Substance Restriction, Product Take-Back and Consumer Alert Regulations Technical and Compliance Issues Timothy McGrady Environmental Compliance Manager,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UK Sales Meeting – 27 th & 28 th September 2005 What is the point of these Directives ? These directives have been introduced in order to ensure a Europe.
Advertisements

ISO EMS OVERVIEW FOR CONTRACTORS
EU RoHS Regulations: Interpretation & Impact for the General Galvanizing Industry ASTM A05 Workshop, May , Norfolk Murray Cook, Director, European.
Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (SDoC)
Hazardous Waste Policy in the EU - the example of electronic waste - November 2005 India Brussels Marianne Klingbeil European Commission Environment Directorate-General.
December 2005 EuP Directive : A Framework for setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products European Commission.
WEEE/RoHS Directive and the Compliance Implications
Matthew Griffin – Jaguar & Land Rover Materials Engineering June 2004
© COPYRIGHT 2005 AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION. COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL. Environment Compliance & Cross-Industry PLM Best Practices Lester Liao General Manager.
Update on Materials Restrictions in the Global Marketplace Liz Harriman MA Toxics Use Reduction Institute TURI TOXICS USE REDUCTION INSTITUTE June 1, 2005.
Overview of WEEE & RoHS Directives
Management of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Experiences from Sweden and Europe Thomas Lindhqvist IIIEE – Lund University JORNADA INTERNACIONAL.
IPC 2-18, 1752 Standard for Materials Declaration
US Electronic Product Stewardship
Environmental law is what we do. TM 1191 Second Avenue Suite 2200 Seattle, WA ELECTRONIC WASTE RECYCLING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION.
C1: Engineering Approaches
Copyright 2008 QNET LLC1 EU Directive 2002/96/EC on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Presented By Yvonne Halpaus – QNET LLC –
The EC RoHS and WEEE Directives - Stakeholder Update 20 June 2011.
Market access requirements EU Engineering products Legislation August 2014.
Source: ec.europa.eu/CEmarking CE marking makes Europe’s market yours!
International Telecommunication Union Committed to connecting the world 4 th ITU Green Standards Week Author Dr. Lu Chunyang Safety and Environment Department.
The Environmental Impact of Photography Aims: To have and open debate around key questions Create a ‘snapshot’ of opinions and viewpoints amongst people.
Presented By Yvonne Halpaus – QNET LLC –
Copyright Reserved Roadmap and Control for the Implementation of the European RoHS Directive NeoPhotonics Corporation Revision, December 2008.
Impact of RoHS Legislation and Resulting Customer Requirements on Industry Anne Johnson Regulatory Affairs Associate 3M Optical Systems Division June 24,
SWWMG – 12 th March 2014 The WEEE Regulations 2013.
Dmitrij Zarinovs Article that I looked at was from European Union Official Journal. WEEE Directive.
WEEE Directive Waste from electrical and electronic equipment Workshop EU legislation Sofia, 20 April 2006 Willem Canneman.
Global Standards & Trade Group Copyright © 2007 Rockwell Automation, Inc. All rights reserved. (Confidential – For Internal Use Only) 1 Environmental Regulations.
1 Summary about REACH & RoHS 10 th July 2008 Kwidzyn Poland “Business Support Programme for Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia and Turkey” BSP 2007/
TAKE BACK LEGISLATIONS By Ben and June. ABOUT TAKE BACK LEGISLATIONS  To decrease the Amount of Waste Produced  Decrease our impact on the environment.
How can you Chip in? Green ICs. What is an IC? “An electronic circuit manufactured by the patterned diffusion of trace elements into the surface of a.
Brominated Flame Retardants: International Restrictions Liz Harriman MA Toxics Use Reduction Institute TURI TOXICS USE REDUCTION INSTITUTE Oct. 25, 2005.
1 Overview of EU environmental legislation– Part II EU Environmental Legislation 2.VII.2008 Warsaw, Poland “Business Support Programme for Bulgaria, Romania,
Environmental Guidelines The Restriction of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (ROHS) Directive (2002/95/EC) –Key Elements Effective.
RoHS China Julia Lietzmann, Attorney-at-Law The Levinson Environmental Law Firm “International Legislation on Hazardous Substances.
ISO 9000 & TOTAL QUALITY ISO 9000 refers to a group of quality assurance standards established by the International Organization for Standardization.This.
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
1 Dr. Kei Biu Chan Chairman, The Hong Kong Electronic Industries Association Chairman, The Hong Kong Green Manufacturing Alliance Chairman and Managing.
Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment (WEEE). Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive Work started in the year 1994 To device a strategy.
A2 DT4 Notes Human Responsibility. 11 Human Responsibility - Laws.
Restriction of Certain Hazardous Substances (RoHS)
Management Methods for Controlling Pollution by Electronic Information Products Chris Cleet, Manager of Environmental Affairs Electronic Industries Alliance.
Regulations on Hazardous Substances (RoHS Directive) EOTC aisbl Rue de Stassart, 36 B-1050 Brussels Belgium Tel Fax
Electronics Legislation in Europe and Infrastructure in Ireland RoHS Directive WEEE Directive – Irelands B2C System – Irelands B2B System Research at UL.
Presentation Topic Darfon Green Plan Implement Schedule  1 st class restricted or banned material SubstanceChinese NameDarfon content Asbestos and its.
2005 RoHS & WEEE implementation Two EU directives set requirements for producers and importers of electrical equipment 1 Content: - The WEEE (Waste Electrical.
CAL/EPA ELECTRONIC WASTE FORUM. WEEE Directive Peggy Harris, DTSC Shirley Willd-Wagner, CIWMB.
3M Touch Systems EU Directives Strategy 3M Touch Systems is committed to transitioning its flagship product lines to WEEE/RoHS compliant status with minimal.
Tim Bannon Product Manager, EMEA RoHS & WEEE Compliance Programme Update.
Model Toxics in Packaging Legislation Sharon Yergeau NH Department of Environmental Services NEWMOA Environmental Summit Providence, Rhode Island September.
WEEE Producer Responsibility in the UK – Best Practice.
Region 3 Successes: Reducing Toxics with NPEP Partnerships Sharon Pérez-Suárez, PMP, CHMM U.S. EPA Region 3 Implementing EO 13423: Opportunities to Reduce.
© 2008 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved. This is a photographic template – your photograph should fit precisely within this rectangle. Welcome to.
SUPPLIER MATERIAL COMPLIANCE DECLARATION
Samsung Electronics Activity to cope with RoHS.
The European WEEE Directive International Seminar on Electronic Waste World Bank – infoDev Eric MUGNIER, Executive director ERNST & YOUNG.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
China ELV - Overall Status of China ELV - Management Requirements
IEC System of Conformity Assessment Schemes for Electrotechnical Equipment and Components.
Management of Chemicals and Wastes in Brazil Contribution of global agreements relevant for chemicals and waste management to national implementation of.
How environmental factors have affected mobile phone prices: Sony Ericsson W550 W550 Sony Ericsson.
Compliance requirements for web portal Year
Update on Product Related Environmental Regulations
15 March 2016, Kiev, Ukraine TWINNING PROJECT
IECEE Hazardous Substances Testing Service (HSTS)
….the Rest of the REACH and RoHS Story
אתגרי ניהול איכות בשרשרת האספקה
Extended Producer Responsibility for
Cathy Blanc-Gonnet Director NGO Humatem, FRANCE
Presentation transcript:

Substance Restriction, Product Take-Back and Consumer Alert Regulations Technical and Compliance Issues Timothy McGrady Environmental Compliance Manager, LG Electronics USA Chairman, ASTM Committee F40 on Declarable Substances in Materials

Voluntary Standards 1.SDOs do not write laws 2.Standards developed by SDOs can gain legal status 1.Via inclusion in contracts 2.Via inclusion in laws/regulations

Standards and Conformity Assessment Model BuyerSeller Contract (Purchase Order) Material Standard Test Method Certified Reference MaterialSI Units

Standards and Conformity Assessment Model Government Business Law (Regulation) Material Standard Test Method Certified Reference MaterialSI Units

Three Types of Product Regulations: 1.Substance Restrictions 2.Producer Responsibility, or Take- Back Requirements 3.Consumer Alerts There are, of course, Hybrids of above

Substance Restrictions Place limits on concentrations of chemical elements or compounds May require either products or materials within products to comply Based primarily on human health and environmental concerns

Substance Restrictions Examples: –European Union RoHS: Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment Restricts substances in materials –California SB20/SB50: Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003 Restricts substances in covered electronic products (display devices)

Take-Back Requirements Require products to be collected, recovered and/or recycled Most focus on Producer Responsibility 3Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Usually require fees Require infrastructure for collection, recovery and/or recycling May require labeling

Take-Back Requirements Examples: –EU WEEE: Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Requires producers to register and participate in collection/recycling schemes Requires labeling –Brazil: National Solid Waste Policy Will require take-back of batteries, electronic equipment, certain lamps

Consumer Alerts Typically require labeling Focused on potential hazards Producer must know or find out what is in their products If certain substances present above limits, must inform consumer

Consumer Alerts Examples: –California Proposition 65 Requires labeling if product contains more than certain concentrations of substances Californias list: ~600 substances –China RoHS, first phase Requires labeling whether RoHS substances are above limits or not

Propagation of Regulations At least 48 countries have either proposed or implemented regulations on EEE (6 continents). Most are Take-back regulations. Several restrict substances Several require labeling

Propagation of Regulations Many sectors impacted: –Packaging –Automotive –Batteries –Toys –Cosmetics –Electrical and Electronic Equipment

True Scope of EU RoHS RoHS Scope found in WEEE Annex IA Categories 1 – 7, 10 covered as of 7/1/06 Categories 8 & 9, medical devices and control and measuring equipment, will be covered, perhaps by 2010 or 2012 Covers equipment dependent upon electric current or electromagnetic fields to operate

True Scope of EU RoHS General exemptions: –Large-scale, fixed installation industrial equipment –Military equipment –Aerospace equipment –Products operating at >1500 volts DC or >1000 volts AC

True Scope of EU RoHS Other exemptions found in RoHS Annex and amendments: –2005/717/EC –2005/747/EC –2006/310/EC –2006/690/EC –2006/691/EC –2006/692/EC

True Scope of EU RoHS Another amendment: 2005/618/EC –Establishes Maximum Concentration Values (MCVs) for RoHS substances –Establishes basis of compliance as each homogeneous material within covered EEE –MCV for cadmium (Cd) is 0.01% by weight –MCV for lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), hexavalent chromium (Cr6+), polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) is 0.1% by weight

True Scope of EU RoHS RoHS limits do not apply to: –Packaging (cardboard, peanuts, plastic wrap, etc.) –Automobiles –Batteries –Only apply to products within scope of RoHS! –Other EU directives for products above

Other EU Directives Packaging and Packaging Waste: 94/62/EC + amendments 2004/12/EC and 2005/20/EC End-of-Life Vehicle: 2000/53/EC + many amendments (on file) Batteries 2006/66/EC (new directive implemented 9/2006) Dangerous Substances 76/769/EEC

True Scope of RoHS Just about any material covered Think about it: you can make a lamp out of a rock, wood, oil (lava lamps) Problem: materials producers cannot control where their materials end up, so they tend to make wholesale changes to materials for the biggest markets Spillover effects

Materials Declarations Compilations of many regulatory requirements plus other non-statutory requirements Hundreds of substances restricted Requirements for many product sectors all lumped into one May be applicable to products as a whole, but not to each material within products

Materials Declarations Example: –Stainless Steel Screw Cannot contain organic materials or mercury - will not survive processing temperatures Do not need to test for hexavalent chromium within material Possible restricted substances present: cadmium, lead; not typically above 0.01%, 0.1% respectively No need to prove other restricted substances are not present above limits

ASTM F2577 Standard Guide for Assessment of Materials and Products for Declarable Substances Published late 2006 Is a tool for materials suppliers Provides means of push back for suppliers when asked for empirical data on many substances

Materials Declarations Materials Declarations = Liability Transfer Instruments –UK allows Due Diligence Defense –Do what a reasonable person would do to comply with regulations –If company can show due diligence on their part, can point to third party –Third party may be treated as if they committed infraction

Materials Declarations Belgium does not allow Due Diligence Defense Means that producer is responsible no matter what However, materials declarations act as a means to enjoin others into lawsuits, or allows counter-suit No one wants to be the next Sony

Materials Declarations Producers wanted empirical evidence, or proof, that suppliers products comply with materials declarations requirements This led to massive testing, done primarily in Taiwan and mainland China Tests applied were EPA test methods for air, soil and water Electronic materials are typically metal, plastic and ceramic Tests were misapplied, leading to false negative and false positive results Claims of compliance not substantiated

So…Where Are the Standards? IEC TC 111 WG3 –IEC Ed. 1 test methods failed to pass (October 2006) IPC 175x series –Standardized materials declaration –Hasnt found widespread acceptance ASTM Committee F40 –Materials-based approach –ASTM F 2577 has been published –Many other standards in development

Standards and Conformity Assessment Model BuyerSeller Contract (Purchase Order) Material Standard Test Method Certified Reference MaterialSI Units

Materials Establish reasonable requirements specific to materials Require documentation on materials (test results, certificates of analysis) Recognize risks for each material (e.g., colored plastics) Work with suppliers

Metals Evaluation 1.Carbon/Low Alloy Steel 2.Stainless Steel 3.Copper and Copper Alloys 4.Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys 5.Solders 6.Plating 7.Coatings

Metals Evaluation 1.Carbon/Low Alloy Steel Lead exempt up to 0.35% Chromium in metals is in zero valence, or ground state – not hexavalent! Cadmium as contaminant is possible Mercury >0.1% not possible PBB/PBDE not possible Specify: Pb <0.35%; Cd <0.01% Note: L in grades stands for lead, e.g. 12L14 or 10L18

Metals Evaluation 2.Stainless Steels Lead exempt up to 0.35%, but not likely Chromium in metals is in zero valence, or ground state – not hexavalent! Cadmium as contaminant is possible Mercury >0.1% not possible PBB/PBDE not possible Specify: Pb <0.35% (or lower); Cd <0.01% Note: L in grades stands for low carbon, e.g. 304L = 0.03% carbon maximum Note: Welding in presence of oxygen could form hexavalent chromium!

Metals Evaluation 3.Copper and Copper Alloys Cadmium likely, possibly >0.01% Lead is exempt to 4% maximum Chromium in metals is in zero valence, or ground state – not hexavalent! Mercury >0.1% not possible PBB/PBDE not possible Specify: Pb <4%; Cd <0.01%

Metals Evaluation 4.Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys Two major grades contain lead: 6262 and 2018 Lead exempt up to 0.4% Cadmium possible >0.01%, particularly in high-zinc grades (7000 series) Mercury possible, but not likely >0.1% Chromium in metals is in zero valence, or ground state – not hexavalent! PBB/PBDE not possible Specify: Pb <0.4%; Cd <0.01%; Hg <0.01%

Metals Evaluation 5.Solders #1 source of lead in electronics Many exemptions; e.g., high melting temperature solder w/Pb >85% is exempt Sn-Ag-Cu (SAC) replacement solders may contain Pb, Cd greater than MCVs PBB/PBDE highly unlikely Hexavalent chromium highly unlikely Mercury is possible, but not likely Specify: Pb <0.1%, Hg <0.1%, Cd <0.01%

Metals Evaluation 6.Plating Many types Chromium plating is not in hexavalent state (but surface residuals may remain) Lead and cadmium used as catalysts, can be present above MCVs (nickel plating) Cadmium plating exemption for contacts (RoHS Annex) Plating can be difficult to evaluate Specify: Pb <0.1%; Cd <0.01%; Cr6+ <0.1 µg/cm 2

Metals Evaluation 7.Coatings Many types Zinc (galvanized steel) may contain Pb, Cd Hexavalent chromium conversion coatings common on zinc, aluminum, cadmium and copper substrates Pigmented coatings (e.g. paint) can contain Pb, Cd, Hg or Cr6+ Specify: Pb <0.1%, Cd <0.01%, Hg <0.1%, Cr6+ <0.1 µg/cm 2

Aluminum Substrate Epoxy mounting material Hex Chrome Conversion Coating

Hexavalent chromium replacements (coatings) Most are using trivalent chromium Some success in less demanding applications Most replacements not proven through real world experience Self-healing property of hex chrome not often duplicated Trivalent products can still test positive for hexavalent chromium

Plastics Evaluation Could contain any RoHS substance (Hg possible, but unlikely) Pigments could be Cd, Pb, Hg, Cr6+ Pb, Cd used as stabilizers Hg possible in urethanes Bright, opaque colors should raise concerns (yellow, orange, red, green in particular) PBDEs possible DecaBDE exempt for now PBBs not manufactured since 1970s

Standards and Conformity Assessment Model BuyerSeller Contract (Purchase Order) Material Standard Test Method Certified Reference MaterialSI Units