AR-07-01 – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topics discussed in ADC & UIC Re AIP Multiplicity of clearinghouses End-to-end discovery How to make the searches better Usability testing results Comments.
Advertisements

GEOSS ADC Architecture Workshop Break-out summaries: Initial Operating Capability (IOC) Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey February 5,
GEOSS ADC Architecture Workshop Session 3c Test Facility for GEOSS Registration Paul Smits EC-JRC
GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot Water Information Services with GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium.
SCADM Report Working Paper 10. Overview SCAR Data and Information Management Strategy (DIMS) – endorsed Oct Introduction to the draft SCAR Data.
GEOSS Data Sharing Principles. GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan 5.4 Data Sharing The societal benefits of Earth observations cannot be achieved without.
Report of the Architecture and Data Committee (ADC) for the C4 Meeting Ivan B. DeLoatch, ADC Co-chair June 2008.
UIC Draft Report to C4: Issues and Recommendations 25 September, 2008 The UIC Co-Chairs Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Thierry Ranchin, France Francesco Pignatelli,
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 21, 2008.
Standards and Interoperability Forum: Status, Issues & Plans GEO Architecture and Data Committee Kyoto, Japan 9 February 2009 Siri-Jodha Singh Khalsa.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Infrastructure May 5, 2011.
Call for Proposals: Earth Observations in Decision Support Joint Effort of GEO Capacity Building Committee and User Interface Committee March 2009.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Days 2 & 3 Presentation of ID-02 Catalyzing Resources for GEOSS Implementation for Plenary Session.
The GEO Work Plan * 2010 Update (GEO-VI) * New Online Management System Alexia Massacand (Work Plan Coordinator) Rik Baeyens (IT Manager)
EEA-USEPA Research linkages meeting September 23, 2004 Setting the scene: The Research and Environmental Policy Context What is the challenge? The Office.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI)
Slide # 1 Report to ADC AR Status Doug Nebert, POC U.S. Geological Survey.
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
From “Usability Testing 2009” to the “Sprint to Plenary 2011” GEO Portal and Clearinghouse: reaching out to users with user-friendly interfaces. Gary J.
Architecture Priorities. Why do stakeholders perceive that the architecture does not meet needs? Users are not seeing what they expect The interaction.
Architecture and Data Management Strategy (Action Plan) Ivan 1 DeLoatch, USGS, ADC Co-chair Alessandro Annoni, EC, ADC Co-chair Jay Pearlman, IEEE, ADC.
GEOSS Architecture Describes how components fit together for providing data and information that will be better …than the individual components or systems.
How GEO works  Coordinating activities of Members and Participating Organisations  Supporting the development of capabilities for Observations, Processing.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure: A practical tour Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey September 2008.
Report of the IOC Task Force on the GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) Ivan DeLoatch, U.S. Geological Survey Alan Edwards, European Commission Co-chairs.
ADC Meeting ICEO Standards Working Group Steven F. Browdy, Co-Chair ADC Workshop Washington, D.C. September, 2007.
GEO Architecture and Data Committee Architecture Workshop Hosted by the European Commission At the Joint Research Centre February 2008 DRAFT.
AIP-2 Kickoff Workshop End-to-end use case: Discovery, access, and use with variations Doug Nebert GEOSS AIP-2 Kickoff September 2008.
ENV proposal meeting, Geneva, Sep. 24, GCI Presentation Joost van Bemmelen, ESA
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-03: Science and Technology in GEOSS ID-03-C1: Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation.
Linking Tasks, Data, and Architecture Doug Nebert AR-09-01A May 2010.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Internal Structure and Standards Steven F. Browdy (IEEE)
WGISS-39, Tsukuba, Japan, May 11-15, 2015 GEO Community Portals Ken McDonald/NOAA CWIC Session, WGISS–39 May 13, 2015.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Francesco Pignotelli,
Synthesis of Strategic Issues (Climate, Disasters, Water) and a draft European strategic framework.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
GEOSS Interoperability Workshop November 12-13, Introduction to the SIF Steven F. Browdy, IEEE
® GEOSS AIP 5 Water SBA Update HDWG June 2012 Matt Austin NOAA Stefan Fuest KISTERS Jochen Schmidt NIWA.
Initial Operating Capability Task Force (IOCTF) Status Briefing September 21, 2008.
Slide # 1 Report to the GEO ADC on the Standards and Interoperability Forum 12 Sept 2007 National Academy of Sciences Washington, D.C. IEEE Committee on.
Introducing the Science and Technology Roadmap 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
GEO Standards and Interoperability Forum SIF First Organizational Meeting 27 July 2007 Barcelona, Spain.
Report of the Architecture and Data Committee (ADC) R.Shibasaki (ADC, Japan)
Task IN-03 GEO Work Plan Symposium 2014 GEOSS Common Infrastructure IN-03.
The Process for Achieving Interoperability in GEOSS AGU Fall Meeting IN43C-08.
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 22, 2008.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Initial Operating Capability Directions and Discussion Presented to GEO ADC Geneva May
GEO Implementation Boards Considerations and Lessons Learned (Document 8) Max Craglia (EC) Co-chair of the Infrastructure Implementation Board (IIB) On.
Science and Technology Roadmap - current progress 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
Implementing GEOSS architecture with-and-for Users George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium Task lead AR-09-01B.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Access to Priority Earth Observations Data “ Sprint to Plenary” Group on Earth Observations Eighth Plenary Session - GEO-VIII.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOSSIW - November, 2008 GEOSS “Interoperability” Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
GEOSS Common Infrastructure: A Practical Tour Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey AIP-3 Kickoff March 2010.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOS - August, 2008 GEOSS Interoperability Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
GEO ADC Co-Chair meeting USGS, Reston, Dec Slide # 1 AR Interface implementations for GEOSS George Percivall
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) The GEOSS Common Infrastructure allows Earth Observations users to search, access and use the data, information, tools.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Slides prepared by Alessandro Annoni, JRC Jay Pearlman, IEEE and GEO Secretariat.
© GEO Secretariat Work Plan Management Update GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012.
Introduction to the GEOSS Registries: Components, Services, and Standards Doug Nebert U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee June 2007.
GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS
Introduction to the GEOSS Component and Services Registry
AR Doug Nebert, POC-elect GEO ADC Co-Chairs Meeting,
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 22, 2008.
2017 WPS Break-Out Session: Addressing Gaps
Work Plan Management GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012
Status Report on SIF to GEO ADC
GEOSS Future Products Workshop March 26-28, 2013 NOAA
Presentation transcript:

AR – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will be published/printed by JAXA and announced by the GEOSec; Tactical Guidance is still in process, targeted for October release UIC recommends the inclusion of a requirements registry for earth observations to be integrated with the existing services and standards. Requirements available from several members. –Joint effort and discussion document with UIC is needed to clarify the needs, interaction, governance, and approach of a solution; Could this be achieved through a new Task? GEOSS Earth Observation taxonomy or ontology suggested to facilitate association of requirements, services, and applications –Identify requirements for observables ontology drawn from the existing EO communities in order to associate applications, needs, and available services

AR-07-01: Registries Define and deploy GEOSS Registries –Component and Service Registry: operational –Standards and Special Arrangements Registry: operational –Online capabilities referenced in Tactical Guidance, as of May 2008, Tactical Guidance document is still not visible on the GEO Website –Connection points between Requirements Registry and other Registries being identified (Feb 2008) User Requirements Registry prototype online for testing by UIC, published draft May 2008 Best Practices Wiki, online April 2008

User Requirements Registry Need to formalize UIC commitment for the operation and interaction with the registry – significant governance issue Web-form upload by privileged individuals anticipated Batch upload from existing requirements systems also anticipated Architectural tie-points exist between the observations (observable parameters) and the Services and Standards Registries Continued web services and database support to be offered by this Task to UIC during IOC

User Requirements Registry UIC Task (US-07-01) plans to develop a registry to store EO requirements for identified classes of users in support of applications (SBAs) Development on-hold pending a database re-design to simplify the collection and presentation of entrie

Version 04 page 5 What will make GEOSS valuable, unique and sustained? GEO Common Infrastructure reaches Sustained Fully Operation Capabilities (from IOC to SFOC) GEO members and participating organisations –make available their resources for a broader community to the maximum feasible extent by registering systems and components –harmonise data and services access conditions by adopting GEO data sharing principles –increase their level of interoperability by progressive convergence toward commonly used standards –sustain operations by leveraging investments and operating in real international partnerships Large use by User Communities

Version 04 page 6 ADC Issues and Recommendations Population of the GEOSS registries must be intensively encouraged Continuous response to Users direction through the UIC and the user requirements authentication and registration Implementation of the GEOSS Data Sharing Principles is important to ensure the real use of registered resources Reflection on Public & Private partnerships opportunities is needed Sustainable operation should be established for Common infrastructure and registered GEO resources

IOC Recommendations for long- term GCI operations Potential points for recommendation include: –long-term implications and possible related contractual requirements –systems operations and maintenance (hardware, telecommunications, and software) –proprietary vs. open-source software impacts –the use of multiple Portals and Clearinghouses –access procedures, user interface conventions and user community requirements –transition criteria and planning for when portal or segment providers terminate contributions to the GCI. –Enhancing the GCI and improving the registration process Proposed milestone: draft document available April/May 2009

THE SPECTRUM OF USERS Earth observations & earth system models Data-to-Information archiving & services Decision support tool development Decision making Assessment of benefits Earth system scientists and modelers Earth system service providers Environmental process modelers & researchers Policy Makers & Environmental managers Public officials, advocacy groups and the Public From observations To societal benefits Requirements well known Not aware that observational Requirements are even needed NOVICE USERS

GEOSS Components GEOSS Services GEOSS Standards GEOSS Special Arrangements expose reference may become nominate offer GEOSS Registries U.S.A. IEEE UDDIebRSCSW SRU Web UI USER Applications What do they do? USER Types Who are they? USER Requirements User Engagement UIC EPA/NASA/IEEE/ECMWF/ERG/U Nevada GEO Task US-09-01a Gathering Observational Priorities EXISTING NEW