School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)  Indicates satisfactory progress by a district or a school toward the goal of proficiency for all students

Participation Rate Elementary-Middle Level  40 or more students in an accountability group  95% of students enrolled must have valid scores on an appropriate assessment

Participation Rate Secondary Level  40 or more students in an accountability group  95% of seniors must take the appropriate assessment by June of their senior year

Performance Index (PI)  A value from 0 to 200 assigned to an accountability group  Indicates how that group performed on a required State test

Measuring Performance  At the elementary and middle levels, performance measured using assessments in ELA, math, and science  At the secondary level, performance measured using assessments in ELA and math, and graduation rate  Assessment performance is defined by four levels: Level 1 = Not meeting learning standards Level 2 = Partially meeting learning standards Level 3 = Meeting learning standards Level 4 = Meeting learning standards with distinction

Effective Annual Measurable Objectives  The lowest performance index that an accountability group is expected to achieve  If an accountability group’s performance index equals or exceeds the Effective AMO, AYP has been reached

Greenville Central School District OVERVIEW OF DISTRICT PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE

Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts AYPParticipationTest PerformancePerformance Objectives Student GroupStatus Merit Criterion Percentage Tested Merit Criterion Performance Index Effective AMO Safe Harbor Target All Students (623:610)  100%  Ethnicity White (601:591)  100%  Other Groups Students with Disabilities (115:113)  99%X Economically Disadvantaged (165:160)  100%  Final AYP Determination  4 of 4

GCS Compared to NYS Public- 3-5 ELA GCSNYS Grade 364%69% Grade 463%69% Grade 571%67%

GCS Compared to NYS Public- 6-8 ELA GCSNYS Grade 655%60% Grade 758%56% Grade 866%49%

Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics AYPParticipationTest PerformancePerformance Objectives Student GroupStatus Merit Criterion Percentage Tested Merit Criterion Performance Index Effective AMO Safe Harbor Target All Students (617:600)  99%  Ethnicity White (598:581)  99%  Other Groups Students with Disabilities (115:109)  97%  Economically Disadvantaged ( )  100%  Final AYP Determination  4 of 4

GCS Compared to NYS Public 3-5 Mathematics GCSNYS Grade 381%78% Grade 482%68% Grade 573%60%

GCS Compared to NYS Public 6-8 Mathematics GCSNYS Grade 665%60% Grade 774%56% Grade 843%54%

Elementary/Middle-Level Science AYPParticipationTest PerformancePerformance Objectives Student Group Safe Harbor Qualification Met Criterion Percentage Tested Merit Criterion Performance Index Effective AMO Safe Harbor Target All Students (209:205)Qualified  100%  Ethnicity White (205:201)Qualified  100%  Other Groups Students with Disabilities (38:37)---  Economically Disadvantaged (42:42)Qualified  100%  Final AYP Determination  1 of 1

GCS Compared to NYS Public 4 and 8 Science GCSNYS Grade 498%86% Grade 888%64%

Secondary-Level English Language Arts AYPParticipationTest PerformancePerformance Objectives Student GroupStatus Merit Criterion Percentage Tested Merit Criterion Performance Index Effective AMO Safe Harbor Target All Students (82:75)  99%  Ethnicity White (79:72)  99%  Other Groups Students with Disabilities (16:16) Economically Disadvantaged (7:8) Final AYP Determination  2 of 2

GCS Compared to NYS Public Secondary ELA GCSNYS 2002 Cohort71%69% 2001 Cohort71%68%

Secondary-Level Mathematics AYPParticipationTest PerformancePerformance Objectives Student GroupStatus Merit Criterion Percentage Tested Merit Criterion Performance Index Effective AMO Safe Harbor Target All Students (82:75)  98%  Ethnicity White (79:72)  97%  Other Groups Students with Disabilities (16:16) Economically Disadvantaged (7:8) Final AYP Determination  2 of 2

GCS Compared to NYS Public Secondary Mathematics GCSNYS 2002 Cohort80%71% 2001 Cohort85%67%

GCS Compared to NYS Public Secondary Graduation Rate GCSNYS 2002 Cohort78%55%

Greenville Central School District Summary Elementary/Middle LevelSecondary Level Student Group English Language ArtsMathematicsScience English Language ArtsMathematics Graduation Rate All Students  Ethnicity White  Other Groups Students with Disabilities  -- Economically Disadvantaged  -- Student Groups Making AYP in each subject4 of 4 1 of 12 of 2 1 of 1

Greenville CSD Receives Special Recognition  GCSD-Title I High Performing, Gap Closing District, May 2007  Leading New York forward to accomplish dual goal of increasing student achievement while closing the gap in student performance

Greenville CSD Future Implications  K-12 Curriculum Alignment  Professional development concerning research based instruction