 Conference, Playa del Carmen, Mexico Dec 3, 2004.
COSMO/CosPA 2010 Searches for the Highest Energy Neutrino with IceCube Searches for the Highest Energy Neutrino with IceCube Aya Ishihara ( Fellow) (JSPS.
B.Baret Vrije Univertsiteit Brusse l Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium The AMANDA – IceCube telescopes & Dark Matter searches B. Baret on behalf of the.
Collisions: Cosmic Accelerators the sky > 10 GeV photon energy the sky > 10 GeV photon energy < cm wavelength > 10 8 TeV particles exist > 10 8.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Aspen Institute for Physics 02 Francis Halzen the sky the sky > 10 GeV photon energy < cm wavelength > 10 8 TeV particles exist > 10 8 TeV particles.
IceCube and AMANDA: Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole Brennan Hughey February 22nd, 2007.
KEK, Feb 27, 2006Tom Gaisser1 Cosmic-ray physics with IceCube IceTop the surface component of IceCube.
XIX European Cosmic Ray Symposium Firenze (Italy) Neutrino Astronomy and Cosmic Rays at the South Pole Latest.
Science Advisory Committee March 30, 2006 Jim Yeck IceCube Project Director IceCube Construction Progress.
Status and Results Elisa Bernardini DESY Zeuthen, Germany VLVnT Workshop Amsterdam, Oct (
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
IceCube project Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics, Chiba University.
5 June 2002DAQ System Engineering Requirements 1 DAQ System Requirements DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review David Nygren.
Icecube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole Kirill Filimonov, University of California, Berkeley, for the IceCube Collaboration.
Large-scale Underwater/ice Neutrino Telescopes G. Domogatsky (INR RAN, Moscow)
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Hardware Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL David Nygren.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
I Taboada, GA Tech High-energy neutrino astronomy with IceCube Ignacio Taboada Georgia Institute of Technology for the IceCube collaboration Madison, NDM.
IceCube: A km-scale Detector David Nygren, LBNL ISVHECRI 6-12 September 2004.
1 Particles and Nuclei International Conference (PANIC05) Santa Fe, NM (U.S.A.) October 24 th, from Quark n.36, 02/01/04 Neutrino.
Neutrino Astrophyics at the South Pole. S. Seunarine for the RICE Collaboration.
1 slide Brennan Hughey University of Wisconsin – Madison for the AMANDA Collaboration Recent Results From the AMANDA Experiment Rencontres du Vietnam August.
IceTop Design: 1 David Seckel – 3/11/2002 Berkeley, CA IceTop Overview David Seckel IceTop Group University of Delaware.
IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole Brendan Fox Pennsylvania State University for the IceCube Collaboration VLVNT08 - Very.
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
Dark Matter Searches with AMANDA and IceCube Catherine De Clercq for the IceCube Collaboration Vrije Universiteit Brussel Interuniversity Institute for.
The prototype string for the km3 scale Baikal neutrino telescope VLVnT April 2008 Vladimir Aynutdinov, INR RAS for the Baikal Collaboration for.
Measuring the total neutrino cross section using the IceCube detector
Julia Becker for the IceCube collaboration
Christian Spiering, ESC DESY, Sept.2003
IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole
Presentation transcript:

A km 3 Neutrino Telescope: IceCube at the South Pole Howard Matis - LBNL for the IceCube Collaboration

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory2 Neutrino Astronomy measuring s by its µ  Stable particles:  p,  Stable particles:  p,  Astrophysical Sources GRB, AGN, Super Novae GRB, AGN, Super Novae GZK (p +CMB  ) GZK (p +CMB  ) Topological defects Topological defects  Backgrounds Atmospheric  ’ s Atmospheric  ’ s Atmospheric ’ s Atmospheric ’ s IceCube Earth Accelerator Target

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory3 IceCube 1400 m 2400 m South Pole IceTop Skiway  IceCube is designed to detect neutrinos of all flavors at energies from 10 7 eV (SN) to eV  80 Strings  4800 PMT  Instrumented volume: 1 km 3  Depth: 1400 m to 2400m Amanda

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory4 South Pole Dark sector AMANDA IceCube Dome Skiway

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory5 Detecting s  s interact in earth  Produce µ (follows path of )  Detect Cherenkov light in ice with phototubes buried in the ice  Detect upward µ s  Ice filters downward cosmic µ s

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory6 1 Km Measure  energy at the detector by counting the number of fired PMTs and the total light. E µ =10 TeVE µ = 6 PeV Simulated  + N   - + X

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory7 Other Reactions e + N  e - + X Electron Cascade 1 PeV ≈ 500 m diameter PeV  (300 m)    decays  + N  - + X

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory8 IceCube String OM Spacing: 17 m HV and Base Gel Main Cable Glass pressure sphere rated to 10,000 psi Outer diameter: 13” 60 optical sensors/string photomultiplier 1400 m 2400 m DOM String

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory9 Digital Optical Module - (DOM)  Self-triggers on each pulse  Captures waveforms  Time-stamps each pulse  Digitizes waveforms  Performs feature extraction  Buffers data  Responds to Surface DAQ  Set PMT HV, threshold, etc 33 cm DOM Board

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory10 Requirements for One Element Digital Optical Module (DOM)  Time resolution:< 5 ns rms  Waveform capture > 250 MHz for first 500 ns > 250 MHz for first 500 ns ~ 40 MHz for 5000 ns ~ 40 MHz for 5000 ns  Dynamic Range > 200 PE / 15 ns > 200 PE / 15 ns > 2000 PE / 5000 ns > 2000 PE / 5000 ns  Dead-time< 1%  OM noise rate < 500 Hz ( 40 K in glass sphere)  1 to 10,000 photons that are incident over several µs  High dynamic range waveform recording

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory11 Time-stamping in DOM  Course time-stamp local 40 MHz clock local 40 MHz clock Very stable  f/f ~ 6 x /s Very stable  f/f ~ 6 x /s  t ~ 25 ns not enough by itself  t ~ 25 ns not enough by itself Okay for triggering Okay for triggering  Fine time-stamp pulse sample # in ATWD pulse sample # in ATWD  t ~ 3.3 ns (algorithm can do better)  t ~ 3.3 ns (algorithm can do better)

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory12 Time Synch- ronizing Modules DOM Surface  t down =  t up =1/2(T round-trip -  t) tt

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory13 Network  Copper-wire 0.9 mm  in twisted-pair Adequate for ICECUBE needs: Power:<3 Watts/DOM (<20% loss) Power:<3 Watts/DOM (<20% loss) Timing:<5 ns rms throughout time-base Timing:<5 ns rms throughout time-base Messaging: control, code modifications Messaging: control, code modifications Data:~ kBytes/second/DOM Data:~ kBytes/second/DOM  InIce Two DOMS/pair, to save $, bulk, logistics  IceTop One DOM/pair, to get bandwidth

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory14 DAQ Network Architecture String - Electronics in the ice Global Timing

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory15 AMANDA String 18  Springboard for transition to IceCube  41 DOMs deployed in 99/00 season; 37 operational  Test bed: download new code into ice  Communicate and program in North America

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory16 String 18 DOM Board Oscillator

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory17 Digital ATWD Waveforms Single Photon ADC Spectra Complex MHz Time ADC Charge Hi Gain Low Gain No Gain Clock “Slow” ADC ATWD Channels 1 - 4: 1.7 ns/sample for 217 ns ADC: 60 ns/sample for 7.7  s “Bucket” ~ 600 Hz

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory18 Timing with “Phone Wire” to few ns  Transit time for 2.5 km twisted pair: ~12  s  Rise-time after propagation ~ 2  s (~1/t)  Use a bipolar “Time-Mark” signal pulse  Digitize time-mark 20 MHz, 10-bit  Fit leading edge & baseline : 3.5 ns rms

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory19 Timing with µ s T (DOM N ) T (DOM N+1 )  T = T (DOM N ) - T (DOM N+1 ) Two clear components: random coincidences (flat) correlated light (peak at ~ 0) 12 m  t - ns

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory20 Reconstructed  Event Only first hit in each OM shown Down flow of light No “early photons” Late hits consistent with: light scattering, or a second  ? Down going 

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory21 String 18 Performance  Timing: 3.5 ns rms (very stable)  SPE spectrum:as expected  PMT Gain Drift:<<0.2 %/week  LED Beacons:~8 ns rms (ice optics)  Down going  :observed  µ waveforms:~15% have > 1 “hit”

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory22 Summary  IceCube – New detector under development to explore astrophysical s  Decentralized timing with digital technology Measure full waveform Measure full waveform Provides more information for reconstruction Provides more information for reconstruction More detail for physics discovery More detail for physics discovery Feature extraction - less data to record and transmit Feature extraction - less data to record and transmit  Can synchronize separate and remote elements to several ns  Fully functional prototypes tested with muons in AMANDA  Prototypes meet or exceed IceCube requirements

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory23 Institutions: 11 US, 9 European, 1 Japanese and 1 Venezuelan; 1.Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware (*) 2.BUGH Wuppertal, Germany (*) 3.Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium (*) 4.CTSPS, Clark-Atlanta University, Atlanta, USA 5.DESY-Zeuthen, Zeuthen, Germany (*) 6.Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, USA 7.Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA (*) 8.Department of Physics, Southern University and A\&M College, Baton Rouge, LA, USA 9.Dept. of Physics, UC Berkeley, USA (*) 10.Institute of Physics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany (*) 11.University of Mons-Hainaut, Mons, Belgium (*) 12.Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA (*) 13.Dept. of Astronomy, Dept. of Physics, SSEC, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA (*) 14.Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, River Falls, USA (*) 15.Division of High Energy Physics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (*) 16.Dept. of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden (*) 17.Dept. of Physics, University of Alabama, USA 18.Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium (*) 19.Chiba University, Japan 20.Dept. of Astrophysics, Imperial College, UK 21.Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, USA 22.Universidad Simon Bolivar, Caracas, Venezuela(*) also in AMANDA IceCube Collaboration

SPIE Hawaii - August 2002H. Matis – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory24 The End