1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions (Tertiary Prevention) Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dan Ebbert Paul Cicciarelli
Advertisements

Integrated Implementation of Initiatives: SEL, PBIS, RTI Marla Dewhirst, Technical Assistance Director, PBIS Network
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS) – Implementers’ Blueprint Michael Mahoney, M.S., NCSP Safe & Healthy School Coordinator Oregon Department.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
School-wide PBIS Universal Systems Year 3 Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
Multidisciplinary Teams
Improving School Climate and Student Behavior Through Positive Behavior Supports Doug Maraffa.
Developing an Organizational Structure
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
AGENDA Welcome! 3:10 Meeting Expectations: Be Present Engage
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
By: Andrew Ball. What do school psychologists do? School psychologists work to find the best solution for each child and situation. They use many different.
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Positive Behavior Support in Juvenile Facilities: Webinar Mary Magee Quinn, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist American Institutes for Research.
1. “A caring community of learners is one whose members feel valued, personally connected to one another, and committed to everyone’s growth and development.”
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Oregon’s Initiatives & Grants  Roadmap  Action  Responsibility Nancy Latini, Ph.D. Oregon Department of Education 2008.
1 Response to Intervention Symposium Student Assistance Program Presenter: Lorraine Brown, Content Specialist Stan Mantooth, Ventura County Superintendent.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Celeste Rossetto Dickey PBIS/MTSS Coordinator
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
Counselor’s Meeting August 11, 2014 Michelle Coconate, RtI Facilitator Academic & Behavioral Response to Intervention (RtI)
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
“The intentional CPS shift in terminology to a multi-tiered system” from RtI is meant to integrate both academics and behavior as uniformly critical to.
University of Rhode Island EDC 452. A process of:  Providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and  Using learning.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
Youth Forum Cities Implementation of School-wide PBIS Rob Horner, University of Oregon Rebecca Mendiola, Santa Clara County Office of Education.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Creating a Positive Environment: P ositive B ehavioral I nterventions & S upports Carol Frodge Former Principal, Edmonds School District PBIS Trainer Fierce.
Tier 3 Systems for Sustainable Success WI RtI Center WI PBIS Network Rachel Saladis.
BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
PBIS Secondary Team.  The team that targets the Yellow: 5-10% of those students who are still struggling despite Universal Level training.  Supporters.
Positive Behavior Intervention Supports PBIS Cambrian School District April 2011.
Responsiveness-to-Intervention: What is It? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut October.
Problem Solving and RtI ASCA Conference Denver, 2007 Rich Downs School Counseling Consultant Student Support Services Project Florida Department of Education.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
PBS Systems Overview Lisa P. Hammel Effective Educational Practices.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Michelle Coconate RtI Facilitator Parent University Woodruff Career & Technical Center November 19, 2015.
Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Family & Community Team Member Network Meeting Thank you for coming! Please make yourself comfortable.
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
RTI Response to Intervention Connecting the Pieces.
SCTG COACHES WEBINAR November 3, 2015 December 1, 2015 January 5, 2016 February 2, 2016 March 1, 2016 April 5, 2016 May 3, 2016.
Michelle Coconate RtI Facilitator Counselors’ Meeting Woodruff Career & Technical Center September 24, 2015.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Rachel Saladis Wisconsin PBIS Network
What is the role of a school psychologist?
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Presentation transcript:

1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions (Tertiary Prevention) Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions (Tertiary Prevention) Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions (Secondary Prevention) Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Small Group Interventions Some Individualizing Targeted Group Interventions (Secondary Prevention) Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions (Primary Prevention) All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions (Primary Prevention) All settings, all students Preventive, proactive School-Wide Systems for Student Success A Response to Intervention Model Academic Systems Behavioral Systems

Three Levels of Behavior Support (developed by the Institute on Violence and Destructive Behavior, University of Oregon, 1999)

School-wide Discipline and Climate Steering Committee (SDCSC) and Intervention Progress Team (IPT) Functions of the SDCSC (Universal) Addresses and prevents 80 to 90% of problem behaviors Determines the areas of need within the school Sets priorities within school Identifies needed strategies, staff training, and resources Oversees program implementation and evaluation within school Provides ongoing support for staff members implementing positive behavior support programs Shares outcomes and makes program modifications as necessary Coordinates school and community services Monitors and evaluates progress and procedures in place to ensure fidelity of program implementation, continued support, and program effectiveness Selects research-based programs Functions of the IPT (Targeted and Intensive) Designs and coordinates intensive and early intervention programs for the remaining 10% to 20% of the students who are at risk of severe academic or behavioral problems Conducts proactive, regular student screening and coordinates and shares information with the SDCSC Initiates functional assessments Monitors positive behavioral interventions and supports for individual students. Coordinates school and community services Monitors and evaluates progress and procedures in place to ensure fidelity of program implementation, continued support, and program effectiveness. Analyzes data Plans interventions

Establishing a School-Wide Plan in the Social/Emotional and Behavioral Areas The programs developed by the school-wide discipline and climate steering committee (SDCSC) will address and prevent about 80% to 90% of student problem behaviors, and early intervention will address about an additional 5% to 10% of student problem behaviors. The IPT needs to be developed to address students needing early interventions and the remaining 1% to 5% of students. Typically, 1% to 7% of students are associated with about 50% of the behavior problems in a school.

Developing an Organizational Structure Why Have a School-Wide Discipline and Climate Steering Committee? It is impossible for one staff member to develop, implement, and maintain a school-wide discipline program. It takes a team. Involvement promotes change Members share varied perspectives, set priorities, and help support other staff members. Multiple models are available More individualized training of team members is possible Closer monitoring and supervision of pilot programs are possible

School-Wide SDCSC Responsibilities Assesses the needs of staff Develops a comprehensive school plan based on factors that contribute to problem behaviors as well as positive behaviors Sets priorities Identifies needed strategies, staff training, and resources Oversees and assists with staff training Oversees program implementation and evaluation Shares outcomes and makes program modifications as necessary

SDCSC Team Membership Two to five teachers School principal Pupil services personnel Students Parents Classified staff Community members Others as needed

List of science-based, research-validated programs that meet standards for Healthy Kids, CA Department of Education, and CASEL Program I Can Problem Solve (Pre-K, K-3), Lions Quest Skills for Adolescence (6 to 8), PeaceBuilders (K to 5), Positive Action (K to 6), Impact on Behavioral Outcomes Safe learning environments *Sound SEL Instructional Practice: self-awareness, social awareness, self-management, relationship skills, responsible decision-making Alcohol and other drugs * Sound SEL Instructional Practice: self awareness, self- management, relationship skills, responsible decision-making Safe learning environments * Sound SEL Instructional Practice: relationship skills, responsible decision-making Alcohol and other drugs Safe learning environments * Sound SEL Instructional Practice: self-awareness, self- management

List of science-based, research-validated programs that meet standards for Healthy Kids, CA Department of Education, and CASEL cont. Program Project ALERT (6 to 8), Project Northland (6 to 8), Project Toward No Tobacco Use (TNT, 6 to 8): Second Step (K to 3), Impact on Behavioral Outcomes Alcohol and other drugs Tobacco use Alcohol and other drugs Tobacco use *Sound SEL Instructional Practice: responsible decision- making Tobacco use Safe learning environments *Sound SEL Instructional Practice: self-awareness, self- management, relationship skills, responsible decision-making

References and Resources California Department of Education: Character Education ( California Department of Mental Health, “Prevention and Early Interventions (PEI) Resource Materials ( CalSTAT Technical Assistance and Training, “California Cadre of BEST Trainers” ( Eber, L. with IL PBIS Network, “NASDSE Satellite Conference Series, May 9, 2007” ( Healthy Kids ( Sugai, G., “School-Wide Positive Behavior Support and Response to Intervention” (RTI Action Network, Ventura County Model for Using Response to Intervention (RtI) for Special Education Eligibility, DRAFT Ventura County Office of Education, “Creating Asset Rich Environments for Children and Youth,” 12/07