Life is all about choices … Human Subjects Research Ethics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Life is all about choices … Responsible Research Ethics and The Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
Advertisements

INFORMED CONSENT IN BIO-MEDICAL RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN PARTICIPANTS Selina khatun MPH, Mphil Lecturer(Anatomy Department) MMC.
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Andrea H. Jackson, Ph.D. Assistant Dean Howard University Office of Research and the Graduate School Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Workshop Tuesday,
Ethical issues in clinical research Bernard Lo, M.D. August 24,
UH employees and students who conduct research involving human subjects are required to obtain approval from the Committee on Human Studies (CHS). John.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
HIV Clinical Trials Janice Price, M.Ed, RN HIV Clinical Research Program Coordinator Swedish Medical Center Seattle, WA USA.
Detectives in the Classroom - Investigation 2-3: What's Wrong with This Picture? What's Wrong with This Picture?
Research Ethics Anne J. Davis, RN, PhD, DSc (hon), FAAN.
Human Subject Protection Judith Birk IRB Health / Behavioral Sciences.
How You Can Be an Advocate for Clinical Trials in Your Community.
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Ethics in Research involving Human Subjects Dr. Walid S. Abdelkader Head of Preventive Medicine and Primary Care Division IMC Feb
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Anthony J. Minisi, MD Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program.
ADDRESSING BAD RESEARCH Rels 300 / Nurs October 2014.
Ethical Concerns in Research
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
Human Subjects’ Research. Learning Objectives Discuss key ethical concerns The role of the IRB Principles and origin of Belmont Report Principle of informed.
Today: What ethical considerations are needed when using humans as research subjects?
HUMAN RESEARCH HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. Objectives Identify the history events that lead to the development of principles, regulations, and guidance.
1 HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS Daniel R. Vasgird, PhD, CIP Office of Research Compliance West Virginia University (304)
Research Methods Leadership 389.
Sex, Drugs, Rock and Role, and Other Ethical Dilemmas in Community Based Research Robert T. Trotter, II General Motors Sigma Xi Lecture Dec. 4, 2003.
Legal & Ethical Issues. Objectives At the completion of this session the participant will be able to: ◦ Describe the ethical principles associated with.
Eugenics Movement Nuremberg Code Declaration of Helsinki WWII – Time Line for Human Subject Research and.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
TERRENCE F. ACKERMAN, PH.D. PROFESSOR OF BIOETHICS CHAIR, UTHSC IRB.
Ethics and Social Research
Announcements Lab 5 Due Today Nothing due today! Due Next Lab Lab Assignment 5: CITI training New links on Blackboard site i.e. “class slides” & “lab slides”
The ethical conduct of research with human participants Nancy E. Kass, ScD Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of.
Human Subjects Research at ASU An Overview. Overview Definitions Historical Framework Federal Guidelines Human Subjects Research at ASU.
Research Ethics – A Short History. Quiz “Every treatment is an experiment”“Every treatment is an experiment”Author? Committee on medical research – 1941(FDR)Committee.
Chapter 5 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research.
Research Ethics. Ethics From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character Implies a judgment of character.
Research Ethics.
The Ethics of Research on Human Subjects. Research Activity on Human Subjects: Any systematic attempt to gain generalizable knowledge about humans A systematic.
Consent Procedures. What is Informed Consent? Consent by a patient to a surgical or medical procedure or participation in a clinical study after achieving.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Ethics. Ethics Just because researchers could do a study, doesn’t mean that they should Is the science adding to a body of knowledge? Is the research.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Announcements Unit 1 exam: -2 nd period: September 30 1 st period: September 29 Quiz NEXT CLASS: -Cognitive approach: strengths and weaknesses -Mann, Vrij,
Chapter 10 Research in the Schools: Ethical-Legal Issues Jacob, Decker, & Hartshorne 1.
Protection of Human Research Subjects Theresia Yiallourou Nora Leonardi Ulrike Kettenberger November 19 th 2010.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Beyond Regulations: Ethical Considerations in Research
M6728 Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Ethics of Research. History of Regulation of Research n A history of scandals –Nazi experiments, WWII –Beecher expose of US research without consent,
Purpose of Clinical Trials Assess safety and efficacy of Experimental treatments New combinations of drugs New approaches to surgery or radiation therapies.
PRIMER: Human Subjects, Past, Present, and Future Susan Metosky, Arizona State University Debra Murphy, Arizona State University.
Principles for the Protection of Human Rights Beneficence Primary goal of health care as doing good for clients under our care. Good care requires that.
Ethics in Research A class discussion. What is Ethics in Research? and Why is it Important?
Clinical Trials and You Ellen Valentine, M.S., CCC-SLP Community Outreach and Education Program Science Park Research Division, Smithville, Texas.
Informed consent as an essential component in the ethics of biomedical research الموافقة المستبصرة كعنصر أساسى فى أخلاقيات البحث الحيوى الطبى د. عدنان.
Informed Consent in Research Why Conduct Research? Research involving humans is premised on a fundamental moral commitment to advancing human welfare,
Psychology and Ethics September 22 & 23. Bellringer (5-7 sentences in journal) What does the term “ethics” mean to you? What is ethical and what is not?
Ethical Dilemma Research that is most likely to reveal something important about human nature is also the most likely to violate human rights. A number.
Ethics in Human Medical Research
Ethics in Medical Research. Ethics in Medical Research.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Ethics in Research.
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
The Need for Ethical Principles
Research, Experimentation, & Clinical Trials
Ethics of human research
Presentation transcript:

Life is all about choices … Human Subjects Research Ethics

Join me as we journey back to an age where The field of Medicine comes into its own, and Optimism, Progress, and Science sit on the Throne of GOD Welcome to the Ethical Time Machine All Aboard!

Piaget describes stages of cognitive development First Test Tube Baby Born 1978 First Human Heart Transplant Year First successful Open Heart Surgery Penicillin sulfa drugs First Electrocardiogram 1903

Syphilis Study Exposed The Beecher Article (NEJM) 1932 The Syphilis Study Begins Trigger Events Nuremberg Code Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations Common Rule The Nazi Experiments US Human Radiation Experiments The Thalomide Tragedy Milgram Study 20 th Century Research Ethics Milestones Back to the Future

Nazi Germany at beginning of World War II Was the most scientifically and technologically advanced country in the world, Had a proposed code of research ethics, Supported midwifery, nutrition programs, ecology, public health, human genetics, cancer, radiation, and asbestos research

However … The Nazis also … exploited peoples trust in the medical community by performing unethical experiments on populations they discriminated against.

Nazi Battlefield Medicine Experiments 1942: High altitude or low pressure experiments at Dachau : Freezing experiments at Dachau : Malaria experiments at Dachau : Phosphorus burn experiments at Buchenwald 1944: Seawater experiment at Dachau

At Ravensbruck women were shot or slashed on the legs. The wounds stuffed with glass, dirt, and bacteria cultures and sewn shut then treated with experimental anti-infective agents.

Syphilis Study Exposed The Beecher Article (NEJM) 1932 The Syphilis Study Begins Trigger Events Nuremberg Code Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations Common Rule The Nazi Experiments US Human Radiation Experiments The Thalomide Tragedy Milgram Study 20 th Century Research Ethics Milestones Back to the Future

The Nuremberg Code Key Ideas –Voluntary Informed Consent –Right of the Subject to Withdraw from the Experiment at any Time –A Human Subject Cannot be Sacrificed for the Greater Good of Science –Investigator must terminate the experiment at any time the well-being of his/her subjects is threatened.

Syphilis Study Exposed The Beecher Article (NEJM) 1932 The Syphilis Study Begins Trigger Events Nuremberg Code Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations Common Rule The Nazi Experiments US Human Radiation Experiments The Thalomide Tragedy Milgram Study 20 th Century Research Ethics Milestones Back to the Future

Human Radiation Experiments In 1994, President Clinton appointed the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE) To investigate unethical experiments conducted by our government during WWII and the Cold War Era

ACHRES Investigation Revealed … testing on soldiers feeding radioactive cereal to teenagers at a school for the mentally retarded, irradiating the testicles of prison inmates, injecting plutonium into hospital patients, intentional releases of radiation into the environment …

4000 human radiation experiments conducted In a two prong effort by the US to –P–Provide for National Security –P–Provide medical studies to improve human health Too often deceptively, secretly, and/or without informed consent

Testimony before ACHRE, 1995 My mother, Jan Stadt, had a number, HP-8. She was injected with plutonium March 9, She was 41 years old, and I was 11 years old at the time. My mother and father were never told or asked for any kind of consent to have this done to them. My mother went in (to the hospital) for scleroderma...and a duodenal ulcer, and somehow she got pushed over into this lab where these monsters were. Milton Stadt Son of subject in the Rochester University experiments

Syphilis Study Exposed The Beecher Article (NEJM) 1932 The Syphilis Study Begins Trigger Events Nuremberg Code Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations Common Rule The Nazi Experiments US Human Radiation Experiments The Thalomide Tragedy Milgram Study 20 th Century Research Ethics Milestones Back to the Future

The Thalidomide Tragedy

Thalidomide was prescribed for morning sickness Approved in Europe in late 1950s but not in US due to diligent efforts by one USDA doctor. However as was common practice among pharmaceutical companies … some U.S. doctors were supplied samples and paid to study its safety and efficacy.

It was subsequently discovered that … Thalidomide causes severe deformities in babies and its effects are even passed on to later generations.

Syphilis Study Exposed The Beecher Article (NEJM) 1932 The Syphilis Study Begins Trigger Events Nuremberg Code Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations Common Rule The Nazi Experiments US Human Radiation Experiments The Thalomide Tragedy Milgram Study 20 th Century Research Ethics Milestones Back to the Future

1962 Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Looked at practices of pharmaceutical companies Required more testing before widespread use Informed consent from patients receiving experimental drugs

Syphilis Study Exposed The Beecher Article (NEJM) 1932 The Syphilis Study Begins Trigger Events Nuremberg Code Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations Common Rule The Nazi Experiments US Human Radiation Experiments The Thalomide Tragedy Milgram Study 20 th Century Research Ethics Milestones Back to the Future

Socio-Behavioral Studies Milgrams Study of Obedience to Authority –Subjects coerced into feeling they had seriously injured somebody The Stanford Prison Experiment –What happens when you put good people in an evil place? – Radiation experiments on soldiers –Fear

Syphilis Study Exposed The Beecher Article (NEJM) 1932 The Syphilis Study Begins Trigger Events Nuremberg Code Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations Common Rule The Nazi Experiments US Human Radiation Experiments The Thalomide Tragedy Milgram Study 20 th Century Research Ethics Milestones Back to the Future

Declaration of Helsinki 1964 Research with humans should be based on the results from laboratory and animal experimentation Research protocols should be reviewed by an independent committee prior to initiation Informed consent from research participants is necessary Research should be conducted by medically/scientifically qualified individuals Risks should not exceed benefits

Syphilis Study Exposed The Beecher Article (NEJM) 1932 The Syphilis Study Begins Trigger Events Nuremberg Code Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations Common Rule The Nazi Experiments US Human Radiation Experiments The Thalomide Tragedy Milgram Study 20 th Century Research Ethics Milestones Back to the Future

Dr. Beecher began his famous article in the NEJM by stating: … medicine is sound, and most progress is soundly attained …

He then went on to describe … 22 examples of research studies with controversial ethics conducted by reputable researchers and published in major journals. "Until this article we assumed that unethical research could only occur in a depraved regime like the Nazis. Robert J. Levine, MD

Syphilis Study Exposed The Beecher Article (NEJM) 1932 The Syphilis Study Begins Trigger Events Nuremberg Code Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations Common Rule The Nazi Experiments US Human Radiation Experiments The Thalomide Tragedy Milgram Study 20 th Century Research Ethics Milestones Back to the Future

Syphilis the AIDS of an earlier time Untreated, it can lead to –s–severe heart disease, –b–brain damage, –p–paralysis, and –d–death. The problem was, until 1907, no one could treat it.

Then Nobel Prize-winning microbiologist Paul Ehrlich discovered Salvarsan an arsenic-based compound. It was the first chemotherapy.

The 1920s was a progressive era in medicine Armed with confidence and the Scientific Method, Public Health Service officials were determined to control syphilis in their time. They set up free treatment clinics throughout the south, including Macon county, Alabama, home to the Tuskegee Institute.

While writing the final report, Dr. Taliaferro Clark, head of the PHS Venereal Disease Division conceived an idea to salvage the study … Macon county offered an unparalleled opportunity for the study of the effect of untreated syphilis in the Negro male. But in 1932, the funding for treatment ran out.

The Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro male (1932 – 1972) was only supposed to last a year … but then Dr. Raymond Vondelehr advocated continuing the study to get autopsies. Autopsies would confirm clinical observation and therefore greatly contribute to the scientific reliability of the studys findings.

Bringing them to Autopsy By the time Jean Heller broke the story in the Washington Star in 1972 The experiment had gone on for 40 years. During all this time, it was no secret to the wider medical community. Results of the study had been published in well known medical journals. Yet no one ever questioned the study.

399 Participants None were ever told they had syphilis. None were ever offered a cure even when penicillin became available in Researchers had even interfered to keep subjects from getting penicillin so the study could continue.

28 men died of syphilis 100 men died from related complications at least 40 wives were infected 19 children had contracted the disease at birth a whole peoples trust was shattered Nothing Learned will Prevent, Find, or Cure a Single Case

Bad Blood Macon county residents were very poor. They lived and died without medical care because they could not afford it. They didnt distinguish between syphilis and a host of other maladies which they called bad blood. They trusted the government doctors and they traveled great lengths to get a little free medical care. They were told they were being treated for bad blood.

I, like most everybody else, was horrified at the things that were practiced upon these Jewish people, such as doing experiments while the patients were not only alive but doing such things as would cause their deaths. All these sorts of things were horrendous to me and I, like most everyone else, deplored them. Dr. John R. Heller, Researcher, Tuskegee Syphilis Study

Final Report of Tuskegee Syphillis Study "Society can no longer afford to leave the balancing of individual rights against scientific progress to the scientific community."

Syphilis Study Exposed The Beecher Article (NEJM) 1932 The Syphilis Study Begins Trigger Events Nuremberg Code Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations Common Rule The Nazi Experiments US Human Radiation Experiments The Thalomide Tragedy Milgram Study 20 th Century Research Ethics Milestones Back to the Future

In 1974 at Belmont, the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects began deliberations … Kenneth John Ryan, M.D., Joseph V. Brady, Ph.D., Robert E. Cooke, M.D., Dorothy I. Height, President, NCNW, Albert R. Jonsen, Ph.D., Patricia King, J.D., Karen Lebacqz, Ph.D., David W. Louisell, J.D., Donald W. Seldin, M.D., Eliot Stellar, Ph.D., Robert H. Turtle, LL.B., Attorney.

Which led in 1978 to the opening words of the Belmont Report Scientific Research has produced substantial social benefits. It has also posed some troubling ethical questions.

The 3 Basic Ethical Principles of the Belmont Report Respect for Persons Benefice Justice

Respect for Persons Definition: Individuals should be treated as autonomous agents Persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection Application: Voluntary Informed Consent Belmont Report

Benefice Definition: Do not harm Maximize possible benefits Minimize possible harms Application: Assessment of risks and benefits Belmont Report

Justice Definition: Who ought to receive the benefits of research? Who ought to bear its burdens? Application: Equitable Selection of Subjects Belmont Report

Syphilis Study Exposed The Beecher Article (NEJM) 1932 The Syphilis Study Begins Trigger Events Nuremberg Code Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations Common Rule The Nazi Experiments US Human Radiation Experiments The Thalomide Tragedy Milgram Study 20 th Century Research Ethics Milestones Back to the Future

Piaget describes stages of cognitive development First Test Tube Baby Born 1978 First Human Heart Transplant Year First successful Open Heart Surgery Penicillin sulfa drugs First Electrocardiogram 1903

Home free in the 21 st Century? Research is still Risky –Gene Therapy Trials Death of 18 year old Jesse Gelsinger in 1999 Conflict of interest –Cloning –Nanotechnology –Internet Research –Artificial Intelligence –Chemical and Biological terrorism –Space travel …

Institutions where Studies have been temporarily suspended July 1998 – July 2001 Rush Presbyterian – St. Lukes Medical Center Friends Research Institute Veteran Affairs Greater LA Virginia Commonwealth University John Hopkins

Questions to Consider Why should we be concerned about Human Subject Research? Do you think another Tuskegee could happen in the future? Do you think a Tuskegee could ever happen to you? Can you envision yourself ever being faced with an ethical dilemma in Human Subjects research? What are some guidelines or resources you could turn to? And finally, The Tuskegee Study started in the United States in 1932 and continued for 40 years, well past the Nuremberg trials. It was also no well kept secret. Research articles were published in major medical journals during this time. Why do you think nobody saw a connection between Nuremberg and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study?

The 1997 Presidential Apology to Tuskegee Participants

choices have consequences Now its your turn - how will YOU choose? Life is all about choices …