Robert W. Arts, Ph.D. Professor of Education & Physics University of Pikeville Pikeville, KY The Mini-Zam: Formative Assessment for the Physics Classroom.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing Student Performance
Advertisements

The Journey – Improving Writing Through Formative Assessment Presented By: Sarah McManus, Section Chief, Testing Policy & Operations Phyllis Blue, Middle.
Leadership Workshop September 4, 2009
When Students Can’t Read…
Classroom Instruction That Works Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, and Jane Pollock August 19, 2008.
Using assessment for learning
Wynne Harlen. What do you mean by assessment? Is there assessment when: 1. A teacher asks pupils questions to find out what ideas they have about a topic.
Assessment & Evaluation adapted from a presentation by Som Mony
Classroom Instruction That Works Providing Feedback.
Gradual Release of Responsibility & Feedback
Chapter 1 What is listening?
 Standards Based Grading Discussion- February 3, 2014.
Overview of Formative Assessment (Diagnostic & Feedback) vs. Summative Assessment (Mastery & Standardised) Presented by Philip Holmes-Smith School Research.
Assessment OF Learning (Summative) vs
Dr. Pratibha Gupta Associate professor Deptt. of Community Medicine ELMC & H, Lucknow.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Assessment Assessment involves the sampling of some aspect of a person's learning/knowledge at a particular moment. Depending upon the kind of sample.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Activity: Pre-Assessment Probe Classroom Assessment Technique (CAT) Domain: Assessing Prior Knowledge, Recall, and Understanding: CAT Activity: Background.
STANDARDS BASED GRADING Harrison High School. WHY STANDARDS BASED GRADING?  Grades should have meaning  Ensures uniform grading practices  Makes classroom.
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
Principles of Assessment
Robert W. Arts, Ph.D. Professor of Education & Physics University of Pikeville Pikeville, KY Presented at the Spring Meeting of the Kentucky Association.
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
Robert W. Arts, Ph.D.* Professor of Education & Physics University of Pikeville Pikeville, KY Using a Universal Qualitative Analysis Writing Assignment.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
The Formative Assessment Cycle Solve a selection of problems of a given skill Analysis Students are instantly told if their answers on ASSISTment are correct.
Lynn Thompson Center for Applied Linguistics Startalk Network for Program Excellence Chicago, Illinois October 16-18, 2009 Formative and Summative Assessment.
August 2007FFP Testing and Evaluation Techniques Chapter 7 Florida State Fire College Ocala, Florida.
STUDENT LEARNING IMPACT PROJECT: Reading for Meaning Kelly Johnson Cedar Ridge Elementary School April 19, 2007.
Timber Trace Elementary School October 4, Introduction Module # 1 Structure of the Handbook Design Questions and Modules Sample Activity Box How.
Adventures in flipping a cell biology course Dr. Katie Shannon Biological Sciences Missouri S&T Flipped Fridays.
Teaching Thermodynamics with Collaborative Learning Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Department June 9, 2006.
Rod Hardy Hanover-Horton High School Math Data Retreat Results: Beginning the Process.
Classroom Evaluation & Grading Chapter 15. Intelligence and Achievement Intelligence and achievement are not the same Intelligence and achievement are.
Assessment Literacy Interim Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
Two Levels of Course Assessment to Identify Student Learning Carol Lerch, Ph.D S 52 Friday 11:45 – 12:35.
Record Keeping and Using Data to Determine Report Card Markings.
Understanding Alaska Measures of Progress Results: Reports 1 ASA Fall Meeting 9/25/2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon,
Assessed: 2007, 2010, 2011,  PHIL 101 (Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics)  GE elective choice  BA 300 (Ethical Decision Making in Business)
Grading Guidelines for Secondary Schools
Formative and Summative Evaluation. Formative Evaluation The goal of formative assessment is to Monitor student learning Provide ongoing feedback Improve.
All teachers will use cumulative marks, consistency is key. This is important as marks will be displayed on the PARENT PORTAL and STUDENT PORTAL on the.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Student Learning Objectives. Introductions Training Norms Be present Actively participate in activities Respect time boundaries Use electronics respectfully.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
State Support for Classroom Assessment Fen Chou, Ph.D. Louisiana Department of Education National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.
Welcome to 5 th grade’s Parent Orientation Night.
“Teaching”…Chapter 11 Planning For Instruction
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Class Assessment Best Practices for Monitoring and Evaluating Your Classroom pp
Graduate Instruction Methods Fall 2008 Being a successful TA Cesar D. Guerrero Department of Computer Science and Engineering October.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
SCIENCE Assessment Amanda Cantafio.
PGCE Evaluation of Assessment Methods. Why do we assess? Diagnosis: establish entry behaviour, diagnose learning needs/difficulties. Diagnosis: establish.
What do you think? The most effective method for assessing my students is to use a large end of unit test.
Assessment In Learning Marie Wilson EDU 650 Teaching, Learning, and Leading in the 21 st Century Instructor: Heather Caldwell May 21 st, 2016.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Using the Snyder Student Rubric Presentation Link:
Assessment Of, For, and AS Learning
Using the 4.0 Gradebook.
Revised Higher Course Event
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
TESTING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION GA 3113 lecture 1
Presentation transcript:

Robert W. Arts, Ph.D. Professor of Education & Physics University of Pikeville Pikeville, KY The Mini-Zam: Formative Assessment for the Physics Classroom Presented at the Spring Meeting of the Kentucky Association of Physics Teachers Elizabethtown, KY, March 2013

What is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a range of assessment procedures employed during the learning process in order to modify teaching and learning activities in an attempt to improve student attainment. It typically involves frequent feedback for both student and teacher that focuses on the details of content and performance. –This differs from “summative assessment” which refers to the assessment of the learning and summarizes the development of learners at a particular time. For example, after a period of work, the learner sits for a test and then the teacher marks the test and assigns a score with no opportunity to revisit any misunderstood content. Based on the intent of formative assessment, the Mini-Zam was born!

What is a Mini-Zam? A Mini-Zam (mini combination of a quiz and an exam) is ALWAYS one multiple choice question AND one open response question related to the previous day's lecture material given EVERY CLASS DAY during the last ten to fifteen of the lecture. There are several purposes to implementing the Mini-Zam strategy: to provide feedback for the professor to modify subsequent learning activities and experiences to identify and remediate group or individual deficiencies to move focus away from achieving grades and onto learning processes, in order to increase self efficacy and reduce the negative impact of extrinsic motivation to improve students' metacognitive awareness of how they learn frequent, ongoing assessment allows both for fine-tuning of instruction and student focus on progress

To receive full credit for a multiple choice question, both the correct answer and a reasonable explanation must be given. To receive full credit for a open response question, a full (all steps shown) and reasonable explanation must be given. The key is consistency in formatting and grading: Each of the Multiple Choice problems is worth up to 10 points May be qualitative or quantitative Each of the Open Response problems is worth up to 25 points May be qualitative or quantitative As such, EVERY mini-zam is worth up to 35 points. Format

There are generally 41 mini-zams scheduled to be given during a term. The average of the BEST 38 of these minizams comprises 40% of a student's final course grade. However, if fewer than 41 minizams end up being administered, the total mini-zam percentage for the semester is still 40% for the group of mini- zams completed, minus the lowest THREE that will still be dropped! A missed mini-zam can be made up. However, due to the nature of these assessments, they MUST be completed BEFORE the next regular class meeting! After that time a student will have forfeited the points for that particular missed mini-zam. This policy is in place in the event that a student has a valid reason for not being in class; however, if any student seems to be abusing this policy (greater than 10% of the mini-zams having to be made up), then they will run the risk of not being able to make future ones up at all. General Policies

Fall Term Sample

Spring Term Sample

Findings Thus Far…. FALL Term YEARNHWsLabsUQAWAsMini-ZamsQ&E AvgFinal % (prior to comp final; if applicable) Averages = SPRING Term YEARNHWsLabsUQAWAsMini-ZamsQ&E AvgFinal % (prior to comp final; if applicable) Averages =

Interesting Tid-Bits S2012 –1148 total mini-zams were given –Only 6 were never made up (0.5%) F2012 –2470 total mini-zams were given –128 mini-zams were not taken during class time (5.2%) –72 mini-zams were never made up (2.9%) S2013 –1170 total mini-zams have been give thus far –80 mini-zams have not been taken during class time (6.8%) –35 mini-zams have not been made up (3.0%)

Items for Further Study Normalize the scores (reflect same % for each assignment category) Look at average MZ score following a missed class (suspect a lower %) Compare MWF averages Look at post break averages (Fall Break, Labor Day, Thanksgiving, Spring Break, Good Friday, Hillbilly Days) Averages for each topic covered

Thank You ! Any Questions?