1 LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Technology Initiative Grant Program Developing and Submitting TIG Project Evaluation Plans Bristow Hardin, LSC,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

From the eyes of an Administrator A general overview of e-CFunds Administrative Site, including navigation and exploring the features of this powerful.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Planning Reports and Proposals
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
Slide 1 FastFacts Feature Presentation August 14 th, 2008 We are using audio during this session, so please dial in to our conference line… Phone number:
ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Pat Picariello, Director, Developmental Operations 1 Strategic Planning & New Activity Development.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Strategic Planning & New Activity Development September 2013.
Business Process Improvement in the Economic Programs Directorate at the U.S. Census Bureau Deborah M. Stempowski Shirin A. Ahmed U.S. Census Bureau ICES.
REQ Enrollment in Demand Response Programs Process Flow Engineering Firm Retail Customer Demand Response Service Provider (DRSP) Distribution Company.
Project design, preparation and approval Basel Convention Resource Mobilization Workshop Nairobi, 3 – 7 December 2006 Andreas Arlt Secretariat of the Basel.
1 American Community Survey: Update New Jersey State Data Center Meeting June 11, 2008 Nancy Torrieri American Community Survey Office.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Program Goals, Objectives and Performance Indicators A guide for grant and program development 3/2/2014 | Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
SAC Needs Assessment. Background A goal of the Massachusetts State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education and Care (SAC) Identify the needs of.
Michigan Electronic Grants System Plus
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Addition Facts
Supporting managers: assessment and the learner journey
Peer Review and Development Groups Support for Excellence Programme - Huddle.
1 Drafting a Standard n Establish the requirements n Agree the process n Draft the Standard n Test the Standard n Implement the Standard.
Grants 3.0 Departmental Administrator Review January 22, 2014.
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Vision: A strong and capable civil society, cooperating and responsive to Cambodias development challenges 1.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
2009 Strategic Planning playbook
Effective Contract Management Planning
Human Capital Investment Programme Disability Activation Project (DACT) WELCOME Support Workshop Thursday 7 th February
1 Division of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Knowledge Management and Transfer Project 7/30/12.
March 23, Todays Outcomes By the end of todays workshop, participants will be able to... Revise and/or finalize SAOs within their areas Discover.
Introduction to Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS)
Evaluation Capacity Building Identifying and Addressing the Fields Needs.
Department of Finance and Administration Office of the Mississippi Management and Reporting System 1 MAGIC Implementation Services Discussion February.
Educational Technology Outreach Collaboration Between Business, School Districts and the University 2001 Maryland Technology Showcase Davina Pruitt-Mentle.
Symantec Education Skills Assessment SESA 3.0 Feature Showcase
Developing and Implementing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
Southeastern Association of Educational Opportunity Program Personnel 38 th Annual Conference January 30 – February 3, 2010 Upward Bound Internal & External.
The Re-Start Meeting Warren County School Strategic Planning Process Action Team Leaders September 25, 2013.
1 Department of State Program Evaluation Policy Overview Spring 2013.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Brief introduction to Secondary Care SOAR users Last updated: 13 th December 2012.
Week 1.
Electronic Personnel Master File (ePMF) 1 District Preparation Overview Managing the Electronic Staff Collection Process New York State Education.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) HMIS and the Impact of Outcomes in Prevention Services Sponsored by: National Center on Homelessness Among.
05/19/04 1 A Lessons Learned Process Celebrate the Successes Learn From the Woes Natalie Scott, PMP Sr. Project Manager.
Observer Schedules Pre-Observation Conference To schedule a pre-observation conference, select Schedule.
SMARTworks ® EffectiveResponse Training: Patient Registration National Park Medical Center November 20, 2014.
MINNESOTA CLIENT ACCESS, BARRIERS AND SOLUTIONS (MN-CABS STUDY) A study of Minnesota’s disproportionally underserved legal services clients and proposed.
Introduction to Writing Proposals Courtesy of
Chapter 3: Marketing Intelligence Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education Canada1.
2012 TIG CYCLE INFORMATIONAL WEBINAR David Bonebrake, Jane Ribadeneyra Legal Services Corporation.
Legal Services Corporation: Evaluation Assistance to TIG Grantees May 4, 2004 Please standby while others connect.
USING DATA TO IMPROVE PROGRAM PERFORMANCE 2013 TIG CONFERENCE Presenters: Michael O’Connor, Prairie State Legal Services (IL) Rachel Perry, Cleveland Legal.
Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
School Improvement Planning and Reporting for Cohort 2 and Cohort 3 Schools June 8, 2015June 8, 2015.
Legal Services and the Courts: Technology Partnerships to Improve Access to Justice Presented by Glenn Rawdon.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Defining Clear Goals and ObjectivesDefining Clear Goals and Objectives Barbara A. Howell, M.A. PAD 5850.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Presentation transcript:

1 LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Technology Initiative Grant Program Developing and Submitting TIG Project Evaluation Plans Bristow Hardin, LSC, Glenn Rawdon, LSC,

2 What Well Cover Today TIG Evaluation Plan Requirements Plan Development and Approval Processes Evaluation Plan Contents Use Of Evaluation Plan Automated Form

3 TIG Evaluation Plan Requirements Plan required for all non-website grants. Grantees cannot receive a second grant payment until their evaluation plan is approved. Must be in specified format and include all required information.

4 TIG Evaluation Plan Webpage TIG Evaluation Plan Webpage: Information about evaluation plan requirements and approval processes Links to all instructional and guidance information Link to automated evaluation plan form on the LawHelp Interactive server : Activated Wednesday, May 12, 2010.

5 The Evaluation Plan: An Essential Management Tool for Maximizing Project Effectiveness Specifies projects: Goals and objectives Activities and strategies that will be implemented to achieve the goals and objectives Methodologies and data sets that will be used to assess and document the projects accomplishments. Provides framework for monitoring project implementation and results Identifies and facilitates collection of data required for the TIG Final Report (and other fundraising).

6 TIG Evaluation Plan Submission & Approval Process Automated form produces Word document. Plan submitted in Word format to Bristow Hardin ( If changes are required for plan approval, LSC staff will notify the grantee via of the needed changes. Grantee then submits revised plan to Bristow Hardin for review and approval. LSC notifies grantee via when plan approved and provides copy of the approved plan. Grantee uploads approved plan to milestone reporting system

7 Evaluation Plan Contents: Administrative Information Grantee Name TIG Grant Number Submission Date: Date evaluation plan submitted to LSC. Approval Date: LSC will enter; this is the date plan is formally approved by LSC. Contact Person: Individuals LSC should contact with questions, etc., about the plan. (Not grantee executive director unless they helped develop plan.) address(s) & Phone number(s): for contact person(s)

8 Evaluation Plan Contents: Substantive Elements Goal Statement Objectives Strategies and activities implemented to achieve each objective Evaluation methodologies/data sets to assess & document progress toward each objective

9 Evaluation Plan Contents: Goals and Objectives Goals and objectives both articulate what project managers hope to achieve, but … Goals specify projects broad and long term intended results for (or impact on) a specified target population. vs. Objectives more specific, concrete, short-term and measurable – identify the project deliverables and provide measures to assess a projects achievements.

10 Evaluation Plan: Differences between Goals & Objectives GoalsObjectives BroadNarrow and Specific Long-termShort-term AbstractConcrete General intentionsPrecise Difficult to QuantifyMeasurable

11 Evaluation Plan Contents: Goals TIG evaluation plan should contain a single goal statement. Goal statement identifies the technolog(ies) or technology system(s) that the grantee proposes to develop Identifies in broad terms how the system(s) will increase the quality/quantity of client services and/or enhance the grantees operational effectiveness/efficiency.

12 Evaluation Plan Contents: Objectives Plan will have multiple objectives. Objectives Specify the extent to which and ways the project technology(ies) or technology system(s) will enhance client services and/or program operations. Provide the measurable criteria project managers will use to assess and document a projects accomplishments.

13 Evaluation Plan Contents: Strategies and Activities Evaluation Plan must identify the one or more major strategies and activities that will be undertaken to achieve each of the project objectives. Typically, multiple strategies and activities for each objective. Activities flow logically from and be directly related to the objectives. Some strategies or activities can correspond to more than one objective. If so, place these in field(s) for each of the objectives to which they correspond.

14 Evaluation Plan Contents: Evaluation Methodologies and Data Plan should identify the evaluation method(s) and specific data set(s) used to assess and document the projects progress in achieving each objective (or significant activities/strategies). Three broad types of evaluation data: Administrative Surveys Interviews and other qualitative data The most effective evaluations will use a combination of these data types.

15 Evaluation Methodologies and Data Sets: Administrative Data – Benefits Critical quantitative or qualitative data regarding program operations Easy and inexpensive to obtain – generated and compiled as part of routine program operations Readily available from a variety of sources.

16 Evaluation Methodologies and Data Sets: Administrative Data – Examples Case management or intake system data re: number, demographic characteristics, residence of clients served Data re: outreach activities conducted, number and types of training provided, number of persons trained. Information from partners or other data bases 1. Law Help Interactive data re: use of HotDocs automated forms 2. WebTrends or similar data re: document downloads 3. Court information from courts re: number of pro se filings

17 Evaluation Methodologies and Data Sets: Surveys Relatively quick and easy way to collect uniform data Can be tailored to different groups, e.g., clients, advocates, other program staff Low demands on respondents – brief, focused question formats Provide quantitative data easy to compile and analyze On-line survey tools (e.g., Poverty Law Survey Tool, SurveyMonkey) for survey design, administration and data compilation and analysis

18 Evaluation Methodologies and Data Sets: Interviews and other Qualitative Data Data from in-depth interviews complement data from other data sources Provide more in-depth and specific information than surveys Direct observation also valuable. Example: Observing clients attempts to find information on a website reveals ways to improve a websites usability.

19 Use of the Automated Form Link to the form from the TIG website:

20 Saving and Editing the Form After You Complete the form save as answer file Can return to edit, add information, etc. Submit completed form to LSC