Shoreline Master Program Update First Review of Preliminary Draft Shoreline Master Program [Entity] [Month Day, 2009] 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Advertisements

Shoreline Master Program Update Shoreline Master Program Update: Process Overview City of Benton City August 30,
Joint Work Session Skagit County Planning Commission and Shoreline Advisory Committee May 22, 2012.
Proposed Land Use & Development Regulations Public Hearing Month Day, 2012.
Shoreline Management Act approved by voters in the early 1970’s to: – Encourage water-dependent uses – Protect shoreline natural resources – Promote public.
Shoreline Master Program Update. Shoreline Management Act approved by voters in the early 1970’s to: – Encourage water-dependent uses – Protect shoreline.
Clallam County Shoreline Master Program Update: Cathy Lear for DRMT October 2009.
LID and Stormwater Technical Resource Center Update County Road Administration Board November 3,
Planned Unit Development
Community Development Department CP AND HG RESIDENTIAL LOTS, LLC AND CITY OF PALM COAST Settlement & Development Agreement.
Island County SMP Shoreline Residential Development Workshop December 5, 2011.
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission ZOS Location Map Feet.
Planning Commission meeting 5/22/2012.  Project Schedule  Planning Commission’s Role  Review Chapters 1 – 3 of Draft SMP  Focus is on understanding.
Clallam County Shoreline Master Program Presented to the Dungeness River Management Team March 2010 Bogachiel, Sol Duc, and Quillayute Rivers, 2007 Miller.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
Planning Commission meeting 6/26/2012.  Update on DOE Comments  Review Chapter 4 - Shoreline Use Provisions  Questions.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, :30 PM.
Kitsap County Shoreline Master Program Update Task Force Work Group Meeting August 16, 2011.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Best Local Land Use Practices Development Incentives Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
Shoreline Master Program Update First Review of Preliminary Draft Shoreline Master Program City of Wenatchee April 15,
SKAGIT COUNTY SHORELINE REGULATIONS Planning Commission Workshop April 3, 2012.
2013 Spokane River Conference March 26, Shelley Lake Gravel Pit Spokane River.
KITSAP SMP TASK FORCE Reconvened Meeting #1 November 9, 2011 Draft SMP Progress Update.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Grays Harbor County Shoreline Master Program Update Our Heritage, Our Future Grays Harbor Master Builders January 9, 2012.
Planning Area Standards May 18, Outline of today’s meeting Introductions Recap of previous community meetings Planning Area Standards Discussion.
Hazard Mitigation Planning and Project Funding. Agenda Objectives Overview of Hazard Mitigation Hazard Mitigation Planning Mitigation Project Funding.
Watercourse DPA District of North Vancouver Streamside DPA Development Permit Area for the Protection of the Natural Environment: Streamside Areas Public.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
Community Development Department Special Exceptions for: Automotive parts (e.g. accessories and tires) and Automotive, Recreational Vehicle, and Boat Dealers.
WEST BERKELEY PROJECT Master Use Permits (MUP) May 15, 2012 Response to Concerns & Issues.
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Nonconforming Uses and Structures Washington Dept. of Ecology Betty Renkor October 25, 2007.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
Shore Protection Act (O.C.G.A , et seq.) Karl BurgessApril 5, 2011 Photo of Choice.
CBJ Planning Commission Presentation November 9, 2010 Subdivision Ordinance Revision Update.
Planning under the Growth Management Act
Lake Michigan Coastal Program Coastal 101 – 2007 Edition.
Community Development Department APPLICATION #2457 GRAND HAVEN PUD AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2411 GRAND HAVEN NORTH: SMALL SCALE FLUM AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Prince George’s County MNCPP-C Draft: December, 2004.
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Updating Kitsap County’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) – process overview, public outreach, involvement.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
Land Use Planning in Oroville: How is the Community Thinking? Presenter: Chris Branch Community Development Director City of Oroville Ph:
Washington’s Shoreline Management Act and Shoreline Master Program Updates City of Fife Special Planning Commission Meeting May 19, 2019.
LESSONS LEARNED January 2007 Presented by: Thomas J. Young, Assistant Attorney General Peter Skowlund, Department of Ecology.
LOCATIONAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA FOR UTILITY SCALE PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR FACILITIES.
Redevelopment in the Resort Housing District To the Sanibel- Captiva Chamber of Commerce Nov. 29, 2011 Prepared by: Planning Department.
KITSAP COUNTY SMP UPDATE Board of County Commissioners Decision-only hearing to consider local adoption of SMP January 28, 2013 Kitsap County Department.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN-07-03a & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
Community Development Department Ryan’s Landing Planned Unit Development Application No
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
PORT OF TACOMA. 1. Background 2. City Process Update 3. Review Guiding Principles 4. Next Steps General Business: City of Tacoma Shoreline Master Program.
Wetlands Focus Group. Responsibilities and Goals   Growth Managements Act (Chapter 163, FS) of 1985   Included the adoption of the State Comprehensive.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Environmental Critical Areas Regulations
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
Our Mission We work with landowners, communities, and organizations to protect lakes and rivers through developing effective, transferable, long-term solutions.
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
36 CAs across Ontario (mainly in the south)
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
PROVISIONS OF H.R
City of Enumclaw Shoreline Master Program Periodic Update
City of Lake Forest Park Shoreline Master Program Periodic Update
Presentation transcript:

Shoreline Master Program Update First Review of Preliminary Draft Shoreline Master Program [Entity] [Month Day, 2009] 1

Shoreline Master Program Update Why Update the SMP Now? –Shoreline Management Act passed in 1971, adopted in 1972 –County and Cities adopted SMP in 1975, last major update 1979 –Cooperative program – state and local governments –New State SMP rules adopted in 2003 –All local governments must update Due in Chelan County by 2013 –County and Cities are working cooperatively –Have State grant as early adopter on east side 2

Shoreline Master Program Update Where Does This Apply? –Shoreline Jurisdiction Stream ≥20 cfs, lakes ≥20 acres Upland areas 200 feet from OHWM Floodways and some adjacent floodplain area Associated wetlands Private use/development on federal lands –New Uses Existing shoreline uses and activities may continue 3

Shoreline Master Program Update Agenda –SMP Requirements –Key SMP Principles –SMP Development –SMP Contents Environment Designations Public Access Vegetation Conservation In-water Activities Upland Activities –Restoration Plan –Next Steps 4

Shoreline Master Program Update SMP Requirements 5

Shoreline Master Program Update 6

Inventory & Analysis SMP - Environment Designations - Goals - Policies - Regulations Cumulative Impacts Analysis Local Adoption Restoration Plan Ecology Review and Adoption Required Steps Determine Jurisdiction Public Participation 7

Shoreline Master Program Update Where Are We Now? Inventory & Analysis SMP - Environment Designations - Goals - Policies - Regulations Cumulative Impacts Analysis Local Adoption Restoration Plan Determine Jurisdiction Ecology Review and Adoption Public Participation 8

Shoreline Master Program Update Key SMP Principles 9

Shoreline Master Program Update Key Principles of the SMP –Balance environmental protection public access water-oriented uses –No Net Loss of Ecological Function –Preferred Uses 10

Shoreline Master Program Update Ecological Function SMP Updates: Achieving No Net Loss of Ecological Function SMP Restoration Plan Voluntary restoration opportunities No Net Loss – Current Baseline On-going degradation from existing development Unavoidable impacts from new development Key: DegradedImprovedSMP elements Higher Lower SMP Update Framework to achieve NNL Inventory & Characterization Environment Designation Development Policies & Standards Recommended Actions outside SMA authority Compliance Strategy Cumulative Impacts Analysis Restoration Plan Shoreline violations Off-site mitigation opportunities Offsetting mitigation Avoid and Mitigate Impacts 11

Shoreline Master Program Update Shorelines of State Preferred Uses: –Uses that control pollution & prevent environmental damage –Uses unique to or dependent upon use of the state's shoreline –Single family residences –Ports –Shoreline recreational uses –Water-dependent uses, e.g. parks, marinas, piers, industrial and commercial developments –Other uses providing an opportunity for substantial numbers of people to enjoy the shorelines Shorelines of Statewide Significance Preferred Uses: Uses that –Protect the statewide interest over local interest –Preserve the natural character of the shoreline –Result in long-term over short- term benefit –Protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline –Increase public access to publicly owned areas of the shorelines –Increase public recreational opportunities –Other element consistent with SMA deemed appropriate or necessary 12

Shoreline Master Program Update SMP Development 13

Shoreline Master Program Update Development of the SMP –Builds upon: SMP Guidelines & Consistency Analysis Inventory/Analysis Report –Includes: Specific subjects requested by County and City staff & the public –Furthers consistency with state & federal permit requirements 14

Shoreline Master Program Update Public Involvement –Shoreline Advisory Committee Winter 2008/2009 –Visioning Workshops Fall 2008 –Community Outreach – fliers, fairs, etc. –Local City and County meetings with planning commissions and elected officials 15

Shoreline Master Program Update Contents –Environment Designations –Goals –Policies –Regulations Structure –“Universal” Chapters 1-8 –“Unique” Chapters 9-14 –Differences = environment designations vegetation conservation upland development Intent –Meet state requirements & local community needs –Improve consistency –Improve staff and public usability Preliminary Draft SMP 16

Shoreline Master Program Update Current SMP: Prepared in 1975 Contains –Goals and Policies –Shoreline Use Regulations –Environment Boundaries Pre-Draft SMP Update New Chapters Environment Designations (Chapter 3) Shoreline Works & Structures divided by: –Piers and docks (Section 5.14) –Shoreline stabilization (Section 5.18) –Breakwaters, jetties, groins and weirs (Section 5.6) –Flood hazard reduction (Section 4.3) –In-water structures (Section 5.12) Ecological Protection & Critical Areas (Section 4.1) Public Access (Section 4.4) Vegetation Conservation (Section 4.5) Water Quality, Stormwater & Nonpoint Pollution (Section 4.6) Shoreline Habitat & Natural Systems Enhancement Projects (Section 5.17 ) 17

Shoreline Master Program Update Changes That May Affect Property Owners Switch from common line setback to standard setback [bullet for Cities only] More prescriptive requirements for shoreline vegetation protection and restoration Increased justification and design requirements for shoreline stabilization Streamlined permitting with added uses subject to SDP rather than CUP Reduced ambiguity and increased consistency and predictability with added detail (e.g., pier regulations, public access) 18

Shoreline Master Program Update SMP Contents Environment Designations Public Access Vegetation Conservation In-water Activities Upland Activities 19

Shoreline Master Program Update Environment Designations Based On: Criteria in the Guidelines Ecological condition per Inventory/Analysis Existing and planned land use 20

Shoreline Master Program Update Environment Designations Chelan County (Section 9.3) –Maintaining existing naming protocol Natural Conservancy Rural Urban –Adding two new designations Aquatic (required) Federal (suggested) 21

Shoreline Master Program Update Environment Designations City of Cashmere (Section 10.3) New designation system consistent with Guidelines recommendations –Urban Conservancy –Shoreline Residential –High Intensity –Aquatic Recognizes differences in ecological function and desired land uses within the City and its UGA Formerly a single Urban designation 22

Shoreline Master Program Update Environment Designations City of Chelan (Section 11.3) New designation system consistent with Guidelines recommendations –Urban Conservancy –Shoreline Residential – Single-Family –Shoreline Residential – Multi-Family –High Intensity –Aquatic Recognizes differences in ecological function and desired land uses within the City and its UGA Formerly a single Urban designation 23

Shoreline Master Program Update Environment Designations City of Entiat (Section 12.3) New designation system consistent with Guidelines recommendations –Urban Conservancy –Shoreline Residential –Waterfront Business (consistency with Waterfront Plan) –High Intensity –Aquatic Recognizes differences in ecological function and desired land uses within the City and its UGA Formerly a single Urban designation 24

Shoreline Master Program Update Environment Designations City of Leavenworth (Section 13.3) New designation system consistent with Guidelines recommendations –Natural –Urban Conservancy –Shoreline Residential –High Intensity –Aquatic Recognizes differences in ecological function and desired land uses within the City and its UGA Formerly a single Urban designation 25

Shoreline Master Program Update Environment Designations City of Wenatchee (Section 14.3) –New designation system consistent with Guidelines recommendations Natural Urban Conservancy Shoreline Residential Waterfront (consistency with Waterfront Plan) High Intensity Aquatic –Recognizes differences in ecological function and desired land uses within the City and its UGA –Formerly a single Urban designation Shoreline Master Program Update 26

Shoreline Master Program Update Public Access – Proposed Priorities 1.Maintain existing sites, facilities & easements 2.Provide new facilities or enhance existing facilities on existing public lands 3.Acquire property or easements to implement adopted public access plans or to recognize unique opportunities 4.Require physical or visual access as a condition of approval for shoreline development activities Would need to be consistent with the level of demand by the development and have a benefit to the public 27

Shoreline Master Program Update Vegetation Conservation Basic Principles (Section 4.5) –Preserve existing vegetation to maximum extent practicable –Additional protection for buffers –All impacts must be mitigated –Aligned with critical areas regulations –Some passive or essential uses (e.g., trails, utilities,) allowed –Existing vegetation and management practices may continue Shoreline Master Program Update 28

Shoreline Master Program Update Vegetation Conservation Chelan County (Section 9.5) –Consistent with County Critical Areas Regulations except, water- dependent uses may be located up to water’s edge –Certain other Shoreline Master Program Update Environment Designation Buffer Width High IntensityLow Intensity Natural Conservancy Rural Urban Lower Lake Chelan 5025 Lots < 300’ deep25% of depth, greater of 25’ or common line setback water-oriented uses may be located in buffer if alternate location not feasible 29

Shoreline Master Program Update Vegetation Conservation City of Cashmere (Section 10.5) –Widths developed using average existing condition –Water-dependent uses may be located up to water’s edge –Certain other water-oriented uses may be located in the buffer if alternate location not feasible Shoreline Master Program Update Environment Designation Standard BufferReduced Buffer Urban Conservancy 150’112.5’ Shoreline Residential 50’37.5’ High Intensity 80’60’ –Buffers may be reduced up to 25% with appropriate mitigation 30

Shoreline Master Program Update Environment Designation Standard BufferReduced Buffer Urban Conservancy150’112.5’ Shoreline Residential – Single Family and Multi- Family 50’37.5’ High Intensity50’37.5’ –Buffers may be reduced up to 25% with appropriate mitigation Vegetation Conservation City of Chelan (Section 11.5) –Widths developed using average existing condition –Water-dependent uses may be located up to water’s edge –Certain other water-oriented uses may be located in the buffer if alternate location not feasible 31

Shoreline Master Program Update Vegetation Conservation City of Entiat (Section 12.5) –Widths developed using average existing condition –Water-dependent uses may be located up to water’s edge –Certain other water-oriented uses may be located in the buffer if alternate location not feasible Environment Designation Standard BufferReduced Buffer Urban Conservancy150’112.5’ Shoreline Residential80’60’ Waterfront Business and High Intensity 40’30’ –Buffers may be reduced up to 25% with appropriate mitigation 32

Shoreline Master Program Update Vegetation Conservation City of Leavenworth (Section 13.5) –Widths developed using average existing condition –Water-dependent uses may be located up to water’s edge –Certain other water-oriented uses may be located in the buffer if alternate location not feasible Environment Designation Standard BufferReduced Buffer Natural200’150’ Urban Conservancy150’112.5’ Shoreline Residential80’60’ Waterfront Business and High Intensity 80’60’ –Buffers may be reduced up to 25% with appropriate mitigation 33

Shoreline Master Program Update Vegetation Conservation City of Wenatchee (Section 14.5) –Widths developed using average existing condition –Water-dependent uses may be located up to water’s edge –Certain other water-oriented uses may be located in the buffer if alternate location not feasible Environment Designation Standard BufferReduced Buffer Natural200’150’ Urban Conservancy150’112.5’ Shoreline Residential100’80’ Waterfront Business and High Intensity 150’112.5’ –Buffers may be reduced up to 25% with appropriate mitigation 34

Shoreline Master Program Update Shoreline Uses and Permits –Shoreline Uses & Activities allowed by environment designation More lenient – Urban or High Intensity More restrictive – Natural Other designations in-between – Conservancy –Shoreline Permits Shoreline Substantial Development Permits –Exemptions Shoreline Conditional Use Permit Shoreline Variance Permit 35

Shoreline Master Program Update Use Matrix 36 The chart is coded according to the following legend. P=Permitted CU=Conditional Use X=Prohibited (-)=Subject to use limitations in Chapter 5 and Chapters 9 to 14; otherwise prohibited Natural Conservancy Rural Urban Aquatic Marinas and commercial piersXCUPPP Commercial: Water-dependent usesXCUPP Commercial: Nonwater-oriented usesXXP(-) X Upland fill outside of CMZ/ floodplainXCUPP-- Upland fill inside of CMZ/ floodplainXXCUP-- Recreational: Water-dependentCUPPPP Recreational: Nonwater-orientedXCU X Residential: Single-familyCUPPPX Residential: Multi-familyXXCUPX

Shoreline Master Program Update Piers and Docks (Section 5.14) –Applies to residential structures serving ≤4 residences –Addresses fixed-pile piers, floats, boatlifts, and buoys –Generally permitted on appropriate waterbodies in all environments except Natural –Minimize size of structures, and mitigate for new impacts –Consistency with state and federal regulations 37

Shoreline Master Program Update Shoreline Stabilization (Section 5.18) –New bulkheads permitted if necessary –Existing bulkhead may be replaced if demonstrated need –Soft approaches required unless demonstrated to be insufficient –Minimize size of structures –Minimize and mitigate for new impacts. –Soft shoreline projects may extend waterward of ordinary high water 38

Shoreline Master Program Update Residential Uses –Single-family is Preferred Use –Multifamily allowed where zoning allows in High Intensity or Shoreline Residential environments –Standards for shoreline frontage, height, and side setbacks –Key issue for single-family is establishing shoreline frontage –Key issues for multifamily include maximum height and views 39

Shoreline Master Program Update Commercial & Industrial Uses –Water-dependent, water-related, or water- enjoyment are preferred –Nonwater-oriented uses allowed in limited cases –Allowed where zoning allows in High Intensity & Urban environments –Key policy issue – maximum heights, public views, and residential uses 40

Shoreline Master Program Update Restoration Plan 41

Shoreline Master Program Update Restoration Plan –Definition of Restoration –Includes goals, policies and actions for restoration –Facilitates meeting and exceeding the basic “no net loss” standard –Relies heavily on watershed and subbasin plans –Acknowledges the activities and benefits of multiple other organizations 42

Shoreline Master Program Update Next Steps Assemble working draft -- April 2009 Release 1 st Review Draft -- May 11, 2009 –Workshops, open houses –Subcommittees State review “Dynamic” comment period Public Hearing Draft – October