Ferry Transit Capacity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Advertisements

Chapter 3: Software Basics Section I: Preparing to Use Technology.
Rail Transit Capacity.
February 12, 2010 Government Center Station Reconstruction Project Green Line / Blue Line Public Meeting December, 2012.
Bus Capacity.
Unit 7a Travel Arrangements
Transit Capacity & Quality of Service Manual, 3rd Edition Fixed Route Quality of Service.
Marine Exchange of Puget Sound John Veentjer Executive Director, Puget Sound Marine Exchange President, Maritime Information Services of North America.
Introduction to Air Transport Statistics ICAO Aviation Data Analyses Seminar Middle East (MID) Regional Office October Economic Analysis and Policy.
US West Coast Lafarge North America – Port of Redwood City Confidential1 Lafarge USWC Presentation for: Port or Redwood City Board of Commissioners.
Maritime Information Services of North America A non-profit maritime organization established to provide information, communications and services to ensure.
Transit Capacity & Quality of Service Manual, 3rd Edition Station Capacity.
MARITIME TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
Juneau Downtown Tourism Transportation Study May 27, 2003.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition (Selected slides used for lectures at Bina Nusantara University) Internetworking.
1 Design of Evacuation System for High-Rise Building Danqing Yu.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
Design Speed and Design Traffic Concepts
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 26: Transit Pricing.
Book: The Global Airline Industry By: Peter Belobaba Flight Crew Activities During a Typical Flight Sections – Presented by: Nahid Boustani.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Overview of the TCQSM.
DIVISION OF PORTS AND HARBORS PORTSMOUTH, NEW HAMPSHIRE Captain Geno J. Marconi, Port Director.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Operations Webinar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. June 28, 2006.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
Redwood City Ferry Terminal Why Ferry Service Terminal Needs Locational Analysis Land availability for 5-6 acre terminal Vehicular access Environmental.
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
U.S. Coast Guard Unclassified
Chapter 4. After completion of this chapter, you should be able to: Explain “what is the Internet? And how we connect to the Internet using an ISP. Explain.
Presented to: 2012 Pacific Aviation Director’s Workshop, Guam By: Juan S.A. Reyes, A.C.E., ACSI Date: March 13-15, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
Underkeel Clearance (UKC) Project
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Chapter 1: Highway Functions
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Innovative ITS services thanks to Future Internet technologies ITS World Congress Orlando, SS42, 18 October 2011.
Terminal Design Passenger Processing. errata  Consider TSA impacts.
ALEXANDRIA PORT AUTHORITY. Location Of Alexandria Port Main International Trade Route Alexandria Port.
MARYLAND FREIGHT SUMMIT Freight in the Mid-Atlantic Region Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration September.
CEO, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data Peter Stopher, Jun Zhang and Eoin Clifford Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies The University of Sydney.
Managing Travel for Planned Special Events: What, Why, & Benefits Walt Dunn, P.E. Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Talking Operations Seminar January.
Harbors Module NH2: Problem Identification, Inventory and Forecast, and Determination of Objectives and Constraints.
1 Whatcom County Public Works Whatcom County Public Works GOOSEBERRY POINT LEASE STATUS & UPDATE OCTOBER 13, 2009.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Airport and Airline Access Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Systems Engineering and Civil and Environmental.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
UNIT 2 MARINE VEHICLES Marine vehicles operate in or on water, for the purposes of transportation, recovery of natural resources, warfare, research or.
Water Emergency Transportation Authority 1 San Francisco Bay Area Draft Short Range Transit Plan January 2016.
Complete Streets Training
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Annex 2 – Rules of the Air Annex 2 – Rules of the Air Annex 3 – Meteorological Services Annex 3 – Meteorological Services Annex 6 – Operation of aircraft.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Port of Everett MASTER PLAN UPDATE April 8, 2008.
MODULE 4, LESSON 5 Developing Service: Calculating Capacity.
Experiences with On-Board Mass Monitoring in Australia Gavin Hill General Manager, Strategic Development Transport Certification Australia.
Aquatic Invasive Species Law
Terminal Design Passenger Processing
SEA TOURISM- PARTNERING & MARKETING
Breaches.
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME SECURITY.
Rural Transit Stop Design Guidelines Prof Omer maaitah
Maritime Information Services of North America
Presentation transcript:

Ferry Transit Capacity

Presentation Overview Learning objectives Ferry facilities and service Vessels Ferry terminals Operations Capacity considerations

Learning Objectives Gain an understanding of the wide variety of vessels, service types, and conditions which influence ferry service Unlike other transit services, ferry services tend to vary widely and have little in common with each other Presentation of vessel access considerations and typical terminal configurations Become familiar with factors affecting ferry capacity: Berth capacity Dock capacity Vessel passenger capacity

Changes from the 2nd Edition Re-organization of chapter for clarity Updated content Removal of material unnecessarily specific to certain systems Generalization of other content to increase applicability Discussion of maritime security (MARSEC) Purpose is to promote a framework for understanding ferry operations and capacity instead of specific approaches for certain system types New spreadsheet tool for helping evaluate ferry transit capacity

Ferry Facilities and Service Colman Dock, Seattle

Ferry Facilities and Service Ferries provide a significant transit element in many cities: New York San Francisco Seattle Vancouver, BC Boston Also in smaller communities: Nantucket – Martha’s Vineyard Victoria, BC Boston

Many Systems Go Unnoticed Washington has: Eight publicly owned ferry operators with 16 routes At least three privately operated systems Several tourist systems (excursions) Ferry on Puget Sound, WA

Distinct Types of Ferry Service Mixed auto–passenger Passenger-only Water taxies Water taxi, Baltimore

Route Types Crossing bodies of water Island service Parallel to shoreline Two-stop routes Multi-stop routes Ferry services crossing San Francisco Bay

Factors Unique to Ferry Service Tidal influence (ranges from minimal to 40 feet) Water body and shoreline Harbor congestion Weather (fog, wind) Vessels are usually one or few of a kind Berthing requirements vary by vessel class Length, width, freeboard, door locations Island service requirements Emergency, commercial, reservations, other Harbor ferries, Copenhagen

Factors Unique to Ferry Service (cont’d.) Most trips are multimodal System lack of spare vessels Operation by non-traditional transit providers Regulatory environment (US Coast Guard) Certificates of Inspection – Capacity Crew size (dispatch problems) Security requirements MARSEC Levels 1, 2, and 3

Ferry Vessels Staten Island Ferry, New York 12

Factors Determining Vessel Type Type of service Auto–passenger, passenger-only, water taxi Required speed Conventional or high-speed Environmental factors Seas, reliability Operational costs Speed-dependent

Vessel Types Monohull Catamarans Small Waterplane Area Twin Hull (SWATH) Hydrofoils Surface effect ships Hovercraft Catamaran, Sydney, Australia

Ferry Terminals Ferry Building dock, San Francisco 15

Factors Influencing Ferry Terminal Siting Difficult shoreline issues – residential, downtown, industrial Public access – views – aesthetics Shoreline conditions Water depth Currents Fetch & breakwaters Marine traffic Marine life Ferry terminal, Sidney, British Columbia

Terminal Elements Street access Terminal building Lobby (open queuing area) Ticketing (fare sales) Control (collection, passenger count, security) Secure holding (security, pre-load) Boarding control SeaBus Terminal, North Vancouver, British Columbia

Terminal Elements (cont’d.) Vessel access Pier (deep water) Berth (mooring) Ramp (elevation) Gangway (access) Circular Quay, Sydney, Australia 18

Example Terminal Configuration Terminal Building Street Access Boarding Control Secure Holding Lobby Ticketing Ticket Collection Security Passenger Count Gangways Berths Ramp Pier

Issues with Multiple Routes at a Single Terminal Passenger control and separation by route Simultaneous vessel landings can occur Embarkation and disembarkation conflicts Terminal Building Street Access Boarding Control Secure Holding Lobby Ticketing Ticket Collection Security Passenger Count Gangways Berths Ramp Pier

More Common Terminal Arrangement #1 Street Access Terminal Building Boarding Control Secure Holding Lobby Ticketing Ticket Collection Security Passenger Count Gangways Berths Ramps Piers

More Common Terminal Arrangement #2 Street Access Terminal Building Boarding Control Secure Holding Lobby Ticketing Ticket Collection Security Passenger Count Gangways Ramp Pier

Operations Active Pass, British Columbia 23

Routes and Crossing Capacity Multi-stop routes: Passengers may or may not disembark at a stop Passenger count is difficult to maintain First-in first-out pre-staging passengers is difficult Crossing between two points: All passengers disembark at each stop Multi-stop ferry service, Brisbane, Australia

Capacity Island ferry service, Fur, Denmark 25

Berth Capacity Berth capacity: Arrival service time Vessel clearance time Maneuver Tie up Gangway placement Disembarking time Passenger volume – bottleneck location Passenger walking times (from vessel to holding area access)

Berth Capacity (cont’d.) Berth capacity: Departure service time Embarking time Passenger volume – bottleneck location Passenger walking times (from holding area to vessel) Vessel clearance time Gangway removal Tie up Maneuver Total of departure service time, arrival service time, and an operating margin to account for delays gives the minimum service time per vessel These times will be different for different vessels using a berth, and will vary by time of day with passenger volumes These service times determine the maximum number of vessels that can be scheduled to use a berth during an hour

Notes on Berth Capacity (cont’d.) Simultaneous disembarking and embarking May not be viable due to security requirements Difficult at best—no control in a hazardous area Passenger load control is difficult Automobile embarking and disembarking Procedure included in TCQSM Not addressed further in this presentation Schedule float/operating margin Additional time for consideration of uncertain or extreme conditions

Dock and Route Capacity Dock capacity Sum of individual berth capacities Number of vessels serving berth in an hour Passenger capacity of vessel(s) serving berth (not all vessels using a given berth may be identical) Vessel passenger capacities will vary by amount of crew provided Route/crossing capacity Vessel frequency Vessel passenger capacity Peak hour factor (PHF) Accounts for fluctuations in demand during the analysis hour Not all offered capacity will be able to be used, except under a reservation system, if pass-ups are not to occur Capacity = (frequency) ×(weighted average vessel passenger capacity) ×(PHF) 29

More Information TCRP Report 165: TCQSM—Chapter 9, Ferry Transit Capacity Ferry capacity spreadsheet included on the CD-ROM TCRP Report 152: Guidelines for Ferry Transportation Services TCRP Synthesis 102: Integrating Passenger Ferry Service with Mass Transit All of these documents are available as: Free individual printed copies and PDF downloads through the TCRP Dissemination Program http://www.tcrponline.org Free PDF downloads directly from TCRP http://www.trb.org/TCRP/Public/TCRP.aspx (Publications section) or simply do an Internet search for the report number (e.g., TCRP Report 165) Individual or multiple copy purchases from the TRB Bookstore http://books.trbbookstore.org/

Acknowledgments and Permissions Presentation authors Bill Carter and Ryan Avery (Parsons Brinkerhoff, Quade & Douglass) Photo credits Colman Dock: Bill Carter All others: Paul Ryus This presentation was developed through TCRP Project A-15C Research team: Kittelson & Associates; Parsons Brinkerhoff, Quade & Douglass; KFH Group; Texas A&M Transportation Institute; and Arup This presentation and its contents may be freely distributed and used, with appropriate credit to the presentation authors and photographers, and the Transit Cooperative Research Program