A Comprehensive Approach to Early Childhood Assessment and Intervention Kelly-Vance, L., Ryalls, B. O., & Dempsey, J. University of Nebraska Omaha NASP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meeting the AT Needs of Preschool Students Under The IDEA Ronald M. Hager, Esq., Senior Staff Attorney, National Disability Rights Network, Washington,
Advertisements

Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
The Power of Play in an Early Childhood RtI Model Lori Zito & Kristy Feden Papillion La Vista Schools Lisa Kelly-Vance & Brigette Ryalls University of.
California Preschool Learning Foundations
DRDP Measure Slides by Domain
5-1 Chapter 5: Stages and Strategies in Second Language Acquisition With a Focus on Listening and Speaking ©2012 California Department of Education, Child.
Comprehension and Analysis of Age-Appropriate Text Foundations and Framework Volume 1 © 2012 California Department of Education (CDE) California Preschool.
2-1 Chapter 2: Preschool English Learners, Their Families and Their Communities ©2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with.
Preschool Learning Foundations and Curriculum Framework, Volume 2
Human Performance Improvement Process
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 15, 2010 Division of Service Support,
1 Citrus County 21 st CCLC Progress Report Larry Parman External Evaluator.
1 Champlain Valley Head Start Child Outcomes Assessment in Champlain Valley Head Start.
1 Progress Reports in Child Care. 2 Why Progress Reports? Support communication with parents Help with program planning Support transitions to new programs.
Board of Early Education and Care Retreat June 30,
Early English Language Development (EELD) Standards Framework
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Summit Massachusetts Tiered System of Support MTSS – Academic - AM Massachusetts Department of Elementary and.
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
ABC Technology Project
Observation: The Key to Responsive Planning
VOORBLAD.
Why are you here? REALLY…...
Welcome & Introductions: Introduce presenters
The Intentional Teacher
Progress Monitoring in Reading: Why, What, and How
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
District Advisory Council (DAC) 1 October 22, 2012 Westlawn Elementary School.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
The Creative Curriculum for Preschool – Literacy Looking Deeper at Vocabulary and Phonological Awareness May 3, 2013.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
Helping Families Promote Children’s Social Emotional Competence Based on materials from Center for Social Emotional Foundation of Early Learning (CSEFEL)
25 seconds left…...
SCIA Special Circumstances Instructional Assistance
Lise Fox, Ph.D.: University of South Florida
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
5 by 5: Growing Healthy Learners An early childhood system of care designed to prepare vulnerable children for success in school and in life. Sylvia Echols.
Slide 1 Comparison of Young Children’s Development by Child and Family Characteristics Tulsa County Results February 2014.
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Small Group Time
1. 2 Easy-to-Use Administrator Features 3 Customisable Screen Cutoff Scores.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
PSSA Preparation.
CpSc 3220 Designing a Database
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 4c: Communicating with Families 1 6/12/201 3.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
RtI in Early Childhood Lisa Kelly-Vance, UNO and Kristy Feden, Papillion- LaVista Schools.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Chapter 5 Early Identification and Intervention
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
Early Childhood Special Education
Presentation transcript:

A Comprehensive Approach to Early Childhood Assessment and Intervention Kelly-Vance, L., Ryalls, B. O., & Dempsey, J. University of Nebraska Omaha NASP 2011: San Francisco

Acknowledgements and Appreciation Papillion-LaVista Public School District, Omaha, NE Especially Kristy Feden! Sarpy County Head Start, NE School Psychology Graduate Students Many, many children and their families University Committee on Research Artwork by Julie K. Hart

What is Play Assessment? An observation of a child’s skills in the context of play Cognitive (thinking and problem-solving) Social Behavioral A system that results in a description of a child’s competencies and areas of need A method of monitoring a child’s progress in curriculum and intervention

Use of Play Assessments Individual assessments to determine performance levels in developmental domains Screening classes or groups to determine group performance Progress monitoring of individuals, groups, and/or classrooms Program evaluation to determine program effectiveness

What is play intervention? An intervention process in which the areas of need that are identified in play assessment are addressed in the context of play

Why play interventions? Teachers easily understand the intervention Children are in their natural environment Parents can learn how to conduct interventions

Conducting Play Assessments Observational Approach “how to”

Observation Sessions Determine setting Laboratory Classroom Home Select time of day (free play is ideal in classrooms) Make sure that the toys can elicit a wide range of skills

Observation of Play Observe at least 30 minutes to determine level of exploratory/pretend play Document the amount of time for play behaviors (explained later) For supplementary subdomains, observe until child reaches age appropriate levels of play or until you determine that the results are accurate Validate from the teacher

Level of Facilitation Do not guide the child’s play Do not let others guide the child’s play For categories that were not observed, you can set up an opportunity – may need to ask teacher If category never observed and no opportunities are available, ask teacher for input

Observation of Social/Behavior Also note any social and/or behavioral strengths and possible areas of need Initiation of play Receptivity of play when others initiate Variety of playmates Adult vs. child play

Additional Developmental Domains Can also note on the following Language Motor Interests

Coding Play Forms and coding guidelines How to analyze the observations

Assessment Forms Observation and Coding Summary and Progress PIECES Developmental Progression of Play

What is measured…. Supplemental Play Skills – Problem Solving Skills and Planning - measures cognitive development Discrimination/ Classification Skills Quantification Skills Drawing Skills Sequencing Abilities Core Play Skills – measures cognitive development Exploratory Play Simple Pretend Play Complex Pretend Play Social Skills Behavior Language can be noted

Social: Play Partners Number Child(ren)/Adults

Social: Play Direction Initiator – child initiates play with another child or adult Follower – child follows play of another child or adult Cooperative – child has cooperative play interchanges with another child or adult

Communication Language heard during play – document This can be a conversation with an adult or another child or the target child could be talking to him/herself

Supplemental Areas of Assessment Strategic Behavior and Problem Solving Skills Discrimination/Classification Skills Quantification Skills Drawing Skills Sequencing Abilities

Reporting results Highest level of play coded for each subdomain (i.e., core and supplemental) Percent of time in pretend vs. exploratory play Number of steps in pretend play (when applicable) Description of the variety of play acts, toys used, and level of facilitation Social dimensions of play Behaviors that may facilitate or interfere with play

Results of play assessment Competencies Student observed an age appropriate skill in the play subdomain Reported skills Teacher reported an age appropriate skill in the play subdomain but the skill was not observed Emerging skills Skill was observed rarely or only with facilitation Areas of need Skill was not observed or reported

Intervention System Using the assessment data

System – Level 1 Screening of all children using the PIECES observation and coding system Can be conducted 3-4 times per year Purpose: To determine group progress and program effectiveness To determine which children need additional interventions Must have a criteria for moving to Level 2

System – Level 2 Small group or individual interventions Interventions are 1-2 times per week Progress is monitored 1-2 times per week Evaluate progress every 4-6 weeks Establish a criteria for moving from Level 2 to Level 3 and from Level 2 to Level 1

System – Level 3 Level 3 – Individual or small group interventions Progress is monitored 2-3 times per week Interventions are 3-5 times per week Evaluate progress every 4-6 weeks

Play Interventions Determine from assessment results Intensity depends on need Small group or individual interventions can be used Frequent progress monitoring is required because young children change very quickly Peer comparisons are helpful in determining if improvement is due to development or the intervention

Play Interventions can include Parents* Teachers Peers Siblings Older children in a school – if applicable *Hart found that parents are knowledgeable about play and believe it is important to development but their child’s play level did not reflect the belief

Interventions Individual and group intervention strategies Teach new skills Model Add ons Increase emerging skills Verbal prompts Play partners Use verbal praise and encouragement throughout intervention

References Cherney, I. C., Kelly-Vance, L., Gill, K., Ruane, A., & Ryalls, B. O. (2003). The effects of stereotyped toys and gender on play assessment in 18-47 month old children. Educational Psychology, 22, 95-106. Kelly-Vance, L., Needelman, H., Troia, K., & Ryalls, B. O. (1999). Early childhood assessment: A comparison of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and a Play-Based Technique. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 27, 1-15. Kelly-Vance, L., & Ryalls, B. O. (2008). Best practices in play assessment and intervention. In J. Grimes & A. Thomas, (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V, vol. 2, 549-559. Kelly-Vance, L., & Ryalls, B. O. (2005). A systematic, reliable approach to play assessment in preschoolers. School Psychology International, 26, 398-412. Kelly-Vance, L., Ryalls, B. O., & Glover, K. G. (2002). The use of play assessment to evaluate the cognitive skills of two- and three-year old children. School Psychology International, 23, 169-185. Mallory, J., Kelly-Vance, L, & Ryalls, B. O. (2010). Incorporating divergent thinking into play interventions for preschool children with developmental risk factors. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 20, 57-71.

Contact Information Lisa Kelly-Vance lkelly-vance@unomaha.edu Brigette Ryalls bryalls@unomaha.edu Jessica Dempsey jessicadempsey@unomaha.edu www.unomaha.edu/schoolpsych/playresources.php