Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards. The Big Picture Two audience groups Two audience groups States States Service providers Service providers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 5 – State ALoS. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 3 ICAO.
Advertisements

Module N° 6 – Prescription/Performance based environment.
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
1 Documentation Legal Framework Air Navigation Orders Guidelines ATS Manual Airport Manual Safety Management Manual ICAO Annexes Licenses / Certificates.
1 SAFETY ORGANISATION. 2 Safety Organisation 3 Safety Organisation - Regulator.
Module N° 7 – SSP training programme
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
1 Safety Policy April Safety Policy National Level Regulator Service Provider Service Provider.
Integra Consult A/S Safety Assessment. Integra Consult A/S SAFETY ASSESSMENT Objective Objective –Demonstrate that an acceptable level of safety will.
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
SAFETY MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
© Integra A/S SAFETY MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP Karachi - January 2006 PRESENTERS: PETER THORSEN STEFAN REIB.
ICAO Safety Oversight Audit and Safety Oversight Status in Nepal
1 Welcome Summary - First visit Dhaka Integra A/S Independent consultancy company Headquarter located in Copenhagen, Denmark Working worldwide.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Integra Consult A/S November 2005Karachi, Pakistan Safety Assessment Projects Karachi, Pakistan Integra Consult A/S.
1 Regulation. 2 Organisational separation 3 Functional Separation.
Session No. 4 Implementing the State’s Safety Programme Implementing Service Providers SMS
ICAO AVIATION SAFETY PROGRAMMES
Safety and Security in Air Traffic Management Rod Graff Agenda Item 2.
Safety Management – A Compromise Between Production and Protection
ICAO State Safety Programme (SSP) Implementation Course
Prescription / Performance
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
Module N° 7 – Introduction to SMS
ICAO Part 139 Review Aerodrome Certification Rule Design Proposal
Presentation of the proposed Annex 19 – Safety Management
ICAO Harmonized Safety Management Requirements – The Safety Concern ICAO Harmonized Safety Management Requirements – The Safety Concern Captain Daniel.
Panel Discussion of SMS
Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP) and Safety Management System (SMS) in the Context of the Seveso II Directive.
1 Vince Galotti Chief/ATMICAO 27 March 2007 REGULATING THROUGH SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGETS.
Aviation Safety, Security & the Environment: The Way Forward Vince Galotti Chief/Air Traffic Management ICAO Safety and Efficiency An ICAO Perspective.
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
1 Safety Management Systems A Transport Canada Civil Aviation Program Update.
Session No. 4 Implementing Service Providers SMS Implementing the State’s Safety Programme SMS Senior Management Workshop Rome, 21 May 2007.
International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations (ICCAIA)
Focus on Incident reporting
Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards ICAO SMS Framework
ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar
Joint ACAC/ACI Seminar on Certification of Aerodromes Marrakech, 5–6 September 2003 David Gamper, Director, Technical/Safety Airports Council International.
APLA ORGULLO DE PERTENECER.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
ICAO Requirements on Certification of Aerodromes Module - 2
SMS, Human Factors and FRMS – A Perspective Capt. Dan Maurino RAeS HF Group Conference on Building Fatigue into Safety Systems Crawley, 30 October 2012.
Copyright Safety Operating Systems 2008 TRAINING AUDITS AND SMS By: Captain Jack Casey, FRAeS Chief Operating Officer Safety Operating Systems, LLC.
1 ICAO Developments in Safety Management Captain Len Cormier CTA COSCAP-NA.
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course.
Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.
Requirements - background
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office SAFETY MANAGEMENT The ICAO perspective Michel Béland ICAO Regional Safety.
Ensuring the Safety of Future Developments
Jacques Vanier ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS SAFETY PERFORMANCE.
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
1 Fourth Meeting Flight operations and Air traffic management Component of the North Asia Regional Aviation Safety Team (NARAST) Bangkok, Thailand 31 st.
Advance Safety Management System - Concepts Session 3 IATA Training & Development Institute 1.
International Civil Aviation Organization Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives John Illson Air Navigation Bureau 25 May 2011.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Presented to: Southern Region (NRC) Date: 13 May 2008 Safety Management Systems SMS: Moving forward in System Safety.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.
ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
LPRI – SAFETY INDICATOR OF THE STATE SAFETY PROGRAMME (SSP)
Baku Azerbaijan, 5 – 7 April 2006
Safety Management – A Compromise Between Production and Protection
Global Runway Safety Symposium
GA Flight Examiners Seminar
ICAO Harmonized Safety Management Requirements – The Safety Concern
SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGETS
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards

The Big Picture Two audience groups Two audience groups States States Service providers Service providers Three distinct requirements Three distinct requirements Safety programme Safety programme SMS SMS Management accountability Management accountability Two audience groups Two audience groups States States Service providers Service providers Three distinct requirements Three distinct requirements Safety programme Safety programme SMS SMS Management accountability Management accountability

As of 23 November 2006 States shall establish a safety programme, in order to achieve an acceptable level of safety in: The operation of aircraft The operation of aircraft The maintenance of aircraft The maintenance of aircraft The provision of air traffic services The provision of air traffic services Aerodrome operations Aerodrome operations States shall establish a safety programme, in order to achieve an acceptable level of safety in: The operation of aircraft The operation of aircraft The maintenance of aircraft The maintenance of aircraft The provision of air traffic services The provision of air traffic services Aerodrome operations Aerodrome operations

What is a Safety Programme? An integrated set of regulations and activities aimed at improving safety Safety regulation Safety regulation Safety oversight Safety oversight Accident/incident investigation Accident/incident investigation Mandatory/voluntary reporting systems Mandatory/voluntary reporting systems Safety data analysis Safety data analysis Safety promotion Safety promotion An integrated set of regulations and activities aimed at improving safety Safety regulation Safety regulation Safety oversight Safety oversight Accident/incident investigation Accident/incident investigation Mandatory/voluntary reporting systems Mandatory/voluntary reporting systems Safety data analysis Safety data analysis Safety promotion Safety promotion

As of 23 November 2006 States shall require, as part of their safety programme, that an [operator, maintenance organization, ATS provider, certified aerodrome operator] implements a safety management system accepted by the State that Identifies safety hazards Identifies safety hazards Ensures that remedial action necessary to maintain an acceptable level of safety is implemented Ensures that remedial action necessary to maintain an acceptable level of safety is implemented Provides for continuous monitoring and regular assessment of the safety level achieved Provides for continuous monitoring and regular assessment of the safety level achieved Aims to make continuous improvement to the overall level of safety Aims to make continuous improvement to the overall level of safety States shall require, as part of their safety programme, that an [operator, maintenance organization, ATS provider, certified aerodrome operator] implements a safety management system accepted by the State that Identifies safety hazards Identifies safety hazards Ensures that remedial action necessary to maintain an acceptable level of safety is implemented Ensures that remedial action necessary to maintain an acceptable level of safety is implemented Provides for continuous monitoring and regular assessment of the safety level achieved Provides for continuous monitoring and regular assessment of the safety level achieved Aims to make continuous improvement to the overall level of safety Aims to make continuous improvement to the overall level of safety

What is an SMS? A systematic approach to managing safety, including the necessary organizational structures, accountabilities, policies and procedures Providers are responsible for establishing an SMS Providers are responsible for establishing an SMS States are responsible of the acceptance and oversight for providers SMS States are responsible of the acceptance and oversight for providers SMS A systematic approach to managing safety, including the necessary organizational structures, accountabilities, policies and procedures Providers are responsible for establishing an SMS Providers are responsible for establishing an SMS States are responsible of the acceptance and oversight for providers SMS States are responsible of the acceptance and oversight for providers SMS

Safety Programme – SMS Relationships State safety programme Organizations safety management system (SMS) Organizations production processes Objective: Public safety Objective: Manage and control safety risk Acceptance Oversight Objective: Achieve commercial goals and customer satisfaction Risk management Safety assurance Protection Production Oversight

As of 23 November 2006 An accepted safety management system shall clearly define lines of safety accountability throughout the [airline, maintenance, ATS provider, certified aerodrome operator] organization, including direct accountability for safety on the part of senior management

Acceptable Level of Safety The acceptable level of safety to be achieved shall be established by the State (s) concerned Expressed in practical terms by two measures or metrics Expressed in practical terms by two measures or metrics Safety performance indicators Safety performance indicators Safety performance targets Safety performance targets Delivered through various tools and means Delivered through various tools and means Safety requirements Safety requirements The acceptable level of safety to be achieved shall be established by the State (s) concerned Expressed in practical terms by two measures or metrics Expressed in practical terms by two measures or metrics Safety performance indicators Safety performance indicators Safety performance targets Safety performance targets Delivered through various tools and means Delivered through various tools and means Safety requirements Safety requirements

Acceptable Level of Safety Legal considerations Establishing acceptable level(s) of safety does not replace legal, regulatory, or other already established requirements, but it must support compliance with them Establishing acceptable level(s) of safety for their safety programme leaves unaffected the obligations of States, and does not relieve States from compliance with SARPs Legal considerations Establishing acceptable level(s) of safety does not replace legal, regulatory, or other already established requirements, but it must support compliance with them Establishing acceptable level(s) of safety for their safety programme leaves unaffected the obligations of States, and does not relieve States from compliance with SARPs

Acceptable Level of Safety Safety indicators Safety indicators – Established objectives of a safety programme or an SMS No more than 0.8 Cat A and B (most serious) runway incursions per million operations through 2009 Safety targets – Safety targets – Medium or long-term objectives of a safety programme or an SMS By 2010 reduce Cat A and B (most serious) runway incursions to a rate of not more than 0.5 per million operations May be different or the same Safety indicators Safety indicators – Established objectives of a safety programme or an SMS No more than 0.8 Cat A and B (most serious) runway incursions per million operations through 2009 Safety targets – Safety targets – Medium or long-term objectives of a safety programme or an SMS By 2010 reduce Cat A and B (most serious) runway incursions to a rate of not more than 0.5 per million operations May be different or the same

Acceptable Level of Safety Safety requirements – Operational procedures, technology and systems, programmes, and contingency arrangements Measures of reliability, availability and/or accuracy may be added Install Airport Surface Detection Equipment-Model XV (ASDE-XV) at (three busiest airports) within the next 12 months, with 98% annual availability Safety requirements – Operational procedures, technology and systems, programmes, and contingency arrangements Measures of reliability, availability and/or accuracy may be added Install Airport Surface Detection Equipment-Model XV (ASDE-XV) at (three busiest airports) within the next 12 months, with 98% annual availability

Acceptable Level of Safety There will seldom be a single or national acceptable level of safety There will seldom be a single or national acceptable level of safety Different acceptable levels of safety will be separately agreed between the oversight authority and individual service providers Different acceptable levels of safety will be separately agreed between the oversight authority and individual service providers Each agreed acceptable level of safety should be Each agreed acceptable level of safety should be commensurate to the complexity of individual service provider specific operational context commensurate to the complexity of individual service provider specific operational context availability of operator/services provider resources availability of operator/services provider resources There will seldom be a single or national acceptable level of safety There will seldom be a single or national acceptable level of safety Different acceptable levels of safety will be separately agreed between the oversight authority and individual service providers Different acceptable levels of safety will be separately agreed between the oversight authority and individual service providers Each agreed acceptable level of safety should be Each agreed acceptable level of safety should be commensurate to the complexity of individual service provider specific operational context commensurate to the complexity of individual service provider specific operational context availability of operator/services provider resources availability of operator/services provider resources