Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole"— Presentation transcript:

1 IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole
Brendan Fox Pennsylvania State University for the IceCube Collaboration VLVNT08 - Very Large Volume Neutrino Telescopes Toulon, France

2 The IceCube Collaboration
Bartol Research Institute, Delaware, USA Pennsylvania State University, USA UC Berkeley, USA UC Irvine, USA Clark-Atlanta University, USA University of Alaska, Anchorage, USA Univ. of Maryland, USA 29 institutions ~250 people University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA University of Wisconsin-River Falls, USA LBNL, Berkeley, USA Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, USA USA (11) Japan Europe (15) Chiba University, Japan University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ New Zealand Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium Universiteit Gent, Belgium Humboldt Universität, Germany Universität Mainz, Germany DESY Zeuthen, Germany Universität Dortmund, Germany ANTARCTICA Universität Wuppertal, Germany MPI Heidelberg, Germany RWTH Aachen Uppsala University, Sweden Stockholm University, Sweden Oxford University, UK Utrecht University, Netherlands Amundsen-Scott Station

3 Detecting Neutrinos In Ice
Phototubes Muon neutrino Electron neutrino Tau neutrino Track: + increased detection volume Cascade: - must be in detector Hybrid: - must be in detector +  points along , i.e. to source -  background (brems’ng) - need E>o(1000 TeV) - cosmic ray  background - limited pointing capability + nil background - energy measurement “okay” + good energy measurement + pointing capability + best energy measurement (also includes NC ,)

4 Digital Optical Module (DOM)
IceCube-AMANDA AMANDA Eiffel Tower Svenska Dagbladet Digital Optical Module (DOM) currently instrumented IceTop - ICECUBE : 4800 DOMs on 80 strings ICETOP : 160 Ice-Cherenkov tank surface array (IceTop) - AMANDA: 677 OMs surrounded by IceCube

5 IceCube Digital Optical Module
Low intrinsic noise ~ 500 Hz Fast digitization 30 ms/channel Waveform: 4 channels/128 sample Low power consumption 5 W per DOM Up to 12 ms combined waveform length Variable sampling speed: MHz Up to p.e./10 ns charge resolution

6 IceCube Digital Optical Module

7 DOM Final Acceptance Testing
freezer ~60 DOMs at time 3 identical setups at UW-Madison (USA) 1 setup at DESY-Zeuthen (Germany) 1 setup at Uppsala University (Sweden)

8 DOMCal Summary for FAT22 Budweiser-TP4Y0031
1260 Volts 1340 Volts Gain vs. HV Fit 1e7 DOMCal Summary for FAT22 Budweiser-TP4Y0031 1.6pC Charge (pC) HV Most PMTs achieve 1e7 at Volts • Require 5e7 at <2kV

9 Time Resolution Test Laser occupancy ~ laser trigger times recorded in dedicated “Sync DOM” PMT signal recorded in DOM 100,000 synchronized hits sampling time 3.5nsec pulse height digitizer 0.1mV/count Time computed from leading edge (50% of pulse maximum) Resolution 2-3nsec includes DAQ time slewing relative to Sync DOM

10 Dark rate monitoring ~120 hours checking for: Average Rate 2-3kHz
Temp (°C) –35°C –10°C 5e7 Dark rate monitoring ~120 hours checking for: Average Rate 2-3kHz includes non-PMT contributions will be 650Hz in ice (or 300Hz without double- counting time-correlated noise) No instabilities

11 Construction Plan Overview
08-09 09-10 IC-40 DEPLOYED AMANDA … drilling/deployment plans for the season being discussed

12 Schematic of Hot Water Drilling

13

14 String Deployment

15 Season … 18 strings deployed!

16 String 39 two-week freeze-in movie
Commissioning String 39 two-week freeze-in movie

17 Commissioning 76 528 820 1136

18 DOM Survivability 76 DOMs 589 DOMs 1390 DOMs 2515 DOMs
66-33 “New_York” and “Dou_Mu” go high current 39-61 “Hydrogen” PMT breaks 54-47 “Garbanzo_bean” stops communicating 39-22 “Liljeholmen” stops communicating properly 39-21 “Aspudden” slows down 30-60 “Rowan” stops communicating

19 DOM-to-DOM Synchronization
RAPCAL: Sync each DOM to GPS time

20 Initial Timing Verification
dom 10 17m dom 11 string 76

21 Initial Timing Verification
Means Sigmas … timing of all DOMs within spec (<3 ns)

22 Timing Verification With Muons
Cherenkov Photons  track Emission on the Cherenkov Cone string 49

23 Long-Term Stability of Timing
track position of leading edge on monthly basis … … timing stable over IC-22 data-taking period

24 Initial String Geometry

25 String Geometry - z check

26 String Geometry - z check
For string 64, the stage 1 depth was a bit of guess since the pressure sensor broken.

27 String Geometry - (x,y) check
Select well reconstructed muon tracks Vary (x,y) of DOM … look at the log-likelihood -vs- (x,y) Minimium will be where the DOM is situated MC studies still underway … technique looks promising

28 Readout Scheme

29 Detector Monitoring Snapshot

30 Neutrinos in IC-9 (2006) RESULT
Online filtering at Pole to isolate sample of “good” up-going candidates Transfer this sample by satellite to North More refined analysis … … Log-likelihood reconstruction, etc. … apply additional quality cuts, etc. to gain more down-going muon rejection Ratio of data to simulation: At selected cut strength of 10: 234 up-going  in live-days of data (purity of neutrino sample > 95%) Mis-reconstructed atmospheric muons RESULT J. Pretz, Ph.D. thesis (Maryland) [DRUM ]

31 Neutrinos in IC-9 (2006) ZENITH AZIMUTH t ~ 90-110° … muon background
peaks in  artifact of the IC-9 string configuration

32 Prospects for IC-22 … IC-40 … (Integrated Exposure)
“Actual” Graph shows cumulative km3·yr of exposure × volume 1 km3·yr reached 2 years before detector is completed Close to 4 km3·yr at the beginning of 1st year of full array operation. NOTE: not adjusted for actual

33 Upcoming Season Plans 1996-2001: AMANDA 2004-05: 1 string 2005-06: 8
: 13 12 planned : 18 14 planned : 16+ : 16+ : 7+ 09-10 08-09

34 String Layout Options DEEP CORE UHE STRINGS Preliminary design
Olaf Schulz Preliminary design UHE STRINGS

35 Conclusions Drilling/deployment of IceCube strings is going well
Deployment of IceTop stations also on target (40 stations deployed) IceCube components (DOMs/daq/triggers/filter/etc.) up and going IceCube is working as expected … first physics results from IC-22 (318 95% uptime) … IC-40 data-taking started April 1, 2008 IceTop-40 is working too … tank/station performance as per specs … first physics physics from IC-22 being prepared now AMANDA integrated into IceCube … low energy results improved by using IceCube as veto In the future, - Low energy core planned … first string to be deployed 08-09 - UHE arrangement of final strings underway … Elisa Resconi discussed the physics expected from IceCube + these extensions.

36 BACKUP SLIDES

37 } LC IceCube Triggering InIce:
4 3 5 2 1 InIce: - Local coincidence between neighboring modules (variable time window: presently = 1 us) On the surface: - require NDOMs  8 within 5 us window Form event from all “hits” within ±8 us of trigger } LC

38 Ice Properties Bubbles at higher depth dust layers
Scattering Absorption Bubbles at higher depth dust layers Average optical parameters: abs ~ nm sca ~ nm


Download ppt "IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google