Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Teacher Evaluation Patrick Burk, Ph.D. Graduate School of Education Educational Leadership.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Orientation to EVALUATION PROCEDURES August, 2006.
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Who Put “Instructional Monitoring” On My To Do List? Suggestions for Principals M. Ann Levett, Ed.D.
How Do We Know We Are Making Progress? Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
Osceola School District’s Classroom Instructor Evaluation The Ins and Outs of Our Classroom Instructor Evaluation
Professional Development and Appraisal System. Rules To Know From Commissioner’s Rules Chapter 150.AA Subchapter  Each teacher must be appraised.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Idaho Tiered Teacher Licensure May 13, Vision for Tiered Teacher Licensure Attract and retain great teachers in Idaho Identify struggling teachers.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
New Teacher Induction Academy Data Collection November 30, 2011
EPMS OVERVIEW – Prepare Planning Stages – Provide Ongoing Communication – Performing Evaluation Stage – Address substandard performance. – Use EAP appropriately.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys ™ Module 8: Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities Spring 2010 Teacher and.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
SUBTITLE DAY, MONTH, YEAR Accreditation Support for Teachers Introduction to Accreditation at Proficient Teacher Module 5 of 5.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Implementing post-290 EVALUATION: Remediating Inadequate Performance of Teachers 1 The Hungerford Law Firm April 13, 2015.
ADEPT Framework
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
Teacher Orientation August, 2011 Brazosport Independent School District Professional Development and Appraisal System
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
Learning Centered Conferencing with the Using the Danielson Framework John Hellwich & Michelle Lewis.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Evaluation: Implications for your Professional Future Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
O UR S CHOOLS E VALUATION P ROCESS Brad, Chad, Holly, Katie, Lily, and Pat.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Teacher Orientation August, 2012 Brazosport Independent School District Professional Development and Appraisal System.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Standard 6 Unit Governance and Resources. 6a: Unit Leadership and Authority The unit and other faculty collaborate with P-12 practitioners in program.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
Polices, procedures & protocols
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Process
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Process
Cooperating Teacher In-Service
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Presentation transcript:

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Teacher Evaluation Patrick Burk, Ph.D. Graduate School of Education Educational Leadership and Policy January 27, 2011

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Basic Question How do we provide the best prepared and most effective teachers possible in all of our classrooms?

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Drivers of Teacher Quality Recruitment of candidates Undergraduate preparation/content knowledge Entry criteria into the Graduate School of Education Quality of teacher preparation program Internship/student teaching Initial assignment and mentoring support Ongoing professional development Regular evaluation

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evaluation Purpose Improve Instruction: Provide feedback to the teacher on quality of instruction Identify areas needing improvement Document areas of strength and weakness Take steps toward requiring evidence of improvement or removing the teacher

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Frequency Annually during probationary period of two years Every two years thereafter As needed Type Formal: Contractual, official personnel record Informal: Unscheduled classroom visitations, observations

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Procedure Goal setting conference Schedule one or more formal observation visits Post observation conference What was observed: Strengths and weaknesses Identification of areas for improvement Written summary of the observation and goal attainment Exemplary, satisfactory or needs improvement Signed by both teacher and principal Placed in the permanent employee record In many states, this evaluation can be challenged if the teacher disagrees with the report

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Criteria for Evaluation Input Preparation Rigor of content Method of delivery appropriate to material and students Classroom/lesson management plans Assessment of learning Attention to range of student needs Pacing and balance of activities Classroom environment

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Student performance and demonstration Level of engagement of students Behavior appropriate to the lesson Level of demonstrated mastery of content Evidence of higher order thinking and application Output Criteria for Evaluation

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Post-Observation Conference with teacher to review the lesson and discuss observations Document the strengths of the teacher Identify areas needing improvement Identify next steps and areas for growth Professional development plans Areas the teacher identifies for new growth Sign a written report of the evaluation

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Improvement Is Needed Plan of Correction A specific plan that identifies areas that are in need of improvement Identify specific steps the teacher must take to improve Identifies types of support and assistance that will be available Timeline for reevaluation On notice that dismissal is possible

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing What if the Teacher Disagrees? Grievance Procedure An important part of the teachers’ employment contract Teacher notifies the supervisor that there is a disagreement A follow-up conference is held Teacher presents evidence Was the contract followed appropriately? May have representation from union Principal decides to change or sustain the evaluation or conduct additional observations Can be challenged beyond the principal in a grievance hearing

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Issues in Evaluation What are the criteria for judging teacher effectiveness? Student performance on assessments? Who is best suited to evaluate? Instructional improvement is continuous Professional Learning Communities Peer coaching and observation “Walk Through” “Teaching Rounds” Periodic documentation Professional teaching standards and scoring criteria for teacher evaluation

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Thank You Questions?