Substance dualism and mental causation Michael Lacewing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Personal identity Michael Lacewing
Advertisements

Free will and God’s omniscience
Michael Lacewing Is the mind the brain? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Cartesian Dualism. Real Distinction Argument P1.Whatever can be clearly and distinctly conceived apart can exist apart. P2.Whatever can exist apart are.
Descartes’ cosmological argument
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
Concept innatism II: the case of substance Michael Lacewing
Indirect realism Michael Lacewing
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
The Mind-Body Duality Source: Robert H. Wozniak
Chapter 2 The Mind-Body Problem
The metaphysics of mind: an overview Michael Lacewing
The knowledge argument Michael Lacewing
Property dualism and mental causation Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Dualism and the Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
Descartes argument for dualism
The Mind-Brain Type Identity Theory
Logical behaviourism: objections
© Michael Lacewing Functionalism and the Mind- Body Problem Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing The Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Mental causation Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Logical behaviourism Michael Lacewing
Introducing metaethics Michael Lacewing
Surviving Death: A Guide for Beginners Michael Lacewing
Dualism: epiphenomenalism
Learning objective: To understand the threat of solipsism for substance dualists; To evaluate whether substance dualism can solve the ‘problem of other.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
Functionalism and consciousness
Learning objective: To understand what is meant by epiphenomenalism and issues with it. epiphenomenalist dualism Causal redundancy.
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Anomalous monism Michael Lacewing uk.
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing
Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Eight problems Descartes and his immediate successors were concerned with 1. The Mind-Body Problem 2. The Problem of Other Minds 3. The Problem of Skepticism.
Eliminative materialism
Descartes’ divisibility argument
The argument for the existence of bodies (Meditation 6) 1.Nature provided me with a strong propensity to believe there are bodies. 2.The only way I could.
The Princess Elizabeth Argument. Materialism: Human beings are wholly material— every part of a person, including the mind, is a material body. Dualism:
© Michael Lacewing Determinism: varieties Michael Lacewing
Criticisms of Dualism. Descartes argument for dualism I can clearly and distinctly conceive of the mind without the body and the body without the mind.
The zombie argument: objections Michael Lacewing
Substance and Property Dualism Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity ?v=sT41wRA67PA.
Mind body problem What is the relationship between mental states and the physical world? Zoltán Dienes, Philosophy of Psychology René Descartes ( )
Recap on your whiteboards
Ryle’s philosophical behaviourism
Substance and Property Dualism
Michael Lacewing Ethical naturalism Michael Lacewing
The problem of other minds
Minds and Bodies.
Paley’s design argument
Descartes’ trademark argument
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
Property dualism: objections
Descartes’ proof of the external world
The zombie argument: responses
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Michael Lacewing The zombie argument Michael Lacewing
Functionalism Eliminativism Prop Dualism MBIT Sub Dualism Behaviourism
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Recap Questions What is interactionism?
What keywords have we used so far
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Is the concept of substance innate?
Functionalism Eliminativism Prop Dualism MBIT Sub Dualism Behaviourism
Michael Lacewing Physicalism Michael Lacewing
Test Recap Time What does it mean to suggest that mental properties are emergent (3 marks) Explain the criticism that whilst P-Zombies are conceivable,
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Presentation transcript:

Substance dualism and mental causation Michael Lacewing

Substance dualism Dualism: there are two sorts of substance, mind (or soul) and matter –Minds can exist independent of bodies –Mental properties are properties of a mental substance Materialism: there is just one sort of thing, matter –Mental properties are properties of a material substance

Mental causation Descartes: the mind is just thought, not in space; matter is just extension, in space The problem: how could one possibly causally affect the other? –Mental causation: thoughts, desires and other psychological states cause both other mental states and changes in the body (e.g. movement)

Princess Elisabeth’s version Physical things only move if they are pushed. Only something that is extended and can touch the thing that is moved can exert such a force. But the mind has no extension, so it can’t touch the body. Therefore, the mind cannot move the body. Reply: This isn’t an accurate account of why things move –E.g. force of gravity doesn’t need contact

Development The movement of a physical object is only initiated by some physical force, exerted at some point in space. If dualism is true, then the mind is not in space and cannot exert any physical force. Therefore, either dualism is false or the mind cannot cause (any part of) the body to move. The mind can cause the body to move. Therefore, dualism is false.

Conservation of energy The law of the conservation of energy: in any closed system, the total amount of energy in that system remains unchanged. The universe is a closed system. Therefore, total amount of energy in the universe remains unchanged.

Conservation of energy If the mind, as a non-physical substance, could move the body, the total amount of energy in the universe would increase. Therefore, if the mind could move the body, the law of the conservation of energy would not apply to the universe, and the universe is not a closed system. Therefore, because what is changing the physical energy in the universe is not itself physical, physics cannot give us the complete, correct account of physical energy in the universe. –Physics is wrong to think that physical movement can only be caused by a physical force.

Neuroscience Movements of the body are caused by physical events in the brain. We have no evidence of the mind changing what happens in the brain. Reply: we have no evidence that the mind does not change what happens in the brain –If dualism is true, then some brain events have no physical cause The empirical evidence is not against dualism.

Epiphenomenalist dualism Perhaps substance dualism is true, but there is no mental causation –This is epiphenomenalism The claim is very counterintuitive The claim threatens to undermine choice and responsibility for our actions