Drug Offender Reform Act Smarter Sentencing + Smarter Treatment = Better Outcomes and Safer Neighborhoods.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Challenge Incarceration Program (CIP)
Advertisements

Assessing Sexual Offenders Inmates for Residential Community-Based Addiction Treatment RC-BAT Peter R. Cohen MD, Medical Director, ADAA April 29, 2010.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” MLK “The time.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” - MLK.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing and Corrections 1. Sentencing Options 2. Purposes of Punishment 3. Parole 4. Capital Punishment 5. Corrections.
Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: What Works with Offenders? Rita Dries July 2006.
Women and Corrections: A Model Program By Vanessa Alleyne,PhD.
YCJA THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. JOHN HOWARD SOCIETY ROLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Provides public education about the law, especially the.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Austin American Statesman August 21, 2007 Texas leads nation in number of drunken driving deaths WASHINGTON BUREAU Tuesday, August 21, 2007 WASHINGTON.
Basic Cost / Benefit Analysis of Drug Court Client Costs Prescription Drug Abuse and Overdose Prevention Rapid Response Drug Task Force Presented to the.
Reentry: A Community Based Strategy. Overview Brief History of Community Programs Over the last two decades there has been substantial growth in community.
THE COALITION OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROVIDERS OF NEW JERSEY The Role of Community Resource Centers in Offender Re-entry.
Youth and Crime: Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA – 2003) Law 12 MUNDY 2009.
Cost-Effective Interventions for Juvenile Offenders Dr. Peter W. Greenwood Academy of Experimental Criminology Association for the Advancement of Evidence-Based.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Mentally Ill Offenders and Sex Offenders. The Problem Mental illness and the lack of sufficient mental health care have driven offenders into the CJ system.
Evidence-based Practices (EBP) in Corrections
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
Chapter 40 Rehabilitation. Objectives Identify the major factors that affect criminal behavior Explain the role of correctional treatment programs in.
1 Ed Monahan Public Advocate Substance Abuse: Senate Bill 4 (2009) Treatment options expanded Ernie Lewis KY Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers June.
Alcohol And Drug Abuse Issues Volusia And Flagler Counties Stewart-Marchman Center, Inc. July 2006.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
Louisiana Access to Recovery LA-ATR Understanding Addiction & Supporting Recovery Webinar Pastor Pythian Noah June 25, 2009.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
ST. LOUIS FAMILY COURT Judge Jimmie M. Edwards July 21, 2011.
Drunk Driving: A Strategy for Reducing Recidivism 12 th Annual Michigan Traffic Safety Summit Tuesday March 13, 2006 Bradley Finegood, MA, LLPC.
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Define community corrections and discuss its role in the criminal justice system  LO2 Describe.
Risk/Needs Assessment Within the Criminal Justice System.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
The Coalition of Community Corrections Providers of New Jersey A Partnership Responding to Prisoner Re-entry.
Chapter 3 Addictions: Theory and Treatment. Drug Addiction Behavioral pattern of drug use Overwhelming involvement Securing of its supply Tendency to.
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 6 The Correctional Client.
Prevention and Early Intervention Linking Long-Term Vision with Short-Term Costs J effrey P oirier, B.A. M ary M agee Q uinn, Ph.D. American Institutes.
Broken Windows or Broken Logic? Supervising Offenders in the Community.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Should Teens Be Prosecuted As Adults for Major Crimes? By Quinn, Alex, and Kaela.
DYS and Arkansas’ Juvenile Justice System Entrance Children age who are proven to have broken the law and are under the authority of a juvenile.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
Incarceration, Reentry and Disparities in Health: What are the connections? Nicholas Freudenberg Hunter College, May 5, 2006 Presented at the Prisoner.
EL PASO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SERVICES Dr. Henry Sontheimer Department Director & Criminal Justice Planner.
CADPAAC January 2010 Quarterly Meeting COSSR Pilot Presentation San Mateo County’s Experience in Transforming Treatment and Recovery Services.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation: A Systems Analysis Using the Burke- Litwin Model of Organizational Change and Performance.
HB 3194 CRAIG PRINS3/5/14 OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION NEVADA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
TECBD, 2003 Financial and Human Costs of Treatment or Failure to Provide Treatment Mary Quinn Jeffrey Poirier American Institutes for Research National.
U NIT 6 By: Amy Ng, ABD, MSCJA. O BJECTIVES Weekly Reminders Holiday Info Drug Treatment.
Chapter 14 The Future of Corrections. Collateral Effects of Imprisonment Politics of Corrections and the Media The War on Drugs The Costs of Current Policies.
INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND THE ROLE OF GPS Thomas H. Williams, Associate Director Community Supervision Services July 14-15, 2008 United States Sentencing.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Suppose We Try Something New in Addiction? Different Perspectives and Research Implications.
Principles of Effective Drug Addiction Treatment Health 10 The Truth About Drugs Ms. Meade.
Risk Reduction Program Enabling Learning Objectives 1.Select from a list the fourteen high-risk behaviors used in the Risk Reduction Program. 2.Identify.
Evidence-Based Public Policy in the Criminal Justice System  Washington State’s (Evolving) Approach  What Works Conference, 2013 —Justice Reinvestment.
Multnomah County What Works Conference Craig Prins, Executive Director Michael Wilson, Economist Criminal Justice Commission 1.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
Fairbanks S.O. Treatment and Management Program (1998-Nov. 2103) Moreen Fried, LCSW # (1998-Nov. 2013)
The Youth Justice System. Youth Justice System For centuries, youths were treated the same as adults under the law. For centuries, youths were treated.
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
Using the National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices (NCJTP) Survey
Summit County Probation Services
Justice Division Strategic Planning
Youth and Crime: Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA – 2003)
Curing the root causes of addiction
Presentation transcript:

Drug Offender Reform Act Smarter Sentencing + Smarter Treatment = Better Outcomes and Safer Neighborhoods

What is DORA? A change in public policy Offenders with drug problems are identified early Drug treatment options are expanded in the community and in correctional facilities Crime is reduced Victims are spared

Why Do We Need DORA? 85% of offenders have a drug problem that drives their criminal behavior Our prison system is at capacity Treatment works

Drugs & Alcohol Linked to Tragedy 62% of assaults 52% of rapes 80% of child abuse 50% of spousal abuse 20-35% of suicides 69% of drownings 49% of murders 50% of traffic fatalities 68% of manslaughter charges

What is Smarter Sentencing? Occurs when judges have more information to craft better sentences. Under DORA, judges know an offender’s drug history. Treatment is not mandatory, but becomes more readily available.

How Does DORA Save Me Money? $3,500 for treatment vs. $24,000 for a prison bed Decreased crime = decreased criminal justice and victim costs Increase in employment for treated offenders

How Does DORA Create Safer Neighborhoods? Upon Completion of Treatment: Dramatic decrease in criminal activity Substantial increase in abstinence for alcohol and drugs Increase in stabile living environments

The DORA Approach Represents a Shift in Public Policy

The DORA Process Arrest Drug Screening Drug & Risk Assessment* Drug Addiction and Crime Cycle Broken Recommend Treatment Drug problem? High risk? Recommend Incarceration Offender Sentenced Treatment Provided PSI * Drug Assessment is the Addictions Severity Index (ASI) the Risk Assessment is the Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI)

DORA’s Treatment Strategy How Does it Work?

How Does Addiction Happen? Drugs cause long and short-term changes in the brain Drugs hamper a person’s ability to make correct decisions and control compulsive behavior Treatment helps offenders correct their behaviors, confront the problems associated with drug use, and recover from addiction.

How Does Treatment Work? RESIDENTIAL INTENSIVE OUTPATIENT AFTERCARE & RELAPSE PREVENTION Severe addiction Serious addiction Dependent Completed treatment Screening and Assessment Decreased Intensity of Service

The 3-year DORA Plan Phasing in a New Way of Doing Business

YEAR 1YEAR 2YEAR 3 screen drug offenders 1,600 treated $6.3 on-going Screen all offenders Assess, if needed, for addiction severity Assess for risk to community 3,349 treated4,479 treated $12.1 on-going$16.7 on-going

Is it Worth $16.7 million? Yes! Treatment Works

Economic Impact The costs associated with these offenders Justice system Medical system Public assistance Work-related Victimization

The Costs Savings Every tax dollar spent on treatment produces $5.60 in avoided costs to the taxpayer.

Summary of Recommendations Eventually screen and assess all offenders over a 3-year phase-in. Provide appropriate level of treatment services and new treatment slots. Evaluate our efforts. Realize cost savings by avoiding repeated incarceration costs and further victimization.