Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
A Guide to Implementation
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Effective Practices for Preventing and Addressing Young Children’s Challenging Behaviors Mary Louise Hemmeter, Ph.D.: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Using the Child Outcomes Summary From Part II: What is the COSF Using the Child Outcomes Summary From Part II: What.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
Food Safe Schools: what‘s it all about? Presentation Objectives  Participants will gain an understanding of the importance of food safety throughout.
1 Using Research to Assess, Build and Collaborate with Partners in Child Development Friday, January 28, 2011 Southern Early Childhood Association Savannah,
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Project Aim To provide training for Early Childhood Care Providers (ECCPs) on Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) principles within the EIBI autism classroom,
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Differentiated Supervision
Components of Quality Program Assessment Tools.  “Inclusion has legal status in legislation mandating educational services for all children with disabilities.
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
Research to Practice: Implementing the Teaching Pyramid Mary Louise Hemmeter Vanderbilt University
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
WESTERN SUFFOLK BOCES L.A. WILSON TECH EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION and CARE I & II.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
A Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) for Early Care and Education Settings.
AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,
Resources for Supporting Engagement for Each and Every Family 1.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Overall Concept Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Teacher Training Teaching practices Children’s practicing food safety.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
The Iowa Distance Mentoring Model (DMM) for Early ACCESS promotes the systematic implementation of family guided routines based intervention (FGRBI) for.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
THINKING ABOUT MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION (TMI) A Study of Elementary and Middle School Principals’ Leadership Content Knowledge Education Development Center.
Community Planning Training 5- Community Planning Training 5-1.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators To learn how to explain the Communities That Care process and the research.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Ready schools... Ready schools... Ready Children... Ready Families... Ready Schools... Ready Communities Ready Schools Virginia’s Definition of School.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network PAPBS Network Coaches Day January 28, Fidelity Measures Lisa Brunschwyler- School Age- School.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
School Oral Health Program (SOHP) 2 Dr Hidayathulla Shaikh.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Comprehensive Planning
Reproductive Health and Safety Education: Making It Stick in NC
Presentation transcript:

Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan

Project Objectives 1. Multidisciplinary teams will develop research based food safety education training module (e.g., food safety curriculum, video, materials…). 2. Early childhood teachers and parents will participate in greater numbers, and increase numbers of hours, in food safety education training. 3. Early childhood administrative personnel, teachers, and parents will demonstrate increased knowledge and understanding of effective strategies to teach children about food safety behaviors. 4. Early childhood teachers will apply and teach food safety behaviors in the classrooms with greater frequency. 5. Children will demonstrate improved food safety practices in the classroom. 6. There will be a reduced risk of the food-borne illness in Alabama.

Phase I: (Research Component) Training Module Development Principal Goal: Development of a food safety preschool education training module  Food safety curriculum  Training guide  Training procedures  Training materials

Phase I: (Research Component) Training Module Development Criteria for curriculum:  Curriculum is supported by scientific research  Curriculum improves children’s awareness of food safety  Curriculum enhances teacher’s instructional practices  Curriculum promotes and enhances parent’s awareness of food safety

Phase I: (Research Component) Training Module Development Content of “Teaching-the-Other” training curriculum:  Recognizing the symptoms of food-borne illness  Recognizing the causes of food-borne illness  Appropriate steps for the prevention of transmission of food-borne illness  Proper food handling procedures  Proper hand washing techniques  Proper food serving procedures  Teaching food safety promotion concepts to children and parents

Phase I: (Research Component) Training Module Development Other Phase I Goals:  Production of Food Safety video  Dissemination of professional development package (curriculum, training guide, & video) to target childcare programs  Development of parent-mentoring program on food safety

Phase I: (Research Component) Training Module Development Evaluation: The curriculum development workshops will be evaluated for effectiveness through observation and with the use of workshop evaluation questionnaires. Curriculum and training materials will be critically examined for alignment with NAEYC standards and food safety curriculum standards.

Phase I: (Research Component) Training Module Development Curriculum and training materials will be field tested at selected sites. Random field tests at three childcare centers will be used to determine whether the curricula procedure and materials developed during Phase I will have educationally meaningful effects on children. Evaluating the preschool experiences of children and teaching practices based on NAEYC standards will form the core set of indicators to measure the curriculum outcome. This stage of evaluation will focus on the contextual variables that might influence how the curriculum is implemented (e.g., culture and neighborhood characteristics). Pre- and post-intervention data will be collected across program sites.

Phase II (Education Component): Team Training Principal Goal: To train 60 early childhood education teams in implementing the food safety curriculum, and to train these educational teams to train others in how to implement the curriculum.

Phase II (Education Component): Team Training Targets:  Over a three year period, 60 childcare programs will participate in the program  300 childcare personnel will be directly trained  childcare personnel will participate in “Share-the-Training” skill building

Phase II (Education Component): Team Training Evaluation: Evaluation of the one-day workshops will focus on: the effectiveness of the “Teach-the-Other” workshop activities the extent to which participants acquire key knowledge and skills in the following areas-  food safety subject knowledge,  teaching strategies for food safety practices,  use of data and assessment to inform classroom practices,  strategies for building partnerships with parents the effectiveness of the “Share-the-Training” activities  implementation plans developed by participants Data collection methods will include observation, surveys and questionnaires, planning records, and team member records

Phase III (Extension Component) Share- the-Training Principal Goal: Capacity-building to provide, improve, and expand services in food safety education to early childhood educators, family members, and community partners.

Phase III (Extension Component) Share- the-Training Target: Dissemination of food safety training information annually to-  500+ early childhood education teachers  parents  children

Phase III (Extension Component) Share- the-Training Evaluation: Project evaluation in Phase III will focus on collection and analysis of data on-  the impact of the project approach and components on participant behaviors  the impact of the project strategies on teaching practices of ECE teachers  the impact of the projects strategies on the food safety knowledge and skills of children in participating childcare centers  the effectiveness of follow-up technical assistance being provided.  incidences of food-borne illness as reported by Alabama Department of Public Health records