The Difference is in the Delivery Highly-Efficient, Cost-effective, Broadcast over the Internet.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P2P: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. 2 A Very Short History Fundamental Internet architecture is distributed Centralized web servers dont scale - Easy.
Advertisements

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Question ?Can P2P and peer-assisted streaming technology help broadcasters and content providers overcome the.
The Difference is in the Delivery Highly-Efficient, Cost-effective, Broadcast over the Internet.
The Worlds leading LIVE Peer Streaming Network Mikkel Dissing, Founder and CEO.
Octoshape experience: a matter of quality Stephen Alstrup Octoshape August 2008
P2P Media Summit Silicon Valley August 4, 2008 Jeff Capone.
1Abacast - Confidential1 Hybrid Content Delivery Network (CDN) Technologies and Services.
1Abacast - Confidential1 Hybrid Content Delivery Network (CDN) Technologies and Services.
Robert Levitan, CEO Laird Popkin, CTO. What is Pando? A hybrid P2P network with… Cost savings, efficiency and scalability of a distributed network Reliability.
Abacast - Confidential1 Hybrid Content Delivery Network (CDN) Technologies and Services.
The Evolution of P2P Technology Robert Levitan, CEO Pando Networks P2P MEDIA SUMMIT, CES 2008.
1Abacast - Confidential1 Hybrid Content Delivery Network (CDN) Technologies and Services.
1Abacast - Confidential1 Hybrid Content Delivery Network (CDN) Technologies and Services.
Nicharee Srirochanakul
Internet for multimedia content Yogendra Pal Chief Engineer, All India Radio.
Your Video on Your Website BroadbandVideo Presentation 2002.
Hosting Windows Media: Best Practices Oliver Pribramsky Program Manager, Deployment Team Digital Media Division Microsoft Corporation.
Thanks to Microsoft Azure’s Scalability, BA Minds Delivers a Cost-Effective CRM Solution to Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Latin America MICROSOFT.
Streaming Multimedia. What is streaming? Streaming media consists of sound and video, continuously “streamed” over the Internet.
BrightAuthor v3.7 software and BrightSign XD v4.7 firmware
CONFIDENTIAL©2008 MEDIAMELON, INC. DCIA PRESENTATION Kumar Subramanian
Your Webinar Software Just Isn’t That into You Understanding the Difference between Webcasting and Web Conferencing Hugh Taylor VP of Marketing MediaPlatform,
Performance Analysis of Orb Rabin Karki and Thangam V. Seenivasan 1.
Web resources !!! By David Sherwood CSC 101 February 5, 2009.
COMS E6125 WHIM Internet Television Joost Babelgum Preethi Narayan
Kally Hristov CEO. Streaming Media Overview Presentation Outline What is Streaming Why Stream Internet Campus Sermon Archive Mobile Streaming Multi-Campus.
Streaming media over the Internet A million channels and there is still nothing on! By Samuel Shiffman Streaming Technologist Seton Hall University
1 Taking the Classroom Experience to the Web Innovative Ways to Use Streaming Media in E-Learning Geoff Spencer Higher Education Market Manager Accordent.
Introduction to Streaming © Nanda Ganesan, Ph.D..
COMM 3353: Communication Web Technologies I Chapter 3b: Internet Radio Chapter 3b: Internet Radio
Presented by Mrs. Reynolds. Do you own or have access to an iPod or other MP3 device or a home computer? Are you familiar with the term podcast and what.
Apps VS Mobile Websites Which is better?. Bizness Apps Survey Bizness Apps surveyed over 500 small business owners with both a mobile app and a mobile.
Contact Us: For more information on this or any other TownNews.com product, contact your regional sales manager. Main TownNews.com Office:
T Multimedia Programming Maciej Korczyński, Krzysztof Zurek.
ISIGN IMS Proximity Marketing Solution (IMS) iSIGN Media Corp Sales 1ATTRACT. TRANSACT. MEASURE.
Business Models In Media Industries. Definitions (1) A business model is an action methodology for the systematic and routine generation of money or equivalent.
Kendra initiative CONTENT DELIVERY RESEARCH Content Delivery Summit Amsterdam February 2001 "Fueling the demand for broadband Internet" Daniel Harris -
Design Windows Media Services Infrastructure. Module 7: Design Windows Media Services Infrastructure Design Windows Media Services for live streaming.
EE616 Technical Project Video Hosting Architecture By Phillip Sutton.
WebCaster and Hybrid Flash Multicasting Briefing.
Trial of AMT Technology: AT&T and Major League Gaming (MLG) March 30, 2011 © 2011 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved.
INFOCOM, 2007 Chen Bin Kuo ( ) Young J. Won ( ) DPNM Lab.
Eyeblaster Video Enhancements for RMP 6.1. Agenda Video Enhancements Goals Main features and Creative Process Flash Video Components Bandwidth Optimization.
Data Compression and Network Video by Mark Pelley Navin Dodanwela.
Online Quantitative Research What works, and what doesn’t? Scott W. Spain DigitalBiz Corporation
Audio on the Web Teaching OntheNet 2002 Minneapolis, MN June 23-25, 2002.
Communicate with All Workers Involved in the Process of Delivering High-Quality Health Care by Choosing Dossier365 on the Azure Platform MICROSOFT AZURE.
Streaming Media A technique for transferring data on the Internet so it can be processed as a steady and continuous stream.
Delivering Video over IP
Eyeblaster - Mindshare. [index] EYEBLASTER: GLOBAL RICH MEDIA LEADER Innovative solutions and expert service, spanning 15 countries.
Virtual Classes Provides an Innovative App for Education that Stimulates Engagement and Sharing Content and Experiences in Office 365 MICROSOFT OFFICE.
Fs Streaming Media a presentation by Florian Seidel.
What is streaming media technology? Don Youngs Florida Conference of The United Methodist Church.
Multiplexing Team Members: Cesar Chavez Arne Solas Steven Fong Vi Duong David Nguyen.
March 2001 CBCB The Holy Grail: Media on Demand over Multicast Doron Rajwan CTO Bandwiz.
Flight is a SaaS Solution that Accelerates the Secure Transfer of Large Files and Data Sets Into and Out of Microsoft Azure Blob Storage MICROSOFT AZURE.
COM 597 Streaming Media Class 5 July 6, Fortune 1000 Companies expectations on Streaming Budgets 2004.
California State University, LA Presented by Amanda Steven StevenAamirObaid.
SharePoint ShortUrl and SharePoint Document Merge SharePoint and Office 365 Add-ins to Increase Productivity and Improve User Adoption! OFFICE 365 APP.
Webcasting: From Start to Finish Steve Mack, LUX Media
The VERSO Product Returns Portal Incorporates Office 365 Outlook and Excel Add-Ins to Create Seamless Workflow for All Participating Users OFFICE 365 APP.
Streaming Media. What is Streaming Media The delivery of audio, video and other multimedia content across the internet using streaming media servers.
TV Broadcasting What to look for Architecture TV Broadcasting Solution
Live Global Sports Events
Nimble Streamer Helps Media Content Providers Create Streaming Networks Cost-Effectively and Easily by Utilizing Azure’s Worldwide Scalability MICROSOFT.
An Introduction to Microsoft NetShow Services and Advanced Streaming Format (ASF) By Huang Yi-Chin.
Who We Are – Brief History
Digital television systems - (DTS)
MWS9943.
Performance and Scalability Issues of Multimedia Digital Library
Presentation transcript:

The Difference is in the Delivery Highly-Efficient, Cost-effective, Broadcast over the Internet

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 The Difference is in the Delivery Abacast patented technology greatly improves the delivery of one-to-many real-time streaming media.

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Distributed Streaming ab cd bcd a abcd cd ab abcd abc d abcd abc d

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Reduction in Bandwidth Example Network Efficiency - Audio Total Audience 1882 Total Audience X 48Kbps = 88.2Mbps 102 Direct Connected X 48Kbps = 4.8Mbps Bandwidth Saved = 83.4Mbps

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Example Network Efficiency - Video Reduction in Bandwidth Total Audience 442 Total Audience X 350Kbps = Mbps 179 Direct Connected X 61.18Kbps = 4.8Mbps Bandwidth Saved = 89.9Mbps

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Abacast Compared to Peer-to-Peer ?Not like classic peer-to-peer ?Each user is in constant contact with the server for real-time QoS monitoring ?Real-time redirection (no stale peer lists) ?Users do not know anything about each other ?Users do not store anything for each other ?Users are only distribute signal when actively connected ?If the user needs their upstream bandwidth they always have priority over Abacast distribution of the stream

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Abacast Compared to Unicast ?Similarities: 8Full DRM Compatibility 8Media Formats: ?Server plug-in architecture allows for quick adaptation for any format - Windows Media, MP3, aacPlus, MPEG 2, MPEG 4, … 8Encoding 8Media Players: ?Client plug-in architecture allows for quick adaptation to any player - Windows Media, Real, Winamp, Custom with API 8End-User Operations 8Browser Independent

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Abacast Compared to Unicast ?Important Differences: Efficiency 8Scalability 8Reduced Infrastructure Deployment 8Stability, Adaptability 8Quality of Service Monitoring all the way to end-user

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Quality of Service - Better Stream Connection ?Abacast technology has proven higher quality stream connections than standard unicast stream technology. ?In side-by-side comparisons Abacast Enabled streams had fewer breaks, skips, or buffers than standard unicast streaming technology. ?The result is that listeners and viewers stay connected to your streams longer and have better streaming experiences with fewer interruptions.

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 DualGrid ?New Product (November of 2006) ?Live and On-demand streaming technology in a single solution ?Live events followed by On-demand archives ?Live 24 by 7 broadcast with individual show archives ?Includes automated archival process ?Includes download and push options ?1 st commercial solution of it type

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Corporate Streaming and File Distribution 8Extremely Efficient 8No expensive equipment 8Significantly less IT staff time 8More efficient than hardware Multicast 8Drastically less expensive 8and unlike traditional hardware multicasting, it really works! DualGrid provides all the benefits of Multicast and Edge Serving without any of the setup time, hassle, or expense.

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Full Service Offering ?Lowest Cost, Highest Quality Live Streaming ?DualGrid – Live and On-demand P2P streaming ?Complete, Real-time Statistics including Cume, AQH, Peak, Average Duration, Uniques, Sessions, and more… ?Full End-user Support & Extensive Knowledge Base ?24 by 7 Premier Customer Support ?Ad/Content Injection variable length, unique buffering system, affidavit reports, several trigger types… ?Digital Right Management ?Automatic Encoder Pager Alert System ?Hosted Services and Technology Only

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Full Service Offering ?Live and On-Demand Unicast Streaming ?Subscription Systems ?Podcasting ?Cellular Streaming ?Automatic Archiving ?Web/Player Design ?Audio Processing Cards ?Virtual Video Drivers ?Encoding Software

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Network Statistics Real-time Peak & Duration, also Cume, AQH,…

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Questions

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 P2PTV Trends ?More interest now than ever before ?Video surpassing audio ?Seen as required technology for effective business planning ?Most broadcasters surprised at how long the technology has been around and how well it works ?Many new entrants into the market place ?Commercial vs FREE ?Several hurdles still exist…

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Client-side Plug-in adsp:// Media Server Media Player Plain Streaming Abacast Enabled Streaming Encoder

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 P2P Technology Implementation ?Continuing stigma from the past ?Sill alternative technology ?Becoming more pervasive ?Lack of standardization ?Requires client-side plug-in installation/acceptance ?Many broadcasters are hesitant to impose client- side plug-in on audience ?Complications of asynchronous data connections and high bitrate streaming 8On-demand vs Live

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Implementation Strategies ?Ideal - technology included in media player ?Installation ideas 8Download size 8Quick and easy vs. educational 8Trust relationships 8Timing ?Value proposition for consumer 8Content is King – Sole source 8Increased quality for commodity content

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Proven Network Technology ?Over six (6) years in operation ?40,034,200 plug-in downloads (as of February 1st, 2007) ?Better than expected network efficiency ?~10 million end-user hours per month ?~3.6 million uniques per month ?Webcast Metrics Top Stations ?Windows Media Guide Featured Stations

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Client Download Process ?Fast and Easy Download and Installation (~900KBytes) ?Customizable to Broadcaster ?White label ready ?Multilanguage Support ?API for Custom Applications

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Plug-in Acceptance ?Highest in subscription models ?Higher in sole source content ?Higher with broadcaster promotion ?Higher in good value added proposition ?Almost always higher than anticipated by broadcaster ?More pervasive use of such technologies will help acceptance

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Results ?62% acceptance in general commoditized content ?78% where added value and promotion strategies are used 8Not good figures on those who can not accept higher quality streams 8No figures on those who change their minds over time ?93% with sole source content ?99% in subscription based models

Patent No. 6,970,937 B1 Questions