Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IceCube project Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics, Chiba University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "IceCube project Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics, Chiba University."— Presentation transcript:

1 IceCube project Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics, Chiba University.

2 Bartol Research Inst, Univ of Delaware, USA Pennsylvania State University, USA University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA University of Wisconsin-River Falls, USA LBNL, Berkeley, USA UC Berkeley, USA UC Irvine, USA Bartol Research Inst, Univ of Delaware, USA Pennsylvania State University, USA University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA University of Wisconsin-River Falls, USA LBNL, Berkeley, USA UC Berkeley, USA UC Irvine, USA Univ. of Alabama, USA Clark-Atlanta University, USA Univ. of Maryland, USA IAS, Princeton, USA University of Kansas, USA Southern Univ. and A&M College, Baton Rouge Univ. of Alabama, USA Clark-Atlanta University, USA Univ. of Maryland, USA IAS, Princeton, USA University of Kansas, USA Southern Univ. and A&M College, Baton Rouge Universidad Simon Bolivar, Caracas,Venezuela Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium Universität Mainz, Germany DESY-Zeuthen, Germany Universität Wuppertal, Germany Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium Universität Mainz, Germany DESY-Zeuthen, Germany Universität Wuppertal, Germany Uppsala Universitet, Sweden Stockholm universitet, Sweden Kalmar Universitet, Sweden Imperial College, London, UK University of Oxford, UK Utrecht University, Utrecht, NL Uppsala Universitet, Sweden Stockholm universitet, Sweden Kalmar Universitet, Sweden Imperial College, London, UK University of Oxford, UK Utrecht University, Utrecht, NL Chiba University, Japan University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand Who are we ?

3 AMANDA IceCube IceTop IceCube 80 strings 60 OMs/string 17 m vertical spacing 125 m between strings IceTop 160 tanks frozen-water tanks 2 OMs / tank First year deployment (Jan 2005) 4 IceCube strings (240 OMs) 8 IceTop Tanks (16 OMs) 10” Hamamatsu R-7081 1200 m IceTop Tank deployed in 2004

4 Theoretical bounds and future atmospheric  W&B MPR DUMAND test string FREJUS NT-200 MACRO  NT-200+ AMANDA-II IceCube AMANDA-97 AMANDA-00 opaque for neutrons Mannheim, Protheroe and Rachen (2000) – Waxman, Bahcall (1999)  derived from known limits on extragalactic protons +  -ray flux neutrons can escape

5 Construction: 11/2004-01/2009 AMANDA SPASE-2 South Pole Dome Skiway 100 m Grid North

6 Right now at the pole

7 DOM … a Key element in IceCube

8 Digital Optical Module (DOM) HV Base Main Board (DOM-MB) “Flasher Board” 10” PMT 13” Glass (hemi)sphere

9 PMT Absolute Calibration Qe x Ce N2 laser @ 337.1 nm Use Rayleigh scattering for beam dumping (~1E-11) for SPE measurement

10 Setup ATTENUATOR Pressure meter Temp monitor

11 Chamber Center 窓1窓2 レーザー Baffle (beam size 1cm) Rotation bed Configuration Survey

12 Setup photo

13 – Light source (Laser Science VSL-337ND-S) N 2 laser lambda = 337.1nm E max =300uJ (for 1p.e., E~2nJ) Pulse width<4nsec – Si energy probe (Laser Probe Inc. RjP-465) 500fJ-250nJ Detection area:1.0cm 2 Accuracy=+-5% MODULE Pressure and Temperture monitored by Pressure meter and Platinum resistor

14 Data Analysis QE(absolute efficiency) = photoelectron # / incidental photon # I. Estimate photoelectron # per laser shot photoelectron # = -ln(N ped /N all ) II. Estimate scattered light yield Y = incidental photon # / initial laser photon ~ aperture x Cross Section

15 Laser Energy Profile

16 Signal subtraction sf0077@1atm

17 Calculation of “light yield” Typically 4.764957518892241E-11 dumped

18 2 Dimensional Absolute Efficiency SF0077

19 Center Edge ADC ADC spectrum of Center and Edge of photocathode

20 SF0077, SF0050, SF0061 2 Dimensional Absolute Efficiency

21 SF0077 Really see only scattered photons? -> 'YES' There's no other factors(offset) for data

22 Typical Error Budget ➢ Statistics ● photoelectron # : 10% ➢ Systematics photoelectron # : 1% Light yeild (aperture) : 4% Initial photon fluctuation : 4% Pressure : 1% Photon energy probe: 5% Total Error Budget : 12.7%

23 FY2005 Goal PMTDOM Standard Candle (absolutely calibrated, 2D scanned)

24 FY2005 Goal 1400 m 2400 m AMANDA South Pole IceTop Skiway “Perfect” standard Candle


Download ppt "IceCube project Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics, Chiba University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google