Draft Strategy 6-10-09 RMP Modeling Strategy John Oram Jay Davis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Prioritization Framework Principles
Advertisements

The Clean Estuary Partnership and the RMP Comparing two stakeholder programs producing science in support of policy James M. Kelly, Chair Bay Area Clean.
Conceptual Model for Sediment Transport in SF Bay Presented to CFWG June 10, 2009.
Guadalupe River Small Tributaries Loading Study: Do we continue? If so How!! Lester McKee San Francisco Estuary Institute, Oakland, CA San Francisco Estuary.
Contaminant Fate WG 5 Year Plan RMP CFWG Meeting January 15, 2008.
RMP Dioxin Strategy Susan Klosterhaus Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup Item #9.
1 Update on Small Tributaries Loading Strategy Richard Looker, Chris Sommers, Arleen Feng, Jay Davis, and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup.
Contaminant Fate WG 5 Year Plan RMP CFWG Meeting September 14, 2007.
Exposure and Effects Workgroup Study Ideas Five-Year Plan: Risk to Birds Is there clear evidence of pollutant effects on survival, reproduction,
Contaminants at the Estuary Interface Jon Leatherbarrow 1 Rainer Hoenicke 2 Lester McKee 1 1 San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 California Resources Agency.
Concentrations and loads of PCBs and OC pesticides in the Guadalupe River watershed Jon Leatherbarrow 1,2, Lester McKee 1, John Oram 1 1 San Francisco.
Mercury in SF Bay The 8-Minute Conceptual Model California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region RMP Annual Meeting May 4, 2004.
Draft Strategy Revised RMP Modeling Strategy John Oram Jay Davis Item #8.
Pollutant Loads to the Bay: Measuring the L in TMDL Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup and Watershed Program Manager SFEI RMP Annual.
Mercury and PCBs TMDL Implementation Tom Mumley San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Regional Board Monitoring and Special Studies Related to 303d Listing and TMDLs Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
The RMP Mercury Strategy Jay A. Davis San Francisco Estuary Institute Presented at: The RMP Mercury Coordination Meeting Feb 2008.
South Bay SUNTANS Application Presented to the CFWG June 10, 2009.
Impairment Assessment and Conceptual Model of Legacy Pesticides: DDT, Chlordane, and Dieldrin RMP Annual Meeting May 4, 2004 Jon Leatherbarrow, Chris Werme,
The South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project and Bay Water Quality SFEI Letitia Grenier, Jay Davis, Robin Grossinger.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Days 2 & 3 Presentation of ID-02 Catalyzing Resources for GEOSS Implementation for Plenary Session.
Motivation for the Forum Coordination Tri-State Partnership (on-going cooperation) Tri-State Partnership (on-going cooperation) Corps Watershed Plan Corps.
Planning for Our Future:
O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
Megan Kaun San Francisco District (415) US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® San Francisco District Sediment.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Puget Sound Monitoring Consortium March-April 2008 updates to interested parties.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Policy Considerations in the Lower Poplar River Turbidity TMDL Study Greg Johnson, Karen Evens, and Pat Carey, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed.
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?
Item 3b Guadalupe River Monitoring WY 2010 Jen Hunt, Ben Greenfield, Sarah Lowe, Lester McKee Sources, Pathway, and Loading Work Group May 6th, 2010.
SFEP/EPA Proposal Background- prior NBWA grant EPA Funds and Process SFEP Process EPA Approval and Schedule NBWA Proposal-$1.5 Million Other Funds.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
International Federation of Accountants April 28, 2009 Impact Assessment Process for IFAC Linda Lach and Alta Prinsloo.
Draft. NAWMP Progress Assessment You did what with our $3 billion?
1 Richard Looker 2008 RMP Annual Meeting October 7, 2008 The Water Board’s Regulatory Approach and the RMP Mercury Strategy Hg.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Water Resources Technical Committee Chesapeake Bay Program Overview & Updates July 10, 2008 Tanya T. Spano.
Water Quality in San Francisco Bay J.A. Davis San Francisco Estuary Institute.
OVERVIEW: CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTS AND WATER & CLIMATE CHANGE ACTIVITIES Water Resources Technical Committee Oct. 29, 2015 Presented by Tanya.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
Draft Outline for Bay Margins Conceptual Model Presented to the CFWG June 10, 2009.
1 Dynamic modeling in a representative watershed (Guadalupe) Michelle Lent, John Oram, and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup May 6 th.
Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment San Diego IRWMP Regional Advisory Committee Meeting October 9, 2007.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Summary of the Report, “Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Modeling” 22 September 2004 Walter.
1 1 The Project Description: Framing the CEQA Analysis Terry Rivasplata.
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Sources, Pathways, and Loadings Regional Monitoring Program for Trace Substances Annual Meeting, March 23 rd 2002 Lester McKee Watershed Program Manager.
Draft Strategy To Optimize Resource Management of Storm Water
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
158th Caribbean Fishery Management Council Regular Meeting
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
158th Caribbean Fishery Management Council Regular Meeting
SMR Nutrient Initiative Group Background Information Review
Presentation transcript:

Draft Strategy RMP Modeling Strategy John Oram Jay Davis

Draft Strategy Intent To develop a capacity to predict the effect of different management alternatives on –loads from watersheds, –the recovery of contaminated areas on the Bay margin, –the recovery of the Bay as a whole

Draft Strategy Approach To develop conceptual and numeric models of the physical, chemical, and biological processes governing the fate of water, sediment, and pollutants of concern in San Francisco Bay and its associated watersheds

Draft Strategy Question 1 : Bay Margins What is the contribution of contaminated Bay margins to impairment in the Bay and what are the projected impacts of management actions to the Bay's recovery?

Draft Strategy Question 2 : Bay Recovery What patterns of exposure are forecast for major segments of the Bay under various management scenarios?

Draft Strategy Question 3 : Small Tributary Loads What are the projected impacts of management actions on loads or concentrations of pollutants of concern from the high-leverage small tributaries? Where should management actions be implemented in the region to have the greatest impact?

Draft Strategy Some Comments Need very specific details about the uses anticipated by Water Board staff (and other stakeholders) –ongoing, iterative, transparent process for developing these questions, tracking various decision points Need milestones or decision points to make sure model outputs will be available at the right time for consideration by water board staff/managers. –Currently have ~5 year goal informing PCBs TMDL v2.0 Need a clear narrative describing what we already know, how the proposed work could expand that, what it will take to get there –To be addressed as part of Margins Conceptual Model

Draft Strategy Strategy : Coordination Establish (or Participate in) a Bay Area Modeling Forum that will –guide agencies and NGOs in the selection, use, and interpretation of models –improve communication and coordination of local modelers and stakeholders –reduce duplication of efforts –improve the overall quality of modeling products Will Participate in CeNCOOS Forum Aug 6-7, 2009

Draft Strategy Strategy : Bay & Margins Model Develop a flexible grid model capable of implicitly allowing for the interaction of fine-scale processes occurring at the Bay Margins with the larger-scale processes of the Bay proper

Draft Strategy Strategy : Bay & Margins Model What is a flexible grid anyway? –An approach to allow increased resolution in areas of concern

Draft Strategy Strategy : Bay & Margins Model # cells44,148 cell sizeCurvilinear 50 m to 1.3 km dt (min) Curvilinear Grid Delft3d grid from P. Barnard (USGS)

Draft Strategy Strategy : Bay & Margins Model SUNTANS grid of Puget Sound Unstructured Grid

Draft Strategy Strategy : Local Watersheds Develop models of key watersheds over the next three years with the goal of developing a regional model (or set of models) Watersheds will be identified by SPLWG and Small Tributaries Strategy Team –These groups will provide project oversight as well. Implement field studies to fill information gaps –2010 funding proposed to identify information gaps

Draft Strategy Strategy : Local Watersheds Example: Guadalupe Watershed Model

Draft Strategy * = currently funded by RMP