Rethinking Entry-Level Mathematics 2011 Academic Affairs Summer Meeting Martha Venn, Vice President of Academic Affairs Barry Monk, Chair of Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Advertisements

Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
High Risk Factors for Retention Freshman Year Experience Review of the Literature Review of Preliminary Data.
EPS 101 & FYE 101 Northern Arizona University. First Year Seminars... Freshmen Success hinges on:  Developing academic & intellectual competence  Establishing.
1 Classroom Expectations – Guiding Students to Succeed.
Teresa Ryerse Overton.  Suburbs of Washington DC  5 Campuses and a separate Medical Education Campus  78,000 Students  2,600 Faculty and Staff  ~8,000.
What Worked and What Didn’t MOMATYC Spring Meeting April 2, 2011.
MCCVLC Distance Learning Administrators Survey Results & Discussion.
Get Your Feedback Into GEAR League of Innovations, 2013 Rio Salado College Patricia Case, Ph.D Tristan Marble, MA Corey Pruitt, MS.
Prepared by: The Office of Institutional Research and Assessment 06/05/2009.
Design and Development Awards Spring 2015 TLOS Networked Learning Design and Strategies (NLDS)
Temple University Russell Conwell Learning Center Office of Senior Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies GETTING INVOLVED IN RESEARCH AT TEMPLE UNIVERSITY.
Michael J. Badolato, EdD, Senior Academic Technology Officer Middlesex Community College | Bedford and Lowell MA.
SURVEY OF RECENT GRADUATES AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ASSISTING IN THE ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Dr. Teresa Ward Ms. Beth Katz Office of Institutional.
PRESENTATION TO THE DIVISION OF INSTRUCTIONAL INNOVATION AND ASSESSMENT, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Musings on Course Redesign.
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.
Tammy Muhs Assistant Chair, MALL Director University of Central Florida NCAT Redesign Scholar Course Redesign: A Way To Increase Student Success.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
MCCVLC Distance Learning Administrators Survey Results & Discussion.
UMKC Retention. UMKC Goals UMKC Goals: Current Baseline By 2015By 2020 Retention69.2%80%85% Graduation47.5%50%55%
AFCEA/AFA July 23,  There are 35 colleges and universities across the state that are members of the University System of Georgia.  All of them.
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Pradeep Singh Southeast Missouri State University.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Catch Them While You Can! DCCCD 2 nd Annual Student Success Summer Institute 2010.
Assessing Tomorrow’s Leaders Today in an Integrated Reading and Writing Course NADE 2015 – Greenville, SC Kina Lara and Tina Willhoite San Jacinto College.
EGS 1001C Introduction to Engineering Succeeding in the Classroom Professor: Dr. Miguel Alonso Jr.
Math 20: Basic Mathematics and Math 5: Math Learning Strategies Prepared by Ilva Mariani, Math LC Coordinator.
University of Maryland Baltimore County Department of Psychology Psyc100: Introductory Psychology Eileen O’Brien, Ph.D.
Engaging Mathematics at Roosevelt University College Algebra: Modeling the City Barbara Gonzalez and Cathy Evins Engaging Mathematics 1 Timeline: Fall.
Glen Hatton Introduction to Financial Accounting TURNING THE ACCOUNTING CLASSROOM UPSIDE DOWN Randy Hoffma n Introduction to Managerial Accounting PHASE.
End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,
Advising to Make the Grade FYE Assignments that Benefit Students and Advisers Veronica Giguere Florida Institute of Technology.
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE Julie Woodruff, Associate Professor of English Mary Millikin, Director of Institutional Research representing the AtD Data Team.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
Data You Can Bank On What can OIR do for you?. Fall 2007 Student Demographics 13,217 students 69% Female 52% Minority Average age is 27 18% are First-time.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
The Redesigned Elements of Statistics Course University of West Florida March 2008.
Admit It: Not All Students Really Need “That” from Math Class AACC 95 th Annual Convention San Antonio, Texas April 20, 2015 Parkland College.
How to Create and Teach an Orientation Course Celeste Spier, MA Coordinator, College of Arts &Sciences Advising Center University of Nebraska- Lincoln.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Rethinking English Composition A Redesign Project in Process Anne Homan English Instructor Math, English, and Developmental Studies, Division Chair State.
A Redesign of Intermediate Algebra using the Hawkes Learning System Dr. Latonya Garner March 29, 2010 Mississippi Valley State University Department of.
CCHE690 MEDIA REVIEW Having taught for Yavapai college in Prescott for many years after having taught at Universal Technical Institute in Phoenix. I am.
Provost’s Address to the University Senate December 13, 2004.
Student Preferences For Learning College Algebra in a Web Enhanced Environment Dr. Laura J. Pyzdrowski, Pre-Collegiate Mathematics Coordinator Institute.
Ready or Not, Here I Am! League Innovations Conference 2010.
Interactivity and Intervention An Overview of Calculus Redesign at Missouri S&T.
MAP the Way to Success in Math: A Hybridization of Tutoring and SI Support Evin Deschamps Northern Arizona University Student Learning Centers.
Marchetta Atkins, Mathematics Instructor Alcorn State University Alcorn State, Mississippi College Algebra 16 sections Fall Semester Sections/Number.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
ST RS ST RS Southern Illinois University Carbondale What Happened in Business Didn’t Stay in Business Tabitha Stone.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Intermediate Algebra Redesign University of Central Missouri Department of Math & Computer Science.
College Credit Plus Welcome Students and Parents to: Information Session.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
The University of Arizona
Athens Technical College
Santa Ana College School of Continuing Education
Graduation Initiative 2025
Graduation Initiative 2025
Co-Requisite Learning Support at Columbia State Community College:
Maximizing Student and Faculty Success Through Professional Collaboration Shakitha League Of Innovations 2017.
Academic Report 2007/2008 AYP.
FSSE-G RESULTS Faculty Survey of Student Engagement for Graduate Student Instructors.
ALEKS & College Algebra - A Journey to Finding the Best Model:
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
Presentation transcript:

Rethinking Entry-Level Mathematics 2011 Academic Affairs Summer Meeting Martha Venn, Vice President of Academic Affairs Barry Monk, Chair of Mathematics

The Big Picture Leadership University System of Georgia/Board of Regents It is the right thing to do!

Strategic Conversations Who Are We? Where are we now? Where do we want to go? How will we know when we arrived? How do we plan to get there?

Campus Enrollment Trends Student Profiles Root Causes (USG) Who are we?

Macon State College Institutional Profile –Four-Year State College –18 Bachelor’s Degrees, 31 Majors –Associate’s Degrees, Career Programs, and Certificates –Location: 1 hour south of Atlanta –Two Campuses (Macon & Warner Robins) –Unique Model: Programs concentrated toward professionally oriented disciplines –Point of Access Institution –Growth –Affordability

Enrollment Fall 2010

Student Profile Fall 2010 Full-time students54.9% Part-time students45.1% Men34.4% Women65.6% Average age26.3 Class Breakdown Freshmen2,288 Sophomores1,155 Juniors1,071 Seniors1,503 Joint enrollment students113 Transients43 Others59

Roots of the Problem 1. Underprepared Students –62% spent from 0-5 hours /week studying –64% “never” or “sometimes” prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in 2. First generation college students –59% indicated that their mother (guardian) did not complete a 4 year degree –55% indicated that their father (guardian) did not complete a 4 year degree 2010 Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement

Roots of the Problem 3.Students register from semester to semester without a long term academic view towards graduation –31% did plan to graduate from Macon State College –35% were not sure if they would graduate from Macon State College 2010 Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement

Performance Data Financial Data Stakeholder Input SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) Where are we now?

Strategic Goals Strategic Priorities Where do we want to go?

Performance Objectives Measures and Targets How will we know we arrived?

Initiatives Action Steps How do we plan to get there?

Entry-Level Mathematics Classes MATH 1101: Introduction to Mathematical Modeling –Broad content coverage –Wide use of applications –“math for the masses” MATH 1111: College Algebra –Traditional mathematics course –Students who continue into higher-level math courses

Faculty Perspective – Some Initial Concerns –How am I supposed to teach someone who doesn’t come to class? –I can only do so much with underprepared students. –I’m not going to pass students just to make the numbers look better. –I’m overworked already.

Can We Really Change Anything? Being a mathematician, I tend to think of it this way: Effectiveness = f (C, N) C = Factors instructors can control N = Factors instructors can’t control

Can We Really Change Anything? Effectiveness = f (C, N) Examples of factors instructors can control (C) –Instructional methods –Use of Homework/Learning Management Systems –Grading schemes –Design of assessments Examples of factors instructors can’t control (N) –Too extensive to list… We can still be effective even if α is small. = α ·C + (100%– α )·N

MATH 1101: Intro to Mathematical Modeling Pilot Project (Fall 2010 & Spring 2011) –4 Instructors –7 Sections in Fall 2010 –6 Sections in Spring 2011 –Primary Areas of Concern Attendance/Classroom Engagement Unpreparedness of Students Homework Completion

MATH 1101: Intro to Mathematical Modeling Strategies Interactive Lecture –Goals Improve attendance Increase student participation and interest Increase the chances that students will study more outside of class –Strategy Move away from “Sage on the Stage” Daily in-class worksheets Encourage group work Student Motivation: Count participation as 10% of course grade

MATH 1101: Intro to Mathematical Modeling Strategies Homework Management System –Goals Encourage homework completion Keep students on task –Strategy Online system tied to the textbook that includes guided tutorials and automatic grading Student Motivation: Count participation as 20% of course grade

MATH 1101: Intro to Mathematical Modeling Strategies Cumulative Assessment –Goals Help students retain material Give students a “second chance” without “giving it all away” –Strategy Include on each exam all material that has been taught up to that point. Each subsequent exam is weighted more than the previous one because it includes more material.

MATH 1101: Intro to Mathematical Modeling Preliminary Results Success Rates (A, B, or C) –The average success rate for all instructors in the semester before the pilot project was 55% –The average success rate for the sections in the pilot project (both semesters) was 73%

MATH 1101: Intro to Mathematical Modeling Preliminary Results Attendance Comparing sections from only those instructors involved in the project. SemesterPercentage of Students With 5 or More Absences Fall 2009 (before)26.36% Fall 2010 (after)15.64% Spring 2010 (before)30.86% Spring 2011 (after)22.46%

Student Perspective –Spring 2011 Midterm Survey

MATH 1101: Intro to Mathematical Modeling Implications & Limitations –Preliminary results seem to indicate: An increase in success rates An improvement in class attendance Satisfaction among students about the strategies used –Questions: Are the results significant? Will the results generalize to the rest of the faculty?

MATH 1111: College Algebra –Goals Increase overall success rates – especially among unprepared students without lowering standards Standardize the content across sections “Force” students to engage in their own learning –Strategy Redesign the course using the Emporium Model

MATH 1111: College Algebra The Emporium Model –Generally involves replacing lectures and replacing them with a learning resource center that features instructional software and just-in-time personalized assistance.

MATH 1111: College Algebra Considerations in Choosing the Instruction Software –Individual learning path for students –Algorithmically generated free-response problems –Extensive reporting capabilities –Cost effective

MATH 1111: College Algebra Results Success Rates (A, B, or C) –The average success rate for all instructors in the spring 2009 was 54.57% –The average success rate for all sections in the redesign in spring 2010 was 59.39%

MATH 1111: College Algebra Results General Education Assessment Spring Redesign Number#1#2#3#4#5#1%#2%#3%#4%#5% %96.00%89.30%42.70%85.30% Spring Other Number#1#2#3#4#5#1%#2%#3%#4%#5% %84.40%80.50% 81.80%

Faculty Buy-In What motivates faculty to buy-in to the idea of redesign? –Loyalty to the profession –A reasonable argument about the reasons for redesign and inclusion in the decision-making process –Recognition from chairs, deans, etc.. –Support (monetary and otherwise) –Credit for scholarship/service

Faculty Perspective – Some Initial Concerns –How am I supposed to teach someone who doesn’t come to class? –I can only do so much with underprepared students. –I’m not going to pass students just to make the numbers look better. –I’m overworked already.

Addressing Faculty Concerns? How am I supposed to teach someone who doesn’t come to class? –The strategies employed in MATH 1101 seem to improve attendance –If the focus is on student engagement, then attendance will follow.

Addressing Faculty Concerns? I can only do so much with underprepared students. –In MATH 1111, ALEKS creates an individualized learning plan for each student. Students in the same class may be at different points at any given time with the material.

Addressing Faculty Concerns? I’m not going to pass students just to make the numbers look better. –The focus of the redesigns is on making the student more accountable for their own learning rather than inflating grades.

Addressing Faculty Concerns? I’m overworked already. –Rewarding/recognizing faculty who participate in course redesign is an important part of the process. Support from administration is vital. –Using instructional systems offsets some of the work put into teaching.

Questions

Dr. Marti Venn Vice President for Academic Affairs Macon State College Dr. Barry Monk Chair, Department of Mathematics Macon State College