LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 LOG 211 “Supportability Analysis” Course Development Overview Presented to the Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) Functional Integrated Product Team (FIPT) Presented by Patrick M. Dallosta, CPL Performance Learning Director Defense Acquisition University 1

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 Discussion Topics Key Personnel LCL Competency – DAU Curriculum Crosswalk Current Status/Schedule Course Description Course Content / TLOs & ELOs Projected Throughput Impact on Training/PLD Assessment Questions & Answers 2

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 Key Personnel Course ManagerJim Curry Course Manager Regional Representatives Capital and Northeast: Jim Curry West:Andre Murphy Midwest:Barry Berty South:Greg Walker Mid-Atlantic: James Boone GLTC Instructional Systems Specialist James McDaniel LCIC Performance Learning Director (PLD)Patrick Dallosta LCIC Director for Logistics and SustainmentBill Kobren 3

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 LCL Competency – DAU Curriculum Crosswalk Competency/ Course LOG 101 LOG 102 LOG 103 LOG 200 LOG 201 LOG 204 LOG 206 LOG 211 LOG 215 LOG 235 LOG 236 LOG 340 LOG 350 Logistics Design Influence Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Planning Product Support and Sustainment Configuration Management Reliability & Maintainability Analysis Technical/Product Data Management Supportability Analysis Principal course that addresses the competency Deployed course/significant upgrade in progress Courses where the competency is a major learning point New course in development/planning Legend: 4

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 LOG 211 Course Objectives Role of Supportability and Supportability Analysis in focusing the wide range of technology, engineering, logistics, and management concepts and tasks involved in the design and sustainment of complex systems. Role of Logistician in the Supportability Analysis - Systems Engineering process Importance of implementing Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM) and Supportability principles early in the development of systems requirements Impact of RAM/Supportability on the design process and the effectiveness of the product support strategy. 5

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 Supportability Analysis Life Cycle Framework 6

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 LOG 211 Competency/Proficiency Analysis SUPPORTABILITY ANALYSIS COMPETENCY/PROFICIENCY 1. Analysis Framework 2. Logistician’s Role 3. JCIDS Process 4. KPP Development 5. Supportability Objectives 6. Maintenance Concept 7. Design Criteria 8. Logistics Product Data/Database 9. R&M Modeling, Analysis 10. RAM Trade off Availabif 11. Product Support Analysis 12. Product Support Package 13. Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis 14. Fault Tree Analysis 15. Condition Based Maintenance 16. Reliability Centered Maintenance 17. Level of Repair Analysis 18. Maintenance Task Analysis 19.Supportability Design Review 20. Supportability Demonstration SUPPORTABILITY ANALYSIS (Note 7) Use analysis tools and techniques of supportability in the systems engineering process and in sustainment planning ***** ************** Evaluate and select appropriate supportability analysis tools. ***** ************** Apply appropriate techniques and information to maintain readiness and operational capability * ***** Apply M&S in support of logistics decisions. ***** ************** Evaluate performance outcomes related to supportability and Life Cycle Cost ***** ***** Evaluate impact of changes to policies, procedures and tools. ***** ************* Select and implement appropriate types/methodologies of supportability/sustainment analyses. ***** ************** Identify supportability issues and determine solutions. ***** *** Conduct supportability analysis to define support requirements to influence design improve readiness and minimize Life Cycle Cost. * **** ************** Analyze system/equipment performance data to resolve technical or procedural problems. * ***** Develop functional requirements, usage forecasts, failure rates, and initial repair and replacement factors. *** ****** Assess the impact of supportability and affordability analyses on sustainment planning and execution. *** ***** Apply and monitor the Reliability Centered Maintenance **** ******* 7

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 LOG 211 Terminal Learning Objectives (TLO) 8 Develop Hardware and Software Supportability Objectives/Maintenance Concept Establish Supportability Metrics Translate metrics into design criteria within SE process Generate Logistics Product Data/GEIA Std-0007 Database Develop R&M Modeling, Prediction, Allocation and Analysis Conduct R&M, Availability, Cost/Affordability Trade-off Analysis Recognize FMECA and FTA processes and contribution to supportability Recognize value of PHM/RCM in the CBM process and supportability Conduct Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) Conduct Maintenance Task Analysis Conduct Software Supportability Analysis Recognize the elements of the Product Support Package as an output of Supportability Analysis Recognize the process and impact of Supportability Design Reviews Evaluate suitability in terms of supportability and adequacy of Product Support Package Recognize analytical processes necessary for Post-Fielding Sustainment Generate a supportability analysis product (Capstone)

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 DRAFT LOG 211 Course Outline MonTueWedThuFri AM Topic 1 Introduction/Admin/ Student Introduction Topic 2 Supportability Analysis/Framework/ Logistician’s Role Topic 6 CASE STUDY: M&S Exercise Logistics Product Data/GEIA Std-0007 Database Topic 7 CASE STUDY: M&S Exercise R&M Modeling, Prediction, Allocation and Analysis Topic 10 Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis /Fault Tree Analysis Topic 11 Condition Based Maintenance/ Reliability Centered Maintenance Topic 14 CASE STUDY: Maintenance Task Analysis Topic 15 CASE STUDY: Software Supportability Analysis Topic 19 Capstone Materials Topic 20 Course Completion/ Graduation PM Topic 3 CASE STUDY: Supportability Objectives/ Maintenance Concept Topic 4 Supportability Metrics Topic 5 Translating Metrics into Design Criteria Topic 8 CASE STUDY: M&S Exercise Diagnostic & Prognostic Capabilities Topic 9 CASE STUDY: M&S Exercise R&M, Availability, Cost/Affordability Trade-off Analysis Topic 12 Product Support Analysis/ Product Support Package Topic 13 CASE STUDY: M&S Exercise Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) Topic 16 Supportability Design Reviews Topic 17 CASE STUDY: Evaluate Suitability Topic 18 Post-Fielding Sustainment Reviews X 9

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 LOG 211 Development Schedule GSA release of Request for Quotation (RFQ)July Vendor QuestionsJuly RFQ Responses DueJuly DAU EvaluationAug Anticipated AwardAug Instructor PilotJuly Student PilotSep FY 13 Deployment (Core Plus)Nov

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 PLD Assessment LOG 211’s course content may be a challenge students with minimal math and engineering skills, as well as a ‘traditional logistics’ perspective. Mitigation Approach Prerequisites LOG 103 Reliability, Availability and Maintainability CLL 012 Supportability Analysis CLL 008 Designing for Supportability in DoD Systems Gaming & Simulation Five technical areas Well designed tasks Cumulative learning Building “Capstone” Take-Away for future use 11

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 PLD Assessment LOG 211 complex development effort Complexity of subject matter Use of a Case Study Gaming & Simulation to facilitate learning technical areas Extensive Instructor and Student Materials Capstone Materials LOG 211 students will have a unique ‘hands-on’ appreciation of the interfaces between Design and Sustainment Systems Engineering and Logistics Engineering PM, SPRDE and T&E Career fields will review LOG 211 Performance Work Statement (PWS) Gain consensus Recognize/incorporate perspectives Serve as Subject Matter Experts 12

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 Impact on Training Directly addresses Policy Requirements Weapons Systems Acquisition Reform Act (WSARA) of 2009 DoD USD(AT&L) Memo “Reliability Availability and Maintainability (RAM)” USD(AT&L) Memo “Better Buying Power” DTM , “RAM Planning, Analysis, Tracking and Reporting” Provides students insight into Systems Engineering – Logistics engineering processes Affordability Importance of Design Interface Impact of RAM on performance and sustainment Product Support Management and IPS Elements Cross-Career Field training PM SPRDE / T&E LCL 13

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 Q & A Thank you for the Opportunity to Serve the Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) Functional Integrated Product Team 14

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 Back Up 15

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 NOTIONAL Projected Throughput 16 LOG 211FY12FY 13FY 14 Graduates # Classes StatusPilotCore PlusCertification LCL SPRDE PM T&E Great Interest in LOG 211 from SPRDE, PM and T&E Career Fields

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 FY13 LCL Certification Curriculum 17 Application/case based GS 9-12 & E7-O4 Level II Certification LOG 201 Intermediate Acquisition Logistics LOG 201 Intermediate Acquisition Logistics 35 hours, online LOG 200 Intermediate Acquisition Logistics LOG 200 Intermediate Acquisition Logistics LOG 235 Performance Based Life Cycle Product Support LOG 235 Performance Based Life Cycle Product Support 35 hours on-line 4.5 days classroom P LOG 211 Supportability Analysis LOG 211 Supportability Analysis 4.5 days classroom ACQ 202 Intermediate Systems Acquisition ACQ 202 Intermediate Systems Acquisition P ACQ 203 Intermediate Systems Acquisition ACQ 203 Intermediate Systems Acquisition 4.5 days classroom LOG 206 Intermediate Systems Sustainment LOG 206 Intermediate Systems Sustainment 40 hours, online NOTE: There would still be NO prerequisites for LOG hours on-line P 25 hrs, on-line Level I Certification ACQ 101 Fundamentals of Systems Acquisition Management ACQ 101 Fundamentals of Systems Acquisition Management Knowledge based GS 5-9 & E7-O3 26 hrs, on-line 30 hrs, on-line P 2 Continuous Learning Modules: PBL & Designing for Supportability 2 Continuous Learning Modules: PBL & Designing for Supportability LOG 103 Reliability, Availability & Maintainability LOG 103 Reliability, Availability & Maintainability LOG 102 Systems Sustainment Management LOG 102 Systems Sustainment Management 1-3 hrs ea, on-line LOG 101 Acquisition Logistics Fundamentals LOG 101 Acquisition Logistics Fundamentals 28 hrs, on-line Case/scenario based GS & E7-O5 Level III Certification P P LOG 350 Enterprise Life Cycle Logistics Management LOG 350 Enterprise Life Cycle Logistics Management LOG 340 Performance Based Life Cycle Sustainment LOG 340 Performance Based Life Cycle Sustainment 8.5 days classroom P = Prerequisite Level I “Core Plus” Courses & CL Modules (See DAU catalog for details) Level I “Core Plus” Courses & CL Modules (See DAU catalog for details) Level III “Core Plus” Courses & CL Modules (See DAU catalog for details) Level III “Core Plus” Courses & CL Modules (See DAU catalog for details) New Cert Courses Level II “Core Plus” Courses & CL Modules (Includes LOG 204 CM Course & new LOG 2xx Tech Data Mgt Course ) Level II “Core Plus” Courses & CL Modules (Includes LOG 204 CM Course & new LOG 2xx Tech Data Mgt Course )

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July Background Defense Science Board Task Force on Developmental T&E " "Operational effectiveness is the overall degree of mission accomplishment of a system when used by representative personnel in the environment planned or expected for operational employment of the system considering organization, doctrine, survivability, tactics, vulnerability and threat. " "Operational suitability is the degree to which a system can be satisfactorily placed in field use, with consideration given to reliability, availability, compatibility, transportability, interoperability, wartime usage rates, maintainability, safety, human factors, manpower supportability, logistics supportability, documentation, training requirements, and natural environmental effects and impacts.

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July Defense Science Board (DSB) Findings Problems – High Suitability failure rates were caused by lack of a disciplined systems engineering process, including a robust reliability growth program, during system development. – RAM shortfalls are frequently identified in DT, but program constraints (schedule and funding) often preclude incorporating fixes and delaying IOT&E. Solutions – Identify and define RAM requirements during the JCIDS process, and incorporate them in the Request for Proposal (RFP) as a mandatory contractual requirement – Strengthen Program Manager accountability for RAM-related achievements – Make RAM, to include a robust reliability growth program, a mandatory contractual requirement and document progress as part of every major program review – Ensure an adequate cadre of experienced RAM personnel is part of the Service acquisition and engineering office staffs

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 AT&L/SSE Memorandum for President, DAU “Addition of RAM Courses to Selected DAWIA Certification Career Paths” AT&L/SSE Memorandum for President, DAU “Addition of RAM Courses to Selected DAWIA Certification Career Paths” 20 “The RIWG identified a critical need for improved knowledge within the DAWIA workforce…and recommends…” “…adding courses…to selected career fields…” (Per Attachment)* “…consider the establishment of a Learning Center of Excellence to support…RAM education and training via mechanisms such at Rapid Deployment Training, Targeted Training, and CoP/SIA products…” “Request…the O-FIPT consider these recommendations and provide a strategy to address them within 30 days…”

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 RIWG Analysis of DAU Curriculum Course and Content Recommendations 21 CAREER FIELDLEVEL ILEVEL IILEVEL IIIRECOMMENDATION ContractingCLE 301Add as Core ITCLE 301 Life Cycle LogisticsCLE 301LOG 203 Production, Q&MCLE 301, LOG 203Change to Core from “As Assigned” Program ManagementCLE 301LOG 203Add as Core SPRDE PECLE 301LOG 203Add as Core SPRDE S&TLOG 203CLE 301Add as Core SPRDE SELOG 203CLE 301Change to Core from “As Assigned” T&ECLE 301LOG 203Add as Core Requirements OfficerCLM 041RQM 110 (Pilot) TBD Add RAM Concepts to Level II Add RAM Tasks to Level III COURSE SPECIFICS LOG 203Strengthen Course (classroom, cross-career) CLE 301Strengthen Course (classroom, cross-career) POTENTIAL NEW COURSE (Section 852) LOG 211 Supportability Analysis 36 hours classroom instruction – builds on and expands LOG 201 and LOG 203’s focus on Supportability Analysis, Maintenance Planning, RAM, and Life Cycle Cost – includes rigorous mathematical analysis.

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 LCL Career Field Implications 22 Human Strategic Capital (HCS) Competencies – Logistics Design Influence – Integrated Logistics Support Planning – Product Support & Sustainment – Configuration Management – Reliability & Maintainability Analysis – Technical/Product Data Management – Supportability Analysis Path Ahead Insert / Strengthen “R” “A” & “M” in the Career Field Architecture and Curriculum via updates and course revisions Workforce Reconstitution –Recruit and hire personnel for T&E and RAM related positions –Ensure Key Leadership Positions (KLP) include T&E and RAM personnel –Retain and recognize RAM expertise –Develop and train RAM expertise –Strengthen and apply RAM expertise Path Ahead Establish “Workforce Improvement” Memo tenants as focus areas for Implementation. Ensure consistency with other Career Fields LOG 103 LOG 211

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 LOG 211 TLO/ELO 23

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 1. Course Administration/ Introduction and Team Building 1.1 Verification of student enrollment/personal information 1.2 Familiarization with DAU/classroom features, health/safety, food/beverage, post access, 1.3 Completion of course prerequisites 1.4 Introduction of course objectives and content. 1.5Team building via personal introductions 24

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 2. Develop Hardware and Software Supportability Objectives/Maintenance Concept 2.1[Relate] the process of determining User Needs to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 2.2[Analyze] the role of the Concept of Operations (CONOPS) in developing Supportability Objectives and the Maintenance Concept. 2.3[Relate] the importance of the Use Study in developing Supportability Objectives 2.4[Develop] Supportability Objectives consistent with User input 2.5 [Develop] the Maintenance Concept consistent with User input and Supportability Objectives 2.6 [Relate] the importance of the Maintenance Concept in conducting Supportability Analyses and providing Product Support 2.7 [Relate] the importance of the Maintenance Concept in conducting Product Support Analyses 2.8 [Examine] the importance of the Maintenance Concept in developing the Product Support Package 2.9 [Examine] the continuous review of the Maintenance Concept to ensure effective support given changes in user requirements and design changes [Assess] the impact of Supportability on both design and sustainment domains 25

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 3. Establish Supportability Metrics 3.1 [Relate] the importance of Supportability Metrics in Supportability and Supportability Analysis 3.2[Derive] Supportability Metrics consistent with Supportability Objectives and User input 3.3 [Examine] how Supportability Metrics will be reviewed, tested and evaluated 3.4[Assess] the impact of Supportability Metrics on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 26

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 4. Translate Metrics Into Design Criteria Within SE Process 4.1 [Relate] the Systems Engineering (SE) process to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 4.2 [Analyze] the Supportability Metrics as system design requirements 4.3[Derive] design criteria consistent with system design requirements 4.4 [Assess] the impact of establishing design criteria on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 27

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 5. Generate Logistics Product Data/ GEIA Std-0007 Database 5.1 [Relate] the Logistics Product Data/GEIA Std-0007 Database to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 5.2[Generate] Logistics Product Data 5.3[Create] a Logistics Product Data Database 5.4 [Assess] the impact of Logistics Product Data/Database on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 28

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 6. Conduct R&M Modeling, Prediction, Allocation and Analysis 6.1 [Relate] Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Modeling, Prediction, Allocation and Analysis to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 6.2 [Apply] Reliability & Maintainability Modeling 6.3 [Apply] Reliability & Maintainability Prediction 6.4[Apply] Reliability & Maintainability Allocation 6.5[Apply] Reliability & Maintainability Analysis 6.6[Apply] Logistics Product Data/Database 6.7 [Assess] the impact of Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Modeling, Prediction, Allocation and Analysis on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 29

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 7. Conduct R&M, Availability, Cost/ Affordability Trade-off Analysis 7.1 [Relate] Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Availability, Cost/Affordability Trade-off Analysis to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 7.2 [Apply] Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Availability, Cost/Affordability Trade-off Analysis 7.3[Apply] Logistics Product Data/Database 7.4 [Assess] the impact of Reliability & Maintainability (R&M), Availability, Cost/Affordability Trade-off Analysis on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 30

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 8. Examine FMECA and FTA processes and their impact on Supportability 8.1 [Relate] Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 8.2 [Distinguish] the differences between FMECA and FTA 8.3[Examine] the Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) process 8.4 [Examine] the Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) process 8.5 [Assess] the impact of Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 31 LOG 211 Supportability Analysis Kick-Off Meeting June

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 9. Examine diagnostic/prognostic capabilities in the CBM+ process and their impact on Supportability 9.1 [Relate] diagnostic and prognostic capabilities to the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process 9.2[Distinguish] the differences between diagnostic and prognostic capabilities 9.3 [Apply] diagnostic and prognostic capabilities as part of the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process 9.4[Apply] Logistics Product Data/Database 9.5 [Assess] the impact of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities in Condition Based Maintenance Plus (CBM+) process on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 32

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 10. Examine RCM processes and contribution to (CBM+) 10.1 [Relate] Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) to the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process 10.2 [Examine] Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) as part of the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process 10.3 [Assess] the impact of Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 33

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 11. Recognize PHM processes and contribution to CBM [Relate] Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) to the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process 11.2 [Examine] Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) as part of the Condition Based Maintenance Plus process 11.3 [Assess] the impact of Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 34 LOG 211 Supportability Analysis Kick-Off Meeting June

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 12. Conduct Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) 12.1 [Relate] Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 12.2[Relate] Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) to the Maintenance Concept 12.3 [Relate] Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) to Product Support Analysis 12.4 [Relate] Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) to the Product Support Package 12.5 [Apply] Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) to the system design 12.6[Apply] Logistics Product Data/Database 12.7 [Assess] the impact of Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 35

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 13. Conduct Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) (Case Study) 13.1 [Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 13.2[Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to the Maintenance Concept 13.3[Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to the Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) 13.2[Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to FMECA and FTA Analyses 13.2[Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to Reliability & Maintainability Modeling, Prediction, Allocation and Analysis 13.3 [Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to Product Support Analysis 13.4 [Relate] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to the Product Support Package 13.5 [Apply] Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) to the system design 13.6[Apply] Logistics Product Data/Database 13.6 [Assess] the impact of Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA) on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 36 LOG 211 Supportability Analysis Kick-Off Meeting June

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 14. Conduct Software Supportability Analysis (Case Study Review) 14.1 [Relate] Software Supportability Analysis to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 14.2 [Examine] Software Supportability Analysis 14.3[Apply] Logistics Product Data/Database 14.4 [Assess] the impact of Software Supportability Analysis on system design and Product Support 37 LOG 211 Supportability Analysis Kick-Off Meeting June

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 15. Examine the PS Analysis Process and the elements of the PS Package as an output of Supportability Analysis 15.1 [Relate] Product Support Analysis process to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 15.2 [Examine] the Product Support Analysis process in identifying Product Support Package elements 15.3 [Examine] the Product Support Package in support of continuing sustainment 15.4 [Assess] the impact of Product Support Analysis and Product Support Package on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 38

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 16. Recognize the process and impact of Supportability Design Reviews 16.1 [Relate] Supportability Design Reviews to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 16.2 [Examine] the Systems Engineering (SE) design review process and milestones 16.3 [Relate] Supportability design review criteria 16.4[Evaluate] system design compliance to requirements 16.5[Assess] the impact of Supportability Design Reviews on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 39

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 17. Evaluate Suitability in terms of Supportability and adequacy of Product Support 17.1 [Relate] Suitability to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 17.2 [Relate] Test & Evaluation/Supportability Demonstration to system design, Supportability and Product Support 17.3[Evaluate] Supportability Demonstration Case Study outcomes 17.4[Assess] the impact of Supportability Demonstration on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 40

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 18. Recognize The Critical Analytical Processes Necessary For Post-Fielding Sustainment 18.1 [Relate] Post-Fielding Sustainment to Supportability and Supportability Analysis 18.2 [Examine] the post-fielding analytical process for continuous assessment of sustainment adequacy 18.3 [Examine] major factors impacting sustainment adequacy 18.4[Assess] the impact of post-fielding analysis on Supportability and Supportability Analysis 41

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 TLO/ELO 19. CAPSTONE Option 1: Generate a comprehensive supportability analysis product in support of assigned task; students conduct the task/analysis and report results by task area. Option 2: Generate a comprehensive list of supportability and supportability analysis issues and processes for student discussion 42

LOG 211 Course Development Overview 15 July 2011 Instructor Certification Process/Course Deployment Instructor Qualification Process First take the Course as a Student Observe (Sit-In) the Course with a Certified Instructor. Instructor/Student Training “Train the Trainer – March 2011 Faculty Pilot (Instructor Validation) scheduled 4-8 April 11 Student Pilot scheduled 1-5 AUG 11 Initial fielding in FY-12 as Belvoir campus FY-12 Instructors - Curry, Brown, Dallosta, Simcik Objective of 5 Belvoir during FY-12 FY-12 (OCT11-SEP12) Belvoir instructors certify Regional reps Level II Certification Requirement starting FY-13 (OCT 2012) FY-13 Instructors each Region) 43